SEVENTH PERSUASIVE APPEAL FOR MR. MAUGHAN

Sunday, April 20, 2014

SEVENTH PERSUASIVE APPEAL, NOWHERE TO RUN

Mr. James Maughan

Assistant Deputy Director

Division of Financial Assistance

Phone: 916-341-5694

Email: jmaughan@waterboards.ca.gov

Mail address:  1001 I Street, 16th Floor

Sacramento, CA 95814

Dear Mr. James Maughan,

I am sending this letter to you today April 20, 2014 as a matter of 

SEVENTH PERSUASIVE APPEAL. I have not received any response 

from you, since January 30, 2014 despite SIX (6) PERSUASIVE APPEALS

for you to respond. Also,  I respectfully asked you to please seek a permission 

from Mr. Tom Howard for him to allow you to send me an e-mail address

to where I could write him to but likewise, I have not receive any

response from you.  Please grab the seventh chance to redeem yourself.
Think it over, sooner or later, someone will be blowing the whistle to 
free herself out of this controversy.

Again, my plea remain;  please send me back the "original" ERES educational

records credentials with the signatures of the three of you (Maughan,

Wilkinson and Hernandez) as soon as you can or send me an e-mail address
for me to communicate with Mr Tom Howard.

I made the PERSUASIVE APPEAL SIXTH TIME DATED March 15, 2014

as part of this letter and I have it printed below.

Thank you very much.

Yours faithfully,

 Antonio L. Buensuceso Jr.

SIXTH PERSUASIVE APPEAL FOR MR JAMES MAUGHAN

SIMILAR COPY HERE

Mr. James Maughan

Assistant Deputy Director

Division of Financial Assistance

Phone: 916-341-5694

Email: jmaughan@waterboards.ca.gov

Mail address:  1001 I Street, 16th Floor

Sacramento, CA 95814

Dear Mr. James Maughan,

I am sending this letter to you today March 30, 2014 as a matter of 

SIXTH PERSUASIVE APPEAL. I have not received any response 

from you, since January 30, 2014 despite FIVE (5) PERSUASIVE APPEALS

for you to respond. Also,  I respectfully asked you to please seek a permission 

from Mr. Tom Howard for him to allow you to send me an e-mail address

to where I could write him to but likewise, I have not receive any

response from you.  Please grab the sixth chance to redeem yourself.

Again, my plea remain;  please send me back the "original" ERES educational

records credentials with the signatures of the three of you (Maughan,

Wilkinson and Hernandez) as soon as you can or send me an e-mail address
for me to communicate with Mr Tom Howard.

I made the PERSUASIVE APPEAL FIFTH TIME DATED March 15, 2014

as part of this letter and I have it printed below.

Thank you very much.

Yours faithfully,

 Antonio L. Buensuceso Jr.

FIFTH PERSUASIVE APPEAL FOR MR JAMES MAUGHAN
(Please click to see the e-mail copy.)

FIFTH PERSUASIVE APPEAL Saturday,  March 15,  2014

FOURTH PERSUASIVE APPEAL 

(Please click to see the e-mail copy.)

dated Sunday, March 2, 2014

   

PERSUASIVE APPEAL THIRD TIME 

(Please click to see the e-mail copy)

dated February 23, 2014

The TRUTH will set you FREE.

JOHN DONOVAN APRIL 20, 2014 ARTICLES

Royal Dutch Shell CEO Ben van Beurden Bows to Putin

Apr 20th, 2014

by John Donovan. 

No comments yet

Shell’s Ben van Beurden bows to Putin: Good Friday, 18 April 2014

For ever a 100 years, Shell has been driven by unscrupulous greed as its sole motivator. Shell funded Hitler and the Nazis party and has subsequently done business with a string of evil regimes, including General Sani Abacha, Gaddafi, Saddam Hussein and the Mad Mullahs of Iran. Putin is but the latest  power mad egomaniac to be treated like royalty by Shell. Bowed to and fawned over on Good Friday by the overpaid bootlicker, Ben van Beurden. 

Sunday, 20 April 2014

By John Donovan

The New York Times newspaper published an article today under the headline: In Cold War Echo, Obama Strategy Writes Off Putin

Extract:

Just as the United States resolved in the aftermath of World War II to counter the Soviet Union and its global ambitions, Mr. Obama is focused on isolating President Vladimir V. Putin’s Russia by cutting off its economic and political ties to the outside world, limiting its expansionist ambitions in its own neighborhood and effectively making it a pariah state.

Extract ends

The article goes on to claim that Mr. Obama’s aides believe his actions “have sent a message to international businesses, and that just the threat of broader measures has produced a chilling effect.”

The actions of Royal Dutch Shell PLC – the biggest business on the planet in terms of revenue generated, provide proof that the message is being treated with contempt, just as the oil giant did with U.S. sanctions imposed on Iran.

Shell is not interested in morals, ethics, human rights, the safety of it employees, the public, or any other consideration, except money.

For over a 100 years, Shell has been driven by unscrupulous greed as its sole motivator.

Shell funded Hitler and the Nazi party, and has subsequently done business with a string of evil regimes, including General Sani Abacha, Gaddafi, Saddam Hussein and the Mad Mullahs of Iran.Putin is but the latest  power mad egomaniac to be treated like royalty by Shell. Bowed to and fawned over on Good Friday by the overpaid bootlicker, Ben van Beurden. 

In June 2001, the claim by President George W Bush that he had looked Putin in the eye and “was able to get a sense of his soul” was greeted with bemusement given the sinister pedigree of Putin as a KGB Colonel. To be fair, this was long before the polonium fueled assassination in London, the annexation of Crimea and the recent estimates that as a result of being the leader of perhaps the most corrupt regime in history, Putin has amassed a $40 billion dollar personal fortune.

