MY FAVORITE PAGES

Saturday, December 14, 2019

STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 57 DATED 14DEC20 12:00PM



INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 57

INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE TO EMAIL:

Claim Number 55-06c6-44x INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 56 DATED 14DEC20 11:38AM

NOTES ON IMPROPRIETY : PERTAINING TO INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 56 

NUMBER 1.

MR. GUENIOT, THE ASSISTANCE SOUGHT IS,  PLEASE PROVIDE A CONCISE SUBSTANTIVE DENIAL LETTER ON MY CLAIMS FOR SECONDARY DAMAGES FILED IN JUNE 2020 AND VANDALISM WHICH COVERAGE I DISCOVERED JUST IN NOVEMBER 4, 2020 WHEN YOU BELATEDLY FURNISHED ME WITH THE COPY OF THE POLICY BEYOND ON WHAT IS REQUIRED BY THE REGULATION.

TO WIT:

FAILURE TO PROVIDE WRITTEN A CLEAR SUBSTANTIVE DENIAL DOCUMENTS CORRESPONDING TO THEM  ARE CLEAR VIOLATIONS  OF SECTION 2695.5. 

NUMBER 2.

DELIBERATE INTENTION TO SOW CONFUSION.

IT IS AN IMPROPER RESPONSE FOR RESPONDING TO EMAILS WITH DIFFERENT SUBJECTS WHICH TEND TO CREATE MORE CONFUSIONS.


DENIALS AND ASSERTIONS NEEDED TO BE 

SUBSTANTIATED, OTHERWISE, CRIMINALS MERE 

SAYING EMPTY WORDS OF DENIAL AND STATEMENTS 

WOULD NEVER BE CONVICTED.


























CLEARER READING BELOW OF THE EMAIL SCREENSHOT ABOVE:

Dear Mr. Buensuceso,

 

I’m writing to acknowledge receipt of the email below as you have requested.

 

As I previously communicated to you on November 13, 2020, we have done our best to answer your questions and provide a reasonable explanation for the basis of the denial of the claim based on the policy language.  Our position as communicated in our letters dated May 6, 2020, June 12, 2020, July 13, 2020, July 17, 2020, July 31, 2020 and responsive emails are unchanged.  The May 6, 2020 letter included the applicable policy language.  This claim file remains closed.  All conditions previously quoted still apply.

 

Your emails contain allegations of misconduct. All such contentions are denied. You should not interpret our silence as any agreement with you, or any waiver of our rights under the policy or law.  We reserve all rights under the policy and the law. 

 

Sincerely,

 

Louis

 

 

Louis E Gueniot III

Claim Team Manager
State Farm General Insurance Company


NOTES ON IMPROPRIETY : PERTAINING TO INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 57.

NUMBER 1.

MR. GUENIOT, THE ASSISTANCE SOUGHT IS,  PLEASE PROVIDE A CONCISE SUBSTANTIVE DENIAL LETTER ON MY CLAIMS FOR SECONDARY DAMAGES FILED IN JUNE 2020 AND VANDALISM WHICH COVERAGE I DISCOVERED JUST IN NOVEMBER 4, 2020 WHEN YOU BELATEDLY FURNISHED ME WITH THE COPY OF THE POLICY BEYOND ON WHAT IS REQUIRED BY THE REGULATION.

TO WIT:

FAILURE TO PROVIDE WRITTEN A CLEAR SUBSTANTIVE DENIAL DOCUMENTS CORRESPONDING TO THEM  ARE CLEAR VIOLATIONS  OF SECTION 2695.5. 


Section 2695.5. Duties upon Receipt of Communications

(b) Upon receiving any communication from a claimant, regarding a claim, that reasonably suggests that a response is expected, every licensee shall immediately, but in no event more than fifteen (15) calendar days after receipt of that communication, furnish the claimant with a complete response based on the facts as then known by the licensee. This subsection shall not apply to require communication with a claimant subsequent to receipt by the licensee of a notice of legal action by that claimant.



NUMBER 2.

DELIBERATE INTENTION TO SOW CONFUSION.

IT IS AN IMPROPER RESPONSE FOR RESPONDING TO AN EMAIL ASKING FOR A CLEAR AND CONCISE DENIAL LETTER LIKE "As I previously communicated to you on November 13, 2020, we have done our best to answer your questions and provide a reasonable explanation for the basis of the denial of the claim based on the policy language. " WHERE IN YOUR EMAIL IN NOVEMBER 13, 2020 YOU  MENTIONED OF MY DAMAGES CLAIM FROM VANDALISM COMMITTED BY YOUR INFORMANT PLUMBER TITOUAH?

NUMBER 3. 

YOU ARE SAYING "we have done our best" WHAT EFFORTS HAVE YOU MADE TO EXPLAIN YOUR POSITION? WHAT YOU HAVE WRITTEN ME ARE JUST A TEMPLATE OF EMPTY AND UNSUBSTANTIATED FIVE (5) FEEBLE MINDED OR FEW INSANE SENTENCES, REPEATEDLY ALL OVER AGAIN. WHAT YOU HAVE DONE BEST IS TO SOW MORE AND MORE CONFUSIONS TO DETER ME CONTINUING NEGOTIATIONS WITH YOU. BUT I ASSURE YOU, I WILL CONTINUE GOOD FAITH NEGOTIATIONS WITH YOU THOUGH YOU CONTINUALLY DISPLAY OBVIOUS AND REPREHENSIBLE MANIFESTATIONS OF BAD FAITH.





No comments:

Post a Comment