Adolph Reed Jr., and Heather Gautney: As presidential candidate offers bold proposals, supporters mobilize to reclaim higher education as a public good
Paul Ryan—Liar, Hypocrite, Charlatan, and Right-Wing Extremist
Peter Dreier: But in any rational look at the spectrum of American political views, it is hard to imagine attaching the word "moderate" or “moderate conservative” to Ryan on any issue except perhaps his clothing preferences and his haircut.
Adolph Reed Jr., and Heather Gautney: As presidential candidate offers bold proposals, supporters mobilize to reclaim higher education as a public good
Brent Budowsky: The abuse of power and possible violation of House rules by using taxpayer money to misuse a congressional committee to achieve partisan purposes continues today with Clinton’s testimony before the Benghazi Committee.
Making Public Transportation Work for America’s Job Seekers
Nadine Levyfield: Our goal at Jobs to Move America is to keep these tax dollars in the U.S. in order to reinvest this money back into our workforce. We want to make sure our transportation economy is driving in the right direction.
Joe Mathews:Generations of excessive frugality and underinvestment have created various forms of scarcity in public services. The response to that scarcity is a push to conserve, and conservation is expensive.
Goodbye Middle Class: 51 Percent Of All American Workers Make Less Than 30,000 Dollars A Year
By Michael Snyder, on October 20th, 2015
shared from
We just got more evidence that the middle class in America is dying. According to brand new numbers that were just released by the Social Security Administration, 51 percent of all workers in the United States make less than $30,000 a year. Let that number sink in for a moment. You can’t support a middle class family in America today on just $2,500 a month – especially after taxes are taken out. And yet more than half of all workers in this country make less than that each month. In order to have a thriving middle class, you have got to have an economy that produces lots of middle class jobs, and that simply is not happening in America today.
You can find the report that the Social Security Administration just releasedright here. The following are some of the numbers that really stood out for me…
-38 percent of all American workers made less than $20,000 last year.
-51 percent of all American workers made less than $30,000 last year.
-62 percent of all American workers made less than $40,000 last year.
-71 percent of all American workers made less than $50,000 last year.
That first number is truly staggering. The federal poverty level for a family of five is $28,410, and yet almost 40 percent of all American workers do not even bring in $20,000 a year.
If you worked a full-time job at $10 an hour all year long with two weeks off, you would make approximately $20,000. This should tell you something about the quality of the jobs that our economy is producing at this point.
And of course the numbers above are only for those that are actually working. As I discussed just recently, there are 7.9 million working age Americans that are “officially unemployed” right now and another 94.7 million working age Americans that are considered to be “not in the labor force”. When you add those two numbers together, you get a grand total of 102.6 million working age Americans that do not have a job right now.
So many people that I know are barely scraping by right now. Many families have to fight tooth and nail just to make it from month to month, and there are lots of Americans that find themselves sinking deeper and deeper into debt.
If you can believe it, about a quarter of the country actually has a negative net worth right now.
What that means is that if you have no debt and you also have ten dollars in your pocket that gives you a greater net worth than about 25 percent of the entire country. The following comes from a recent piece by Simon Black…
Credit Suisse estimates that 25% of Americans are in this situation of having a negative net-worth.
“If you’ve no debts and have $10 in your pocket you have more wealth than 25% of Americans. More than 25% of Americans have collectively that is.”
The thing is– not only did the government create the incentives, but they set the standard.
With a net worth of negative $60 trillion, US citizens are just following dutifully in the government’s footsteps.
As a nation we are flat broke and most of us are living paycheck to paycheck. It has been estimated that it takes approximately $50,000 a year to support a middle class lifestyle for a family of four in the U.S. today, and so the fact that 71 percent of all workers make less than that amount shows how difficult it is for families that try to get by with just a single breadwinner.
Needless to say, a tremendous squeeze has been put on the middle class. In many families, both the husband and the wife are working as hard as they can, but it is still not enough. With each passing day, more Americans are losing their spots in the middle class and this has pushed government dependence to an all-time high. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, 49 percent of all Americans now live in a home that receives money from the government each month.
Sadly, the trends that are destroying the middle class in America just continue to accelerate.