None of this matters to Shell. Basically, the company is willing to deal with the devil if that is what it takes to generate multiple million dollar financial packages for its fat cat executive directors, irrespective of their performance, honesty and all moral considerations.

RELATED:

Is Vladimir Putin Another Adolf Hitler?: Forbes Magazine 16 April 2014

Share this:

• Facebook2
• Twitter1
• Email
• Print

Like this:

Posted in: Adolf Hitler, Ben van Beurden, Business Principles, Gas, Gazprom,GoogleNews, Human Rights, Iran, John Donovan, Libya, Nigeria, Oil, Royal Dutch Shell Nazi Secrets, Royal Dutch Shell Plc, Russia, Sakhalin II, Shell Employee Safety, United States.
Tagged: Gas · Gazprom · Nigeria · Oil · President Bush · President Obama · President Putin · Royal Dutch Shell Plc · Russia

Royal Dutch Shell Fooling About With Numbers

Apr 20th, 2014

by John Donovan. 

No comments yet

So a 5 minute look inside the reported numbers paints a different picture, certainly a clearer picture and a picture that despite the hot air,  from a risk analysis viewpoint clarifies that there has been no significant reduction in risk despite the credit being taken by the industry and the Regulator.

ARTICLE BY BILL CAMPBELL (RIGHT), RETIRED SHELL INTERNATIONAL HSE GROUP AUDITOR

Fooling about with numbers.

As a shareholder I received a letter from Shell UK Country Chairman recently.  Under Health and Safety he takes credit for an important milestone achieved in April 2013 when he states our upstream business in the North Sea achieved an important milestone in a 50 per cent reduction in the number of hydrocarbon releases over the last three years in line with the industry commitment made in 2009.  In 2008 there were 83 major and significant releases and this reduced to 72 in 2009.  The Energy Minister and the HSE pronounced this at the time as a significant reduction but actually it only reduced mean time between releases from circa every 4 days to circa every 5 days, hardly a significant reduction. From formal risk analysis a significant risk reduction could only be claimed by an order of magnitude reduction that is from 83 to 8.  However, the politics of any reduction is to blow your trumpet whether the reduction is actually reducing risk or not.

However back to the recent letter from the Chairman. What we are not made aware of is what Shell’s contribution to the 50 per cent reduction was.  That aside, the 2012/13 figures listed 46 major and significant releases or mean time between releases circa every 8 days and as I have attempted to hammer home, over and over, that any one of these releases has the potential, are likely, to cause a major accident event.  Also not covered in the numbers is that 9 releases of the 46 were defined as major up from three the previous year or the largest number of major releases recorded in the last 14 years.

So a 5 minute look inside the reported numbers paints a different picture, certainly a clearer picture and a picture that despite the hot air,  from a risk analysis viewpoint clarifies that there has been no significant reduction in risk despite the credit being taken by the industry and the Regulator.  Certainly a reduction is always better than an increase but we only need one of these releases to ignite, perhaps it will be the next one, so the North Sea has still got a long way to go.

When fooling around with numbers you can communicate to the man in the street a false sense of the realty of the situation when or if it is in your vested self interest so to do.

Bill Campbell

Share this:

• Facebook1
• Twitter
• Email
• Print

Like this:

Posted in: Bill Campbell, Environment, GoogleNews, Oil, Royal Dutch Shell Plc.
Tagged: North Sea Oil · Royal Dutch Shell Plc

The TRUTH will set you FREE.

JOHN DONOVAN APRIL 19, 2014 ARTICLES

Royal Dutch Shell bets on LNG, on an epic scale

Apr 19th, 2014 

by John Donovan. 

No comments yet

By John Donovan

The comments below are from a Motley Fool article that draws attention to the fact that Shell’s Prelude FLNG project represents a bet “on an epic scale.”  The author is right. The project is an uninsured, uninsurable risk, which like Shell’s Alaskan ambitions, could potentially destroy Shell. 

As to the likelihood of the project being “on schedule and on budget,” we know Shell’s atrocious “misfires” track record on that score e.g. the Corrib Gas project in Ireland: 13 years behind schedule and four times over budget. And “Cash All Gone” (Kashagan), another white elephant.

Perhaps if Shell has managed to obtain any contingency risk insurance for Prelude, it will kindly let me know.

Extract from an article by Adam Galas published 18 April 2014 by The Motley Fool under the headline: “Why Dividend Growth Investors Should Avoid Royal Dutch Shell and Total”

Royal Dutch Shell is attempting to forge a comeback after several years of misfires. An example of this was the $5 billion spent at Beaufort, Alaska. After eight years (with no oil production), the company abandoned the project. Now a new CEO, Ben van Beurden, is at the helm and determined to steer a better course. 

The company is planning on selling $15 billion in assets between 2014-2015 and focusing on LNG exports and offshore drilling. This includes the construction of the largest ship in history, thePrelude, to act as a floating LNG liquefaction and tanker loading terminal. The estimated cost is 20% lower than land-based LNG export facilities, assuming the project can be accomplished on schedule and on budget.

FULL ARTICLE

Share this:

• Facebook1
• Twitter2
• Email
• Print

Like this:

Posted in: Alaska, Arctic, Corrib Gas Project, Gas, GoogleNews, Ireland, John Donovan,LNG, Prelude FLNG Project, Royal Dutch Shell Plc, Shell Employee Safety, Shell Project Delays, Shell Project Overruns.
Tagged: Corrib Gas Project · Gas · Ireland · John Donovan · Kashagan · Royal Dutch Shell Plc

The TRUTH will set you FREE.