MY FAVORITE PAGES

Wednesday, July 29, 2015

HOWARD_29JULY2015_21st TIME_ TORTIOUS ORDEAL DEALING WITH MR. JAMES MAUGHAN






TENTH PERSUASIVE APPEAL LOSING TIME TO ACT

I am sending this letter to you today June 28, 2014 as a matter of TENTH PERSUASIVE APPEAL. I have not received any response from you, since January 30, 2014 despite NINE (9) PERSUASIVE APPEALS for you to respond. Also,  I respectfully asked you to please seek a permission from Mr. Tom Howard for him to allow you to send me an e-mail address to where I could write him to but likewise, I have not receive any
response from you.

NINTH PERSUASIVE APPEAL MOVE TO THE RIGHT TRUNK

I am sending this letter to you today May 28, 2014 as a matter of  NINTH PERSUASIVE APPEAL. I have not received any response from you, since January 30, 2014 despite EIGHTH (8) PERSUASIVE APPEALS for you to respond. Also,  I respectfully asked you to please seek a permission from Mr. Tom Howard for him to allow you to send me an e-mail address to where I could write him to but likewise, I have not receive any response from you.  Please grab this ninth chance to redeem yourself. Think it over, sooner or later, someone will be blowing the whistle to free himself/herself out of this controversy. Move to the right trunk before having a bad fall.

8TH PERSUASIVE APPEAL, SPILL THE BEANS


I am sending this letter to you today May 11, 2014 as a matter of EIGHTH PERSUASIVE APPEAL. I have not received any response from you, since January 30, 2014 despite SEVEN (7) PERSUASIVE APPEALS for you to respond. Also,  I respectfully asked you to please seek a permission from Mr. Tom Howard for him to allow you to send me an e-mail address to where I could write him to but likewise, I have not receive any response from you.  Please grab the eighth chance to redeem yourself. Think it over, sooner or later, someone will be blowing the whistle to free himself/herself out of this controversy.  Spill the beans before it is too late.

SEVENTH PERSUASIVE APPEAL, NOWHERE TO RUN

I am sending this letter to you today April 20, 2014 as a matter of SEVENTH PERSUASIVE APPEAL. I have not received any response from you, since January 30, 2014 despite SIX (6) PERSUASIVE APPEALS for you to respond. Also,  I respectfully asked you to please seek a permission from Mr. Tom Howard for him to allow you to send me an e-mail address to where I could write him to but likewise, I have not receive any response from you.  Please grab the seventh chance to redeem yourself. Think it over, sooner or later, someone will be blowing the whistle to free herself out of this controversy.

SIXTH PERSUASIVE APPEAL, GRAB THE VINE


I am sending this letter to you today March 30, 2014 as a matter of  SIXTH PERSUASIVE APPEAL. I have not received any response from you, since January 30, 2014 despite FIVE (5) PERSUASIVE APPEALS for you to respond. Also,  I respectfully asked you to please seek a permission from Mr. Tom Howard for him to allow you to send me an e-mail address to where I could write him to but likewise, I have not receive any response you.  Please grab the sixth chance to redeem yourself.

FIFTH PERSUASIVE APPEAL FOR MR. JAMES MAUGHAN 

I am sending this letter to you today March 15, 2014 as a matter of FIFTH PERSUASIVE APPEAL. I have not received any response from you, since January 30, 2014 despite four (4) PERSUASIVE APPEALS
for you to respond. Also,  I respectfully asked you to please seek a permission from Mr. Tom Howard for him to allow you to send me an e-mail address to where I could write him to but likewise, I have not receive any response from you.  

FOURTH PERSUASIVE APPEAL FOR MR. JAMES MAUGHAN

I am sending this letter to you today March 2, 2014 as a matter of FOURTH PERSUASIVE APPEAL. I have not received any response from you, since January 30, 2014 despite three PERSUASIVE APPEALS for you to respond. Also,  I respectfully asked you to please seek a permission from Mr. Tom Howard for him to allow you to send me an e-mail address to where I could write him to but likewise, I have not receive any response you.

PERSUASIVE APPEAL THIRD IN A ROW


I am sending this letter today, February 23, 2014, to respectfully remind you that I have not received any response from you since I sent you the PERSUASIVE APPEAL dated Thursday, January 30, 2014.  Likewise,  I send the same letter on Sunday,  February 16,  2014.   I did not receive any response from you on those two instances.  These facts led me to believe that you,  like your employees namely, Ms Debbie Zuccala and Mr Andrew Cooper, fled after being proven to be at fault to avoid culpability. Then,  someone else would just butt in without being endorsed and meddle with the issues and complicate the matter even worse.

