MY FAVORITE PAGES

Saturday, December 14, 2019

Claim Number 55-06c6-44x INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 56 DATED 14DEC20 11:38AM







DECEMBER 14, 2020


LOUIS E. GUENIOT
TEAM MANAGER

GORDON LIU
CLAIM SPECIALIST
STATE FARM HOME INSURANCE


RE: Claim Number 55-06c6-44x
       Policy Number 77-C3-B499-7

DATE OF LOSS: April 26, 2020

INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 56 DATED 14DEC20 10:00AM

NOTES ON IMPROPRIETY : 

NUMBER 1.

MR. GUENIOT, THE ASSISTANCE SOUGHT IS,  PLEASE PROVIDE A CONCISE SUBSTANTIVE DENIAL LETTER ON MY CLAIMS FOR SECONDARY DAMAGES FILED IN JUNE 2020 AND VANDALISM WHICH COVERAGE I DISCOVERED JUST IN NOVEMBER 4, 2020 WHEN YOU BELATEDLY FURNISHED ME WITH THE COPY OF THE POLICY BEYOND ON WHAT IS REQUIRED BY THE REGULATION.

TO WIT:

FAILURE TO PROVIDE WRITTEN A CLEAR SUBSTANTIVE DENIAL DOCUMENTS CORRESPONDING TO THEM  ARE CLEAR VIOLATIONS  OF SECTION 2695.5. 

NUMBER 2.

DELIBERATE INTENTION TO SOW CONFUSION.

IT IS AN IMPROPER RESPONSE FOR RESPONDING TO EMAILS WITH DIFFERENT SUBJECTS WHICH TEND TO CREATE MORE CONFUSIONS.


INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 56
REPEATED MISCONDUCTS
FROM
INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSES
MULTIPLE MISCONDUCTS 
1 TO 8 AND 9/10/11/12/13 AND 14
AND 15/16/17/18/19/20/21/22/23/24/25/26/27/28/29/30/31/32/33/34/35/36
AND 37/38/39/40/41/42/43/44/45/46/47/48/49/50/51/52/53/54/55

BEING NOT DISPUTED, OBJECTED AND HABITUALLY REPEATED WITH IMPUNITY.  HENCE, PROVEN TO BE INTENTIONAL, DELIBERATE, MALICIOUS, WILLFUL, WANTON, OPPRESSIVE AND OUTRAGEOUS
AND BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT


Dear Messrs Gueniot and Liu:


PLEASE SEE,

As Mr. Gueniot responded to email as shown next:

Claim Number 55-06c6-44x CONCISE LETTER OF DENIAL REQUEST DATED 2DEC20 6:52AM

MAY I MOST HUMBLY AND RESPECTFULLY REQUEST FROM YOU FOR A CONCISE DENIAL LETTER OF MY INSURANCE CLAIMS COVERING WATER SECONDARY DAMAGES FILED ON JUNE 2020 AND VANDALISM WHICH COVERAGE I DISCOVERED JUST THIS MONTH OF NOVEMBER FROM THE POLICY BOOKLET YOU PROVIDED ME ON NOVEMBER 4, 2020.



THIS SHOWS:

EVIDENCE OF THE 56TH RECORDED MISCONDUCT, PROOF BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT OF,

REPEATED HABITUALLY, INTENTIONALLY,  DELIBERATELY OF MISCONDUCTS RESPONDING TO EMAILS SUBJECT OUTSIDE OF THE SUBJECT UNDER DISCUSSION AND/OR RESPONDING TO EMAILS NOT ADDRESSED TO HIM TO RESPOND AND/OR RESPONDING TO SEVERAL EMAILS ONCE LEAVING OTHER EMAILS NOT RESPONDED.
AND VIOLATION OF DUTIES UPON RECEIPT OF COMMUNICATION
SECTION 2695.

HE HAD SHOWN A TOTAL OF FIFTY SIX (56) RECORDED INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSES AND/OR MISCONDUCTS TO SOW CONFUSION AND INTENTIONALLY AND DELIBERATELY DERAIL AND DELAY THE PROCEEDINGS. HOWEVER, AGAIN, HIS  INAPPROPRIATE
RESPONSE 56 THOUGH WORTHLESS  SIMPLY BECAUSE THE CONTENTS ARE NOT RELATED TO THE QUESTION POSTED FOR HIM TO ADDRESS AND/OR OUTSIDE OF THE SUBJECT MATTER OF THE DISCUSSION AND/OR PROFESSIONALLY DISRESPECTFUL RESPONSE
BUT BECOME A BIG HELP TO BOLSTER MANIFESTATION OF BAD FAITH CLAIM AGAINST STATE FARM.



YOUR ACTIONS, MR. GUENIOT TEND TO SHOW 

THAT YOU MIGHT BE THE REAL MASTERMIND OF 

TITOUAH'S CRIMES.


SO, MR. GUENIOT, AGAIN, MAY I REQUEST FOR YOUR KIND UNDERSTANDING. WE NEED TO HAVE OUR NEGOTIATION ORGANIZED AND RECORDS CLEAR,  SO THAT WE MAY AVOID CONFUSION. OBVIOUSLY, IT APPEARS THAT YOU WANTED MUCH EAGERLY TO CLOSE THE NEGOTIATION AND THE INVESTIGATION PROCESS. HOWEVER, YOUR EFFORTS ARE IN VAIN AS I SEE YOUR INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSES NOW ARE WANING TO ONLY FEW OR THREE (3) WEAK,  SENILE FEEBLE AND DESPICABLE PARAGRAPHS  AND THUS, SIMPLY THIS FACT LEAD ME TO THINK YOU  REALLY JUST WANTED TO AVOID QUESTIONS, WHICH ANSWERS OR NO ANSWER FROM YOU TEND TO SPILL THE BEANS OF MOST PROBABLY TITOUAH AND YOUR CRIMES IN PARTNERSHIP WITH HIM SIMPLY BY READING THE QUERIES SPECIALLY CRAFTED FOR YOU, WITH OR WITHOUT YOUR ANSWERS.



Please acknowledge receipt of this e-mail. THIS EMAIL RESPONSE IS INTENDED FOR YOUR  COLLECTION OF NEW INFORMATION ON INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSES WHICH TO MY TALLY RIGHT NOW ROSE TO 56.  IN OTHER WORDS,  FIFTY-SIX (56) COUNTS OF STATE FARM RECORDED MISCONDUCTS. THOSE UNRECORDED MISCONDUCTS, I AM STILL COLLECTING THEM AND I PROMISE I WILL ADD THEM TO THE LIST WHICH INFORMATION YOU MAY STILL WANTED TO KNOW.


PLEASE RESTRICT ISSUES WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF THE SUBJECT MATTER TO AVOID INAPPROPRIATENESS AND CONFUSION.

Please be reminded that your DENIAL LETTER DATED MAY 6, 2020 was prepared, relayed to us, sent and read by us in just a few minutes unlike the way you are habitually doing WHICH MEANS OBVIOUSLY IT HAD BEEN PART OF A PLAN CONCEIVED AND PREPARED MANY DAYS IN ADVANCE.

Thank you very much.

Yours faithfully,

Antonio L. Buensuceso


No comments:

Post a Comment