VIDEO 7
MAY 25, 2020
VIDEO TAKEN 4 DAYS AFTER REROUTE OF THE HOT WATER LINE ON THE PERIPHERALS OF THE COLD WATER LINE SHOWING 12% TO 17% DAMPNESS SIGN OF POSSIBLE IMPENDING LEAK IN THE COLD WATER LINES AND THE HOT AND COLD WATER LINES TO THE KITCHEN SINK DAMAGED BY THE DIGGING OPERATIONS CONDUCTED RECKLESSLY BY JOHN USING A FORCEFUL JACKHAMMER.
Notice the new hot water line copper pipe installed 4 days ago.
VIDEO 8
TAKEN MAY 5, 2020
AFTER THE COMMOTION AND OPENING OF THE KITCHEN SINK HOT WATER FAUCET MY DAUGHTER TOOK THE VIDEO OF THE EXCAVATION. NOTICE THAT THE EXCAVATION COVERS ONLY SECTION 1 THEN THIS TIME JOHN STOPPED DIGGING SECTION 1 AND MOVED TO SECTION 2 FARTHER AWAY FROM SECTION 1
VIDEO 9
TAKEN MAY 5, 2020
VIDEO SHOWING DELIBERATE AND INTENTIONAL HIDING THE LEAK FROM US THROUGH ORAL DENIAL OF THE EXISTENCE OF LEAK IN THE LINE. HE WAS ASKED WETHER HE DID FIND THE LEAK ALREADY AND JOHN REPLIED A RESOUNDING "NO, NOT YET".
VIDEO 10
TAKEN MAY 21, 2020
VIDEO TAKEN 31 DAYS AFTER REROUTE OF THE HOT WATER LINE ON THE PERIPHERALS OF THE COLD WATER LINE SHOWING 20% TO 12% DAMPNESS CONSISTENT SIGN OF POSSIBLE IMPENDING LEAK IN THE COLD WATER LINES AND THE HOT AND COLD WATER LINES TO THE KITCHEN SINK DAMAGED BY THE DIGGING OPERATIONS CONDUCTED RECKLESSLY BY JOHN USING A FORCEFUL JACKHAMMER BUT FIRST AMERICAN HOME WARRANTY IGNORED TO ATTEND TO THE SERVICE REQUEST CORRESPONDING TO IT.
PICTURES EVIDENCES
PICTURE 1
TAKEN 7 MAY 2020
TOP VIEW OF THE EXCAVATED CONCRETE
WITH AN AREA OF 1.5 SQUARE FEET
WITH A DEPTH OF 6 TO 4 INCHES ( NOT 10 INCHES) AS THE PLUMBER STATED
SECTIONS 1&2.
PICTURE 2
TAKEN 7 MAY 2020
SECTION 1 OF THE EXCAVATED CONCRETE
TOP VIEW WITH DEPTH 6 TO 5 INCHES
FIRST THE PLUMBER DUG SECTION 1 (PICTURE 2) TO A DEPTH OF 6 INCHES. THEN HE NOTICED TRACE OF LEAK IN THE HOT SIDE OF THE WATER LINE. HE INSTRUCTED HIS MAN TO OPEN THE HOT WATER FAUCET IN THE KITCHEN SINK. THE LEAK DISAPPEARED. THEN HE DUG AWAY FROM SECTION 1 TO THE DIRECTION OF SECTION 2 (PICTURE 3)
PICTURE 3
TAKEN 7 MAY 2020
SECTION 2 OF THE EXCAVATED CONCRETE
TOP VIEW WITH DEPTH OF 5 TO 4 INCHES
HE STOPPED DIGGING ON SECTION 2 AFTER EXCAVATING LESS A SQUARE FOOT OF CONCRETE AND STATED HE IS STOPPING EXCAVATING BECAUSE HE STRESS AN ASSUMPTION THAT THE LEAK IS UNDER THE FOUNDATION AND HE HAS DUG 10 INCHES DEPTH OF CONCRETE AND ITS THE MOST HE CAN DO. HE MADE A VIDEO OF HIS STATEMENTS AND THE EXCAVATION TO THE OTHER PERSON ON THE LINE, WHOM WE DO NOT KNOW WHO, DURING THAT TIME. LATER, HOWEVER I LEARNED HE WAS TALKING TO THE ADJUSTER FOR THE SECONDARY DAMAGE WHEN THAT ADJUSTER CALLED INFORMING US THAT ON ACCOUNT OF THE VIDEO AND STATEMENTS OF THE PLUMBER SAYING THE LEAK IS UNDER THE FOUNDATION, HE IS DENYING OUR CLAIM FOR SECONDARY DAMAGE. AND, THE FOLLOWING DAY WE RECEIVED A FORMAL DENIAL LETTER FROM THE HOME INSURANCE.
