31ST_PERSUASIVE APPEAL_WHEN WRONGS PREVAIL OVER RIGHTS, CORRUPTION EXISTS

JUSTICE IS ILLUSORY "We cannot move forward, if we allow the past to pull us back. Finger pointing is not the way that is why I will not waste precious time dwelling on the scenes of the past or blaming those who are perceived to be responsible to the mess that we are in and suffering from except, maybe extract a lesson or two from its errors. We will not tarry because it is the present that we are concerned with and the future that we should be prepared for. Let it not be misunderstood that, is to say clearly that those who betrayed the peoples' trust shall not go unpunished and they will have their day in court and if the evidence warrant they will have a day of reckoning too. When I decided to seek the presidency of this republic, I knew, what the ills of the country were. I knew their causes and I was briefed on those caused the causes. I heard the people on the streets complained that justice has become illusory; that equity and fairness and speedy disposition of cases had deteriorated into hallow concepts fit only for masteral dissertation. It was and is very sad indeed.  As a former prosecutor I know there will always be ways of knowing how fast or how slow cases go. What I did was to look into the number of postponements and the time difference between each postponement and the next setting. It was as simple as that. I will appreciate deeply if we all in government attend to this urgent need. I was determined then and better positioned to wage war against those who make a mockery of our laws including those who make life for us all miserable. I wish to assure everyone though, that vindictiveness is not in my system just... just like you and I we all want equal treat and equal protection are what I asked for all our people. But we must have the courage to fight for what we believe in and deterred by the fear of failing or losing. Indeed, courage knows no limits..cowardice does." _PRESIDENT RODRIGO ROA DUTERTE FIRST STATE OF THE NATION ADDRESS 25JULY 2016 JULY 25, 2016  SALUTATION Dear Chief Justice Sereno, et al:                                        MESSAGE CORRUPTION Corruption is to the human society and toxin is to the human body. Human interactions like blood being pumped through the heart then to the brain and to vital  organs of the human body through the largest and smallest arteries and veins and had to be  constantly cleaned by the kidney out of toxins in normal healthy functioning body vis-a-vis vibrant human society.   Today, the human body is sick. His blood is seriously contaminated with toxins but his kidney had failed and the human body is dying.  So with  the Philippine society.  Good that  the Philippines  found a kidney and a surgeon rolled into one in the person of President Duterte.  As a kidney, he has  processed fresh blood which liven up hope and fulfillment of peoples' aspirations for an honest and responsive government, where in the past had just been a pile of continuing years of toxic  frustration and angst and disillusionment. and hopelessness and despair. As a surgeon,  he is trained  to determine when the wound could still be treated by antiseptics or antibiotics or has to be managed by amputation or castration. Your honors, the choice is yours to make. Corruption has to be stopped, said the surgeon, clear and straightforward.  The president, with his several years as prosecutor and fiscal and a professor in criminal law is not brainless or ignorant to whom you can hide your corruption and crimes from. The president as a surgeon has the capacity of extricating gangrenes, shallow and deep alike and with all due respect, you may want to reform yourselves to revitalize the judicial institution which had been in the rotten state of decay and decomposition then do it  or  you might as well stay put and keep the your malignant disease gangrenes of corruption and be extricated yourselves in due time.  