Claim Number 55-06c6-44x INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 32 DATED 10SEP20 9:43AM

SEPTEMBER 10,  2020 LOUIS E. GUENIOT TEAM MANAGER GORDON LIU CLAIM SPECIALIST STATE FARM HOME INSURANCE RE: Claim Number 55-06c6-44x        Policy Number 77-C3-B499-7 DATE OF LOSS: April 26, 2020 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 30 DATED 9SEP20 9:34pm INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 32 REPEATED MISCONDUCT FROM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSES MULTIPLE MISCONDUCTS  1 TO 8 AND 9/10/11/12/13 AND 14 AND 15/16/17/18/19/20/21/22/23/24/25/26/27/28/29/30/31 BEING NOT DISPUTED, OBJECTED AND HABITUALLY REPEATED WITH IMPUNITY.  HENCE, PROVEN TO BE INTENTIONAL, DELIBERATE, MALICIOUS, WILLFUL, WANTON, OPPRESSIVE AND OUTRAGEOUS AND BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT Dear Messrs Gueniot and Liu: PLEASE SEE, As Mr. Gueniot responded to email as shown next: Claim Number 55-06c6-44x INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 30 DATED 9SEP20 9:34pm THIS SHOWS: EVIDENCE OF 32ND RECORDED MISCONDUCT, PROOF BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT OF, REPEATED HABITUALLY, INTENTIONALLY,  DELIBERATELY. MISCONDUCT RESPONDING TO EMAILS SUBJECT OUTSIDE OF THE SUBJECT UNDER DISCUSSION AND RESPONDING TO EMAILS NOT ADDRESSED TO HIM TO RESPOND. HE HAD SHOWN A TOTAL OF THIRTY-TWO (32) RECORDED INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSES AND/OR MISCONDUCTS TO SOW CONFUSION AND INTENTIONALLY AND DELIBERATELY DERAIL AND DELAY THE PROCEEDINGS. HOWEVER, AGAIN, YOUR  INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 32ND IS WORTHLESS  SIMPLY BECAUSE IT IS NOT WITHIN THE BOUNDS OF SUBJECT BEING DISCUSSED AND ANSWERING QUESTIONS NOT ADDRESSED FOR GUENIOT TO RESPOND. YOUR ACTIONS, MR. GUENIOT TEND TO SHOW THAT  YOU MIGHT BE THE REAL MASTERMIND OF  TITOUAH'S CRIMES. SO, MR. GUENIOT, MAY I REQUEST FOR YOUR KIND UNDERSTANDING. WE NEED TO HAVE OUR NEGOTIATION ORGANIZED AND RECORDS CLEAR,  SO THAT WE MAY AVOID CONFUSION. OBVIOUSLY, IT APPEARS THAT YOU WANTED MUCH EAGERLY TO SEVERE THE NEGOTIATION AND THE INVESTIGATION PROCESS. THIS FACT LEAD ME TO THINK YOU ARE AVOIDING RESPONSE FROM MR. LUI BECAUSE HE MOST PROBABLY WOULD LEAD ME TO YOU, MR.GUENIOT, AS THE REAL MASTERMIND OF TITOUAH'S CRIME AND CONSEQUENTLY,  YOU ARE PREVENTING HIM FROM ANSWERING QUESTIONS POSTED FROM ME FOR HIM.  SO PLEASE MR. GUENIOT, KINDLY WAIT FOR YOUR TURN. DO NOT WORRY, I HAVE PREPARED SOME 100 EASY QUESTIONS ESPECIALLY CRAFTED FOR YOU, I PROMISE, I WILL GIVE YOU THE HONORS TO INTELLIGENTLY AND HONESTLY ANSWER THOSE QUESTIONS. Please acknowledge receipt of this e-mail. THIS EMAIL RESPONSE IS INTENDED FOR YOUR  COLLECTION OF NEW INFORMATION ON INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSES WHICH TO MY TALLY RIGHT NOW ROSE TO 31.  IN OTHER WORDS,  THIRTY-ONE (31) COUNTS OF STATE FARM RECORDED MISCONDUCTS. THOSE UNRECORDED MISCONDUCTS, I AM STILL COLLECTING THEM AND I PROMISE I WILL ADD THEM TO THE LIST WHICH INFORMATION YOU MAY STILL WANTED TO KNOW. PLEASE RESTRICT ISSUES WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF THE SUBJECT MATTER TO AVOID INAPPROPRIATENESS AND CONFUSION. Please be reminded that your DENIAL LETTER DATED MAY 6, 2020 was prepared, relayed to us, sent and read by us in just a few minutes. Thank you very much. Yours faithfully, Antonio L. Buensuceso

Claim Number 55-06c6-44x INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 31 DATED 10SEP20 8:56am

