Dear Senator Chiz,
Mabuhay po tayo!
Sa pagpapatuloy po ng aking salaysay, ay mangyari pong ilahad ko sa inyo kung ano po ako noong kabataan.
At 9, my age, I was in Grade III. I remembered one of the lessons in Social Studies is how one can show patriotism and love for country. My classmates responded from a simple singing the Philippine National Anthemn, Lupang Hinirang, standing straight with the palm of the right hand over the left portion of the breast; and to the heroic dying for the sake of the country.
But what caught my interest most is the idea about our economy : the transfer of goods and services from sellers and buyers. It was expressed in our lesson as " Patronize our own products." This meant that I should buy products made in the Philippines and by Filipinos themselves.
Impregnated by that idea I promised myself that from then on, I will patronize only Filipino enterprises and products.
On a Sunday not long after the week when patriotism was discussed, my mother, auntie and I went to Batangas City about 7 or 8 kilometers from Bauan to buy some goods. It was expensive in Bauan so, going to Batangas City gave a cheaper option.
We rode a jeepney and it took us some 15 or 20 minutes to get to Batangas City.
When the shopping was over, Auntie and my mother were a bit thirsty,hungry and tired. They decided to have a break in a nearby Chinese looking restaurant which I suggested, we should not (my apologies to my Chinese friends) . I told them we should go to the Filipino restaurant on the side citing lessons I learned from school. However, they insisted of going to the Chinese restaurant leaving me behind.
So, imbued with the idea of patriotism, I moved not to join them and walked my way to Bauan. I traced back the way where we pass through and abled to cruise the highway alone. I reached Bauan all by walking penniless, thirsty, hungry and tired.
I did walk for a cause at age 9.
Till then, Sen. Chiz...
Sincerely,
Antonio L.Buensuceso Jr.
(Petitioner)
Wednesday, September 3, 2008
Monday, September 1, 2008
Thursday, August 28, 2008
Truth Ires Shell Management
Sen. Chiz,
Mabuhay po tayo Sen. Chiz !
As I continue showing causes and motives behind Shell's management anger on me, let me discuss some truths that pained them most.
1. The Perfect Attendance Award Scheme is actually a Shell's management scam.
On this scheme which I called scam, the employee is advised not to avail any of his 15-days sick leave and 5-days personal/emergency leaves to become a Perfect Attendance Awardee. At year end, if the employee failed to comply with the directive will most likely to suffer job stagnation, and he who did will be given Perfect Attendance Award recognition and a G. E. flat iron as a token of appreciation and a promise of promotion but his 15-days sick leave and 5-days personal/emergency leaves shall be forfieted in favor of the Company.
The real cost of these sick, personal/emergency leaves if the employee avail of these leaves is not only 20 days but 50 days because the employee who availed of these 20 days will be paid 20 days. In his absence, another employee will be coming in as his replacement and shall be paid 20 days plus 10 days overtime rate. So, it summed up to 50 days.
In otherwords, an awardee is giving away 50 days worth of labor in exchange for a G.E. flat iron , an Award Certificate and an empty promise of promotion. Shell bludgeoned her employees into this inequity in no less than 30 long years.
Since my first year of employment, I've pleaded for sanity, fairness and justice be instituted in the system, and all throughout my years of employment and until the couple of years before I was terminated, I made a pledge not to have my hair cut until management would at at least give sanity to the Perfect Attendance Award Scheme. However, management wanted inequity preserved on her favor and opted to expel me out of the system.
2. The Collective Bargaining Agreement concluded before I was terminated is peppered with controversies and irregularities. I was pursuing, among others, the truth behind the missing minutes of 3 negotiation meetings wherein the economic provision of the CBA is discussed. The reason why the requirement of 2 union member (not an officer) to act as witnesses to the proceeding was waived. They conducted these discussions seemingly under the cover of darkness.
My inquiries continued as what are the underlying circumstances how the two key union officers received a company sponsored trip to Singapore and then to Thailand immediately after the conclusion of the contoversial CBA. Contriversies doubled further when the whole set of union officers were called to a sumptous party in a 5-star hotel in Makati few days after the closure of the CBA. As informations and evidences were being unearthed one by one perpetrators fear truth be gradually exposed further and suffer culpability. Thus, sought to stop the inquiry in any means available to them. They chose to boot me out of the refinery.
Till then Sen. Chiz ....
Sincerely yours,
Antonio L. Buensuceso
(Petitioner)
Mabuhay po tayo Sen. Chiz !
As I continue showing causes and motives behind Shell's management anger on me, let me discuss some truths that pained them most.