As the president in a number of speeches had warned the Abu Sayaff, "There will days of reckoning..."  the same is aptly I believe he may have wanted be addressed to you. Corruption, your honors, as I experienced dealing with you and the rest of your employees had been part of the normal daily chores of doing judicial business in the Supreme Court. Corruption is rampant.  Everyone else is corrupt.  Corruption in the Supreme Court like trash,  is noticeable when there is one in a clean environment.  Even one as minute as a cigarette butt is easy to pinpoint when it, as I reiterate, is in a clean environment .  But when trash and garbage and filth abounds everywhere, no one could ever know though tons more are added to them.  That is the reality in the Philippine Supreme Court, perception of uprightness are mere cosmetics and products of their own self adulation, in contrast with their malignant crookedness and corruption. Filth abounds everywhere, as corruption is.  The Philippine Supreme Court as the emperor of filth propagation  occupies the throne from which power to the grandiose rubbish machinery emanates.  A machinery,  though reprehensible to the morally upright man,  has been allowed to operate, licensed under the doctrine of presumption of regularity.  This doctrine cloaked magistrates with enormous discretionary power to uphold or disregard the constitution or the law at will or bend the rules depending in who the client they would want to serve.  So sometimes, their decisions seemed to look constitutionally or lawfully right or in some cases but not few, often they ridiculously and stealthily did incorporate a new provision in the constitution to comply with the needs of their client and the same is equally true with the same evil motive when these justices spitefully legislated a new law  from the bench entirely contrary to the existing  law through the skillful manipulation of meticulously applied rhetorics in jurisprudence coupled with voluminous citations from various books in law and courts in the United States and all over the globe, where not one in a million people would not have the interest or patience even bother to read or least look at it and just accept it.  Or, and if ever there would be one who would see truth on the contrary nobody would ever listen to him,  no difference with the child who asserted that the emperor is wearing nothing or naked inconsistent with the elders' credit:TES.COM pretentious acceptance of the lie that the emperor is wearing a majestic new clothing which wont be visible to men unfit for their position or stupid. The emperor and the elders naturally wanted to appear fit for their position or not lacking intelligence, though they really are but wanted to continue receiving perks and benefits meant for the fit and intelligent, they blindly accepted the myth espoused by the emperor's new clothes. That is corruption told through tale during the ancient times being reenacted, true to life here, in the Philippine Supreme Court.  The Justices as the emperor exceedingly fond of vanity and insatiable greed had swindled themselves into believing that the robes they are wearing, the robes of the presumption of regularity are no less than the emperor's new clothes where corruption hidden underneath though in reality are visible but justices  and other guardians of law pretended they see not for they are wearing the same robes and benefiting therefrom,  thereby creating a community founded on deceit and corruption..... from top to bottom ...everywhere. Shell,  based on  the verified documents I presented here is an expert in the field of deception and corruption.  