| ||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
|
| ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
| ||||||
The TRUTH will set you FREE.
Tuesday, December 8, 2015
Donald Trump and the Republican Party’s 2016 Death Spiral
The TRUTH will set you FREE.
It Is Time for Responsible Republicans to Say They Won’t Back a Trump-led GOP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The TRUTH will set you FREE.
Lupita Nyong'o wore a light-up dress programmed by young women, and it was stunning.
Napolcom dismisses 21 of 62 PNP men in Ampatuan massacre, suspends 11 others
 | Napolcom dismisses 21 of 62 PNP men in Ampatuan massacre, suspends 11 othersby harryroque |
After five years of deliberations, the National Police Commission (NAPOLCOM) has finally ordered the dismissal from the police service for grave misconduct of 20 police officers linked to the Nov. 23, 2009 Ampatuan massacre, including the highest ranking police officer in Maguindanao province at the time.
 photo credit |
| https://ryanericsongcanlas.wordpress.com/2009/11/24/justice-for-maguindanao-massacre/ |
At the time, P/Supt Maguid was the acting Maguindanao Provincial Police Director while Chief Insp. Dicay was the Deputy Provincial Director.
The police officers, most of whom were members of the 1508th Provincial Mobile Group under P/Supt. Maguid’s command, were found to have conspired with the Ampatuans in flagging the convoy of civilians, journalists and lawyers on their way to Shariff Aguak to file the certificate of candidacy of Vice Mayor Esmael Toto Mangudadatu. Chief Insp. Dicay himself was found to have given the order to block the convoy and led the checkpoint set up by the 1508th Provincial Mobile Group.
According to the Napolcom, the officers also stood in conspiratorial silence when a huge group of armed men led by Datu Unsay Ampatuan arrived and led away the convoy to a nearby hill on Sitio Masalay, where he and his men gunned down the victims mercilessly.
“All of the members of the 1508th Provincial Mobile Group chose to become silent spectators to a crime unfolding before their eyes. Their inaction manifests complicity and unity of action to those who committed the abduction, and later, the murders,” said the Napolcom in its decision.
Following the Supreme Court’s jurisprudence on the question, the NAPOLCOM defines grave misconduct as “a transgression of some established and definite rule of action, more particularly unlawful behavior or gross negligence of a public officer.” Thus it considers any act or omission constituting a prime punishable under the Revised Penal Code as grave misconduct punishable by dismissal from the service.
The decision was signed by the Napolcom Chair and Interior and Local Government Secretary Mel Senen Sarmiento, and his five commissioners, namely Vice-Chair and Executive Officer Eduardo U. Escueta, Luisito Palmera, Constancia P. De Guzman, Alejandro S. Uro and Ricardo C. Marquez.
The Napolcom said Supt Maguid led “the efforts to hide and conceal the incident from the authorities and to dispose of evidence that might have been left by the group of Datu [Unsay] Andal Jr.”
Another police officer – Insp. Saudi Matabalo Mokamad – was dismissed from the service for serious neglect of duty while 20 others were exonerated of all charges for lack of evidence.
The NAPOLCOM however found that it did not have jurisdiction over nine police officers who had gone AWOL, although it may revive the charges against them “in the event that they will be restored to full duty status.”
“This is the very first time since the massacre six years ago that the victims have received some form of justice,” said lawyers Harry Roque, Romel Bagares and Gilbert Andres, who represented in the proceedings the families of 12 journalists who were among those killed in the worst spate of election violence in the country. “We have one quibble – the NAPOLCOM got the figures wrong – there were 58 victims, and not one victim less and we want to set this on historical record.”
The lawyers referred to the case of Midland Review photojournalist Reynaldo “Bebot” Momay, who remains missing but for a set of his dentures found at the massacre site by a fact-finding mission led by their organization, the Center for International Law (Centerlaw). Roque’s group would eventually get the Department of Justice to file a 58th murder complaint before the Quezon City Regional Trial Court trying the multiple murder charges against perpetrators, led by key members of the powerful Ampatuan clan of Maguindanao.
