SHELL ROBBED

EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT PAY

A case of David vs. Goliath by Antonio L. Buensuceso Jr.

image credit:david-and-goliath-shane-robinson.

Pilipinas Shell Petroleum Corporation robbed employee's retirement pay by circumventing the Retirement Pay Law, while ranking Supreme Court of the Philippines personnel, the PIO chief, is delaying and preventing due course to its recovery, whereby:

NUMBER 1. ATTY. THEODORE TE COMMITTED AND CONTINUE TO BE COMMITTING ACTS CONSTITUTING CORRUPT PRACTICES OF A PUBLIC OFFICER UNDER RA 3019_ANTI GRAFT AND CORRUPT PRACTICES ACT

REPUBLIC ACT 3019

ANTI-GRAFT AND CORRUPT PRACTICES ACT

Section 3. Corrupt practices of public officers. In addition to acts or omissions of public officers already penalized by existing law, the following shall constitute corrupt practices of any public officer and are hereby declared to be unlawful:

(e) Causing any undue injury to any party (myself, Antonio L. Buensuceso Jr.) including the Government, or giving any private party (PSPC, SHELL) any unwarranted benefits, (NON-PAYMENT OF RETIREMENT PAY) advantage or preference in the discharge of his official administrative (ATTY. THEODORE TE, functions) or judicial functions through manifest partiality, evident bad faith or gross inexcusable negligence. This provision shall apply to officers and employees of offices (Atty. Theodore Te, an officer of one offices of the Supreme Court, the PIO) or government corporations charged with the grant of licenses or permits or other concessions.

NUMBER 2. ATTY. THEODORE TE COMMITTED AND CONTINUE TO BE COMMITTING ACTS WHICH OBSTRUCT OR FRUSTRATE OR TEND TO OBSTRUCT OR FRUSTRATE THE SUCCESSFUL APPREHENSION OF CRIMINAL OFFENDERS BY VIOLATING WILLFULLY, DELIBERATELY THE PROVISION OF THE LAW PENALIZING OBSTRUCTION OF APPREHENSION OF CRIMINAL OFFENDERS PRESIDENTIAL DECREE 1829 SECTION 1(e)

Section 1. The penalty of prision correccional in its maximum period, or a fine ranging from 1,000 to 6,000 pesos, or both, shall be imposed upon any person who knowingly or willfully obstructs, impedes, frustrates or delays the apprehension of suspects and the investigation and prosecution of criminal cases by committing any of the following acts:

(e) delaying the prosecution of criminal cases by obstructing the service of process or court orders or disturbing proceedings in the fiscal's offices, in Tanodbayan, or in the courts;

PRESIDENTIAL DECREE No. 1829 PENALIZING

OBSTRUCTION OF APPREHENSION AND

PROSECUTION OF CRIMINAL OFFENDERS

MALACAÑANG
M a n i l a

PRESIDENTIAL DECREE No. 1829

PENALIZING OBSTRUCTION OF APPREHENSION AND PROSECUTION OF CRIMINAL OFFENDERS

WHEREAS, crime and violence continue to proliferate despite the sustained vigorous efforts of the government to effectively contain them;

WHEREAS, to discourage public indifference or apathy towards the apprehension and prosecution of criminal offenders, it is necessary to penalize acts which obstruct or frustrate or tend to obstruct or frustrate the successful apprehension and prosecution of criminal offenders;

NOW, THEREFORE, I, FERDINAND, E. MARCOS, President of the Philippines, by virtue of the powers vested in me by law do hereby decree and order the following:

Section 1. The penalty of prision correccional in its maximum period, or a fine ranging from 1,000 to 6,000 pesos, or both, shall be imposed upon any person who knowingly or willfully obstructs, impedes, frustrates or delays the apprehension of suspects and the investigation and prosecution of criminal cases by committing any of the following acts:

(e) delaying the prosecution of criminal cases by obstructing the service of process or court orders or disturbing proceedings in the fiscal's offices, in Tanodbayan, or in the courts;

NUMBER 3. ATTY. THEODORE TE COMMITTED AND CONTINUE TO BE COMMITTING ACTS WILLFULLY, DELIBERATELY in violation of RULE VI, of the Rules Implementing the Code of Conduct and Ethical Standards for Public Officials and Employees (Republic Act No. 6713)

RESPONSE TO REQUESTS AND PETITIONS MANDATED BY THE Rules Implementing the Code of Conduct and Ethical Standards for Public Officials and Employees (Republic Act No. 6713)

(Republic Act No. 6713) RULE 6 _Duties of public officials and employees

Section 3. In case of written requests, petitions or motions, sent by means of letters, telegrams, or the like, the official or employee in charge shall act on the same within fifteen (15) working days from receipt thereof, provided that:

(a) If the communication is within the jurisdiction of the office or agency, the official or employee must:

(1) Write a note or letter of acknowledgement where the matter is merely routinary or the action desired may be acted upon in the ordinary course of business of the department, office or agency, specifying the date when the matter will be disposed of and the name of the official or employee in charge thereof.

NUMBER 4. ATTY. THEODORE TE COMMITTED AND CONTINUE TO BE COMMITTING ACTS WILLFULLY, DELIBERATELY in violation of ARTICLE XI SECTION 1 OF THE PHILIPPINE CONSTITUTION, to wit:
Article XI section 1 of the Philippine constitution

ARTICLE XI : Accountability of Public Officers

Section 1. Public office is a public trust. Public officers and employees must, at all times, be accountable to the people, serve them with utmost responsibility, integrity, loyalty, and efficiency; act with patriotism and justice, and lead modest lives.

TO THE JUSTICES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE PHILIPPINES

IN RE : AC NUMBER 10084

AND GR NUMBER 183273

At this point, AC NUMBER 10084 and GR NUMBER 183273 by virtue of the evidences showing prima facie proofs of miscarriage of justice are needed to be reviewed and accorded proper adjudication. Farther neglect through your gross inexcusable negligence will cause irreparable damage not only to the Filipino peoples' interest and mine but most importantly to your own interest in keeping legitimacy of holding your position as Justices of the Supreme Court. Your Honors, kindly correct the administrative and judicial errors you have committed while there is still time. When there is conflict between the Constitution or Law versus the Supreme Court internal rules, the Constitution and/or the law prevail. Your Honors, with all due respect, please be reminded that the discretionary power in your possession is for the advancement of justice not for the promotion of injustice .

Kindly, show us your people that the Supreme Court is not really composed of people and Justices beholden to Big Money interest, pretending to be deaf and blind to the plight of the oppressed and the defenseless. Your Honors, please scrape the hardened calluses from your eyes...see your people, hear what they are saying...your people suffer from injustice...they cry for justice then deliver justice to them....not tomorrow but now.