791ST PERSUASIVE APPEAL_20SEP19_TO THE SCP JUSTICIDES_ISKO MORENO SEES STUMBLING BLOCKS AS LADDERS TO CLIMB ON

1 CERTIFICATE OF SEPARATION FROM LAST EMPLOYER COMPLAINT 2.  MY QUEST FOR SWINDLED  RETIREMENT PAY BY SHELL SWINDLING ITO, SYNDICATED ESTAFA HOT PURSUIT DUTY OF LAW ENFORCEMENT ENTITIES 936counts SEE BELOW FOR THE 936TH   TIME THE REITERATION OF DEMAND PAYMENT OF RETIREMENT PAY WHICH SHELL REFUSED TO HONOR IN THE PRESENCE AND DEEMED APPROVAL OF THE HONORABLE MAGISTRATES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE PHILIPPINES GEUS_15MAR16_66th FOLLOW UP_REITERATION OF DEMAND  PAYMENT OF RETIREMENT PAY Dishonest scales are an abomination to the Lord, but a just weight is His delight... Proverbs Chapter 11  v. 1 Retirement Pay Law circumvented by Shell subject to penal provision provided for by Article 288 of the Labor Code of the Philippines.

790TH PERSUASIVE APPEAL_19SEP19_TO THE SCP JUSTICIDES_ LOOT LAUGH TOOL NG MGA PAYASO

1 CERTIFICATE OF SEPARATION FROM LAST EMPLOYER COMPLAINT 2.  MY QUEST FOR SWINDLED  RETIREMENT PAY BY SHELL SWINDLING ITO, SYNDICATED ESTAFA HOT PURSUIT DUTY OF LAW ENFORCEMENT ENTITIES 935counts SEE BELOW FOR THE 935TH   TIME THE REITERATION OF DEMAND PAYMENT OF RETIREMENT PAY WHICH SHELL REFUSED TO HONOR IN THE PRESENCE AND DEEMED APPROVAL OF THE HONORABLE MAGISTRATES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE PHILIPPINES GEUS_15MAR16_66th FOLLOW UP_REITERATION OF DEMAND  PAYMENT OF RETIREMENT PAY Dishonest scales are an abomination to the Lord, but a just weight is His delight... Proverbs Chapter 11  v. 1 Retirement Pay Law circumvented by Shell subject to penal provision provided for by Article 288 of the Labor Code of the Philippines.

Claim Number 55-06c6-44x CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JOHN TITOUAH QUESTION 29 18SEP20 10:23pm

SEPTEMBER 18,  2020 LOUIS E. GUENIOT TEAM MANAGER GORDON LIU CLAIM SPECIALIST STATE FARM HOME INSURANCE RE: Claim Number 55-06c6-44x        Policy Number 77-C3-B499-7 DATE OF LOSS: April 26, 2020 CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JOHN TITOUAH QUESTION 29  DID YOU INFORM MR. GUENIOT THAT YOUR BUSINESS PARTNER WITNESS TITOUAH LIED TO YOU THAT HE DUG 8 TO 10 INCHES CONCRETE SLAB THOUGH HE ACTUALLY JUST DUG 4 TO 6 INCHES? PLEASE COME AGAIN JUST TO TAKE MEASUREMENTS ON THE EXCAVATION MADE BY TITOUAH.  MR. GUENIOT MAY COME WITH YOU. Dear Mr. Liu: PLEASE INCLUDE THIS INFORMATION, "THAT YOUR BUSINESS PARTNER WITNESS TITOUAH LIED TO YOU THAT HE DUG 8 TO 10 INCHES CONCRETE SLAB THOUGH HE ACTUALLY JUST DUG 4 TO 6 INCHES", ONE INFORMATION AMONG THE SEVERAL MORE THAN 10 VIDEOS SHOWN TO YOU ON Monday 29 June 2020 11AM.  YOUR BUSINESS PARTNER WITNESS TITOUAH LIED TO YOU THAT HE DUG 8 TO 10 INCHES OF CONCRETE THOUGH HE ACTUALLY JUST DUG 4 TO 6 INCHES. SINCE HE IS YOUR PARTNER, HIS BUSINESS INTEREST IS YOUR OWN, IT DOES NOT MATTER TO YOU EVEN IF TITOUAH LIED AND PRETENDED YOU DID NOT KNOW THE TRUTH BEHIND IT. UNTIL NOW YOU HAVE NOT CONFIRMED THAT THE TRUE DEPTH MEASUREMENTS ARE 4 TO 6 INCHES. SO, PLEASE COME WITH MR. GUENIOT TO TAKE ACTUAL EXCAVATION DEPTH MEASUREMENT TO HAVE YOUR RECORD CORRECT ACCORDINGLY. QUESTION 29  DID YOU INFORM MR. GUENIOT THAT YOUR BUSINESS PARTNER WITNESS TITOUAH LIED TO YOU THAT HE DUG 8 TO 10 INCHES CONCRETE SLAB THOUGH HE ACTUALLY JUST DUG 4 TO 6 INCHES? Please acknowledge receipt of this e-mail and kindly inform me when I should expect a reply to this email. PLEASE RESTRICT ISSUES AND ANSWERS WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF THE SUBJECT MATTER TO AVOID INAPPROPRIATENESS. Please be reminded that your DENIAL LETTER DATED MAY 6, 2020 was prepared, relayed to us, sent and read by us in just a few minutes. Thank you very much. Yours faithfully, Antonio L. Buensuceso

Claim Number 55-06c6-44x INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 43 DATED 18SEP 20 10:17PM