I have no doubts that Shell shrewd as it actually is have anchored its roots within the community of corrupt arbiters, commissioners and justices thriving in the judiciary.  I have strong reasons  to believe, that Labor Arbiter (Lontoc) had decided the case the manner she did, on account of her being under the influence of Shell. CORRUPTION is discernible in the manner which L.A. Lontoc decided issues in the controversy with manifested partiality in favor of Shell. [A] PERILOUS ATEMPT BY LABOR ARBITER LONTOC (Lontoc) TO THRASH OUT JURISDICTION FROM HER TO THE PANEL OF VOLUNTARY  ARBITRATORS DEPICTED HER QUESTIONABLE PARTIALITY TO SHELL'S INTEREST Perplexing was the effort exerted by Lontoc in alleging that this case was one not within her but within the jurisdiction of the voluntary arbitrator. This bias appreciation of the issues by Lontoc  was vehemently objected to by the complainant. When she had been not been questioned and Lontoc when had been allowed to pursue her argument that this case should have coursed through voluntary arbitration then she had effectively denied justice from me and ultimately tilted the balance in favor of her covert client SHELL and successfully deliver victory to SHELL.  The fact that she fully knew that in voluntary arbitration there is a need for the participation of the union in the proceedings where she likewise could infer through the information submitted to her that I was conducting an inquiry against them on the possible culpability of the officers of the the union, hence in truth, the union as expected the union never lend me even a bit of help in pursuing this case.  What more can I expect from them.  They have opted to stay away from my predicament, no one knew what force could deliver them to my side. Besides, Lontoc could no longer deny the fact that this case had passed preliminary discussions under the labor arbiter's  jurisdiction and we had been ordered  to submit our position papers and related documents; hence, Lontoc could not later negate that this case is not within her jurisdiction. Moreover, Lontoc needed to revisit   GR No. 138938 :CELESTINO VIVIERO, petioner vs. COURT OF APPEALS, HAMMONIA MARINE SERVICES and HANSEATIC SHIPPING LTD. respondents  dated October 24, 2000 xxxUnder their CBA both union and respondent companies are responsible for selecting an impartial arbitrator or for convening an arbitration committee, yet it is apparent that neither made a move toward this end. Consequently, petitioner should not be deprived of his legitimate recourse because of the refusal of both union and respondent companies to follow the grievance procedure. Wherefore, the decision of the Court of Appeals is SET ASIDE and the case is remanded to the labor arbiter to dispose of the case with dispatch until terminated considering the undue delay already incurred. SO ORDERED. Mendoza, Quisumbing, Buena, and De Leon, Jr., concur. XXX [B] RETIREMENT PAY LAW CIRCUMVENTION IS AN UNLAWFUL ACT BY SHELL AND DESPITE HAVING BEEN OBJECTED TO BY THE COMPLAINANT AND YET LONTOC DID NOT OBJECT THERETO AND ERRONEOUSLY PROMOTED THE SAME IN CONTRAVENTION OF THE PROVISION OF THE LAW. Lontoc's outright disregard of the Retirement Pay Law when she saw no irregularity for having not objected to to the disbursement of my retirement pay as payment for separation pay. This is circumvention of the Retirement Pay Law. Republic Act No. 7641, " Violation of this provision is hereby declared unlawful and subject to penal provisions provided under Article 288 of this code."  This unlawful act, exceedingly reprehensible from being a manifestation of grave ignorance of the law, is a brazen display of subservience of the labor arbiter as shown by her acquiescence to Shell's whim to violate the law.  