| from: | antonio jr. Buensuceso antoniobuensuceso@gmail.com | ||
| to: | pio@sc.judiciary.gov.ph, pio_personnel@sc.judiciary.gov.ph | ||
| cc: | Antonio Buensuceso | ||
| date: | Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 6:05 PM | ||
| subject: | REPUBLIC ACT 7641 CIRCUMVENTED BY SHELL, PROMOTER GUARDIANS OF LAW SHOULD BE DISCIPLINED | ||
| mailed-by: | gmail.com |
FIRST SENDING_MARCH 24, 2015
NOTE NO RESPONSE
| from: | antonio jr. Buensuceso antoniobuensuceso@gmail.com | ||
| to: | pio@sc.judiciary.gov.ph, pio_personnel@sc.judiciary.gov.ph, Antonio Buensuceso | ||
| date: | Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 1:31 AM | ||
| subject: | REPUBLIC ACT 7641 CIRCUMVENTED BY SHELL , PROMOTER GUARDIANS OF LAW SHOULD BE DISCIPLINED | ||
| mailed-by: | gmail.com |
SECOND SENDING_APRIL 6, 2015
NOTE NO RESPONSE
THIRD SENDING
APRIL 13, 2015
NO RESPONSE
NOTE NO RESPONSE
| from: | antonio jr. Buensuceso antoniobuensuceso@gmail.com | ||
| to: | pio@sc.judiciary.gov.ph, pio_personnel@sc.judiciary.gov.ph | ||
| cc: | Antonio Buensuceso | ||
| date: | Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 12:25 PM | ||
| subject: | REPUBLIC ACT 7641 CIRCUMVENTED BY SHELL, PROMOTER GUARDIANS OF LAW SHOULD BE DISCIPLINED | ||
| mailed-by: | gmail.com |
THIRD SENDING
APRIL 13, 2015
NO RESPONSE
| from: | antonio jr. Buensuceso antoniobuensuceso@gmail.com | ||
| to: | pio@sc.judiciary.gov.ph, pio_personnel@sc.judiciary.gov.ph | ||
| cc: | Antonio Buensuceso | ||
| date: | Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 2:06 AM | ||
| subject: | REPUBLIC ACT 7641 CIRCUMVENTED BY SHELL, PROMOTER GUARDIANS OF LAW SHOULD BE DISCIPLINED | ||
| mailed-by: | gmail.com |
FOURTH SENDING
APRIL 20, 2015
REPUBLIC ACT 7641 CIRCUMVENTED BY SHELL, PROMOTER GUARDIANS OF LAW
SHOULD BE DISCIPLINED
March 21, 2015
Chief Justice Maria Lourdes
Chief Justice Maria Lourdes
Supreme Court of the
Padre Faura, Manila
Republic of the Philippines
HILING SA KUSANG PAGKILOS NG KORTE SUPREMA NG PILIPINAS
ad perpetuam rei memoriam
In perpetual memory
In perpetual memory
Mahal na Chief Justice Ma. Lourdes Sereno,
Magandang araw po sa inyo.
PASIMUNONG PANGUNGUSAP :
ALAMIN NG LAHAT,
na kung sa daan ay napansin
ang mga tinik sa tatapakan
ALAMIN NG LAHAT,
na kung sa daan ay napansin
ang mga tinik sa tatapakan
==============================
==============================
ANNEX 5
THIS IS DOCUMENT TITLED "ANNEX 5" PRESENTED BY SHELL AND PROMOTED BY ATTY. QUIROZ TO SUPPORT PAYMENT OF SEPARATION PAY WHERE IN FACT THE INFORMATION CONTAINED ON IT SHOWED MY RETIREMENT PAY ACCOUNTS, HENCE, MY RETIREMENT PAY HAD BEEN MISAPPROPRIATED, AND RA 7641 CIRCUMVENTED, THEREFORE UNLAWFUL.
