    
|
924counts
SEE BELOW FOR THE 924TH TIME THE REITERATION OF DEMAND PAYMENT OF RETIREMENT PAY WHICH SHELL REFUSED TO HONOR IN THE PRESENCE AND DEEMED APPROVAL OF THE HONORABLE MAGISTRATES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE PHILIPPINES
Dishonest scales are an abomination to the Lord, but a just weight is His delight... Proverbs Chapter 11 v. 1
Retirement Pay Law circumvented by Shell subject to penal provision provided for by Article 288 of the Labor Code of the Philippines.
|
 |
 SEPTEMBER 3, 2020 GORDON LIU
CLAIM SPECIALIST
STATE FARM HOME INSURANCE
RE: Claim Number 55-06c6-44x
Policy Number 77-C3-B499-7
DATE OF LOSS: April 26, 2020
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JOHN TITOUAH
QUESTION 8
DO STATE FARM TOP MANAGEMENT KNEW WHAT MR. GUENIOT IS DOING ?
Dear Mr. Liu:
PLEASE SEE, I MADE THE QUESTION VERY SIMPLE SO THAT YOU CAN RESPOND AT ONCE. JUST WRITE TO ME, YES OR NO.
QUESTION 8.
DO STATE FARM TOP MANAGEMENT KNEW WHAT MR. GUENIOT IS DOING ? Please acknowledge receipt of this e-mail and kindly inform me when I should expect a reply to this email. PLEASE RESTRICT ISSUES AND ANSWERS WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF THE SUBJECT MATTER TO AVOID INAPPROPRIATENESS Please be reminded that your DENIAL LETTER DATED MAY 6, 2020 was prepared, relayed to us, sent and read by us in just a few minutes.
Thank you very much.
Yours faithfully, Antonio L. Buensuceso |
 SEPTEMBER 3, 2020 LOUIS E. GUENIOT TEAM MANAGER CLAIM SPECIALIST
STATE FARM HOME INSURANCE
RE: Claim Number 55-06c6-44x
Policy Number 77-C3-B499-7
DATE OF LOSS: April 26, 2020
STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 22 DATED 3SEP20 12:00PM
INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 22
REPEATED MISCONDUCT
FROM
INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSES
1 TO 8 AND 9/10/11/12/13 AND 14
AND 15/16/17/18/19/20/21
BEING NOT DISPUTED, OBJECTED AND HABITUALLY REPEATED WITH IMPUNITY. HENCE, PROVEN TO BE INTENTIONAL, DELIBERATE, MALICIOUS, WILLFUL, WANTON, OPPRESSIVE AND OUTRAGEOUS
AND BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT
Dear Messrs Gueniot and Liu:
PLEASE SEE,
As Mr. Gueniot responded to email as shown next:
Claim Number 55-06c6-44x STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSES 15,16,17,18,19, 20,21 DATED 3SEP20 6:45am THIS SHOWS: EVIDENCE OF 22 RECORDED MISCONDUCTS, PROOF BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT OF, REPEATED HABITUALLY, INTENTIONALLY, DELIBERATELY. MISCONDUCT RESPONDING TO EMAILS SUBJECT OUTSIDE OF THE SUBJECT UNDER DISCUSSION .
HE HAD SHOWN A TOTAL OF TWENTY-TWO (22) RECORDED INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSES AND/OR MISCONDUCTS TO SOW CONFUSION AND INTENTIONALLY AND DELIBERATELY DERAIL AND DELAY THE PROCEEDINGS. HOWEVER,YOUR INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 22 IS WORTHLESS SIMPLY BECAUSE IT IS NOT WITHIN THE BOUNDS OF SUBJECT BEING DISCUSSED. YOUR ACTIONS TEND TO SHOW THAT YOU MIGHT BE THE REAL MASTERMIND OF TITOUAH'S CRIMES.
|
INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 22 RESPONSE TO EMAIL:Claim Number 55-06c6-44x STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSES 15,16,17,18,19, 20,21 DATED 3SEP20 6:45amNOTE :INAPPROPRIATE RE : OUTSIDE OF THE SUBJECT BEING DISCUSSED.   CLEARER READING BELOW OF THE EMAIL SCREENSHOT ABOVE:
Dear Mr. Buensuceso,
I’m writing to acknowledge receipt of your email below.