1. The Perfect Attendance Award Scheme is actually a Shell's management scam.
On this scheme which I called scam, the employee is advised not to avail any of his 15-days sick leave and 5-days personal/emergency leaves to become a Perfect Attendance Awardee. At year end, if the employee failed to comply with the directive will most likely to suffer job stagnation, and he who did will be given Perfect Attendance Award recognition and a G. E. flat iron as a token of appreciation and a promise of promotion but his 15-days sick leave and 5-days personal/emergency leaves shall be forfieted in favor of the Company.
The real cost of these sick, personal/emergency leaves if the employee avail of these leaves is not only 20 days but 50 days because the employee who availed of these 20 days will be paid 20 days. In his absence, another employee will be coming in as his replacement and shall be paid 20 days plus 10 days overtime rate. So, it summed up to 50 days.
In otherwords, an awardee is giving away 50 days worth of labor in exchange for a G.E. flat iron , an Award Certificate and an empty promise of promotion. Shell bludgeoned her employees into this inequity in no less than 30 long years.
Since my first year of employment, I've pleaded for sanity, fairness and justice be instituted in the system, and all throughout my years of employment and until the couple of years before I was terminated, I made a pledge not to have my hair cut until management would at at least give sanity to the Perfect Attendance Award Scheme. However, management wanted inequity preserved on her favor and opted to expel me out of the system.
2. The Collective Bargaining Agreement concluded before I was terminated is peppered with controversies and irregularities. I was pursuing, among others, the truth behind the missing minutes of 3 negotiation meetings wherein the economic provision of the CBA is discussed. The reason why the requirement of 2 union member (not an officer) to act as witnesses to the proceeding was waived. They conducted these discussions seemingly under the cover of darkness.
My inquiries continued as what are the underlying circumstances how the two key union officers received a company sponsored trip to Singapore and then to Thailand immediately after the conclusion of the contoversial CBA. Contriversies doubled further when the whole set of union officers were called to a sumptous party in a 5-star hotel in Makati few days after the closure of the CBA. As informations and evidences were being unearthed one by one perpetrators fear truth be gradually exposed further and suffer culpability. Thus, sought to stop the inquiry in any means available to them. They chose to boot me out of the refinery.
Till then Sen. Chiz ....
Sincerely yours,
Antonio L. Buensuceso
(Petitioner)
Wednesday, August 20, 2008
Personal Grudges Against Me Exposed
Dear Sen. Chiz Escudero,
Mabuhay po tayo !
Eto po ay ang patuloy kong pagpapaliwanag ng aking kaso laban sa Shell na nasa Korte Suprema na sa kasalukuyan : GR No. 183273 Antonio Buensuceso vs. Pilipinas Shell Petroleum Corporation / Rico Bersamin .
This all stemmed from the personal grudges against me of my employer as manifested by his consequential acts or ommissions on the following incidents:
Management even extend his grudges down to my son.
1. My son, a Shell scholar from high school to college (scholarship granted after passing competetive examinations) . He graduated from DLSU, Taft Ave. Manila and not was not recognized by Shell management nor given at least a word of congratulations when he got first place in the April 2002 Electronics and Communications Engineering Board Exams. The Bauan Municipal Council had conducted a torch parade for him and it was a day of celebration of the "common folks" in the refinery but Shell management acted as if they did not know about it.
Likewise what Management did to my relative.
2. Withdrawal of payment of Performance Related Bonus to Ritchie Coronel, a resignee and had moved to the USA. His pay for his PRB was already in the payroll but when I was about to receive that payment on his behalf, management witheld the payment upon knowing that Ritchie Coronel is my relative.
Deliberate denial of my right to due process.
3. At the last Collective Bargaining Agreement before I was terminated, I learned that the maximum rate of increase was given to employees of a certain department on account of their long 16 years of service, not on account of their position which is supposed to be of a lesser rate. Nevertheless, they were given the maximum rate of increase, 10%. So, just like them I should be given the maximum rate of increase on account of my even longer years of service, 24 years. Employees on that department are actually on the same wage level structure as myself, thus, I believed that the same treatment should be applied to me.
I filed a petition for wage adjustment invoking the same principle applied to the mentioned department but my petition was never given a chance to be heard and was deliberately ignored inspite of my persistent follow-up by the management in collusion with other members of the Labor Management Council on that time. Hence, my right to due process is deliberately denied.
Management imputed upon me worst humiliation in my life.