Roque who is also the first nominee of the party-list Kabayan said that on the whole they “were pleased with the results of the case but would wish to review the Decision, especially in regard to officers who were exonerated as we want to be sure there is a good basis for it.”
The NAPOLCOM’s 23-page decision in the proceedings (NAPOLCOM SD Case No. 2010-1964) only referred to 57 victims.
The administrative proceedings were filed on March 10, 2010 by the lawyer’s clients, namely Zenaida O. Duhay, Juliet Palor Evardo, Ma. Cipriano Gatchalian, Glenna G. Legarda, Arlyn D. Lupogan, Mary Jean M. Merisco, Catherine Nunez, Noemi M. Parcon, Myrna P. Reblando, Ramonita Salaysay, Editha Mirandilla Tiamzon and Erlyn Idalo Umpad.
The NAPOLCOM Decision was dated November 24, 2015 but it was released only yesterday. (For your reference please click here Napolcom Decision Dec2015 .)
All in all 62 , police officers were charged in the administrative proceedings conducted by the NAPOLCOM, which supervises the Philippine National Police. This may be the first time since the Marcos years that entire units of the police had been implicated in a gruesome crime.
The police officers also face multiple murder charges before the Quezon City Regional Trial Court.
Eleven other officers – all members of the 1507th Provincial Mobile Group – were meted out suspensions for 59 days for less grave neglect of duty. They were SP01 Alik Mluk Solano, P02 Kendatu Salem Rakim, P01 Benedick Tentiao Alfonso, P01 Abdurahman Said Batarasa, P01 Marjul Tarulan Julkadi, P01 Datu Jerry Mluk Utto, P01 Mohamad Karim Balading, P01 Marsman Eging Nilong, P01 Abdulmanan Lumbabo Saavedra, P03 Felix Abado Daquilos, and P01 Jimmy Mlah Kadtong.
They were suspended for their failure to report gunfire they heard 30 minutes after the Mangudadatu convoy passed by their checkpoint along the National Highway, Sitio Masalay, Barangay Salman, Ampatuan.
Their superior officer, P/Insp. Mokamad, was found guilty of serious neglect of duty “for failing or refusing to take command in an emergency in order to carry out police duty, being the officer present with the highest rank, grade or position.”
The 1507th Provincial Mobile Group had set up a checkpoint about four kilometers away before that of the 1508th Provincial Mobile Group’s own checkpoint.
Those absolved were P/Supt. Bahnarin Unas Kamaong, P/Supt. Abdulwahid Unas Pedtucasan, P/Senior Insp. Abdulgapor Benasing Abad, SP02 George Sermonia Labayan, SP02 Samad Usman Maguindra, SP01 Oscar Dariua Donato, SP01 Elizer Sarad Rendaje, SP01 Alimola Guinaton Langalen, P03 Gibrael Rojas Alano, P03 Ricky Duya Balanueco, P02 Rexson Diocolano Guiama, P01 Amir Maliwanang Solaiman, P01 Badjun Ibad Panegas, P02 Sandy Diloyodin Sabang, P01 Johann Mansal Draper, P01 Tamano Sahibal Hadi , P01 Ebara Guiamalon Bebot, P01 Pendatun Ambang Dima, P01 Michael Macapeges Macarongon and P01 Abdulbayan Usman Mundas. The non-commissioned officers in this list were members of the 1507th Provincial Mobile Group who were assigned somewhere else at the time of the massacre.
P/Supt Kamong, P/Supt. Ubas and Senior Insp. Abad belonged to the Regional Mobile Group(RMG-ARMM),
Charges against P01 Hernanie Saulong Decipulo Jr were dropped because he died while the proceedings were being conducted.
The NAPOLCOM said it could not proceed with the charges against P02 Tanny Awal Dalgan, P01 Ysmael Nalaunan Baraguir, P01 Abbey Aklad Guiadem, P01 Warden Kusain Legawan, P01 Jonathan Solaiman Engid, P01 Datunot Mangelen Kadir, P01 Joharto Silongan Kamendan, P01 Arnulfo Ayunan Soriano, and P01 Anwear Damaudtang Masukat because they had gone on Absence without Official Leave and had already been dropped from the rolls before the charges were filed against them.