PERSUASIVE APPEAL FOLLOW UP

Dear Mr. James Maughan,I am sending this letter today February 16, 2014 to respectfully remind you that I have not  received any response from you since I sent you the PERSUASIVE APPEAL dated Thursday, January 30, 2014.

Thank you very much.

Yours faithfully,

Antonio L. Buensuceso
Read more »


PERSUASIVE APPEAL DATED JANUARY 30, 2014


January 30, 2014


Mr. James Maughan
Assistant Deputy Director
Division of Financial Assistance
Phone: 916-341-5694
Mail address:  1001 I Street, 16th Floor
Sacramento, CA 95814



 SUBJECT :  Continuing demand for the return of  the original educational credentials                        as evaluated by ERES and comments why  a circle mark was wrap around                      the word  "PHILIPPINES" as shown in the returned exact copy (photocopy)                        of my original educational credentials.

Copy of the credential with discriminatory circular mark around the word "PHILIPPINES".


Dear Mr. James Maughan,



Good morning.


From your e-mail dated December 30, 2013 as an alibi for denying the minimum six (6) educational points for Grade 1 operator certification examination you wrote the following:

"Concerning the request for educational transcripts from you, this is a request that we make to all applicants and all comply with this request in order to take the exam.  It is the only way we can make a determination of educational credits that can be awarded to the applicant.
Section 3700(a)(3)- of the operator certification regulations states “ a copy of a high school diploma or equivalent; college transcripts; graduate school transcripts; report cards; certificates of completion for wastewater treatment and management courses; and chemical, civil, or mechanical engineering registrations issued by California or another state, a territory, or Indian tribe, to verify completion of educations requirements.” (This except is found on page 32 of the regulations).  Here is the link to the regulations:


Please be informed that these regulations are effective just last April 1, 2013  as shown by the information shown below.  For your appreciation,  click "Final Text of Regulations".
These regulations are not yet effective on September 6, 2012. There is no sense applying 
regulations promulgated on April 1, 2013 for applications filed on July 24, 2012.

Announcements

The State Water Resources Control Board (State Water Board) has revised its
regulations in chapter 26 of division 3 of title 23 of the California Code of Regulations,
regarding wastewater treatment plant classification, operator certification, and
contractor registration for the Wastewater Treatment Plant Operator Certification
Program. The regulations are effective April 1, 2013.
Please see:



May I reiterate in unequivocal terms that I  have sent the "original" copy of my
Engineering as evaluated by ERES, Sacramento, CA, together with my
of application documents was prepared by me  then received by Ms. Debbie Zuccala
Hence, may I most respectfully remind you that your statement on your e-mail below, 
to wit:
If this document was not the "original" then the only thing I can conclude is
 that you never  sent the "original" to us but a copy." ,  is outrageous, baseless 
and irresponsible.  As a matter of fact,  Ms Debbie Zuccala had not denied the 
existence of the "original" ERES  educational credentials since 
September 6, 2012 up to the present times.  Ms Christine Gordon,  
Mr. Wes Wilkinson and Ms Anna Hernandez,  all did not deny the existence 
of  the "original" copy of my educational credentials as evaluated by ERES. 
Therefore,  you can not belatedly claim otherwise,  during these times, after you
have been caught  cheating and lying about it.

Since,  September 6, 2012,  on my letter, last paragraph  I have requested and 
demanded that the original copy of my educational credentials covering the 
Bachelor of Science in Management Engineering as evaluated by
ERES (Educational Records Evaluation Service, Sacramento, Ca)  be returned 
to me with signature of Ms Anna Hernandez initially,  which later, since 
Mr  Wes Wilkinson and you have checked it as well,  I requested that 
Mr Wes Wilkinson and you signed it  just the same.  I wanted to categorically 
state that you have not send me  yet the original copy of my educational 
credentials.  With regard to this issue,  it is worthwhile to inform you that 
Ms Debbie Zuccala willfully refused to reply,  Ms  Anna Hernandez  failed to 
respond, Mr Wes Wilkinson ignored to reply, the Office of Operator
Certification ignored to reply, then Mr Andrew Cooper withheld the
information about this ERES educational credentials, then ran away and
hide
,  then now you are telling me that you have sent all the original copy
and you have nothing else to return. With all due respect,  you are cheating.