4. With the help of management supervisors, who have no choice but to follow management instructions, management impugned upon my person the gravest humiliation in my life wherein they rated me the poorest work performer among all 130 operators. I was humiliated in the face of my colleages, friends and family and the whole wide world who happened to read about the "ranking" documents that they have made published. With that stigma they maliciously attached to my reputation, how could I find another gainful employment using the same job experience. Management knew fully well that I can not defend myself in that ranking process because if I did defend myself it would mean participation in the ranking exercise and thereby giving the redundancy program the cloak of legality which they want me to unwiitingly admit. So, I declined to participate. But I contested that the redundancy program is illegal and since the ranking exercise is brought about by an illegal endeavor, ergo, it is illegal as well.
These acts and ommissions, among others, by the management clearly showed personal ill-will motives against me, extended down to my son and relative. These incidents devastatingly annihiliated me as a person, and a worker. Please, Sen. Chiz, help me....
Sincerely yours,
Antonio L. Buensuceso Jr.
(Petitioner)
Mabuhay po tayo !
Eto po ay ang patuloy kong pagpapaliwanag ng aking kaso laban sa Shell na nasa Korte Suprema na sa kasalukuyan : GR No. 183273 Antonio Buensuceso vs. Pilipinas Shell Petroleum Corporation / Rico Bersamin .
This all stemmed from the personal grudges against me of my employer as manifested by his consequential acts or ommissions on the following incidents:
Management even extend his grudges down to my son.
1. My son, a Shell scholar from high school to college (scholarship granted after passing competetive examinations) . He graduated from DLSU, Taft Ave. Manila and not was not recognized by Shell management nor given at least a word of congratulations when he got first place in the April 2002 Electronics and Communications Engineering Board Exams. The Bauan Municipal Council had conducted a torch parade for him and it was a day of celebration of the "common folks" in the refinery but Shell management acted as if they did not know about it.
Likewise what Management did to my relative.
2. Withdrawal of payment of Performance Related Bonus to Ritchie Coronel, a resignee and had moved to the USA. His pay for his PRB was already in the payroll but when I was about to receive that payment on his behalf, management witheld the payment upon knowing that Ritchie Coronel is my relative.
Deliberate denial of my right to due process.
3. At the last Collective Bargaining Agreement before I was terminated, I learned that the maximum rate of increase was given to employees of a certain department on account of their long 16 years of service, not on account of their position which is supposed to be of a lesser rate. Nevertheless, they were given the maximum rate of increase, 10%. So, just like them I should be given the maximum rate of increase on account of my even longer years of service, 24 years. Employees on that department are actually on the same wage level structure as myself, thus, I believed that the same treatment should be applied to me.
I filed a petition for wage adjustment invoking the same principle applied to the mentioned department but my petition was never given a chance to be heard and was deliberately ignored inspite of my persistent follow-up by the management in collusion with other members of the Labor Management Council on that time. Hence, my right to due process is deliberately denied.
Management imputed upon me worst humiliation in my life.
4. With the help of management supervisors, who have no choice but to follow management instructions, management impugned upon my person the gravest humiliation in my life wherein they rated me the poorest work performer among all 130 operators. I was humiliated in the face of my colleages, friends and family and the whole wide world who happened to read about the "ranking" documents that they have made published. With that stigma they maliciously attached to my reputation, how could I find another gainful employment using the same job experience. Management knew fully well that I can not defend myself in that ranking process because if I did defend myself it would mean participation in the ranking exercise and thereby giving the redundancy program the cloak of legality which they want me to unwiitingly admit. So, I declined to participate. But I contested that the redundancy program is illegal and since the ranking exercise is brought about by an illegal endeavor, ergo, it is illegal as well.
These acts and ommissions, among others, by the management clearly showed personal ill-will motives against me, extended down to my son and relative. These incidents devastatingly annihiliated me as a person, and a worker. Please, Sen. Chiz, help me....
Sincerely yours,
Antonio L. Buensuceso Jr.
(Petitioner)
Friday, April 11, 2008
Thursday, April 10, 2008
MAUGHAN CLAIMS TO BE THE AGENCY ADMINISTRATOR
June 21, 2013
Mr. James Maughan
Assistant Deputy Director
Division of Financial Assistance
Phone: 916-341-5694
Email: jmaughan@waterboards.
Mail address: 1001 I Street, 16th Floor, Sacramento, CA 95814
SUBJECT : TWO PERSONS CLAIMING TO BE YOUR (Ms. Debbie Zuccala's)
MANAGER.... VERY CONFUSING
Fact finding and information gathering being pursued by way of
an appeal under the Freedom
Dear Mr. James Maughan,
Good morning.
May I respectfully reiterate that I am requesting from you that you may please furnish me with
the name of the Agency Administrator of the California Water Resources Control Board,
If really you are as you declared, then please state in unequivocal terms that you are the
Agency Administrator of the California State Water Resources Board and not just
Agency Administrator as you have written.