STATE FARM INSURANCE DENIAL LETTER
PICTURE 1A
TAKEN MAY 5, 2020
EXCAVATION SECTION 1 ONLY TAKEN AFTER THE COMMOTION ON THE LEAK SHOWING UP ON THE HOT WATER LINE, THEN THEY STOPPED DIGGING SECTION 1 AND CONTINUED DIGGING AWAY FROM SECTION 1 TO SECTION 2 SHOWING DELIBERATE INTENT NOT TO FIX THE LEAK BUT TO JUST TO MAKE AN EXCAVATION USEFUL TO HIS INTENT TO FALSELY STATE THAT HE HAD EXCAVATED A LOT AND THAT HE WAS NOT ABLE TO SEE ANY LEAK AND THAT THE LEAK SHOULD BE FROM UNDER THE FOUNDATION HE STRESSED, FOR THE BENEFIT OF STATE FARM INSURANCE.
PICTURE A
PICTURE B
NOTICE THE SOFT CONCRETE ON TOP OF THE LEAKING SPOT AN INDICATION THAT THE LEAKING LINE HAD UNDERWENT A PREVIOUS REPAIR AND COULD BE OPENED UP AGAIN NO NEED OF HELPERS AND THE JACKHAMMER AND BRINGING WITH HIM JUST A SMALLER ELECTRICAL HAMMER AND MASONRY CHISEL WHICH WOULD NOT SHATTER THE FOUNDATION AND THE WATER LINES IN IT. NOTE THAT HE BROUGHT WITH HIM 2 HELPERS AND A MIGHTY JACKHAMMER NOT REALLY TO REPAIR THE LEAKING HOT WATER LINE BUT DELIBERATELY HIDE IT FROM US AND TO INTENTIONALLY ACCOMPLISH HIS OBJECTIVE TO CREATE AN EXCAVATION TO PROVE THAT THERE IS "NO LEAK IN THE SLAB BUT A SUSPECTED LEAK UNDER THE FOUNDATION" GIVING HELP TO STATE FARM TO ESCAPE SECONDARY DAMAGE LIABILITY AND GETTING FROM FIRST AMERICAN A COSTLIER PIPE REROUTE THAN SIMPLE LEAK REPAIR. WOULD YOU BELIEVE HIM IF HE SAYS , THE STATEMENTS AND THE VIDEO LIVE PRESENTATION PRODUCED BY HIM WERE FREE? JOHN DAMAGED OUR HOUSE STRUCTURALLY, AND HARMED US FINANCIALLY AND DEFRAUDED US AND FIRST AMERICAN AND ENRICHED STATE FARM INTENTIONALLY AT OUR EXPENSE. HE MUST BE HOLD ACCOUNTABLE TO THIS WRONGDOING. OUR SOCIETY WOULD NOT BE SAFE WITH THIS MAN ROAMING AROUND DOING WRONGS SCOT FREE.
PICTURE C
COPPER PIPE, MAP OR PROFANE GAS CANISTER, TORCH AND OTHER SOLDERING MATERIALS COULD NOT BE SEEN ANYWHERE IN ALL THE VIDEOS BUT JUST THE JACKHAMMER AN INDICATION THAT HE INTENDED JUST TO MAKE AN EXCAVATION AND NOT TO REPAIR ANY LEAKING PART OF THE HOT WATER LINE. HE HAD CONDUCTED THE LEAK DETECTION ABOUT 4 DAYS AGO AND OBVIOUSLY KNEW WHERE THE LEAK IS AND HE SUPPOSED TO FIXING THE LEAK BUT HE CAME WITHOUT THESE TOOLS AND MATERIALS, REVEALING OBVIOUSLY HIS INTENTION TO JUST MAKE AN EXCAVATION WITHOUT ANY SHOWING OF LEAK AS EVIDENCE WHERE STATE FARM CAN RELY ON PURPOSELY TO DENY OUR INSURANCE CLAIM AGAINST STATE FARM.
PICTURE D
MAY 21, 2020
HOT WATER LINE LEAK REPAIR REROUTE RECEIPT SIMPLE LEAK REPAIR WOULD NOT BE ADVISABLE ANYMORE AS PER THE NEW PLUMBER'S ASSESSMENT
DUE TO THE DAMAGE IMPACTED BY THE JACKHAMMER TO THE HOT WATER LINES EMBEDDED IN THE SLAB COSTING US $1068.75
NOTE : HOT WATER LINE TO THE KITCHEN SINK NOT YET INCLUDED YET.
PICTURE E
FIRST AMERICAN INSURANCE DESPITE THE FACT THAT I HAVE A PENDING COMPLAINT OF MISREPRESENTATION AND POOR BUSINESS RECORD RATING AGAINST JOHN TITOUAH OF ALL EXPRESS PLUMBING, THIS INSURANCE STILL WANTED TO DEAL WITH THIS PLUMBING FIRM AND WANTED TO HAVE MY PLUMBING PROBLEM BE SERVICED BY THEM.
PICTURE F
I REQUESTED THAT ANOTHER CONTRACTOR BE SENT TO REPLACE ALL EXPRESS PLUMBING INC
STATE FARM DENIAL SECOND TIME
|