House now requires 'majority consent' before SALN access

Section 17 of Article XI of the 1987 Constitution states: “Section 17. A public officer or employee shall, upon assumption of office and as often thereafter as may be required by law, submit a declaration under oath of his assets, liabilities, and net worth. In the case of the President, the Vice-President, the Members of the Cabinet, the Congress, the Supreme Court, the Constitutional Commissions and other constitutional offices, and officers of the armed forces with general or flag rank, the declaration shall be disclosed to the public in the manner provided by law. ” THE PHRASE "the declaration shall be disclosed  to the public" IS MANDATORY. IT MUST BE  SHOWN TO THE PUBLIC EVEN WITHOUT THE PUBLIC REQUESTING FOR IT.   IF EVER  THERE WAS A LAW PASSED IN THE MANNER THAT DEFEATS MANDATORY SALN DISCLOSURE THEN THAT LAW OR PART OF IT THAT DENIES MANDATORY  DISCLOSURE TO THE PUBLIC  MUST BE STRUCK DOWN FOR BEING  CONTRARY TO THE CHARTER'S PROVISION  HENCE, UNCONSTITUTIONAL.  The House requiring "majority consent' before SALN access denies mandatory disclosure to the public is contrary to the  constitution. Therefore, it must be struck down.   House now requires 'majority consent' before SALN access RG Cruz, ABS-CBN News Posted at Jan 31 2019 07:32 PM MANILA - The public will now need the majority consent of lawmakers in order to access their statements of assets, liabilities and net worth (SALN), under a new House rule that one opposition lawmaker finds repressive. The House of Representatives under Speaker Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo has adopted House Resolution 2467, which details rules for public access to the SALN of congressmen and regular employees of the chamber. In previous Congresses, the House has only released summary reports of the SALNs of congressmen instead of actual SALNs. This has been the practice even under past House Speakers. Individual requests for SALNs of lawmakers will have to be filed before the Secretary General’s Office, except for those covered by subpoena duces tecum. There is a prescribed form and they will have to submit photocopies of at least 2 government IDs. Members of the media must submit proof under oath of media affiliation and a certification of the accreditation of the media organization. Students may also file requests accompanied with a photocopy of a valid school ID, certification of the school that it is to be used for an academic paper and a certification that the student is enrolled. Moreover, the requesting party shall certify under oath that the request does not constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy and the name of the owner of the requested SALN shall not be disclosed but referred to in general terms in cases where the request is made for academic purposes as to protect the House member, officer or employee from unnecessary disclosures. If the request for a SALN is approved, the requesting party has to pay P300 per copy of the SALN. The rules excludes from its coverage consultants and those serving in honorary capacity, laborers and casual or temporary workers. Albay Rep. Edcel Lagman said the resolution imposes "stringent and repressive requirements for the public" to access the SALNs of lawmakers. “What is so sacrosanct about the contents of a Representative’s SALN that the access to it by the public and media is made inordinately restrictive and tedious as contained in the proposed House Resolution No. 1410 on the Rules referring to, among others, access to SALNs of Members of the House?” he said. “Topping the stringent procedure is the condition that any request for access and disclosure must have the imprimatur of the majority in plenary session.” Lagman wants the new leadership of the House and his colleagues to collectively review and liberalize the proposed rules to assure transparency and ready access to the said SALNs. “If we have nothing to hide, why make public access to and disclosure of SALNs, which are public documents, extremely difficult to the extent of discouraging and deterring applicants from securing copies of said SALNs?” he said Fa S

635TH PERSUASIVE APPEAL_31JAN19_TO THE SCP JUSTICIDES_"MANILA BAY CLEAN UP PETITIONERS RECOGNIZED BY FAILON NGAYON"

1 CERTIFICATE OF SEPARATION FROM LAST EMPLOYER COMPLAINT 2.  MY QUEST FOR SWINDLED  RETIREMENT PAY BY SHELL                          SWINDLING ITO, SYNDICATED ESTAFA 780counts SEE BELOW FOR THE 780TH   TIME THE REITERATION OF DEMAND PAYMENT OF RETIREMENT PAY WHICH SHELL REFUSED TO HONOR IN THE PRESENCE AND DEEMED APPROVAL OF THE HONORABLE MAGISTRATES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE PHILIPPINES GEUS_15MAR16_66th FOLLOW UP_REITERATION OF DEMAND  PAYMENT OF RETIREMENT PAY Dishonest scales are an abomination to the Lord, but a just weight is His delight... Proverbs Chapter 11  v. 1 Retirement Pay Law circumvented by Shell subject to penal provision provided for by Article 288 of the Labor Code of the Philippines.