Since,  September 6, 2012,  I have drawn the line. I did not and will not send in 
any  additional educational records.  I do not intend to seek the complete or 
over all  educational  points that the Bachelor of Science in Management 
Engineering could make.  I just needed the minimum six(6) educational points for
Grade 1 operator certification examination. I repeat just six(6) educational points.
It does not make sense that you still needed to analyze transcript of records from 
schools and universities from the Philippines to come up to conclusion that 
I have met the required minimum six(6) educational point for  Grade 1 WWTP
operator certification examination. The evaluation of the transcript of records for
this  mentioned educational credentials have been well taken cared of by 
ERES for you.  Besides, as my record and experience with your staff is to be 
considered, with all due respect, they are incompetent and irresponsible and 
cunning.  At most, as I saw it, they would not know  how to evaluate transcript 
of records from foreign countries as evidenced by their deeds,  as exemplified 
on the next paragraphs and therefore letting your staff and you, analyze transcript 
of records  from the Philippines is deemed to be  a useless and futile  exercise 
being already been professionally taken cared of  for you by ERES.

See for yourself, again with all due respect,  Ms Debbie Zuccala
considered my WWTP Operator Certification application for an application 
for WWTP  Operator-in-Training Certification. These application forms are 
distinctly different from each other and when asked  why,  she refused to reply. 
The code of regulation said, that  applications not in the correct forms shall be 
considered deficient and deficient applications shall not be processed but 
Ms Debbie Zuccala still processed my application and charged me S95 though it 
is not in the correct form and therefore, deficient, and should not been processed, 
and I should have saved my $95.
This proves Ms Debbie Zuccala's incompetence. 

That same application, though has already been found as an application for 
WWTP operator certification and not correct application for WWTP 
certification examination,  but  still Ms Anna Hernandez process it,
and charged me $40 though it was deficient. A violation of your own regulation
done not once,  but twice with express approval of Mr. Wes Wilkinson.
This showed Mr. Wes Wilkinson and Ms Anna Hernandez collective
incompetence.

Second, Mr Wes Wilkinson and Ms Christine Gordon in conspiracy, both send me 
an e-mail on September 24, 2012 claiming each one of them is Ms Debbie 
Zuccala's manager with covert intention to confuse me and drive away culpability 
from Ms. Debbie Zuccala. Though they might be both managers for Ms Debbie 
Zuccala, prudence and courtesy and good judgment dictate that it would 
be very confusing for me to talk to two managers for the same person at the same 
time, especially so, when these two managers are avoiding accountability 
for Ms Debbie Zuccala deeds and/or omissions. Consequently, they have 
completely confused me. This proves that Ms Christine Gordon and
Mr Wes Wilkinson are cunning.

Third, Mr. Andrew Cooper, declared himself as the Freedom of Information Officer, 
then, withheld the information about the now controversial "ERES educational
credentials" and when informed that he was replying to a letter not addressed to 
him and told that his act consisted "usurpation of authority," now,  he is gone into 
hiding. This shows Mr Andrew Cooper gross misrepresentation and dishonesty.

Fourth, as to the person who opened the the letter addressed to the Agency 
as my records showed the suspects might be  from Mr. Andrew Cooper, then, 
Mr. Wes Wilkinson and then you, Mr. James Maughan.  As you already knew, 
that letter was addressed  to  Mr. Tim Howard,  being the Agency Administrator 
and not to you. With all due  respect, with your deeds and/or omissions, which 
plunged me into deeper pain and misery, you became  (pardon me for this word) a  
shame  to the office of  Mr. Tim Howard which you are trying to represent. 
This is gross misrepresentation,  cheating and dishonesty.

Fifth, with your continuing reluctance to return to me original copy of my 
educational credentials  as evaluated by ERES (Educational Records Evaluation 
Service, Sacramento, Ca) together with your signature and rest of signatures of
Ms Anna Hernandez and Mr. Wes Wilkinson,  you have effectively deny me of the 
chance to show that pieces of original document to a neutral third party and to 
seek their corresponding opinion or advice about this matter, and consequently
if warranted,  file appropriate administrative or civil or criminal charges against
Ms Anna Hernandez,  Mr Wes Wilkinson and you,  Mr  James Maughan.
This is suppression of evidential documents, deceit and dishonesty.

Again,  I wanted to reiterate that if Ms Anna Hernandez,  and  Mr. Wes Wilkinson 
and you, most respectfully,  Mr. Maughan strongly believe that you are right on 
denying the minimum six(6) educational point requirement on my educational 
credentials that is with you right now,  (no transcript of records)  for a Grade 1 
WWTP operator certification examination,  then,  please do not hide it,  and put 
your signatures on it with pride and great honor to show the public that you
have  done the right thing.  Otherwise,  you have done something ridiculous
and shameful.

Please send me back the original educational records covering the Bachelor of 
Science in Management Engineering as evaluated by ERES with your signatures
as soon as you can. 

Thank you very much.

Yours faithfully,

Antonio L. Buensuceso 









The TRUTH will set you FREE.

No comments:

Post a Comment