783RD PERSUASIVE APPEAL_10SEP19_TO THE SCP JUSTICIDES_THE TRAGEDY OF INJUSTICE

1 CERTIFICATE OF SEPARATION FROM LAST EMPLOYER COMPLAINT 2.  MY QUEST FOR SWINDLED  RETIREMENT PAY BY SHELL SWINDLING ITO, SYNDICATED ESTAFA HOT PURSUIT DUTY OF LAW ENFORCEMENT ENTITIES 928counts SEE BELOW FOR THE 928TH    TIME THE REITERATION OF DEMAND PAYMENT OF RETIREMENT PAY WHICH SHELL REFUSED TO HONOR IN THE PRESENCE AND DEEMED APPROVAL OF THE HONORABLE MAGISTRATES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE PHILIPPINES GEUS_15MAR16_66th FOLLOW UP_REITERATION OF DEMAND  PAYMENT OF RETIREMENT PAY Dishonest scales are an abomination to the Lord, but a just weight is His delight... Proverbs Chapter 11  v. 1 Retirement Pay Law circumvented by Shell subject to penal provision provided for by Article 288 of the Labor Code of the Philippines.

Claim Number 55-06c6-44x INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 30 DATED 9SEP20 9:34pm

SEPTEMBER 9,  2020 LOUIS E. GUENIOT TEAM MANAGER GORDON LIU CLAIM SPECIALIST STATE FARM HOME INSURANCE RE: Claim Number 55-06c6-44x        Policy Number 77-C3-B499-7 DATE OF LOSS: April 26, 2020 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 29 DATED 9SEP20 4:28pm INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 30 REPEATED MISCONDUCTS FROM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSES  1 TO 8 AND 9/10/11/12/13 AND 14 AND 15/16/17/18/19/20/21/22/23/24/25/26/27/28/29 BEING NOT DISPUTED, OBJECTED AND HABITUALLY REPEATED WITH IMPUNITY.  HENCE, PROVEN TO BE INTENTIONAL, DELIBERATE, MALICIOUS, WILLFUL, WANTON, OPPRESSIVE AND OUTRAGEOUS AND BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT Dear Messrs Gueniot and Liu: PLEASE SEE, As Mr. Gueniot responded to email as shown next: Claim Number 55-06c6-44x INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 29 DATED 9SEP20 4:28pm THIS SHOWS: EVIDENCE OF 30 RECORDED MISCONDUCTS, PROOF BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT OF, REPEATED HABITUALLY, INTENTIONALLY,  DELIBERATELY. MISCONDUCT RESPONDING TO EMAILS SUBJECT OUTSIDE OF THE SUBJECT UNDER DISCUSSION AND RESPONDING TO EMAILS NOT ADDRESSED TO HIM TO RESPOND. HE HAD SHOWN A TOTAL OF THIRTY (30) RECORDED INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSES AND/OR MISCONDUCTS TO SOW CONFUSION AND INTENTIONALLY AND DELIBERATELY DERAIL AND DELAY THE PROCEEDINGS. HOWEVER, AGAIN, YOUR  INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 30 IS WORTHLESS  SIMPLY BECAUSE IT IS NOT WITHIN THE BOUNDS OF SUBJECT BEING DISCUSSED AND ANSWERING QUESTIONS NOT ADDRESSED FOR GUENIOT TO RESPOND. YOUR ACTIONS, MR. GUENIOT TEND TO SHOW THAT  YOU MIGHT BE THE REAL MASTERMIND OF  TITOUAH'S CRIMES. SO, MR. GUENIOT, MAY I REQUEST FOR YOUR KIND UNDERSTANDING. WE NEED TO HAVE OUR NEGOTIATION ORGANIZED AND RECORDS CLEAR,  SO THAT WE MAY AVOID CONFUSION. OBVIOUSLY, IT APPEARS THAT YOU WANTED MUCH EAGERLY TO SEVERE THE NEGOTIATION AND THE INVESTIGATION PROCESS. THIS FACT LEAD ME TO THINK YOU ARE AVOIDING RESPONSE FROM MR. LUI BECAUSE HE MOST PROBABLY WOULD LEAD ME TO YOU, MR.GUENIOT, AS THE REAL MASTERMIND OF TITOUAH'S CRIME AND CONSEQUENTLY,  YOU ARE PREVENTING HIM FROM ANSWERING QUESTIONS POSTED FROM ME FOR HIM.  SO PLEASE MR. GUENIOT, KINDLY WAIT FOR YOUR TURN. DO NOT WORRY, I HAVE PREPARED SOME 100 EASY QUESTIONS ESPECIALLY CRAFTED FOR YOU, I PROMISE, I WILL GIVE YOU THE HONORS TO INTELLIGENTLY AND HONESTLY ANSWER THOSE QUESTIONS. Please acknowledge receipt of this e-mail. THIS EMAIL RESPONSE IS INTENDED FOR YOUR  COLLECTION OF NEW INFORMATION ON INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSES WHICH TO MY TALLY RIGHT NOW ROSE TO 30.  IN OTHER WORDS,  THIRTY (30) COUNTS OF STATE FARM RECORDED MISCONDUCTS. THOSE UNRECORDED MISCONDUCTS, I AM STILL COLLECTING THEM AND I PROMISE I WILL ADD THEM TO THE LIST WHICH INFORMATION YOU MAY STILL WANTED TO KNOW. PLEASE RESTRICT ISSUES WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF THE SUBJECT MATTER TO AVOID INAPPROPRIATENESS AND CONFUSION. Please be reminded that your DENIAL LETTER DATED MAY 6, 2020 was prepared, relayed to us, sent and read by us in just a few minutes. Thank you very much. Yours faithfully, Antonio L. Buensuceso

STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 30 DATED 9SEP20 6:00pm

INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 30 RESPONSE TO EMAIL: Claim Number 55-06c6-44x INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 29 DATED 9SEP20 4:28pm NOTE : INAPPROPRIATE RE, THE EMAIL QUESTION IS NOT ADDRESSED TO GUENIOT TO RESPOND AND HE ABSOLUTELY BLOCKED THE QUESTION ON WHO IS THE PERSON-IN-CHARGE OVER THEM AND HIS ARGUMENTS ARE OUTSIDE OF THE SUBJECT MATTER BEING DISCUSSED AND BEEN REPEATED WITHOUT REMORSE IN DOING HIS MISCONDUCTS WITH IMPUNITY ALL OVER AGAIN. CLEARER READING BELOW OF THE EMAIL SCREENSHOT ABOVE: Dear Mr. Buensuceso, Your email below does not provide any new information for us to evaluate on this claim.  State Farm’s decision remains the same and this claim file remains closed.  All conditions previously quoted still apply. We previously communicated to you that State Farm will no longer respond to your emails which do not provide any new information for us to evaluate on this claim. You should not interpret our silence as any agreement with you, or any waiver of our rights under the policy or law.  We reserve all such rights in the past, present, and future.  If you send in new information that warrants consideration, then we would provide you a substantive response.  Your email contains allegations of misconduct. All such contentions are denied. We handle each claim on its own merits and have complied with the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing in the investigation and handling of this claim. We are required by California Insurance Regulations, Section 2695.7(b)(3), to advise you that if you believe this claim, or any part of this claim, has been wrongfully denied or rejected, you may have the matter reviewed by the California Department of Insurance, Claim Service Bureau, 300 South Spring Street, Los Angeles, California 90013, telephone 800 927 4357. The one year “Suit Against Us” time period referred to in the May 6, 2020 letter includes the time period from the date of loss (April 26, 2020) to the date the claim was reported to State Farm (April 29, 2020).  The one year time period was tolled during our investigation of this claim (April 29, 2020) to the date the claim was initially denied (May 6, 2020).  The one year time period was tolled upon receipt of Antonio Buensuceso Jr.’s email dated May 29, 2020 for additional investigation until the date the denial of the claim was confirm in our June 12, 2020 letter.  That one year time period continues to run as of the date of our June 12, 2020 letter. Sincerely, Louis Louis E Gueniot III Claim Team Manager State Farm General Insurance Company