I am the Claim Team Manager responsible for the supervision of claim 55-06C6-44X submitted by Miriam Brual and Rosalina Buensuceso and will respond to your email. Claim Specialist Gordon Liu and I have reviewed and discussed your email communications received and agreed on the response I provided.
Your email does not provide any new information for us to evaluate on this claim.
We previously communicated to you that State Farm will no longer respond to your emails which do not provide any new information for us to evaluate on this claim. You should not interpret our silence as any agreement with you, or any waiver of our rights under the policy or law. We reserve all such rights in the past, present, and future. If you send in new information that warrants consideration, then we would provide you a substantive response.
Your email contains allegations of misconduct by State Farm, Claim Specialist Gordon Liu and me. All such contentions are denied. We handle each claim on its own merits. State Farm, Claim Specialist Gordon Liu and I have complied with the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing in the investigation and handling of this claim.
This claim file remains closed. All conditions previously quoted still apply.
We are required by California Insurance Regulations, Section 2695.7(b)(3), to advise you that if you believe this claim, or any part of this claim, has been wrongfully denied or rejected, you may have the matter reviewed by the California Department of Insurance, Claim Service Bureau, 300 South Spring Street, Los Angeles, California 90013, telephone 800 927 4357.
The one year “Suit Against Us” time period referred to in the May 6, 2020 letter includes the time period from the date of loss (April 26, 2020) to the date the claim was reported to State Farm (April 29, 2020). The one year time period was tolled during our investigation of this claim (April 29, 2020) to the date the claim was initially denied (May 6, 2020). The one year time period was tolled upon receipt of Antonio Buensuceso Jr.’s email dated May 29, 2020 for additional investigation until the date the denial of the claim was confirm in our June 12, 2020 letter. That one year time period continues to run as of the date of our June 12, 2020 letter.
Sincerely,
Louis
Louis E Gueniot III
Claim Team Manager State Farm General Insurance Company
|
 SEPTEMBER 3, 2020 LOUIS E. GUENIOT TEAM MANAGER CLAIM SPECIALIST
STATE FARM HOME INSURANCE
RE: Claim Number 55-06c6-44x
Policy Number 77-C3-B499-7
DATE OF LOSS: April 26, 2020
STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 15 DATED 2SEPT20 8:37AMSTATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 16 DATED 2SEPT2012:22PM
INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSES 15/16/17/18/20/21
REPEATED MISCONDUCTS
FROM
INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSES
1 TO 8 AND 9/10/11/12/13 AND 14
BEING NOT DISPUTED, OBJECTED AND HABITUALLY REPEATED WITH IMPUNITY. HENCE, PROVEN TO BE INTENTIONAL, DELIBERATE, MALICIOUS, WILLFUL, WANTON, OPPRESSIVE AND OUTRAGEOUS
Dear Messrs Gueniot and Liu:
PLEASE SEE,
As Mr. Gueniot responded to emails as shown next:
THIS SHOWS: REPEATED HABITUAL INTENTIONAL DELIBERATE MISCONDUCT RESPONDING TO EMAILS NOT ADDRESSED TO HIM TO RESPOND. HE HAD SHOWN A TOTAL OF TWENTY-ONE (21) RECORDED INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSES AND/OR MISCONDUCTS TO SOW CONFUSION AND INTENTIONALLY AND DELIBERATELY DERAIL AND DELAY THE PROCEEDINGS. HOWEVER,YOUR INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSES ARE WORTHLESS SIMPLY BECAUSE I AM CALLING ON MR. LIU TO ANSWER QUESTIONS WITHIN THE BOUNDS OF HIS OWN ADMITTED DIRECT PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE WHERE IN YOUR CASE YOU HAVE NONE PROVEN AS OF THIS TIME BEING. YOU, MR. GUENIOT, HAVE NO ESTABLISHED RECORD OF CONTACT, VIRTUAL AND PERSONAL WITH TITOUAH, SO PLEASE, LET THE QUESTIONING BE COMPLETED FIRST WITH MR. LIU. PLEASE KINDLY WAIT FOR YOUR TURN.
|
MY QUEST FOR SWINDLED
RETIREMENT PAY BY SHELL
 
SWINDLING ITO, SYNDICATED ESTAFA
HOT PURSUIT
DUTY OF LAW ENFORCEMENT ENTITIES
SHELL SWINDLING OF RETIREMENT PAY 5TH YEAR
|
;