FIGURE B.1  DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE OF DISBURSEMENT OF RETIREMENT PAY as PAYMENT FOR SEPARATION PAY FIGURE B.2 DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE OF LABOR ARBITER LONTOC'S APPROVAL  OF THE DISBURSEMENT OF THE RETIREMENT PAY AS PAYMENT FOR THE SEPARATION PAY AS PROOF OF THE COLLUSION BETWEEN SHELL AND THE LABOR ARBITER TO CIRCUMVENT THE RETIREMENT PAY LAW [C] DECEPTIVE PRESENTATION OF QUITCLAIM OR RELEASE DOCUMENT BY SHELL _ WITH QUESTIONABLE APPROVAL BY LONTOC Lontoc accepted and approved the document Figure C.1(Annex "5") as a bonafide quitclaim document though the document was not verified and despite the fact of the existence of document Figure C.2 (Annex "J") payment of performance related bonus(PRB). If it were true that Annex"5" is a bonafide quitclaim document then Shell should have not paid me my PRB by virtue of Annex"5" as quitclaim document. But,  Shell paid me my PRB 8 months after execution of Annex"5".  Hence,  obviously Annex "5" is not regarded by Shell and myself during the execution of that Annex "5", as a quitclaim document as I had reiterated in my pleading,  but  those are just attestations on the money or mere receipts of the amounts I received from Shell and consequently,  not being having an effect of a  valid release or quit claim document. FIGURE C.1 DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE OF SHELL SHOWING ANNEX "5" AS QUITCLAIM DOCUMENT FIGURE C.2 DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE OF SHELL SHOWING THE PAYMENT OF THE COMPLAINANT PERFORMANCE  RELATED BONUS DATED OCTOBER 23, 2003 PROVING THAT DOCUMENT ANNEX "5" IS NOT A QUITCLAIM OR RELEASE DOCUMENT FIGURE C.3 PART OF THE NLRC RESOLUTION SHOWING NO OBJECTION TO THE DEED OF THE QUITCLAIM AND RELEASE DOCUMENT IN FAVOR OF SHELL WHERE IN FACT IT HAS NO PROBATIVE VALUE WITH RESPECT TO CONSIDERATIONS CONTAINED THERIN SAYING I AM WAIVING MY RIGHTS AGAINST OTHER CLAIMS AGAINST SHELL. SINCE IN FACT, FIGURE D.1 ANNEX 5 IS NOT A VERIFIED DOCUMENT. IT IS IMPORTANT TO CONSIDER THAT SHELL AND I HAD NO INTENTION TO KEEP FIGURE D.2 ANNEX 5 AS A QUITCLAIM DOCUMENT AS CAN BE DEDUCED FROM THE EXISTENCE OF ANNEX "J" FIGURE C.2 PAYMENT OF MY PERFORMANCE RELATED BONUS ON OCTOBER 23, 2003 EIGHT MONTHS AFTER THE EXISTENCE OF ANNEX 5, A FACT THAT CLEARLY DETERMINED THAT ANNEX 5 FUNCTIONED NOT AS A QUITCLAIM DOCUMENT BUT MERE RECEIPTS OF AMOUNTS I RECEIVED FROM SHELL. FIGURE D.1  FULL PAGE VIEW WHERE THE JOB SECURITY PROVISION OF THE CBA IS SHOWN                                   [E] THE  FACT SHELL CLOSED AN OLD PLANT THEN OPENED A NEW ONE IS UNDISPUTED AND IT IS ALSO TRUE THAT SHELL TERMINATED EMPLOYEES THEN HIRED NEW ONES, LIKEWISE IS TRUE, INCONSISTENT WITH ALLEGATIONS OF REDUNDANCY WHICH LONTOC ON ACCOUNT OF HER PARTIALITY TO SHELL INTERESTS POSED NO OBJECTION THERETO. FIGURE E.1 FIGURE F.1 Notice " Minutes of LMC  Meeting 05 April 2002" on the footnote FIGURE F.2  LABOR MANAGEMENT COOPERATION MEETING. PLEASE NOTICE THE  DATE APRIL 5, 2002.  MY PETITION FOR SALARY  ADJUSTMENT WAS NOT EXISTING YET. F.3 ANNEX "D" PETITION FOR SALARY RATE ADJUSTMENT WRITTEN ON JULY 15, 2002.  THIS PETITION EXISTED MONTHS AFTER THE LMC MEETING DATED APRIL 15, 2002 [G] LONTOC DELIBERATELY DISTORTED FACTS IN FAVOR OF SHELL  BY WRONGLY CITING THAT THE COMPLAINANT IS RESIGNING IN CONTRARY TO THE TRUE FACT THAT THE COMPLAINANT IS "RETIRING" AT THE SOLE OPTION OF THE COMPANY. BY CITING THAT THE COMPLAINANT IS RESIGNING. THE ARBITER BIASED AS SHE WAS TO SHELL'S  INTEREST, HAD DECEITFULLY SHOWN  THATSHELL HAD GENEROUS INTENTIONS TOWARD THE COMPLAINANT  BY SHOWING Pesos 2,075,893.27 in favor of reorganization compared to Pesos 312,214.77 of indebtedness per column under resignation. WHERE IN FACT,  the complainant would be not be drawn to indebtedness as he would be receiving the same amount Pesos 2,075,893.27 since the complainant is retiring and not resigning. THE ARBITER HERSELF BECAME A WILLING ACCOMPLICE OF SHELL  IN THE CRIME OF ROBBING THE COMPLAINANT OF HIS RETIREMENT PAY.  