With a huge assist from the Republican leadership in Congress, Barack Obama recently completed negotiations on the Trans-Pacific Partnership. Also known as Obamatrade, this insidious new treaty is going to cover nations that collectively account for 40 percent of global GDP. Just like NAFTA, this treaty will result in the loss of thousands of businesses and millions of good paying American jobs. Let us hope and pray that Congress somehow votes it down.
Another thing that is working against the middle class is the fact that technology is increasingly taking over our jobs. With each passing year, it becomes cheaper and more efficient to have computers, robots and machines do things that humans once did.
Eventually, there will be very few things that humans will be able to do more cheaply and more efficiently than computers, robots and machines. How will most of us make a living when that happens?…
The robopocalypse for workers may be inevitable. In this vision of the future, super-smart machines will best humans in pretty much every task.A few of us will own the machines, a few will work a bit… while the rest will live off a government-provided income…the most common job in most U.S. states probably will no longer be truck driver.
For decades, we have been training our young people to have the goal of “getting a job” once they get out into the real world. But in America today there are not nearly enough good jobs to go around, and this crisis is only going to accelerate as we move into the future.
I do not believe that it is wise to pin your future on a corporation that could replace you with a foreign worker or a machine the moment that it becomes expedient to do so. We need to start thinking differently, because the paradigms that worked in the past are fundamentally breaking down.
So what advice would you give to a young adult today that is looking toward the future?
Columnist published in The Cleveland Plain Dealer, The Baltimore Sun, The Hill, Salon, The Jerusalem Post www.hagoodman.com
shared from
As a lifelong Democrat against perpetual American counterinsurgency wars in the Middle East, the prospect of a hawkish Democrat or Donald Trump as Commander in Chief isn't acceptable to me, especially when America has a candidate for president who says "I'll be damned" if we send more ground troops back to failed wars.
There are many reasons I'm voting for Bernie Sanders over Trump or Clinton, and I explain these reasons in a recent YouTube segment, however Vermont's Senator will win the Democratic nomination because he's the only chance Democrats have in 2016. I highlight why only Bernie Sanders can defeat Donald Trump in my latest YouTube segment, in addition to why Clinton would have a difficult time against the billionaire.
So why is Bernie our only hope in preventing Trump from ever having a catastrophic encounter with Putin?
First, Real Clear Politics states definitively that polls show Bernie Sanders winning by a wider margin than Clinton over Trump:
CNN/ORC 50 45 Clinton +5
FOX News 40 45 Trump +5
PPP (D) 44 44 Tie
NBC News/Wall St. 49 39 Clinton +10
Quinnipiac 45 43 Clinton +2
ABC News/Wash Post 46 43 Clinton +3
While the most favorable poll for both Democrats is the NBC News/Wall St. poll, Sanders beats Trump in this poll by 16 points, as opposed to Clinton's 10 point lead. CNN has Sanders beating Trump by 4 points more than Hillary Clinton and overall, the Democratic-Socialist from Vermont defeats Trump in all the polls by an average of 5.2 points, as opposed to 2.5 points for Clinton.
Most importantly, Democrats need a foil, or the opposite of the New York billionaire, not the former Senator from New York who's proud of once representing Wall Street. A recent POLITICO article titled Trump has spent years courting Hillary and other Dems explains that Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton have a long history with one another:
Clinton, the Democratic front-runner and former New York senator who had some say over policy that could have impacted Trump's vast business dealings, received donations from both him and son Donald Trump Jr. on separate occasions in 2002, 2005, 2006 and 2007, according to state and federal disclosure records.
Trump has also been generous with the Clinton Foundation, donating at least $100,000, according to the non-profit.
...She wasn't the only Democratic beneficiary of Trump's wealth. Trump donated $5,000 to the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee and $20,000 to the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee in the 2006 cycle, effectively buoying the election prospects of Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi, respectively.
Just $1,000 of Trump's money in the 2006 cycle went to the National Republican Senatorial Committee.
The last time Trump considered a White House run in 2011, reporters seized upon the fact that he has given most of his money to Democrats and Democratic causes, according to records.
While Bernie Sanders is the antithesis of the GOP and especially Trump, Clinton has received money from the billionaire. In terms of the Democratic establishment, years ago "reporters seized upon the fact" that Trump gave so much money to Democrats; a fact he could utilize to his advantage by saying he won't accept foreign donations or donations from rival political parties like Clinton.
As for why he gives to all politicians, Trump is quoted by ABC News as saying, "And you know what, when I need something from them two years later, three years later, I call them."
