Pipelines and welding risks for Shell: Kashagan and Prelude
…customers of certain Far Eastern shipyards have found that in spite of vessels being delivered with all of the necessary certification, unsurveyed welds have not always been up to the standards of the specific “randomly selected” welds on which the certification had been based. This may have interesting implications for the Prelude vessel…. Since Shell does not seem to be able to ensure that the welds on their pipelines in Kashagan were properly executed, all of which should have been inspected, are they any more likely to be sure of the welds on Prelude?
From an oil industry expert
Mitsui paid $1.1 bn, and Anardarko perhaps $2.66bn to settle their liabilities in respect of Macondo.
Mitsui and Anadarko shared responsibility with BP because they were fully appraised of what was going on, and gave their approval to the Macondo operations. Shell is in the same position in Kashagan. It is rather naïve to compare Shell’s role as a partner in Kashagan with that of a shareholder in a public company.
In order for partners to give approval they require adequate information, to which they have ready access.
See this Wall Street Journal article for more information.
On another related subject, customers of certain Far Eastern shipyards have found that in spite of vessels being delivered with all of the necessary certification, unsurveyed welds have not always been up to the standards of the specific “randomly selected” welds on which the certification had been based. This may have interesting implications for the Prelude vessel…. Since Shell does not seem to be able to ensure that the welds on their pipelines in Kashagan were properly executed, all of which should have been inspected, are they any more likely to be sure of the welds on Prelude?
Mitsui and Anadarko shared responsibility with BP because they were fully appraised of what was going on, and gave their approval to the Macondo operations. Shell is in the same position in Kashagan. It is rather naïve to compare Shell’s role as a partner in Kashagan with that of a shareholder in a public company.
In order for partners to give approval they require adequate information, to which they have ready access.
See this Wall Street Journal article for more information.
On another related subject, customers of certain Far Eastern shipyards have found that in spite of vessels being delivered with all of the necessary certification, unsurveyed welds have not always been up to the standards of the specific “randomly selected” welds on which the certification had been based. This may have interesting implications for the Prelude vessel…. Since Shell does not seem to be able to ensure that the welds on their pipelines in Kashagan were properly executed, all of which should have been inspected, are they any more likely to be sure of the welds on Prelude?
Worlds biggest breach of employee data – Shell or Morrisons?
“We are in possession of a massive database containing contact information for every Shell employee throughout the world. It was supplied by an organized group of over 100 Shell employees from the USA, the UK and the Netherlands intent on a corporate revolution inside your company.”
By John Donovan
The news media has reported that Payroll details of 100,000 Morrisons staff have been published on the web.
The UK supermarket chain launched an internal investigation after information about its 100,000 employees was allegedly leaked by an insider and posted on to the internet. According to The Daily Mail, “The company has set up a hotline and dedicated email address for staff who are worried about the possibility of their information falling into the hands of scammers.”
Royal Dutch Shell was hit by an even bigger breach of employee data in February 2010 – the worlds biggest breach of employee information – when a database containing personal information for 177,000 Shell employees and contractors was supplied to me. It was leaked by a group of disgruntled Shell employees.
I sent an email to Michiel Brandjes, the Company Secretary of Royal Dutch Shell Plc and received an alarmed response from Richard Wiseman, the then Chief Ethics & Compliance Officer of the company. The immediate correspondence is printed below. Because Mr Wiseman later confirmed that personal security would be put at risk, I did not publish the database, but instead, at the request of Mr Wiseman, destroyed it. He was good enough to thank me for the responsible way I dealt with the matter.
The incident generated world-wide news coverage.
INITIAL EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE OF “COLOSSAL SECURITY BREACH AT SHELL”
From: John Donovan [mailto:john@shellnews.net]
Sent: 03 February 2010 12:29
To: Brandjes, Michiel CM RDS-LC
Cc: Wiseman, Richard RM SI-RDS-CCO
Subject: COLOSSAL SECURITY BREACH AT SHELL
Sent: 03 February 2010 12:29
To: Brandjes, Michiel CM RDS-LC
Cc: Wiseman, Richard RM SI-RDS-CCO
Subject: COLOSSAL SECURITY BREACH AT SHELL
Dear Mr Brandjes
We are in possession of a massive database containing contact information for every Shell employee throughout the world.
It was supplied by an organized group of over 100 Shell employees from the USA, the UK and the Netherlands intent on a corporate revolution inside your company. We agree with the aims of the group.
No doubt “CAS” is already investigating this colossal breach of security.
In addition to an article being prepared, we intend to make the database available online later today.
Please advise as a matter of urgency if Shell has any objections, and if so, what they are. Obviously we do not want to put anyone at risk, though we cannot currently see that this would be the case.
If it is just a matter of a huge embarrassment for Shell, then we will publish as planned.
Best Regards
John Donovan
John Donovan
REPLY FROM SHELL
From: richard.wiseman@shell.com
Subject: RE: COLOSSAL SECURITY BREACH AT SHELL
Date: 3 February 2010 13:29:07 GMT
To: john@shellnews.net
Cc: michiel.brandjes@shell.com
Subject: RE: COLOSSAL SECURITY BREACH AT SHELL
Date: 3 February 2010 13:29:07 GMT
To: john@shellnews.net
Cc: michiel.brandjes@shell.com
Dear Mr Donovan
Unfortunately, Mr Brandjes is not able to respond and in view of the deadline you have imposed, I thought it sensible to reply. You will appreciate that our immediate concern is the security of Shell’s staff. Accordingly I should be grateful if you would let me know exactly what information you have and intend to publish. In particular, please let me know whether this information includes private contact information like addresses and phone numbers, in which case we would protest very strongly indeed and require that this information is not published.
Regards
Richard Wiseman
Chief Ethics and Compliance Officer
Royal Dutch Shell plc
Shell Centre, London SE1 7NA
Royal Dutch Shell plc
Shell Centre, London SE1 7NA
Registered in England and Wales number 4366849
Registered Office: Shell Centre, London, SE1
Headquarters: Carel van Bylandtlaan 30, 2596 HR
The Hague, The Netherlands
Registered Office: Shell Centre, London, SE1
Headquarters: Carel van Bylandtlaan 30, 2596 HR
The Hague, The Netherlands
Email: richard.wiseman@shell.com
Internet: http://www.shell.com
Internet: http://www.shell.com
Shell Nigeria: Forcados terminal closed by leak
Extract from an Associated Press article published by The Washington Post on 16 March 2014
WARRI, Nigeria — Shell Nigeria says its Forcados crude oil export terminal is closed because of an undersea pipeline leak. The biggest oil producer in Nigeria refused to say how many thousands of barrels of exports are affected by the closure.
COMMENT FROM A REGULAR CONTRIBUTOR:
I guess the oil thieves must have bought themselves a set of scuba gear….
How Shell’s cutbacks will feel in Houston
Extract from an article by Jordan Blum published by Houston Business Journal on 16 March 2014
Shell is cutting about 400 people — out of about 1,800 total — from its onshore North American operations. But Shell spokeswoman Kayla Macke emphasized that most of those 400 employees will be “redeployed” to other Shell projects.
The TRUTH will set you FREE.
No comments:
Post a Comment