SEPTEMBER 10,  2020 LOUIS E. GUENIOT TEAM MANAGER GORDON LIU CLAIM SPECIALIST STATE FARM HOME INSURANCE RE: Claim Number 55-06c6-44x        Policy Number 77-C3-B499-7 DATE OF LOSS: April 26, 2020 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JOHN TITOUAH QUESTION 13 DATED 10SEP20 4:48am INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 31 REPEATED MISCONDUCT FROM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSES MULTIPLE MISCONDUCTS  1 TO 8 AND 9/10/11/12/13 AND 14 AND 15/16/17/18/19/20/21/22/23/24/25/26/27/28/29/30 BEING NOT DISPUTED, OBJECTED AND HABITUALLY REPEATED WITH IMPUNITY.  HENCE, PROVEN TO BE INTENTIONAL, DELIBERATE, MALICIOUS, WILLFUL, WANTON, OPPRESSIVE AND OUTRAGEOUS AND BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT Dear Messrs Gueniot and Liu: PLEASE SEE, As Mr. Gueniot responded to email as shown next: Claim Number 55-06c6-44x CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JOHN TITOUAH QUESTION 13 DATED 10SEP20 4:48am THIS SHOWS: EVIDENCE OF 31ST RECORDED MISCONDUCT, PROOF BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT OF, REPEATED HABITUALLY, INTENTIONALLY,  DELIBERATELY. MISCONDUCT RESPONDING TO EMAILS SUBJECT OUTSIDE OF THE SUBJECT UNDER DISCUSSION AND RESPONDING TO EMAILS NOT ADDRESSED TO HIM TO RESPOND. HE HAD SHOWN A TOTAL OF THIRTY-ONE (31) RECORDED INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSES AND/OR MISCONDUCTS TO SOW CONFUSION AND INTENTIONALLY AND DELIBERATELY DERAIL AND DELAY THE PROCEEDINGS. HOWEVER, AGAIN, YOUR  INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 31ST IS WORTHLESS  SIMPLY BECAUSE IT IS NOT WITHIN THE BOUNDS OF SUBJECT BEING DISCUSSED AND ANSWERING QUESTIONS NOT ADDRESSED FOR GUENIOT TO RESPOND. YOUR ACTIONS, MR. GUENIOT TEND TO SHOW THAT  YOU MIGHT BE THE REAL MASTERMIND OF  TITOUAH'S CRIMES. SO, MR. GUENIOT, MAY I REQUEST FOR YOUR KIND UNDERSTANDING. WE NEED TO HAVE OUR NEGOTIATION ORGANIZED AND RECORDS CLEAR,  SO THAT WE MAY AVOID CONFUSION. OBVIOUSLY, IT APPEARS THAT YOU WANTED MUCH EAGERLY TO SEVERE THE NEGOTIATION AND THE INVESTIGATION PROCESS. THIS FACT LEAD ME TO THINK YOU ARE AVOIDING RESPONSE FROM MR. LUI BECAUSE HE MOST PROBABLY WOULD LEAD ME TO YOU, MR.GUENIOT, AS THE REAL MASTERMIND OF TITOUAH'S CRIME AND CONSEQUENTLY,  YOU ARE PREVENTING HIM FROM ANSWERING QUESTIONS POSTED FROM ME FOR HIM.  SO PLEASE MR. GUENIOT, KINDLY WAIT FOR YOUR TURN. DO NOT WORRY, I HAVE PREPARED SOME 100 EASY QUESTIONS ESPECIALLY CRAFTED FOR YOU, I PROMISE, I WILL GIVE YOU THE HONORS TO INTELLIGENTLY AND HONESTLY ANSWER THOSE QUESTIONS. Please acknowledge receipt of this e-mail. THIS EMAIL RESPONSE IS INTENDED FOR YOUR  COLLECTION OF NEW INFORMATION ON INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSES WHICH TO MY TALLY RIGHT NOW ROSE TO 31.  IN OTHER WORDS,  THIRTY-ONE (31) COUNTS OF STATE FARM RECORDED MISCONDUCTS. THOSE UNRECORDED MISCONDUCTS, I AM STILL COLLECTING THEM AND I PROMISE I WILL ADD THEM TO THE LIST WHICH INFORMATION YOU MAY STILL WANTED TO KNOW. PLEASE RESTRICT ISSUES WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF THE SUBJECT MATTER TO AVOID INAPPROPRIATENESS AND CONFUSION. Please be reminded that your DENIAL LETTER DATED MAY 6, 2020 was prepared, relayed to us, sent and read by us in just a few minutes. Thank you very much. Yours faithfully, Antonio L. Buensuceso

STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 32 DATED 10SEP20 8:09AM

INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 32 RESPONSE TO EMAIL:  Claim Number 55-06c6-44x INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 30 DATED 9SEP20 9:34pm NOTE : INAPPROPRIATE RE, THE EMAIL QUESTION IS NOT ADDRESSED TO GUENIOT TO RESPOND AND HE ABSOLUTELY BLOCKED ANSWERS TO THE QUESTION BY MR. LIU AND HIS ARGUMENTS ARE OUTSIDE OF THE SUBJECT MATTER BEING DISCUSSED AND BEEN REPEATED WITHOUT REMORSE IN DOING HIS MISCONDUCTS WITH IMPUNITY ALL OVER AGAIN. CLEARER READING BELOW OF THE EMAIL SCREENSHOT ABOVE: Dear Mr. Buensuceso, Your email below does not provide any new information for us to evaluate on this claim.  State Farm’s decision remains the same and this claim file remains closed.  