QUIROZ MISLED THE COURT BY PRESENTING
AN ILLEGITIMATE QUITCLAIM DOCUMENT
 |
| "ANNEX 5" SUBMITTED BY QUIROZ ILLEGITIMATE QUITCLAIM DOCUMENT |
SINCE March 9, 2016
IN RE :
A.C. NUMBER 10084
ATTY. RAUL QUIROZ
DISBARMENT CASE
DECEITFUL ACT NUMBER 3
(QUIROZ MISLED THE COURT
BY PRESENTING AN
ILLEGITIMATE QUITCLAIM
OR RELEASE DOCUMENT)
TRANSLATION
4.1.3 DECEITFUL ACT NUMBER 3 BY ATTY. RAUL QUIROZ:
4.1.3 DECEITFUL ACT NUMBER 3 BY ATTY. RAUL QUIROZ:
ATTY. RAUL QUIROZ PRESENTATION OF A
DOCUMENT "ANNEX 5_AS QUITCLAIM" WHICH
IS NOT VERIFIED AND INSISTED, THAT THOUGH
NOT VERIFIED, IT STILL HAD THE WORTH AND
VALUE OF A VERIFIED DOCUMENT AS AN
ENFORCEABLE QUITCLAIM DOCUMENT.
ENFORCEABLE QUITCLAIM DOCUMENT.
Atty. Raul Quiroz presented a document which
he called "quitclaim or release document dated
Position Paper) is not a verified document.
Your Honor, there was no intention, either SHELL
or myself, to treat that document, Annex "5" as
a "quitclaim or release" document.
To support my assertion that there was no
intention, either SHELL or myself, to treat that
document, Annex "5" as a "quitclaim or release"
document, may I present to you the fact, that
eight (8) months after termination of my
employment and execution of Annex "5", I was
paid by SHELL my PRB (performance related
bonus) through the document, Annex "J",
Annex "J" (PRB Payment) was not verified.
If it was true that Annex "5" was intended to
be a "quitclaim or release" document as Atty.
Raul Quiroz supported and promoted as
manifested by his sworn statements numbers
9, 36, 37, 38, 40, 41, 42 and 43 of SHELL
Position Paper, then, it follows that SHELL
has no more pending obligations with regard
to my employment with them. But, the fact is
SHELL still paid me my PRB as reinforced by
Annex "J", thus nullifies Atty. Quiroz claim for
document Annex "5" as "Quitclaim or Release"
document.
Now, having been proven that Annex "5" was
indeed not a bonafide and/or valid and/or
verified "quitclaim or release" document
contrary to Atty. Raul Quiroz claimed it to be.
Hence, Atty. Raul Quiroz deceitfully lied in his
sworn statements numbers 9, 36, 37,
38, 40, 41,42 and 43 of SHELL Position Paper.
Here, you can notice the aggressive and long
discussion to support and promote Annex "5" as
a legitimate "quitclaim or release" document.
However, his efforts to legitimize an illegitimate
Annex "5" can be equated to only 3 words in
the form of a question: "Is it notarized?"
It is therefore, earnestly prayed that Atty. Raul
Quiroz be disbarred for having misled the court
by presenting a not verified Annex "5" document
and make it appear that it has worth and value
of a verified document. The Lawyers Oath
forbids Atty. Raul Quiroz from doing any
deceitful act. Obviously, Atty. Raul Quiroz
committed a deceitful act. Hence, Atty. Raul
Quiroz should be disbarred.
PACKET 3 : LABEL 5.3.1 SHELL Position
Paper Annex "5"
LABEL 5.3.2 Complainant
Reply Annex "J"
LABEL 5.3.3 SHELL Position Paper
Where items 9,36,38,40,
41,42&43 are shown
EXCERPTED FROM THE ORIGINAL
A.C. 10084
ATTY. RAUL QUIROZ
DISBARMENT COMPLAINT
WRITTEN IN PILIPINO
4.1.3 PANGATLONG PANDARAYA :
PAGPAPAKITA NG DOKOMENTO NA HINDI
VERIFIED AT PALABASIN AT IGIIT NA ANG
DOKOMENTO NA YUN AY MAY BISA NG
ISANG VERIFIED NA DOKOMENTO
Ang pagpapakita ng isang dokumento na
tinawag ni Atty. Raul Quiroz na quitclaim or
release document may petsang
Pebrero 15, 2003 (Annex 5, SHELL
Position Paper) ay hindi po notariado.