Regarding the ongoing FBI investigation of Hillary Clinton's emails, rest assured that Trump would do his best to discuss the matter during the entire presidential debates if Clinton is the Democratic nominee. There are simply too many political arrows to hurl at Clinton if you're Donald Trump, and unlike a classy and gracious Bernie Sanders, the billionaire would relentlessly attack Clinton's credibility, honesty, trustworthiness, ties to billionaires like himself, and links to Wall Street.
As for Clinton's ties to investment banks and conservative views on Wall Street, the banking community would be happy with either Hillary Clinton or Jeb Bush, according to a Washington Post article titled The long-running (and unchanging) Wall Street primary between Hillary Clinton and Jeb Bush:
A "Republican-leaning Wall Street lawyer said over lunch in midtown" for that article that, "if it turns out to be Jeb versus Hillary we would love that and either outcome would be fine. We could live with either one." The remarks by Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein that either Bush or Clinton would be great -- remarks that Martin O'Malley is doing his current best to make famous and undercut Clinton -- are also referenced. "Those would be two very good choices and we'd be perfectly happy with them," a "person close to Blankfein" told White and Haberman.
The fact that Wall Street isn't frightened by another Clinton presidency ties into negative favorability numbers for Hillary Clinton. According to a recent CNN poll, "57 percent of Americans say she is not honest and trustworthy." Another CNN poll states55% of registered voters have an unfavorable view of Hillary Clinton. As for swing states, July and August Quinnipiac Swing State polls find that swing states have negative favorability of Clinton and voters believe she is "not honest and trustworthy."
In contrast, Donald Trump is the embodiment of the "billionaire class," an arrogant and brash tycoon who thinks for some reason he's qualified to run the country. Against Sanders, Trump would be on the defensive. A recent Real Clear Politics article quotes Bernie Sanders as explaining why people like Donald Trump will be paying their share of taxes under a Sanders presidency:
What we have seen in the last 30 years, as most Americans know, is a massive redistribution of wealth, unfortunately it has gone in the wrong direction. From the middle class and working families to Donald Trump and his friends, the top one tenth of 1%.
Yes, let me be clear, if we are going to make public colleges and universities tuition free, as I believe we have to, in the 21st Century, yeah, we are going to have a tax on Wall Street speculation, yes we are going ask Trump and his billionaire friends to pay more taxes... We'll come up with a rate, but it will be a damn lot higher than it is now.
It's unimaginable that Hillary Clinton would ever speak in such terms, and since Clinton doesn't even want to reinstate Glass-Steagall, only Bernie Sanders offers Democrats a true ideological challenge to the GOP.
Can Bernie Sanders win a general election?
Well, not only can he win a general election, but he beats Donald Trump by a greater margin than Clinton.
Sanders doesn't have the scandals or honesty issues that Trump could pounce upon in a debate, and Bernie matches up nicely with Trump in a general election for numerous other reasons. Ultimately, Donald Trump embodies every single warning of Bernie Sanders pertaining to money in politics and billionaires controlling the fate of our nation.
With Hillary Clinton's FBI email investigation most likely running through Election Day, the only way U.S. nuclear launch codes get anywhere near a President Donald Trump is if the billionaire gets to debate Hillary Clinton on a national stage. Comfortable on screen and in his element, even Trump's nauseating arrogance would allow him to harp endlessly upon Clinton's email issues and prior controversies. In fact, Hillary Clinton might even lose decisively against Trump, primarily because the billionaire donated to her Foundation and the FBI investigation undermines her credibility.
With Bernie Sanders, the New York billionaire is reduced to a caricature of himself, and the personification of everything wrong in politics. Bernie Sanders is the only hope for Democrats against Trump and polls already show the Democratic-Socialist and Democratic candidate winning. In reality, only Bernie Sanders can save Democrats, and most importantly, the United States of America from a reality show in the White House. For this reason, in addition to many other advantages Sanders offers Democrats, the Vermont Senator will win the nomination and eventually the presidency.
SEE BELOW FOR THE 1001STTIME THE REITERATION OF DEMAND PAYMENT OF RETIREMENT PAY WHICH SHELL REFUSED TO HONOR IN THE PRESENCE AND DEEMED APPROVAL OF THE HONORABLE MAGISTRATES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE PHILIPPINES