As I saw it from the title of your position, you are connected to just a division, to wit:
Division of Financial Assistance and obviously not the State Water Resources Control Board.
Now, please show proof that you are the Agency Administrator of the California Water
Resources Control Board, otherwise, you have done grave misrepresentation, dishonesty and
usurpation of authority committed against my person and interest.
Again, with regards to the phone, please see my application where I filled in "none" for phone
to contact me with.
Please respond in ten (10) days.
Thank you very much.
Yours faithfully,
Antonio L. Buensuceso
Wednesday, April 9, 2008
MAUGHAN COMES AS COOPER HIDES
MAUGHAN COMES AS COOPER HIDES
June 20, 2013
James Maughan
Assistant Deputy Director of Division of Financial Assistance
SUBJECT :TWO PERSONS CLAIMING TO BE YOUR (Ms. Debbie Zuccala's)
MANAGER.... VERY CONFUSING
Fact finding and information gathering being pursued by way of
an appeal under the Freedom
Dear Mr. James Maughan,
Good morning.
With all due respect, may I call your attention to the fact that the e-mail dated June 13, 2012
which you are referring to as an e-mail dated June 12, 2013 is addressed to Mr. Andrew Cooper.
In either case, both e-mails, one dated June 12, 2013 and one dated June 13, 2013 are two
separate existing e-mails addressed to Mr.Andrew Cooper and not to you. With this act,of
replying to communications not addressed to you, may I inform you, with all humility and
respect, that your act constituted two counts of discourtesy, first, to the public on part of my
person and second count of discourtesy you have committed against Mr. Andrew Cooper for
meddling with his e-mail.I have not received any endorsement notice from Mr. Andrew Cooper
naming you as the person to respond in his behalf with respect to those two e-mails.
Your act plunged me deeper into confusion, stress and pain. You know, your employees,
namely certain Ms. Debbie Zuccala, certain Ms. Anna Hernandez, certain Mr. Wes Wilkinson,
certain Ms. Christine Gordon, and Mr. Andrew Cooper all did me wrong, then went into hiding.
Then, someone else just popped out from nowhere, and hurt me just as what you are doing.
With regards to the phone, please see that I wrote" none " for phone in my application form.
Now, may you please furnish me with the name of the Agency Administrator of the California State
Water Resources Control Board. I wanted to write and report to him/her the suffering and injury
that his/her employees, namely, certain Mr. Wes Wiikinson, certain Ms. Christine Gordon,
certain Ms. Anna Hernandez and certain Ms. Debbie Zuccala and certain Mr. Andrew Cooper,
and you Mr. James Maughan have made to my person, so that disciplinary actions and reforms
could be instituted by him/her, purposely for better service and sterling performance of the
California State Water Resources Control Board.
Please respond in ten (10 ) days.
Thank you very much.
Yours faithfully,
Antonio L. Buensuceso Jr.
The TRUTH will set you FREE.
.jpg)
Tuesday, April 8, 2008
CONTINUING FACT FINDING REQUEST
June 13, 2013
Antonio L. Buensuceso Jr.
Andrew Cooper
State Water Resources Control Board
Division of Financial Assistance
Office Technician
Phone: 916-341-5844
Manager....VERY CONFUSING
Fact finding and information gathering being pursued by way of
an appeal under the Freedom
Dear Mr. Andrew Cooper,
Good morning.
May you please furnish me with the name of the Agency Administrator of the California State
Water Resources Control Board. I wanted to write and report to him/her the suffering and injury
that his/her employees, namely, certain Mr. Wes Wilkinson, certain Ms. Christine Gordon,
certain Ms. Anna Hernandez and certain Ms. Debbie Zuccala and you Mr. Andrew Cooper,
have made to my person, so that disciplinary actions and reforms could be instituted by him/her,
purposely for better service and sterling performance of the California State Water Resources
Control Board.
Please respond in ten(10) days.
Thank you very much.
Yours faithfully,
The TRUTH will set you FREE.
Monday, April 7, 2008
COOPER FAILED TO NAME THE CSWRCB ADMINISTRATOR
 | antonio jr. Buensuceso |
| Public Records Act Receipt Letter |
The TRUTH will set you FREE.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
SYNDICATED ESTAFA
MY QUEST FOR SWINDLED
RETIREMENT PAY BY SHELL
 
SWINDLING ITO, SYNDICATED ESTAFA
HOT PURSUIT
DUTY OF LAW ENFORCEMENT ENTITIES
SHELL SWINDLING OF RETIREMENT PAY 5TH YEAR
|