The TRUTH will set you FREE.
ATTY. THEODORE TE_PERSUASIVE APPEALS AND REMINDERS FILED
PERSUASIVE APPEALS
AND REMINDERS FILED
(7 COUNTS)
COUNT 7
(persuasive appeal/reminder on 2december2015)
CHIEF JUSTICE PERSUASIVE VIDEO
Legality of the constitution prevails
over rule on procedure.
ATTENTION:PIO CHIEF
COUNT 6
(persuasive appeal/reminder on 1december2015)
CHIEF JUSTICE PERSUASIVE VIDEO
Save the Chief Justice from shame
ATTENTION:PIO CHIEF
COUNT 5
(persuasive appeal/reminder on 30November2015)
CHIEF JUSTICE PERSUASIVE VIDEO
Stop thinking in silos
ATTENTION:PIO CHIEF
COUNT 4_1
(persuasive appeal /reminder on 27November 2015_1)
ATTENTION:PIO CHIEF
ON THIS DATE YOU MAY HAVE
BEEN CRIMINALLY LIABLE VIA
THE PROVISION OF THE
ANTI-GRAFT AND CORRUPT PRACTICES ACT
ANTI-GRAFT AND CORRUPT PRACTICES ACT
Section 3. Corrupt practices of public officers. In addition to acts or omissions of public officers already penalized by existing law, the following shall constitute corrupt practices of any public officer and are hereby declared to be unlawful:
(e) Causing any undue injury to any party (myself, Antonio L. Buensuceso Jr.) including the Government, or giving any private party (PSPC, SHELL) any unwarranted benefits, (NON-PAYMENT OF RETIREMENT PAY) advantage or preference in the discharge of his official administrative (ATTY. THEODORE TE, functions) or judicial functions through manifest partiality, evident bad faith or gross inexcusable negligence. This provision shall apply to officers and employees of offices (Atty. Theodore Te, an officer of one offices of the Supreme Court, the PIO) or government corporations charged with the grant of licenses or permits or other concessions.
COUNT 4_2
(persuasive appeal /reminder on 27November 2015_2)
ATTENTION:PIO CHIEF
ON THIS DATE YOU MAY HAVE
BEEN CRIMINALLY LIABLE VIA
PROVISION ON
OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE
PRESIDENTIAL DECREE No. 1829 PENALIZING OBSTRUCTION OF APPREHENSION AND PROSECUTION OF CRIMINAL OFFENDERS
MALACAÑANG
M a n i l a
PRESIDENTIAL DECREE No. 1829
PENALIZING OBSTRUCTION OF APPREHENSION AND PROSECUTION OF CRIMINAL OFFENDERS
WHEREAS, crime and violence continue to proliferate despite the sustained vigorous efforts of the government to effectively contain them;
WHEREAS, to discourage public indifference or apathy towards the apprehension and prosecution of criminal offenders, it is necessary to penalize acts which obstruct or frustrate or tend to obstruct or frustrate the successful apprehension and prosecution of criminal offenders;
NOW, THEREFORE, I, FERDINAND, E. MARCOS, President of the Philippines, by virtue of the powers vested in me by law do hereby decree and order the following:
Section 1. The penalty of prision correccional in its maximum period, or a fine ranging from 1,000 to 6,000 pesos, or both, shall be imposed upon any person who knowingly or willfully obstructs, impedes, frustrates or delays the apprehension of suspects and the investigation and prosecution of criminal cases by committing any of the following acts:
(e) delaying the prosecution of criminal cases by obstructing the service of process or court orders or disturbing proceedings in the fiscal's offices, in Tanodbayan, or in the courts;
Section 1. Article 287 of Presidential Decree No. 442, as amended, otherwise known as the Labor Code of the Philippines, is hereby amended to read as follows:
- "Art. 287. Retirement. - Any employee may be retired upon reaching the retirement age established in the collective bargaining agreement or other applicable employment contract. "In case of retirement, the employee shall be entitled to receive such retirement benefits as he may have earned under existing laws and any collective bargaining agreement and other agreements: Provided, however, That an employee's retirement benefits under any collective bargaining and other agreements shall not be less than those provided herein. "In the absence of a retirement plan or agreement providing for retirement benefits of employees in the establishment, an employee upon reaching the age of sixty (60) years or more, but not beyond sixty-five (65) years which is hereby declared the compulsory retirement age, who has served at least five (5) years in the said establishment, may retire and shall be entitled to retirement pay equivalent to at least one-half (1/2) month salary for every year of service, a fraction of at least six (6) months being considered as one whole year. "Unless the parties provide for broader inclusions, the term one-half (1/2) month salary shall mean fifteen (15) days plus one-twelfth (1/12) of the 13th month pay and the cash equivalent of not more than five (5) days of service incentive leaves. "Retail, service and agricultural establishments or operations employing not more than (10) employees or workers are exempted from the coverage of this provision. "Violation of this provision is hereby declared unlawful and subject to the penal provisions provided under Article 288 of this Code."
