shell tabangao refinery life

Friday, February 3, 2017

144TH PERSUASIVE APPEAL_3FEB17_TO THE SCP JUSTICES : THE BASIS ON THE EMPLOYEES WHOM TO BE TERMINATED WAS RIGGED

DEAN AMADO VALDEZ

CARRIAGE BEFORE THE HORSE

IMAGE FIT FOR A RIGGED RANKING

RANKING

RANKING SHOULD OCCUR FIRST BEFORE THE LIST OF EMPLOYEES TO BE TERMINATED EXIST

SOURCE : AC-10084

ATTORNEY RAUL QUIROZ DISBARMENT COMPLAINT DOCUMENTS

HIS FIFTH DECEITFUL ACT

(Contrary to 3.1.1 & 3.1.2.2 & 3.1.2.2 )

DAPAT UNA MUNA ANG PAGKAGAWA NG RANKING [page 1 2 ] BAGO MAGKAROON NG LISTAHAN NGMGA KAWANING TATANGALIN

Your Honor, please, pansinin po natin sa page 3 Nos.6&7 at page 9 No.26 ng Rejoinder:

"6. In identifying the three (3) more employees to be terminated, the

Company adopted a system where rank and file employees are to be ranked by

the supervisors in accordance with a set of criteria agreed upon by the Company

with TASREA prior to the selection of the employees to be terminated. The

pre-agreed criteria were (a) achievement (b) capacity and (c) relationship.

7. The result of the ranking made by the supervisors which is attached as Annex "7"

hereof showed that the Complainant was ranked 66th out of 67 employees or

second (2nd) from the bottom of the ranking. Thus, his inclusion in the list of those
whose employment was terminated."

PACKET 5 : LABEL 5.5.1 SHELL Rejoinder

p.3 Nos.6&7

"26. The company wish to underscore the fact that the Complainant's
termination was based solely on the ranking made by the supervisors of the
Company, which ranking based in turn, on the criteria agreed upon between the
Company and TASREA. Had the Complainant not been near the bottom of the
rankings he would not have been terminated. This would mean, however, that
another lower ranked employee would have to be terminated."

PACKET 5 : LABEL 5.5.2 SHELL Rejoinder

p.9 No.26

Your Honor, please, sinabi po rito ni Atty. Raul Quiroz, na ang pagtatanggal sa

akin sa trabaho ay tanging base(based solely) sa ranking ng mga supervisor.

Kung wala ako sa bottom ng ranking ay hindi ako tatanggalin. Sa ibig pong
sabihin ni Atty. Raul Quiroz na  ranking ang tanging basehan  sa kung sino sino
ang tatanggalin ay tumpak nararapat lamang maunang maganap  ang
pagsasagawa ng ranking bago malaman kung sino sinong kawani ang
tatanggalin. Hindi po ba? Ngunit ang tunay pong kaganapan  ay nangyaring
nauna na magkaroon  si G. Rico Bersamin ng listahan ng mga kawaning
tatanggalin bago po naganap ang pagsagawa ng ranking.

Huling huli na naman po ang pandarayang pagsisinungaling ni Atty. Raul Quiroz.

Tingnan po natin, Your Honor please, noong mag padala si G. Rico Bersamin ng
mga kawaning tatanggalin kay Honorable Director CRISPIN D. DANNUG, JR. ay
petsa November 28, 2002 at kami pong tatlo : si G. Manuel (Manny) Trinidad,
G. Lucio (Jun) Valencia at ako, Antonio (Tony) Buensuceso ay naroon  na sa
listahan ng mga kawaning tatanggalin. Samakatuwid may listahan na si
G. Rico Bersamin ng mga kawani na tatanggalin  noon pang 28th November 2002.

Bistado na naman po si Atty. Raul Quiroz sa kanyang pandaraya at
pagsisinungaling dahil po noong ganapin ang ranking ay noong
January 29, 2003 na nakasaad sa Annex "7" ng Rejoinder[page 1 ] na si Atty. Raul Quiroz mismo ang nagpakita.

Kung totoong ang ranking ang naging basehan ng tatangaling kawani,

bakit po may listahan na ng tatanggalin noong pang November 28, 2002 bago

pa maganap ang ranking noong January 29, 2003?[RANKING page 1]

Si Atty. Raul Quiroz ay bistadong nagsisinungaling. Si Atty. Raul Quiroz ay

papayagan ninyo pa ba na manatiling abogado ? Dapat lang po, Your Honor,
please, madisbar si Atty. Raul Quiroz, dahilan sa kanyang panloloko at
pandarayang kasinungalingan at sagad sa buto na kahiyahiyang pagsisinungaling.

(Contrary to 3.1.1 & 3.1.2.2 & 3.1.2.2 )

PACKET 5 : LABEL 5.5.3 SHELL Position Paper

Annex "3" Letter to

Hon. Crispin D. Dannug Jr

LABEL 5.5.4 SHELL Position Paper

Annex "2" Letter to

Hon. Secretary Patricia Sto. Tomas

LABEL 5.5.5 SHELL Establishment and

Termination Report

LABEL 5.5.6 SHELL List of Affected workers

LABEL 5.5.7 SHELL Rejoinder

Annex "7" Ranking[page 1 2 ]

ILLUSTRATION IN GIF

JANUARY 29, 2003

DATE WHEN RANKING IS DONE

THE RANKING WAS RIGGED

LIST OF EMPLOYEES TO BE TERMINATED

NOVEMBER 29, 2002

ATTY RAUL QUIROZ'S ALIBI WHY I WAS CHOSEN
TO BE TERMINATED

The following Justices of the Supreme Court of the Philippines are DEEMED provided with copy of this "RANKING WAS RIGGED _IN RE A.C. NUMBER 10084_ATTY RAUL QUIROZ DISBARMENT CASE" through Atty. Theodore Te's PIO e-mail address on February 15, 2016 to the present and prayers for corrective administrative and/or judicial and/or disciplinary actions be instituted in due time.