All conditions previously quoted still apply. Your email contains allegations of misconduct. All such contentions are denied. We handle each claim on its own merits and have complied with the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing in the investigation and handling of this claim. We are required by California Insurance Regulations, Section 2695.7(b)(3), to advise you that if you believe this claim, or any part of this claim, has been wrongfully denied or rejected, you may have the matter reviewed by the California Department of Insurance, Claim Service Bureau, 300 South Spring Street, Los Angeles, California 90013, telephone 800 927 4357. The one year “Suit Against Us” time period referred to in the May 6, 2020 letter includes the time period from the date of loss (April 26, 2020) to the date the claim was reported to State Farm (April 29, 2020).  The one year time period was tolled during our investigation of this claim (April 29, 2020) to the date the claim was initially denied (May 6, 2020).  The one year time period was tolled upon receipt of Antonio Buensuceso Jr.’s email dated May 29, 2020 for additional investigation until the date the denial of the claim was confirm in our June 12, 2020 letter.  That one year time period continues to run as of the date of our June 12, 2020 letter. Sincerely, Louis Louis E Gueniot III Claim Team Manager State Farm General Insurance Company

STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 31 DATED 10SEP20 6:57AM

INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 31 RESPONSE TO EMAIL: Claim Number 55-06c6-44x CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JOHN TITOUAH QUESTION 13 DATED 10SEP20 4:48am NOTE : INAPPROPRIATE RE, THE EMAIL QUESTION IS NOT ADDRESSED TO GUENIOT TO RESPOND AND HE ABSOLUTELY BLOCKED ANSWERS TO THE QUESTION BY MR. LIU AND HIS ARGUMENTS ARE OUTSIDE OF THE SUBJECT MATTER BEING DISCUSSED AND BEEN REPEATED WITHOUT REMORSE IN DOING HIS MISCONDUCTS WITH IMPUNITY ALL OVER AGAIN. CLEARER READING BELOW OF THE EMAIL SCREENSHOT ABOVE: Dear Mr. Buensuceso, Your email below does not provide any new information for us to evaluate on this claim.  State Farm’s decision remains the same and this claim file remains closed.  All conditions previously quoted still apply. Your email contains allegations of misconduct. All such contentions are denied. We handle each claim on its own merits and have complied with the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing in the investigation and handling of this claim. We are required by California Insurance Regulations, Section 2695.7(b)(3), to advise you that if you believe this claim, or any part of this claim, has been wrongfully denied or rejected, you may have the matter reviewed by the California Department of Insurance, Claim Service Bureau, 300 South Spring Street, Los Angeles, California 90013, telephone 800 927 4357. The one year “Suit Against Us” time period referred to in the May 6, 2020 letter includes the time period from the date of loss (April 26, 2020) to the date the claim was reported to State Farm (April 29, 2020).  The one year time period was tolled during our investigation of this claim (April 29, 2020) to the date the claim was initially denied (May 6, 2020).  The one year time period was tolled upon receipt of Antonio Buensuceso Jr.’s email dated May 29, 2020 for additional investigation until the date the denial of the claim was confirm in our June 12, 2020 letter.  That one year time period continues to run as of the date of our June 12, 2020 letter. Sincerely, Louis Louis E Gueniot III Claim Team Manager State Farm General Insurance Company

Claim Number 55-06c6-44x CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JOHN TITOUAH QUESTION 13 DATED 10SEP20 4:48am