HENCE,  LONTOC SHOULD HAVE BEEN WARNED REPRIMANDED AND DISCIPLINED. [H] The OIL DEREGULATION LAW which Shell laments that giving financial o economic difficulties to the company which caused them to close an old plant and terminate employees is a huge lie. Instead, the mentioned law is a big help to them ..  We can see that for every increase in costs of doing business like the increase in the crude oil price in the world market they can adjust the price of their petroleum products. They were given the prerogative to set their prices to a level enough to recover loses and ensure business viability.  In other words, the oil deregulation law is their protection against  losses and never it could cause any financial difficulty on them [I] FIGURE I.1 DEMOLITION SERVICE PURCHASE ORDER FIGURE I.2 DEMOLITION CONTRACT FIGURE I.3 DEMOLITION PICTURES [J] PERFECT ATTENDANCE AWARD SCAM NOTE : DIRECT EXCERPT FROM MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION DATED 30 OCTOBER 2008 9.1 Yun pong usapin sa PERFECT ATTENDANCE AWARD SCHEME na tinawag ko pong PERFECT ATTENDANCE AWARD SCAM isa pong nakabalatkayong extortion racket ng SHELL na ang biktima ay ang kaawa-awang kawani na binigyan ng AWARD mismo. Sa simula po ng bawat taon, kaming mga kawani ay sinasabihan ng mga boss namin na magperfect attendance. Ibig sabihin po ay vacation leave lang ang aming gagamitin kung kailangan namin ng leave. Huwag ang sick leave kahit na kami ay may sakit , at huwag din ang emergency o personal leave kahit pa dinala mo ang anak mo sa hospital. Kung ang empleado ay sumunod sa tagubilin siya ay bibigyan ng PERFECT ATTENDANCE AWARD (isang bondpaper) at isang G.E. flat iron (PLANTSA) at isang pamBOBOlang pangako na promotion sa trabaho. Kung hindi naman sinunod ng kawani ang tagubilin, ang kawani ay kakausapin, pagsasabihan at tatakutin na ibibitin ang promotion o ililipat sa ibang job assignment na mahihirapan ang kawani. Walang magawa ang mga kawani kundi sumunod na mag-perfect attendance kahit labag sa loob. Baka po nais ninyong malaman kung gaano kalaki ang nakukuhang kotong ng SHELL sa scam na ito ?Natalakay ko na po ito sa mga dokumento na nai-submit ko sa mga nakaraang hukuman sa wikang Ingles po lamang, ngayon po sa wika po natin. Kaming mga kawani po ay mayroong personal/emergency leave na 5 araw at 15 araw na sick leave. Nakuha po namin yun sa aming CBA. Eto po ang rule nila : HINDI po naming maaring gamitin ang mga naturang leaves upang maging perfect attendance awardee. Ang bawat awardee ay hindi gumamit ng 5 araw na personal/emergency leave at 15 araw na sick leave. Ang mga leaves na ito ay ipo-forfeit ng SHELL. Opo, pino-forfeit po ng SHELL. Ibig sabihin po, ay 20 araw na trabaho ang kinokotong sa kanya ng SHELL. Sa dahilan pong hindi siya lumiban sa trabaho hindi po nangailangan ng kanyang kahalili na sana ay babayaran ng SHELL ng 20 araw at karagdagan pong 10 araw para sa overtime. Sa madaling salita, ang bawat awardee ay nagbibigay sa SHELL ng may halagang 50 araw na kapakinabangan. Bakit naman po tinumbasan lang ng isang papel, isang plantsa at pamBOBOla ? Kung hindi po sinunod bakit kailangan pang ang kawani ay kausapin, pagsabihan at takuting hindi ipo-promote o dili kaya ay ililipat sa ibang mas mahirap na job assignment ? Ang hiling ko po at ng iba pa naming mga kawani, ay commensurate award, at least mga 20 araw rin lang po. Ngunit naging manhid po ang SHELL sa aming hiling