Claim Number 55-06c6-44x INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 29 DATED 9SEP20 4:28pm

SEPTEMBER 9,  2020 LOUIS E. GUENIOT TEAM MANAGER GORDON LIU CLAIM SPECIALIST STATE FARM HOME INSURANCE RE: Claim Number 55-06c6-44x        Policy Number 77-C3-B499-7 DATE OF LOSS: April 26, 2020 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSES 25/26/27/28 DATED 9SEP20, 7:17am, 7:18am,7:18am, 7:19am INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 29 REPEATED MISCONDUCT FROM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSES  1 TO 8 AND 9/10/11/12/13 AND 14 AND 15/16/17/18/19/20/21/22/23/24/25/26/27/28 BEING NOT DISPUTED, OBJECTED AND HABITUALLY REPEATED WITH IMPUNITY.  HENCE, PROVEN TO BE INTENTIONAL, DELIBERATE, MALICIOUS, WILLFUL, WANTON, OPPRESSIVE AND OUTRAGEOUS AND BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT Dear Messrs Gueniot and Liu: PLEASE SEE, As Mr. Gueniot responded to email as shown next: Claim Number 55-06c6-44x STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSES 25/26/27/28 DATED 9SEP20, 7:17am, 7:18am,7:18am, 7:19am THIS SHOWS: EVIDENCE OF 29 RECORDED MISCONDUCTS, PROOF BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT OF, REPEATED HABITUALLY, INTENTIONALLY,  DELIBERATELY. MISCONDUCT RESPONDING TO EMAILS SUBJECT OUTSIDE OF THE SUBJECT UNDER DISCUSSION AND RESPONDING TO EMAILS NOT ADDRESSED TO HIM TO RESPOND. HE HAD SHOWN A TOTAL OF TWENTY-NINE (29) RECORDED INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSES AND/OR MISCONDUCTS TO SOW CONFUSION AND INTENTIONALLY AND DELIBERATELY DERAIL AND DELAY THE PROCEEDINGS. HOWEVER,YOUR  INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 29 WORTHLESS  SIMPLY BECAUSE IT IS NOT WITHIN THE BOUNDS OF SUBJECT BEING DISCUSSED AND ANSWERING QUESTIONS NOT ADDRESSED FOR GUENIOT TO RESPOND. YOUR ACTIONS, MR. GUENIOT TEND TO SHOW THAT  YOU MIGHT BE THE REAL MASTERMIND OF  TITOUAH'S CRIMES. SO, MR. GUENIOT, MAY I REQUEST FOR YOUR KIND UNDERSTANDING. WE NEED TO HAVE OUR NEGOTIATION ORGANIZED AND RECORDS CLEAR,  SO THAT WE MAY AVOID CONFUSION. OBVIOUSLY, IT APPEARS THAT YOU WANTED MUCH EAGERLY TO SEVERE THE NEGOTIATION AND THE INVESTIGATION PROCESS. THIS FACT LEAD ME TO THINK YOU ARE AVOIDING RESPONSE FROM MR. LUI BECAUSE HE MOST PROBABLY WOULD LEAD ME TO YOU, MR.GUENIOT, AS THE REAL MASTERMIND OF TITOUAH'S CRIME AND CONSEQUENTLY,  YOU ARE PREVENTING HIM FROM ANSWERING QUESTIONS POSTED FROM ME FOR HIM.   Please acknowledge receipt of this e-mail. THIS EMAIL RESPONSE IS INTENDED FOR YOUR  COLLECTION OF NEW INFORMATION ON INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSES WHICH TO MY TALLY RIGHT NOW ROSE TO 29.  IN OTHER WORDS,  TWENTY-NINE (29) COUNTS OF STATE FARM RECORDED MISCONDUCTS. THOSE UNRECORDED MISCONDUCTS, I AM STILL COLLECTING THEM AND I PROMISE I WILL ADD THEM TO THE LIST WHICH INFORMATION YOU MAY STILL WANTED TO KNOW. PLEASE RESTRICT ISSUES WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF THE SUBJECT MATTER TO AVOID INAPPROPRIATENESS AND CONFUSION. Please be reminded that your DENIAL LETTER DATED MAY 6, 2020 was prepared, relayed to us, sent and read by us in just a few minutes. Thank you very much. Yours faithfully, Antonio L. Buensuceso

STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 29 DATED 9SEP20 3:43PM

INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 29 RESPONSE TO EMAIL: Claim Number 55-06c6-44x STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSES 25/26/27/28 DATED 9SEP20, 7:17am, 7:18am,7:18am, 7:19am NOTE : INAPPROPRIATE RE, THE EMAIL QUESTION IS NOT ADDRESSED TO GUENIOT TO RESPOND AND HE ABSOLUTELY BLOCKED THE QUESTION ON WHO IS THE PERSON-IN-CHARGE OVER THEM AND HIS ARGUMENTS ARE OUTSIDE OF THE SUBJECT MATTER BEING DISCUSSED AND BEEN REPEATED WITHOUT REMORSE IN DOING HIS MISCONDUCTS WITH IMPUNITY ALL OVER AGAIN. CLEARER READING BELOW OF THE EMAIL SCREENSHOT ABOVE: Dear Mr. Buensuceso, Your email below does not provide any new information for us to evaluate on this claim.  State Farm’s decision remains the same and this claim file remains closed.  All conditions previously quoted still apply. We previously communicated to you that State Farm will no longer respond to your emails which do not provide any new information for us to evaluate on this claim. You should not interpret our silence as any agreement with you, or any waiver of our rights under the policy or law.  We reserve all such rights in the past, present, and future.  If you send in new information that warrants consideration, then we would provide you a substantive response.  Your email contains allegations of misconduct. All such contentions are denied. We handle each claim on its own merits and have complied with the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing in the investigation and handling of this claim. We are required by California Insurance Regulations, Section 2695.7(b)(3), to advise you that if you believe this claim, or any part of this claim, has been wrongfully denied or rejected, you may have the matter reviewed by the California Department of Insurance, Claim Service Bureau, 300 South Spring Street, Los Angeles, California 90013, telephone 800 927 4357. The one year “Suit Against Us” time period referred to in the May 6, 2020 letter includes the time period from the date of loss (April 26, 2020) to the date the claim was reported to State Farm (April 29, 2020).  The one year time period was tolled during our investigation of this claim (April 29, 2020) to the date the claim was initially denied (May 6, 2020).  The one year time period was tolled upon receipt of Antonio Buensuceso Jr.’s email dated May 29, 2020 for additional investigation until the date the denial of the claim was confirm in our June 12, 2020 letter.  That one year time period continues to run as of the date of our June 12, 2020 letter. Sincerely, Louis Louis E Gueniot III Claim Team Manager State Farm General Insurance Company

Claim Number 55-06c6-44x STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSES 25/26/27/28 DATED 9SEP20, 7:17am, 7:18am,7:18am, 7:19am