SEPTEMBER 10,  2020 LOUIS E. GUENIOT TEAM MANAGER GORDON LIU CLAIM SPECIALIST STATE FARM HOME INSURANCE RE: Claim Number 55-06c6-44x        Policy Number 77-C3-B499-7 DATE OF LOSS: April 26, 2020 CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JOHN TITOUAH QUESTION 13  HAD MR. GUENIOT CONFUSED HIMSELF TOO LIKE WHAT HE'S DOING WITH ME? Dear Mr. Liu: PLEASE SEE, As Mr. Gueniot responded to emails as shown next: 1. STATE FARM RESPONSE TO INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSES 9/10/11/12 DATED AUGUST 28, 2020 2:40PM PAR. 6 In the future, State Farm will no longer respond to your emails which do not provide any new information for us to evaluate on this claim. You should not interpret our silence as any agreement with you, or any waiver of our rights under the policy or law.  We reserve all such rights in the past, present, and future.  If you send in new information that warrants consideration, then we would provide you a substantive response.  2. STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 13 DATED AUGUST 28, 2020 2:40PM PAR. 6 In the future, State Farm will no longer respond to your emails which do not provide any new information for us to evaluate on this claim. You should not interpret our silence as any agreement with you, or any waiver of our rights under the policy or law.  We reserve all such rights in the past, present, and future.  If you send in new information that warrants consideration, then we would provide you a substantive response.  3. STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 14 DATED 1 SEPT20 8:37AM PAR. 1 We previously communicated to you that State Farm will no longer respond to your emails which do not provide any new information for us to evaluate on this claim. You should not interpret our silence as any agreement with you, or any waiver of our rights under the policy or law.  We reserve all such rights in the past, present, and future.  If you send in new information that warrants consideration, then we would provide you a substantive response.  4. STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 15 DATED 2SEPT20 8:37AM PAR.1 We previously communicated to you that State Farm will no longer respond to your emails which do not provide any new information for us to evaluate on this claim. You should not interpret our silence as any agreement with you, or any waiver of our rights under the policy or law.  We reserve all such rights in the past, present, and future.  If you send in new information that warrants consideration, then we would provide you a substantive response.  5. STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 16 DATED 2SEPT20 12:22PM PAR. 4 We previously communicated to you that State Farm will no longer respond to your emails which do not provide any new information for us to evaluate on this claim. You should not interpret our silence as any agreement with you, or any waiver of our rights under the policy or law.  We reserve all such rights in the past, present, and future.  If you send in new information that warrants consideration, then we would provide you a substantive response.  6. STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 17 DATED 2SEPT20 12:25PM PAR. 5 We previously communicated to you that State Farm will no longer respond to your emails which do not provide any new information for us to evaluate on this claim. You should not interpret our silence as any agreement with you, or any waiver of our rights under the policy or law.  We reserve all such rights in the past, present, and future.  If you send in new information that warrants consideration, then we would provide you a substantive response.  7. STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 18 DATED 2SEPT20 12:27PM PAR.5  We previously communicated to you that State Farm will no longer respond to your emails which do not provide any new information for us to evaluate on this claim. You should not interpret our silence as any agreement with you, or any waiver of our rights under the policy or law.  We reserve all such rights in the past, present, and future.  