 |
SHELL CIRCUMVENTED THE LAW. SHELL MISAPPROPRIATED THIS
RETIREMENT PAY TO REPLACE HER OBLIGATION FOR THE PAYMENT
OF SEPARATION PAY. THIS IS UNLAWFUL AND
SUBJECT TO PENAL PROVISIONS
PROVIDED FOR IN
RA NO. 7641
RETIREMENT PAY TO REPLACE HER OBLIGATION FOR THE PAYMENT
OF SEPARATION PAY. THIS IS UNLAWFUL AND
SUBJECT TO PENAL PROVISIONS
PROVIDED FOR IN
RA NO. 7641
==============================
==============================
COMPLAINT ON DECEITFUL SEPARATION PAY BEEN
PRESENTED ON THE REJOINDER BY THE COMPLAINANT
AS SHOWN BELOW:
 |
| PAGE 6 PAR26 REJOINDER_DECEITFUL SEPARATION PAY |
 |
| TAKEN FROM PAGE 7 PAR27,28 REJOINDER_DECEITFUL SEPARATION PAY ============================== |
==============================
LABOR ARBITER LONTOC KNEW, PROMOTED AND CONFORMED TO UNLAWFUL ACT BY SHELL AND PROMOTED BY ATTY. QUIROZ TO MISAPPROPRIATE MY RETIREMENT PAY AS PAYMENT FOR SEPARATION PAY, SO THEREFORE, AS MEMBER OF THE BAR CONFORMING TO AN UNLAWFUL ACT, SHE SHOULD BE DISCIPLINED.
 |
| TAKEN FROM PAGE 6 PAR2 NLRC DECISION28 DECEMBER2006 BY LABOR ARBITER MICHAELA LONTOC |
==============================
==============================
COMMISSIONERS JAVIER, BILOG III, AND GENILO
KNEW AND CONFORMED TO UNLAWFUL ACT BY SHELL TO MISAPPROPRIATE MY RETIREMENT PAY AS PAYMENT FOR SEPARATION PAY, SO THEREFORE, AS MEMBERS OF THE BAR CONFORMING TO AN UNLAWFUL ACT, THEY SHOULD BE DISCIPLINED.
COMMISSIONERS JAVIER, BILOG III, AND GENILO knew and wrote that Shell had misappropriated my retirement pay as found by the labor arbiter as payment for separation pay as shown in their decision shown below, yet they conformed with it:
 |
| TAKEN FROM PAGE 6 PAR3_NLRC RESOLUTION_29JUNE2007 BY JAVIER, BILOGIII, GENILO ============================== |
==============================
JUSTICES GUEVARA-SALONGA, DE LEON AND PIZARRO
KNEW AND CONFORMED TO UNLAWFUL ACT BY SHELL TO MISAPPROPRIATE MY RETIREMENT PAY AS PAYMENT FOR SEPARATION PAY, SO, THEREFORE, AS MEMBERS OF THE BAR CONFORMING TO AN
UNLAWFUL ACT, THEY SHOULD BE DISCIPLINED.
JUSTICES GUEVARA-SALONGA, DE LEON AND PIZARRO knew and wrote that Shell had misappropriated my retirement pay as payment for separation pay as shown in their decision shown below, yet they conformed with it:
 |
| TAKEN FROM PAGE 3 PAR 1 COURT OF APPEALS DECISION_6JUNE2007 BY GUEVARA-SALONGA, DELEON, PIZARRO |
==============================
==============================
==============================
 |
| HONORABLE VIDAL, SC CLERK OF COURT THE SUPREME JUDGE
HONORABLE VIDAL CONFORMED AND CONCURRED WITH CA JUSTICES GUEVARA-SALONGA, DE LEON AND PIZARRO, ALSO WITH COMMISSIONERS JAVIER, BILOG III, AND GENILO, AND LIKEWISE WITH THE LABOR ARBITER LONTOC TO THE UNLAWFUL ACT BY SHELL TO MISAPPROPRIATE MY RETIREMENT PAY AS PAYMENT FOR SEPARATION PAY, SO, THEREFORE, AS MEMBER OF THE BAR CONFORMING TO AN UNLAWFUL ACT, SHE SHOULD BE DISCIPLINED.
|
please click on the image to enlarge
JUDGE, THE CLERK OF COURT DECISION dated 30 July 2008
SHELL CIRCUMVENTED THIS LAW
RA NO.7641
SOURCE FROM
SOURCE FROM
RELATED
UNANG PANDARAYA NI ATTY. RAUL QUIROZ
PAGGAMIT NG RETIREMENT BILANG PAMBAYAD SA SEPARATION PAY
ATTY. RAUL QUIROZ DISBARMENT COMPLAINT
FIRST PART
ATTY. RAUL QUIROZ DISBARMENT COMPLAINT
FIRST PART
THIS MAIL WAS SENT ELECTRONICALLY TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE PHILIPPINES ON MARCH 24, 2015, April 6, 2015 , April 13, 2015 and April 20, 2015 as shown in the start of the article THROUGH
The TRUTH will set you FREE.
No comments:
Post a Comment