at nananatili ang extortion racket na ito hanggang ngayon. Ang katinuan po ng sistemang ito ang mahaba ko nang panahong ipinaglalaban hanggang sa taong 2000, nasabi ko sa kanila at sa aking mga kasama sa SHELL na hindi ko puputulin ang aking buhok para lagi ng maala-ala ng lahat na may mga kawaning patuloy na nagnanais ng katinuan sa PERFECT ATTENDANCE SCHEME. Bago pa po lubusang humaba ang buhok ko, Year 2003, sinibak na po ako. FIGURE J.1 PETITION FOR SANITY IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PERFECT ATTENDANCE AWARD SYSTEM [K] MISSING CBA NEGOTIATION MEETINGS INQUIRY DIRECT EXCERPT FROM THE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION DATED 30 OCTOBER 2008,  WHERE,  FROM THE LABOR ARBITER THROUGH THE NLRC, THE COURT OF APPEALS, AND THE SUPREME COURT,   THIS TELL TALE SIGNS OF BREWING CORRUPTION HAD BEEN DELIBERATELY IGNORED UP TO THE PRESENT TIMES. 9.2 Ang aking pong INQUIRY sa nawawalang minutes of CBA negotiations meetings na kung saan pinag-usapan ang paksang pang - economic o pasuweldo ay hindi rin po nabigyang halaga at lubusang pag-aararal ng mga pinagdaanang hukuman. Na, kung ito po ay nabigyan daan na busisiin, matutunghayan po nila, na itong natapos na CBA ay punong-puno ng hinihinalang anomalya at controversiya, dahil sa bukod sa itinago nila ang minutes tungkol dito ay, inalisan pa nila nang dalawang NON-OFFICER union member na tumatayong bantay o witness sa negotiation. Ang TRANSPARENCY sa gaganaping negotiation ay alam naming mga kasapi sa unyon na KAILANGAN kaya po ninais naming makapag-formulate ngGROUND RULES for the CONDUCT OF NEGOTIATIONS silang mga opisyales ng unyon at management panel. Kasama po rito ang requirement ng MINUTES at dalawang NON-OFFICER union member bilang witness . Ang GROUND RULES pong ito ay hiniling naming mga kasapi sa unyon, naisulat at napagkasunduan at sinunod ng buong husay noong pag-usapan ay non-economic benefits, ngunit noong pag-usapan ang pasueldo, ay nabalutan ito ng hinihinalang kabuktutan at misteryo. Ang kaganapang ito ay nagbunsod ng matinding pagdududa sa kadalisayan, kalinisan ng ginanap na negotiation. Lalo pa nga po, noong makalipas ang isa O dalawang linggo na matapos ang CBA ay pinagkalooban ng SHELL ng isang marangyang piging ang mga opisyal ng unyon sa isang kilalang Hotel sa Makati. Ganoon din po, makalipas ang isa O dalawang buwan, ang dalawa pong mataas na lider ng unyon ay pumunta sa SINGAPORE at sa THAILAND na company sponsored trip, sinabi po nilang seminar o training. Marami pong lalo ang naghihinala sa mga misteryong nakapaloob dito at sila ay nagsimulang magsiyasat at magtanong-tanong at ang pormal na INQUIRY ay sinimulan ko. Dapat sana ay natuklasan ang dahilan kung bakit na kung kailan na mayroong INQUIRY o pagsisiyasat sa maaring pandaraya o kabuktutan naganap sa nakatapos na CBA negotiations, kung kailan naman ako tinanggal sa trabaho. Hindi kaya nais lamang ng kumpanya na matigil na itong pagsisiyasat sa dahilang baka matuklasan ang kanilang mga pagkakasala at natakot sa kanilang pananagutan kapag ang mga iyon ay napatunayan. At upang mahinto ang INQUIRY ay naisip nilang tangalin ako. Sinibak nga nila ako. 9.3 Lubos rin po, ang aming pagtataka nang ang mga suliraning pang-unyon ay kinaligtaan nang harapin ng mga lider ng unyon, tulad ng suliranin ng ilang kawani na pinagkaitang pagkalooban ng PRB(performance related bonus) at ang napapabalitang tanggalan sa trabaho. Wala silang ginawa para tulungan ang mga kawawang kasapi upang ipagtanggol ang mga karapatan ng mga ito. 9.4 Manapay, magkahalong pagtataka at pagdududa ang nabubuo sa aming mga damdamin nang may isang kasapi na naglakas loob na simulan o gawin ang mga hakbang upang ang mga suliraning iyon ay lutasin, ay siya pa nila itong ginipit, sinikil at pinabayaan, pinagkaitan ng kanyang karapatan sa "due process", (his petition for maximum salary rate adjustment was deliberately ignored, no hearing about his petition was ever conducted inspite of his persistent follow-ups) at nang ang kawaning ito ay tanggalin, ang mga lider na iyon ay hindi kumilos upang ang karapatang iyon at ang "job security of tenure" ng pobreng kasapi ay ipagtanggol. 