LOUIS E. GUENIOT TEAM MANAGER CLAIM SPECIALIST
STATE FARM HOME INSURANCE
RE: Claim Number 55-06c6-44x
Policy Number 77-C3-B499-7
DATE OF LOSS: April 26, 2020
1.STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 37 DATED 14SEP20 6:14AM2.STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 38 DATED 14SEP20 6:15AM3.STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 39 DATED 14SEP20 6:15AM4.STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 40 DATED 14SEP20 6:17AM5.STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 41 DATED 14SEP20 6:18AM6.STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 42 14SEP20 6:20AM
INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSES 37,38,39,40,41,42
REPEATED MISCONDUCTS
FROM
INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSES
MULTIPLE MISCONDUCTS
1 TO 8 AND 9/10/11/12/13 AND 14
AND 15/16/17/18/19/20/21/22/23/24/25/26/27/28/29/30/31/32/33/34/35/36
BEING NOT DISPUTED, OBJECTED AND HABITUALLY REPEATED WITH IMPUNITY. HENCE, PROVEN TO BE INTENTIONAL, DELIBERATE, MALICIOUS, WILLFUL, WANTON, OPPRESSIVE AND OUTRAGEOUS
AND BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT
Dear Messrs Gueniot and Liu:
PLEASE SEE,
As Mr. Gueniot responded to email as shown next:
1. Claim Number 55-06c6-44x INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSES 33/34 DATED 10SEP20 1:38pm
THIS SHOWS: EVIDENCE OF 37TH, 38TH, 39TH, 40TH, 41ST, 42ND RECORDED MISCONDUCTS, PROOF BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT OF, REPEATED HABITUALLY, INTENTIONALLY, DELIBERATELY. MISCONDUCT RESPONDING TO EMAILS SUBJECT OUTSIDE OF THE SUBJECT UNDER DISCUSSION AND RESPONDING TO EMAILS NOT ADDRESSED TO HIM TO RESPOND.
HE HAD SHOWN A TOTAL OF FORTY-TWO (42) RECORDED INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSES AND/OR MISCONDUCTS TO SOW CONFUSION AND INTENTIONALLY AND DELIBERATELY DERAIL AND DELAY THE PROCEEDINGS. HOWEVER, AGAIN, YOUR INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSES 37TH TO 42ND ARE WORTHLESS SIMPLY BECAUSE THE QUESTION IS NOT ADDRESSED FOR MR. GUENIOT TO RESPOND AND/OR OUTSIDE OF THE SUBJECT MATTER OF THE DISCUSSION AND/OR PROFESSIONALLY DISRESPECTFUL RESPONSE. YOUR ACTIONS, MR. GUENIOT TEND TO SHOW THAT YOU MIGHT BE THE REAL MASTERMIND OF TITOUAH'S CRIMES.
|
MY FAVORITE PAGES
▼

No comments:
Post a Comment