shell tabangao refinery life

Wednesday, June 17, 2015

Shell-led B.C. LNG project nears environmental approval

Jun 17th, 2015

BRENT JANG: KITIMAT, B.C. — The Globe and Mail: Published Tuesday, Jun. 16, 2015: Last updated Wednesday, Jun. 17, 2015

Shell and BG Group PLC announced plans in April to merge, sparking speculation that the combined entity will focus on Kitimat while placing BG’s Prince Rupert LNG project on the back burner.

A liquefied natural gas consortium led by Royal Dutch Shell PLC is expected to receive B.C. environmental approval within days as the group positions itself to be one of the first LNG exporters in the province.

LNG Canada’s plans to export from Kitimat are being reviewed by two B.C. cabinet ministers, who are slated to announce by Monday whether they will grant a provincial environmental assessment certificate.

LNG Canada, backed by Shell and three Asian partners, submitted its environmental assessment application last November to the provincial regulator. The B.C. Environmental Assessment Office referred the file in early May to Natural Gas Development Minister Rich Coleman and Environment Minister Mary Polak.

The TRUTH will set you FREE.

Shell-BG $70 billion deal crosses key milestone with U.S. clearance

Jun 17th, 2015

by John Donovan.

No comments yet

Shell-BG $70 billion deal crosses key milestone with U.S. clearance

LONDON | BY RON BOUSSO: Tuesday Jun 16, 2015

U.S. regulators have given the green light for Royal Dutch Shell’s (RDSa.L) proposed $70 billion acquisition of British rival BG Group (BG.L), the first clearance for the biggest deal in the energy sector in over a decade.

The two companies said on Tuesday the United States Federal Trade Commission (FTC) had cleared the deal.

The deal, which the companies aim to complete by early 2016, will require further regulatory clearances from all the countries BG operates in, including the European Union, China, Australia and Brazil.

Posted in: Ben van Beurden, BG Group, Bidness Etc, Gas, Reuters, Royal Dutch Shell Plc,Shell.
Tagged: Ben van Beurden · BG Group · Royal Dutch Shell Plc · Shell

The TRUTH will set you FREE.

As Shell moves toward Arctic, industry decries regulations

Jun 17th, 2015

by John Donovan.

No comments yet

Article by Jennifer A. Dlouhy published June 16, 2015 by The Houston Chronicle

As Shell moves toward Arctic, industry decries regulations

Industry leaders and allies in Congress say red tape will discourage Arctic exploration

WASHINGTON – Even as Shell Oil Co. gets closer to drilling new exploratory wells in Alaska’s Chukchi Sea, industry leaders and their congressional allies are insisting that the Obama administration’s planned Arctic drilling standards are so onerous and costly they will discourage others from following suit.

“Is the proposed rule intended to make exploration so expensive that it is not financially feasible to explore in our Arctic?” asked former Alaska state Sen. Drue Pearce, who headed the state Senate’s oil and gas committee. “If we want to have development in the Arctic as the president has called for, then we need to have standards that are economically feasible to allow them to go forward.”

Posted in: Alaska, Arctic, BP, Chukchi Sea, Climate Change, Environment, Gas, Gulf of Mexico, Houston Chronicle, Oil Spill, Royal Dutch Shell Plc, Shell.
Tagged: Alaska · Arctic Ocean · BP · Chukchi Sea · Gas · Oil · Royal Dutch Shell Plc ·Shell

The TRUTH will set you FREE.

Shell-BG deal gets U.S. antitrust OK

Jun 17th, 2015

by John Donovan.

No comments yet

Article by Jordan Blum published June 16, 2015 by The Houston Chronicle

Shell-BG deal gets U.S. antitrust OK

Federal Trade Commission decides to waive antitrust waiting period; other nations plan to examine deal

Photo: Christophe Morin /GT

Royal Dutch Shell said Tuesday that its planned $70 billion acquisition of British gas giant BG Group has cleared its only hurdle with U.S. regulators.

The deal awaits scrutiny by other nations, but the Federal Trade Commission’s decision to waive an initial antitrust period was the only U.S. action required and the deal is still on track to close in early 2016, Shell said.

Shell CEO Ben van Beurden said Tuesday in a prepared statement that the early termination of the waiting period is a “clear demonstration of the good progress” being made.

Posted in: Ben van Beurden, BG Group, Gas, Houston Chronicle, LNG, Royal Dutch Shell Plc, United States.
Tagged: Ben van Beurden · BG Group · Gas · LNG · Royal Dutch Shell Plc · Shell

The TRUTH will set you FREE.