9.5 Bago po maganap ang KONTOBERSYAL CBA NEGOTIATION MEETING tungkol sa pasueldo ay nakikita namin ang lubos na katapatan sa tungkulin ang mga sinasabing punong opisyales ng unyon. Ngunit, nang muli silang humarap sa amin matapos ang pagpupulong na naganap sa kung saang yungib ng kadiliman, ay ang mga kasapi na ngayon ang mistulang kanilang kalaban. Hindi po naming mapaniwalaan na kayang tanggapin ng kanilang mga konsyensa na gamitin nila ang kanilang kapangyarihan sa pansarili nilang kapakinabanagan, tulad ng pagkakaloob sa kanilang mga sarili ng taas sa sueldong 10% ng kanilang mas malalaking basic pay, habang may mga kasaping maliit na nga ang basic pay, ay nabigyan lang ng 3% . Ang panglalamang o panggugulang na ito ay labis ang naging pasakit sa mga kasaping nasa mas mabababang posisyon na lubhang naapi sa pagkakataong iyon. Dahil roon ako ay gumawa ng isang tula, alay ko sa mga kaawa-awang inapi ng mga pinunong inaakala nila na mangangalaga ng kanilang karapatan. Heto po ang tula: KATIPUNAN SA BAGONG PANAHON 1 Naalaala mo pa ga, si Andres Bonifacio ? Pilipino taga Tondo, sa Katipunan siya ang Supremo Matatawa ka kung isang tulad nito Ang wikain niya sa mga tao: 2 May tig-isang cedula tayo Ang akin pupunitin ko Punitin rin ninyo ang sa inyo Sa labanang sasabanahin natin Kontra sa mga Kastilang mapang-alipin Eh, maagaw natin ang kaldero ng kanin, Tandaan ninyo ang aking bilin: Sa inyo ang bahaw, sa akin ang bagong saing. Sigawan ang mga katipunero, mabuhay ang Supremo! Sa palakat na usbaw at sirang ulo. 3 Eh, paano naman Supremo ang pang-ulam Siempre pag may kanin dapat may pang-ulam Halimbawa po ay isda, tulad ng galunggong Ang sagot niya ay "Tinatanong pa ba iyan ? Natural akin ang katawan, sa inyo ang ulo, buntot at tiyan." Sigawan ang mga katipunero, mabuhay ang Supremo! Sa tonong sinto-sinto at mukhang naloko. 4 Bakit naman po galunggong, cheap naman po noon. May Kastila ga namang kumakain ng galunggong? Siempre wala kundi makolesterol na litson. Ani ng Supremo, "Aba, eh, madali iyan". Sabay ang kayat ang laway. "Sa akin ang kalamnan at sipsipin ninyo, Ang mga buto-buto at ang pantuhog na kawayan." Sigawan ang mga katipunero, mabuhay ang Supremo! Sa tunog na uto, at parang nagoyo. Antonio L. Buensuceso Jr. 21September2001. FIGURE K.1 FIGURE K.2 CBA NEGOTIATIONS MINUTES OF MEETING SHOULD BE DULY RECORDED FIGURE K.3 Moreover, I reiterated these manifestations and complaint  on Atty. Quiroz disbarment[10] AC-10084, administrative case. As in my previous persuasive appeal, the president, in case you deny the veracity of his observations and continued to preserve the status quo for your own client and personal benefit and interest and relentlessly resumed your corrupt and wicked ways and farther fanned the flames engulfing the remaining pillars of faith the people have in you, then, he may,  as expected resort to the political options of impeachment as  means to catapult reforms in the judicial system as maybe necessary.   In this regard,  you may want to re-evaluate your position regarding the manner you are treating me.  Your Honors, I am showing you four (4) pages documents  3 of which refers to your decision on GR-183273, and 1 page on your decision on AC No. 10084. May I most respectfully offer you this chance to redeem yourselves and show the Filipino people that you are not acting in collusion with Pilipinas Shell Petroleum Corporation, Rico Bersamin, Edward Geus, Atty. Raul Quiroz, Atty. Emiterio Manibog, and Atty. Joy Anne Leong-Pambid to perpetuate the pain and suffering and injustice that you altogether prevailed and casted upon me and my family.   