Claim Number 55-06c6-44x INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSES 23/24 DATED 4SEP20 2:23pm

SEPTEMBER 4,  2020 LOUIS E. GUENIOT TEAM MANAGER GORDON LIU CLAIM SPECIALIST STATE FARM HOME INSURANCE RE: Claim Number 55-06c6-44x        Policy Number 77-C3-B499-7 DATE OF LOSS: April 26, 2020 STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 23 DATED 4SEP20 11:02AM  STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 24 DATED 4SEP20 11:05AM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSES 23/24 REPEATED MISCONDUCT FROM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSES  1 TO 8 AND 9/10/11/12/13 AND 14 AND 15/16/17/18/19/20/21/22 BEING NOT DISPUTED, OBJECTED AND HABITUALLY REPEATED WITH IMPUNITY.  HENCE, PROVEN TO BE INTENTIONAL, DELIBERATE, MALICIOUS, WILLFUL, WANTON, OPPRESSIVE AND OUTRAGEOUS AND BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT Dear Messrs Gueniot and Liu: PLEASE SEE, As Mr. Gueniot responded to email as shown next:  STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 23 DATED 4SEP20 11:02AM  STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 24 DATED 4SEP20 11:05AM THIS SHOWS: EVIDENCE OF 24 RECORDED MISCONDUCTS, PROOF BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT OF, REPEATED HABITUALLY, INTENTIONALLY,  DELIBERATELY. MISCONDUCT RESPONDING TO EMAILS SUBJECT OUTSIDE OF THE SUBJECT UNDER DISCUSSION AND RESPONDING TO EMAILS NOT ADDRESSED TO HIM TO RESPOND. HE HAD SHOWN A TOTAL OF TWENTY-FOUR (24) RECORDED INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSES AND/OR MISCONDUCTS TO SOW CONFUSION AND INTENTIONALLY AND DELIBERATELY DERAIL AND DELAY THE PROCEEDINGS. HOWEVER,YOUR  INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 23, 24 IS WORTHLESS  SIMPLY BECAUSE IT IS NOT WITHIN THE BOUNDS OF SUBJECT BEING DISCUSSED AND ANSWERING QUESTIONS NOT ADDRESSED FOR GUENIOT TO RESPOND. YOUR ACTIONS, MR. GUENIOT TEND TO SHOW THAT  YOU MIGHT BE THE REAL MASTERMIND OF  TITOUAH'S CRIMES. SO, MR. GUENIOT, MAY I REQUEST FOR YOUR KIND UNDERSTANDING. WE NEED TO HAVE OUR NEGOTIATION ORGANIZED AND RECORDS CLEAR,  SO THAT WE MAY AVOID CONFUSION. OBVIOUSLY, IT APPEARS THAT YOU WANTED MUCH EAGERLY TO SEVERE THE NEGOTIATION AND THE INVESTIGATION PROCESS. THIS FACT LEAD ME TO THINK YOU ARE AVOIDING RESPONSE FROM MR. LUI BECAUSE HE MOST PROBABLY WOULD LEAD ME TO YOU, MR.GUENIOT, AS THE REAL MASTERMIND OF TITOUAH'S CRIME AND CONSEQUENTLY,  YOU ARE PREVENTING HIM FROM ANSWERING QUESTIONS POSTED FROM ME FOR HIM.   Please acknowledge receipt of this e-mail. THIS EMAIL RESPONSE IS INTENDED FOR YOUR  COLLECTION OF NEW INFORMATION ON INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSES WHICH TO MY TALLY RIGHT NOW ROSE TO 24.  IN OTHER WORDS,  TWENTY-FOUR (24) COUNTS OF STATE FARM RECORDED MISCONDUCTS. THOSE UNRECORDED MISCONDUCTS, I AM STILL COLLECTING THEM AND I PROMISE I WILL ADD THEM TO THE LIST WHICH INFORMATION YOU MAY STILL WANTED TO KNOW. PLEASE RESTRICT ISSUES WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF THE SUBJECT MATTER TO AVOID INAPPROPRIATENESS AND CONFUSION. Please be reminded that your DENIAL LETTER DATED MAY 6, 2020 was prepared, relayed to us, sent and read by us in just a few minutes. Thank you very much. Yours faithfully, Antonio L. Buensuceso

STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 24 4SEP20 11:05AM

INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 24 RESPONSE TO EMAIL: Claim Number 55-06c6-44x CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JOHN TITOUAH QUESTION 8 DATED 3SEP20 9:42pm NOTE :INAPPROPRIATE RE, THE EMAIL INVESTIGATIVE QUESTION IS NOT ADDRESSED TO GUENIOT TO RESPOND AND HIS ARGUMENTS ARE OUTSIDE OF THE SUBJECT MATTER BEING DISCUSSED. CLEARER READING BELOW OF THE EMAIL SCREENSHOT ABOVE: Dear Mr. Buensuceso, I’m writing to acknowledge receipt of your email below. I am the Claim Team Manager responsible for the supervision of claim 55-06C6-44X submitted by Miriam Brual and Rosalina Buensuceso and will respond to your email.  Your email does not provide any new information for us to evaluate on this claim. We previously communicated to you that State Farm will no longer respond to your emails which do not provide any new information for us to evaluate on this claim. You should not interpret our silence as any agreement with you, or any waiver of our rights under the policy or law.  We reserve all such rights in the past, present, and future.  If you send in new information that warrants consideration, then we would provide you a substantive response.  Your email contains allegations of misconduct. All such contentions are denied. We handle each claim on its own merits. State Farm, Claim Specialist Gordon Liu and I have complied with the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing in the investigation and handling of this claim. This claim file remains closed.  All conditions previously quoted still apply.  We are required by California Insurance Regulations, Section 2695.7(b)(3), to advise you that if you believe this claim, or any part of this claim, has been wrongfully denied or rejected, you may have the matter reviewed by the California Department of Insurance, Claim Service Bureau, 300 South Spring Street, Los Angeles, California 90013, telephone 800 927 4357. The one year “Suit Against Us” time period referred to in the May 6, 2020 letter includes the time period from the date of loss (April 26, 2020) to the date the claim was reported to State Farm (April 29, 2020).  The one year time period was tolled during our investigation of this claim (April 29, 2020) to the date the claim was initially denied (May 6, 2020).  The one year time period was tolled upon receipt of Antonio Buensuceso Jr.’s email dated May 29, 2020 for additional investigation until the date the denial of the claim was confirm in our June 12, 2020 letter.  That one year time period continues to run as of the date of our June 12, 2020 letter. Sincerely, Louis Louis E Gueniot III Claim Team Manager State Farm General Insurance Company

STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 23 DATED 4SEP20 11:02AM

INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 23 RESPONSE TO EMAIL: Claim Number 55-06c6-44x STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 22 DATED 3SEP20 2:43pm NOTE :INAPPROPRIATE RE, HIS ARGUMENTS ARE OUTSIDE OF THE SUBJECT MATTER BEING DISCUSSED. CLEARER READING BELOW OF THE EMAIL SCREENSHOT ABOVE: Dear Mr. Buensuceso, I’m writing to acknowledge receipt of your email below. I am the Claim Team Manager responsible for the supervision of claim 55-06C6-44X submitted by Miriam Brual and Rosalina Buensuceso and will respond to your email.  Claim Specialist Gordon Liu and I have reviewed and discussed your email communications received and agreed on the response I provided. Your email does not provide any new information for us to evaluate on this claim. We previously communicated to you that State Farm will no longer respond to your emails which do not provide any new information for us to evaluate on this claim. You should not interpret our silence as any agreement with you, or any waiver of our rights under the policy or law.  We reserve all such rights in the past, present, and future.  If you send in new information that warrants consideration, then we would provide you a substantive response.  Your email contains allegations of misconduct by State Farm, Claim Specialist Gordon Liu and me. All such contentions are denied. We handle each claim on its own merits. State Farm, Claim Specialist Gordon Liu and I have complied with the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing in the investigation and handling of this claim. This claim file remains closed.  All conditions previously quoted still apply.  We are required by California Insurance Regulations, Section 2695.7(b)(3), to advise you that if you believe this claim, or any part of this claim, has been wrongfully denied or rejected, you may have the matter reviewed by the California Department of Insurance, Claim Service Bureau, 300 South Spring Street, Los Angeles, California 90013, telephone 800 927 4357. The one year “Suit Against Us” time period referred to in the May 6, 2020 letter includes the time period from the date of loss (April 26, 2020) to the date the claim was reported to State Farm (April 29, 2020).  The one year time period was tolled during our investigation of this claim (April 29, 2020) to the date the claim was initially denied (May 6, 2020).  The one year time period was tolled upon receipt of Antonio Buensuceso Jr.’s email dated May 29, 2020 for additional investigation until the date the denial of the claim was confirm in our June 12, 2020 letter.  That one year time period continues to run as of the date of our June 12, 2020 letter. Sincerely, Louis Louis E Gueniot III Claim Team Manager State Farm General Insurance Company

779TH PERSUASIE APPEAL_4SEP19_TO THE SCP JUSTICIDES_SURRENDER OR DIE

1 CERTIFICATE OF SEPARATION FROM LAST EMPLOYER COMPLAINT 2.  MY QUEST FOR SWINDLED  RETIREMENT PAY BY SHELL SWINDLING ITO, SYNDICATED ESTAFA HOT PURSUIT DUTY OF LAW ENFORCEMENT ENTITIES 924counts SEE BELOW FOR THE 924TH    TIME THE REITERATION OF DEMAND PAYMENT OF RETIREMENT PAY WHICH SHELL REFUSED TO HONOR IN THE PRESENCE AND DEEMED APPROVAL OF THE HONORABLE MAGISTRATES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE PHILIPPINES GEUS_15MAR16_66th FOLLOW UP_REITERATION OF DEMAND  PAYMENT OF RETIREMENT PAY Dishonest scales are an abomination to the Lord, but a just weight is His delight... Proverbs Chapter 11  v. 1 Retirement Pay Law circumvented by Shell subject to penal provision provided for by Article 288 of the Labor Code of the Philippines.

Claim Number 55-06c6-44x CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JOHN TITOUAH QUESTION 8 DATED 3SEP20 9:42pm

SEPTEMBER 3,  2020 GORDON LIU CLAIM SPECIALIST STATE FARM HOME INSURANCE RE: Claim Number 55-06c6-44x        Policy Number 77-C3-B499-7 DATE OF LOSS: April 26, 2020 CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JOHN TITOUAH QUESTION 8  DO STATE FARM TOP MANAGEMENT KNEW WHAT MR. GUENIOT IS DOING ? Dear Mr. Liu: PLEASE SEE, I MADE THE QUESTION VERY SIMPLE SO THAT YOU CAN RESPOND AT ONCE. JUST WRITE TO ME, YES OR NO. QUESTION 8. DO STATE FARM TOP MANAGEMENT KNEW WHAT MR. GUENIOT IS DOING ? Please acknowledge receipt of this e-mail and kindly inform me when I should expect a reply to this email. PLEASE RESTRICT ISSUES AND ANSWERS WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF THE SUBJECT MATTER TO AVOID INAPPROPRIATENESS Please be reminded that your DENIAL LETTER DATED MAY 6, 2020 was prepared, relayed to us, sent and read by us in just a few minutes. Thank you very much. Yours faithfully, Antonio L. Buensuceso