Lessons from the Santa Barbara Oil Spill

Donate | Send to a Friend | View in Browser

Dear Friend,

Sea lion pup behind door of animal crate

Rescued oiled sea lion pup June 7, 2015 (credit: USFWS)

Nearly a month has passed since that sunny Tuesday morning when a Santa Barbara County woman smelled a strong, oily odor and called the fire department. That odor, it turned out, was the first sign that something was going terribly wrong with an oil pipeline located on land, but running dangerously close to a culvert that empties onto a popular state beach.
By the time the leaking pipeline was shut down, about 101,000 gallons of crude oil—or roughly 2,400 barrels—had spilled from the broken pipe. Most soaked into the soil, but a crucial 21,000 gallons spilled into the culvert. In what seemed like no time, Refugio State Beach was covered in oil and soon after, an oil slick spread until nine miles of coastline and two state beaches were closed to the public.
I first heard about the spill from a colleague via an instant chat feature on my email account. For a split second, I thought it was a joke. Then, as the realization set in that this was real, my mind shifted back to very, very distant memories of watching newscasts of oiled birds and beaches during the 1969 spill in that same area.
Now, a month after the new Santa Barbara spill, the two state beaches in the northern part of the county remain closed and crews continue to scrape oil from rocks and sand. The body count for wildlife comes to 161 dead birds and 87 dead marine mammals. That's probably a fraction of the birds and mammals harmed, given that many affected in spills fly or swim elsewhere to die. Also, this number doesn't include fish and other sea creatures and plants that make up the rich ecosystem.
The price tag to the pipeline owner for cleanup so far is at least $62 million. That figure doesn't include the costs to the local economy from hotel cancellations and lost tourism. And it doesn't include long-term environmental and public health costs.
Initial results of a federal investigation into the causes of the spill show that the burst pipeline had significant erosion. Notably, there was no automatic shutoff valve or electronic alarm system, which could have helped reduce the amount of oil spilled. And as the press has reported, the pipeline owner, Plains All American, has been in hot water before for pipeline operation and maintenance violations around the country, including some that resulted in other serious spills.
All of this suggests that some of the warnings activists—including our very dedicated Club members—have sounded over the years bear repeating again and again:

There is no such thing as a safe way to transport oil. In 2015 alone, we've seen oil trains derail and explode in Illinois and West Virginia, even as oil companies file for permits to begin transporting huge quantities of oil by rail from other states to seaports in California. We've seen significant pipeline spills on land in urban areas (Atwater Village in Los Angeles County in February) and rural areas (Glendive, Montana, in January) and the spill in Santa Barbara that fouled the ocean.
We can't win against climate change and remain dependent on oil. Currently, nationwide about 27 percent of the main climate pollutant—carbon dioxide—is produced by transportation engines that depend on petroleum products. In California, transportation fueled mostly by petroleum products accounts for 37 percent of our greenhouse gas emissions. To beat climate change, we need to keep the oil in the ground, not enable extreme extraction methods (e.g. fracking) that promote even greater oil dependence.
It isn't enough to rely on decreasing demand to end our oil dependence. Of course we want and need cleaner cars and trucks and long-distance travel modes that don't rely on petroleum products. We applaud everyone who is working to transition transportation away from gasoline and diesel fuels. But even if we manage to end demand for oil in California, oil companies will keep drilling in California and transporting oil from here and through here to send to other places unless we have policies that make it unattractive to do so. That means we have to address supply, too, not just demand.

The legislature and the governor have some opportunities between now and early September to demonstrate that they've learned something from the Santa Barbara spill.
First, they can make sure Senate Bill 788 by Senator Mike McGuire gets through the Assembly and is signed into law. That bill would close a staggering legal loophole that allows oil drilling in offshore areas if the drilling is done from a site located on federal land (that is, through horizontal drilling rigs). The loophole would allow drilling in a biologically rich marine area off of Santa Barbara County, called Tranquillon Ridge. A similar bill failed in the Assembly last year, thanks to heavy pressure by the oil industry. (If you'd like to show your support for this bill to protect the coast, sign the petition here.)
Second, they can pass and sign into law two new bills that will improve oil spill response (Senate Bill 414 by Senator Hannah-Beth Jackson) and make sure any existing pipelines in the state are better maintained and managed (Assembly Bill 864 by Assemblymember Das Williams).
Third, they can pass and sign into law Senate Bill 350 (by Senate President pro Tempore Kevin de Leon), which would, among other things, establish a state goal of reducing oil use in the transportation sector by 50 percent by 2030. Shocking news: The oil industry is opposed to this bill, just as they are to SB 788.
The effects of the recent spill teach us that it's time to close the offshore oil drilling loophole, make sure oil spill response works better, improve management of existing pipelines, and unhook our dependence on oil for transportation. Let's hope it's a lesson that the governor and legislature take to heart.
Sincerely,
Kathryn Phillips

Kathryn Phillips
Director

Sierra Club California is the Sacramento-based legislative and regulatory advocacy arm of the 13 California chapters of the Sierra Club.

Please consider becoming a sustaining donor.