Sec. 2. Nothing in this Act shall deprive any employee of benefits to which he may be entitled under existing laws or company policies or practices.
Sec. 3. This Act shall take effect fifteen (15) days after its complete publication in the Official Gazette or in at least two (2) national newspapers of general circulation, whichever comes earlier.
Sec. 3. This Act shall take effect fifteen (15) days after its complete publication in the Official Gazette or in at least two (2) national newspapers of general circulation, whichever comes earlier.
Approved: December 9, 1992
COUNT 4_4
(persuasive appeal /reminder on 27November 2015_4)
ATTENTION:PIO CHIEF
YOUR FAILURE TO RESPOND IS
FROM THIS DATE MAY OR SHALL CONSTITUTE VIOLATION OF
REPUBLIC ACT NO. 6713 RULE 6
RESPONSE TO REQUESTS AND PETITIONS MANDATED BY THE Rules Implementing the Code of Conduct and Ethical Standards for Public Officials and Employees (Republic Act No. 6713)
(Republic Act No. 6713) RULE 6 _Duties of public officials and employees
Section 3. In case of written requests, petitions or motions, sent by means of letters, telegrams, or the like, the official or employee in charge shall act on the same within fifteen (15) working days from receipt thereof, provided that:
(a) If the communication is within the jurisdiction of the office or agency, the official or employee must:
(1) Write a note or letter of acknowledgement where the matter is merely routinary or the action desired may be acted upon in the ordinary course of business of the department, office or agency, specifying the date when the matter will be disposed of and the name of the official or employee in charge thereof.
COUNT 3
(persuasive appeal /reminder on 26November 2015)
ATTENTION:PIO CHIEF
CHIEF JUSTICE PERSUASIVE VIDEO
Call on cooperation and self-reformation
 |
On this video the Honorable Chief Justice is offering you, Atty. Theodore Te, the carrot. The stick shall be following next. |
COUNT 2
(persuasive appeal /reminder on 24November 2015)
ATTENTION:PIO CHIEF
ATTENTION:PIO CHIEF
click on the image of Ka Pepe Diokno to read article
posted by Atty.Theodore Te about having been inspired by Ka Pepe.
PIO CHIEF Atty. Theodore Te : Thank you for being inspired by Ka Pepe Diokno, and with all due respect please walk the talk and walk tall.
COUNT 1
(persuasive appeal /reminder on 11November 2015)
ATTENTION:PIO CHIEF
Please be guided by this
2014 Christmas message
from Hon. Ma. Lourdes Sereno
The TRUTH will set you FREE.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
SYNDICATED ESTAFA
MY QUEST FOR SWINDLED
RETIREMENT PAY BY SHELL
 
SWINDLING ITO, SYNDICATED ESTAFA
HOT PURSUIT
DUTY OF LAW ENFORCEMENT ENTITIES
SHELL SWINDLING OF RETIREMENT PAY 5TH YEAR
|