Your Honor, wala pong intensyon
alin man ang SHELL o ako na gawing isang
"quitclaim o release document " ang
dokumentong ito. Bilang patunay na hindi
itinuturing na "quitclaim o release document "
ang naturang Annex "5 " ay ang isang
pangyayaring makalipas ang walong buwan
na tanggalin ako sa trabaho, petsa
Octubre 23, 2003 ay tinanggap ko naman
mula sa SHELL ang aking Performance
Related Bonus (PRB). Ako ay muling
pinalagda sa isang "quitclaim o release
document" Annex "J", ng REPLY, hindi rin po
ito notariado. Kung totoo pong ang
Annex "5 "quitclaim noong Pebrero 15, 2003
ay totoong "release document", bakit po noong
Oktubre 23, 2003 ay muli pa po akong binayaran
ng SHELL ng PRB (Performance Related Bonus).
Kaya samakatuwid, yung Annex "5 "na sinasabi
ni Atty. Raul Quiroz na isang quitclaim ay isang
kasinungalingan o pandaraya., base sa mga
ebidensya. Hindi po magsisinungaling ang
ebidensya. Si Atty. Raul Quiroz sa pagpepresenta
ng dokumento na hindi verified , at palabasin na
itong dokomento na may bisa ng isang tunay
na verified document , tulad ng ginawa niyang
pagbibigay o pagtataguyod ng bisa sa Annex "5"
bilang isang quitclaim. Makikita po natin ang
kanyang pagtataguyod dito sa no. 9, 36, 37,
38, 40, 41,42 at 43 sa SHELL Position Paper.
Mapapansin po ninyo ang kanyang mahaba
at nag-babagang mga pagpapaliwanag
sa pagiging isang lihitimong dokomento
bilang "quitclaim" ang ANNEX "5", ngunit
Your Honor, please, ang katapat lang po noon
ay tatlong salita lamang aking sasabihin sa
paraang patanong : "ATTY. RAUL QUIROZ,
NOTARIADO BA?" UUlitin ko po ang aking
tanong sa kanya: "ATTY. RAUL QUIROZ,
NOTARIADO BA?". Kaya ang gawang
pagprepresinta sa harap ng husgado ni
Atty. Raul Quiroz ng dokomento na hindi
notariado at palabasing ang naturang
dokomento ay may bisa ng isang notariadong
dokomento ay walang duda na nanglinlang at
ito po, Your Honor, ay pandaraya kaya dapat
lamang po, Your Honor,
ma-disbar si Atty. Raul Quiroz.
PACKET 3 : LABEL 5.3.1 SHELL Position
Paper Annex "5"
LABEL 5.3.2 Complainant
Reply Annex "J"
LABEL 5.3.3 SHELL Position Paper
Where items 9,36,38,40,
41,42&43 are shown
N O T I C E
The following Justices of
the Supreme Court of the
Philippines are DEEMED
provided with copy of this
"QUIROZ MISLED THE COURT BY PRESENTING AN
ILLEGITIMATE QUITCLAIM DOCUMENT"
through Atty. Theodore
Te's PIO e-mail
address on MARCH 9, 2016
to the present and prayers
for corrective and/or
and/or investigative
and/or administrative
and/or judicial and/or
disciplinary actions
be instituted in due time.
IMAGE CREDIT:http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/
IMAGE CREDIT:http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/
IMAGE CREDIT:http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/
IMAGE CREDIT:http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/
IMAGE CREDIT:http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/
IMAGE CREDIT:http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/
IMAGE CREDIT:http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/
IMAGE CREDIT:http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/
IMAGE CREDIT:http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/
IMAGE CREDIT:http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/
RETIRED FEBRUARY 2016
IMAGE CREDIT:http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/
IMAGE CREDIT:http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/
IMAGE CREDIT:http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/
IMAGE CREDIT:http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/
IMAGE CREDIT:http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/
Justice Alfredo Benjamin S. Caguioa
E-MAIL DEEMED SENT THROUGH
PIO CHIEF E-MAIL ADDRESS
STARTING MARCH 9, 2016
No comments:
Post a Comment