If you send in new information that warrants consideration, then we would provide you a substantive response.  8. STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 19 DATED 2SEPT20 12:28PM PAR.4 We previously communicated to you that State Farm will no longer respond to your emails which do not provide any new information for us to evaluate on this claim. You should not interpret our silence as any agreement with you, or any waiver of our rights under the policy or law.  We reserve all such rights in the past, present, and future.  If you send in new information that warrants consideration, then we would provide you a substantive response.  9. STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 20 DATED 2SEPT20 12:29PM PAR.4 We previously communicated to you that State Farm will no longer respond to your emails which do not provide any new information for us to evaluate on this claim. You should not interpret our silence as any agreement with you, or any waiver of our rights under the policy or law.  We reserve all such rights in the past, present, and future.  If you send in new information that warrants consideration, then we would provide you a substantive response. 10.STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 21 DATED 2SEPT20 12:49PM PAR.5 We previously communicated to you that State Farm will no longer respond to your emails which do not provide any new information for us to evaluate on this claim. You should not interpret our silence as any agreement with you, or any waiver of our rights under the policy or law.  We reserve all such rights in the past, present, and future.  If you send in new information that warrants consideration, then we would provide you a substantive response.  11. STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 22 DATED 3SEP20 12:00PM PAR.4 We previously communicated to you that State Farm will no longer respond to your emails which do not provide any new information for us to evaluate on this claim. You should not interpret our silence as any agreement with you, or any waiver of our rights under the policy or law.  We reserve all such rights in the past, present, and future.  If you send in new information that warrants consideration, then we would provide you a substantive response.  12. STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 23 DATED 4SEP20 11:02AM PAR.4 We previously communicated to you that State Farm will no longer respond to your emails which do not provide any new information for us to evaluate on this claim. You should not interpret our silence as any agreement with you, or any waiver of our rights under the policy or law.  We reserve all such rights in the past, present, and future.  If you send in new information that warrants consideration, then we would provide you a substantive response.  13. STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 24 4SEP20 11:05AM PAR.4 We previously communicated to you that State Farm will no longer respond to your emails which do not provide any new information for us to evaluate on this claim. You should not interpret our silence as any agreement with you, or any waiver of our rights under the policy or law.  We reserve all such rights in the past, present, and future.  If you send in new information that warrants consideration, then we would provide you a substantive response.  14. STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 25 DATED 9SEP20 7:17am PAR.2 We previously communicated to you that State Farm will no longer respond to your emails which do not provide any new information for us to evaluate on this claim. You should not interpret our silence as any agreement with you, or any waiver of our rights under the policy or law.  We reserve all such rights in the past, present, and future.  If you send in new information that warrants consideration, then we would provide you a substantive response.  15. STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 26 DATED 9SEP20 7:18AM PAR.2 We previously communicated to you that State Farm will no longer respond to your emails which do not provide any new information for us to evaluate on this claim. You should not interpret our silence as any agreement with you, or any waiver of our rights under the policy or law.  We reserve all such rights in the past, present, and future.  If you send in new information that warrants consideration, then we would provide you a substantive response.  16. STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 27 DATED 9SEP20 7:18am PAR.2 We previously communicated to you that State Farm will no longer respond to your emails which do not provide any new information for us to evaluate on this claim. You should not interpret our silence as any agreement with you, or any waiver of our rights under the policy or law.  We reserve all such rights in the past, present, and future.  If you send in new information that warrants consideration, then we would provide you a substantive response.  17.STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 28 DATED 9SEP20 7:19am PAR.3 We previously communicated to you that State Farm will no longer respond to your emails which do not provide any new information for us to evaluate on this claim. You should not interpret our silence as any agreement with you, or any waiver of our rights under the policy or law.  We reserve all such rights in the past, present, and future.  If you send in new information that warrants consideration, then we would provide you a substantive response.  18. STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 29 DATED 9SEP20 3:43PM PAR.2 We previously communicated to you that State Farm will no longer respond to your emails which do not provide any new information for us to evaluate on this claim. You should not interpret our silence as any agreement with you, or any waiver of our rights under the policy or law.  We reserve all such rights in the past, present, and future.  If you send in new information that warrants consideration, then we would provide you a substantive response.  19. STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 30 DATED 9SEP20 6:00pm PAR.2 We previously communicated to you that State Farm will no longer respond to your emails which do not provide any new information for us to evaluate on this claim. You should not interpret our silence as any agreement with you, or any waiver of our rights under the policy or law.  We reserve all such rights in the past, present, and future.  If you send in new information that warrants consideration, then we would provide you a substantive response.  THESE ARE 19 COUNTS OF EXAMPLES OF  CONFUSING ARGUMENT BY MR. GUENIOT. HONESTLY, I AM CONFUSED ON WHAT POSITION MR.  GUENIOT WOULD WANT TO ANCHOR HIS ARGUMENT  INTO. HE MOST PROBABLY BE CONFUSED TOO.  WHEN I MIGHT WANT CLARIFICATION ABOUT THESE  ISSUES HE WOULD MOST PROBABLY RESPOND  INAPPROPRIATELY MAKING AND MANIPULATING  CONFUSING STATEMENTS AND WRITE THREAT LIKE  "WE WILL NO LONGER RESPOND TO EMAILS WHICH  DO NOT PROVIDE NEW INFORMATION," BUT HE IS  ACTUALLY RESPONDING THOUGH  INAPPROPRIATELY? HE IS RESPONDING, SO HE IS  READING NEW INFORMATION.  WHAT NEW  INFORMATION HE THINK HE MIGHT WANT TO KNOW  MORE. LIKE MY SELF HE MUST BE CONFUSED TOO.  QUESTION 13  HAD MR. GUENIOT CONFUSED HIMSELF TOO LIKE WHAT HE'S DOING WITH ME? Please acknowledge receipt of this e-mail and kindly inform me when I should expect a reply to this email. PLEASE RESTRICT ISSUES AND ANSWERS WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF THE SUBJECT MATTER TO AVOID INAPPROPRIATENESS Please be reminded that your DENIAL LETTER DATED MAY 6, 2020 was prepared, relayed to us, sent and read by us in just a few minutes. Thank you very much. Yours faithfully, Antonio L. Buensuceso