SEPTEMBER 9,  2020 LOUIS E. GUENIOT TEAM MANAGER GORDON LIU CLAIM SPECIALIST STATE FARM HOME INSURANCE RE: Claim Number 55-06c6-44x        Policy Number 77-C3-B499-7 DATE OF LOSS: April 26, 2020  STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 25 DATED 9SEP20 7:17am  STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 26 DATED 9SEP20 7:18AM  STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 27 DATED 9SEP20 7:18am  STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 28 DATED 9SEP20 7:19am INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSES 25/26/27/28 REPEATED MISCONDUCT FROM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSES  1 TO 8 AND 9/10/11/12/13 AND 14 AND 15/16/17/18/19/20/21/22/23/24 BEING NOT DISPUTED, OBJECTED AND HABITUALLY REPEATED WITH IMPUNITY.  HENCE, PROVEN TO BE INTENTIONAL, DELIBERATE, MALICIOUS, WILLFUL, WANTON, OPPRESSIVE AND OUTRAGEOUS AND BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT Dear Messrs Gueniot and Liu: PLEASE SEE, As Mr. Gueniot responded to email as shown next: STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 25 DATED 9SEP20 7:17am  STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 26 DATED 9SEP20 7:18AM  STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 27 DATED 9SEP20 7:18am  STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 28 DATED 9SEP20 7:19am THIS SHOWS: EVIDENCE OF 28 RECORDED MISCONDUCTS, PROOF BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT OF, REPEATED HABITUALLY, INTENTIONALLY,  DELIBERATELY. MISCONDUCT RESPONDING TO EMAILS SUBJECT OUTSIDE OF THE SUBJECT UNDER DISCUSSION AND RESPONDING TO EMAILS NOT ADDRESSED TO HIM TO RESPOND. HE HAD SHOWN A TOTAL OF TWENTY-EIGHT (28) RECORDED INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSES AND/OR MISCONDUCTS TO SOW CONFUSION AND INTENTIONALLY AND DELIBERATELY DERAIL AND DELAY THE PROCEEDINGS. HOWEVER,YOUR  INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSES 25, 25, 27 AND 28  ARE WORTHLESS  SIMPLY BECAUSE IT IS NOT WITHIN THE BOUNDS OF SUBJECT BEING DISCUSSED AND ANSWERING QUESTIONS NOT ADDRESSED FOR GUENIOT TO RESPOND. YOUR ACTIONS, MR. GUENIOT TEND TO SHOW THAT  YOU MIGHT BE THE REAL MASTERMIND OF  TITOUAH'S CRIMES. SO, MR. GUENIOT, MAY I REQUEST FOR YOUR KIND UNDERSTANDING. WE NEED TO HAVE OUR NEGOTIATION ORGANIZED AND RECORDS CLEAR,  SO THAT WE MAY AVOID CONFUSION. OBVIOUSLY, IT APPEARS THAT YOU WANTED MUCH EAGERLY TO SEVERE THE NEGOTIATION AND THE INVESTIGATION PROCESS. THIS FACT LEAD ME TO THINK YOU ARE AVOIDING RESPONSE FROM MR. LUI BECAUSE HE MOST PROBABLY WOULD LEAD ME TO YOU, MR.GUENIOT, AS THE REAL MASTERMIND OF TITOUAH'S CRIME AND CONSEQUENTLY,  YOU ARE PREVENTING HIM FROM ANSWERING QUESTIONS POSTED FROM ME FOR HIM.   Please acknowledge receipt of this e-mail. THIS EMAIL RESPONSE IS INTENDED FOR YOUR  COLLECTION OF NEW INFORMATION ON INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSES WHICH TO MY TALLY RIGHT NOW ROSE TO 28.  IN OTHER WORDS,  TWENTY-EIGHT (28) COUNTS OF STATE FARM RECORDED MISCONDUCTS. THOSE UNRECORDED MISCONDUCTS, I AM STILL COLLECTING THEM AND I PROMISE I WILL ADD THEM TO THE LIST WHICH INFORMATION YOU MAY STILL WANTED TO KNOW. PLEASE RESTRICT ISSUES WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF THE SUBJECT MATTER TO AVOID INAPPROPRIATENESS AND CONFUSION. Please be reminded that your DENIAL LETTER DATED MAY 6, 2020 was prepared, relayed to us, sent and read by us in just a few minutes. Thank you very much. Yours faithfully, Antonio L. Buensuceso