GR-183273 DECISION AC-10084 DECISION Time is on my side. Every ticks file up to my benefit as it amounts to prolonged and sustained pain and injury and suffering, that you deliberately,  with evil motive,  meant and intended against me and my family and convincingly serve as evidence of collusion between you and Shell being having unity of purpose,  through your grave abuse of discretion and deliberate gross inexcusable negligence, to perpetuate the injustice,  pain and suffering to my family and myself which we are are experiencing since 2003 up to the present time. May you be guided by the following: "SEC 200_  Where-ever law ends, tyranny begins, if the law be transgressed to another's harm; and whosoever in authority exceeds the power given him by the law, and makes use of the force he has under his command, to compass that upon the subject, which the law allows not, ceases in that to be a magistrate; and, acting without authority, may be opposed, as any other man, who by force invades the right of another. This is acknowledged in subordinate magistrates. He that hath authority to seize my person in the street, may be opposed as a thief and a robber, if he endeavours to break into my house to execute a writ, notwithstanding that I know he has such a warrant, and such a legal authority, as will impower him to arrest me abroad. And why this should not hold in the highest, as well as in the most inferior magistrate, I would gladly be informed. Is it reasonable, that the eldest brother, because he has the greatest part of his father's estate, should thereby have a right to take away any of his younger brothers portions? or that a rich man, who possessed a whole country, should from thence have a right to seize, when he pleased, the cottage and garden of his poor neighbour? The being rightfully possessed of great power and riches, exceedingly beyond the greatest part of the sons of Adam, is so far from being an excuse, much less a reason, for rapine and oppression, which the endamaging another without authority is, that it is a great aggravation of it: for the exceeding the bounds of authority is no more a right in a great, than in a petty officer; no more justifiable in a king than a constable; but is so much the worse in him, in that he has more trust put in him, has already a much greater share than the rest of his brethren, and is supposed, from the advantages of his education, employment, and counsellors, to be more knowing in the measures of right and wrong."         _ John Locke : Second Treatise of Civil Government,           Chapter xviii : Of  Tyranny May this message serves as the 31ST PERSUASIVE APPEAL for you to reconsider your position with respect to your appreciation of cases GR-183273 and AC-10084 and institute through your own volition disciplinary actions against erring guardians of law in relation to the cases mentioned as preliminary to showing convincing evidences proving that the court is not acting in collusion with Pilipinas Shell Petroleum Corporation,  its officers and managers its legal counsels, jointly and severally,  to perpetuate pain and suffering and  injustice against me and my family. Otherwise, you all, are in admission of the act of collusion between Shell, her officers and managers, her lawyers and you, having unity of purpose,  to perpetuate injustice, pain and suffering against me and my family, and betrayed the public trust through grave abuse of discretion, evident bad faith and partiality, and guilty as charged. Sincerely, Antonio L. Buensuceso Jr.