DEAN AMADO VALDEZ
RANKING SHOULD OCCUR FIRST BEFORE THE LIST OF EMPLOYEES TO BE TERMINATED EXIST SOURCE : AC-10084
ATTORNEY RAUL QUIROZ DISBARMENT COMPLAINT DOCUMENTS
HIS FIFTH DECEITFUL ACT
DAPAT UNA MUNA ANG PAGKAGAWA NG RANKING [page 1 2 ] BAGO MAGKAROON NG LISTAHAN NGMGA KAWANING TATANGALIN
"6. In identifying the three (3) more employees to be terminated, the
Company adopted a system where rank and file employees are to be ranked by
the supervisors in accordance with a set of criteria agreed upon by the Company
with TASREA prior to the selection of the employees to be terminated. The
pre-agreed criteria were (a) achievement (b) capacity and (c) relationship.
7. The result of the ranking made by the supervisors which is attached as Annex "7"
hereof showed that the Complainant was ranked 66th out of 67 employees or
second (2nd) from the bottom of the ranking. Thus, his inclusion in the list of those
whose employment was terminated."
PACKET 5 : LABEL 5.5.1 SHELL Rejoinder
p.3 Nos.6&7
"26. The company wish to underscore the fact that the Complainant's
termination was based solely on the ranking made by the supervisors of the Company, which ranking based in turn, on the criteria agreed upon between the Company and TASREA. Had the Complainant not been near the bottom of the rankings he would not have been terminated. This would mean, however, that another lower ranked employee would have to be terminated."
PACKET 5 : LABEL 5.5.2 SHELL Rejoinder
p.9 No.26
Your Honor, please, sinabi po rito ni Atty. Raul Quiroz, na ang pagtatanggal sa
akin sa trabaho ay tanging base(based solely) sa ranking ng mga supervisor.
Kung wala ako sa bottom ng ranking ay hindi ako tatanggalin. Sa ibig pong
sabihin ni Atty. Raul Quiroz na ranking ang tanging basehan sa kung sino sino ang tatanggalin ay tumpak nararapat lamang maunang maganap ang pagsasagawa ng ranking bago malaman kung sino sinong kawani ang tatanggalin. Hindi po ba? Ngunit ang tunay pong kaganapan ay nangyaring nauna na magkaroon si G. Rico Bersamin ng listahan ng mga kawaning tatanggalin bago po naganap ang pagsagawa ng ranking.
Huling huli na naman po ang pandarayang pagsisinungaling ni Atty. Raul Quiroz.
Tingnan po natin, Your Honor please, noong mag padala si G. Rico Bersamin ng
mga kawaning tatanggalin kay Honorable Director CRISPIN D. DANNUG, JR. ay petsa November 28, 2002 at kami pong tatlo : si G. Manuel (Manny) Trinidad, G. Lucio (Jun) Valencia at ako, Antonio (Tony) Buensuceso ay naroon na sa listahan ng mga kawaning tatanggalin. Samakatuwid may listahan na si G. Rico Bersamin ng mga kawani na tatanggalin noon pang 28th November 2002. Bistado na naman po si Atty. Raul Quiroz sa kanyang pandaraya at pagsisinungaling dahil po noong ganapin ang ranking ay noong January 29, 2003 na nakasaad sa Annex "7" ng Rejoinder[page 1 ] na si Atty. Raul Quiroz mismo ang nagpakita. Kung totoong ang ranking ang naging basehan ng tatangaling kawani,
bakit po may listahan na ng tatanggalin noong pang November 28, 2002 bago
Si Atty. Raul Quiroz ay bistadong nagsisinungaling. Si Atty. Raul Quiroz ay
papayagan ninyo pa ba na manatiling abogado ? Dapat lang po, Your Honor,
please, madisbar si Atty. Raul Quiroz, dahilan sa kanyang panloloko at pandarayang kasinungalingan at sagad sa buto na kahiyahiyang pagsisinungaling.
PACKET 5 : LABEL 5.5.3 SHELL Position Paper
Hon. Crispin D. Dannug Jr
LABEL 5.5.4 SHELL Position Paper
Annex "2" Letter to
LABEL 5.5.5 SHELL Establishment and
LABEL 5.5.6 SHELL List of Affected workers
LABEL 5.5.7 SHELL Rejoinder
JANUARY 29, 2003
DATE WHEN RANKING IS DONE
THE RANKING WAS RIGGED
LIST OF EMPLOYEES TO BE TERMINATED
NOVEMBER 29, 2002
ATTY RAUL QUIROZ'S ALIBI WHY I WAS CHOSEN
TO BE TERMINATED The following Justices of the Supreme Court of the Philippines are DEEMED provided with copy of this "RANKING WAS RIGGED _IN RE A.C. NUMBER 10084_ATTY RAUL QUIROZ DISBARMENT CASE" through Atty. Theodore Te's PIO e-mail address on February 15, 2016 to the present and prayers for corrective administrative and/or judicial and/or disciplinary actions be instituted in due time.
IMAGE CREDIT:http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/
MAGE CREDIT:http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/
MAGE CREDIT:http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/
MAGE CREDIT:http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/
MAGE CREDIT:http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/
MAGE CREDIT:http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/
MAGE CREDIT:http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/
IMAGE CREDIT:http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/
MAGE CREDIT:http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/
MAGE CREDIT:http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/
IMAGE CREDIT:http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/
MAGE CREDIT:http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/
MAGE CREDIT:http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/
MAGE CREDIT:http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/
|
MY FAVORITE PAGES
▼




























No comments:
Post a Comment