SEPTEMBER 18,  2020 LOUIS E. GUENIOT TEAM MANAGER GORDON LIU CLAIM SPECIALIST STATE FARM HOME INSURANCE RE: Claim Number 55-06c6-44x        Policy Number 77-C3-B499-7 DATE OF LOSS: April 26, 2020 STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 43 DATED 18SEP20 1:26PM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 43 REPEATED MISCONDUCTS FROM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSES MULTIPLE MISCONDUCTS  1 TO 8 AND 9/10/11/12/13 AND 14 AND 15/16/17/18/19/20/21/22/23/24/25/26/27/28/29/30/31/32/33/34/35/36 AND 37/38/39/40/41/42 BEING NOT DISPUTED, OBJECTED AND HABITUALLY REPEATED WITH IMPUNITY.  HENCE, PROVEN TO BE INTENTIONAL, DELIBERATE, MALICIOUS, WILLFUL, WANTON, OPPRESSIVE AND OUTRAGEOUS AND BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT Dear Messrs Gueniot and Liu: PLEASE SEE, As Mr. Gueniot responded to email as shown next: Claim Number 55-06c6-44x CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JOHN TITOUAH QUESTION 28 DATED 17SEP20 11:21pm THIS SHOWS: EVIDENCE OF 43RD RECORDED MISCONDUCTS, PROOF BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT OF, REPEATED HABITUALLY, INTENTIONALLY,  DELIBERATELY. MISCONDUCT RESPONDING TO EMAILS SUBJECT OUTSIDE OF THE SUBJECT UNDER DISCUSSION AND RESPONDING TO EMAILS NOT ADDRESSED TO HIM TO RESPOND. HE HAD SHOWN A TOTAL OF FORTY-THREE (43) RECORDED INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSES AND/OR MISCONDUCTS TO SOW CONFUSION AND INTENTIONALLY AND DELIBERATELY DERAIL AND DELAY THE PROCEEDINGS. HOWEVER, AGAIN, YOUR  INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 43RD ARE WORTHLESS  SIMPLY BECAUSE THE QUESTION IS NOT ADDRESSED FOR MR. GUENIOT TO RESPOND AND/OR OUTSIDE OF THE SUBJECT MATTER OF THE DISCUSSION AND/OR PROFESSIONALLY DISRESPECTFUL RESPONSE. YOUR ACTIONS, MR. GUENIOT TEND TO SHOW  THAT YOU MIGHT BE THE REAL MASTERMIND OF  TITOUAH'S CRIMES. SO, MR. GUENIOT, AGAIN, MAY I REQUEST FOR YOUR KIND UNDERSTANDING. WE NEED TO HAVE OUR NEGOTIATION ORGANIZED AND RECORDS CLEAR,  SO THAT WE MAY AVOID CONFUSION. OBVIOUSLY, IT APPEARS THAT YOU WANTED MUCH EAGERLY TO SEVERE THE NEGOTIATION AND THE INVESTIGATION PROCESS. HOWEVER, YOUR EFFORTS ARE IN VAIN AS I SEE YOUR INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSES NOW ARE WANING TO ONLY FEW OR THREE (3) WEAK,  SENILE AND FEEBLE PARAGRAPHS  AND THUS, SIMPLY THIS FACT LEAD ME TO THINK YOU ARE REALLY JUST AVOIDING RESPONSE FROM MR. LUI BECAUSE HE MOST PROBABLY WOULD LEAD ME TO YOU, MR.GUENIOT, AS THE REAL MASTERMIND OF TITOUAH'S CRIME AND CONSEQUENTLY,  YOU ARE PREVENTING HIM FROM ANSWERING QUESTIONS POSTED FROM ME FOR HIM.  SO PLEASE MR. GUENIOT, KINDLY WAIT FOR YOUR TURN. DO NOT WORRY, I HAVE PREPARED SOME 100 EASY QUESTIONS ESPECIALLY CRAFTED FOR YOU, I PROMISE, I WILL GIVE YOU THE HONORS TO INTELLIGENTLY AND HONESTLY ANSWER THOSE QUESTIONS. Please acknowledge receipt of this e-mail. THIS EMAIL RESPONSE IS INTENDED FOR YOUR  COLLECTION OF NEW INFORMATION ON INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSES WHICH TO MY TALLY RIGHT NOW ROSE TO 42.  IN OTHER WORDS,  FORTY-THREE (43) COUNTS OF STATE FARM RECORDED MISCONDUCTS. THOSE UNRECORDED MISCONDUCTS, I AM STILL COLLECTING THEM AND I PROMISE I WILL ADD THEM TO THE LIST WHICH INFORMATION YOU MAY STILL WANTED TO KNOW. PLEASE RESTRICT ISSUES WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF THE SUBJECT MATTER TO AVOID INAPPROPRIATENESS AND CONFUSION. Please be reminded that your DENIAL LETTER DATED MAY 6, 2020 was prepared, relayed to us, sent and read by us in just a few minutes. Thank you very much. Yours faithfully, Antonio L. Buensuceso

STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 43 DATED 18SEP20 1:26PM

INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 43 RESPONSE TO EMAIL: Claim Number 55-06c6-44x CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JOHN TITOUAH QUESTION 28 DATED 17SEP20 11:21pm NOTE : INAPPROPRIATE RE, MR. GUENIOT ARGUMENTS ARE OUTSIDE OF THE SUBJECT MATTER BEING DISCUSSED AND BEEN REPEATED WITHOUT REMORSE IN DOING HIS MISCONDUCTS WITH IMPUNITY ALL OVER AGAIN. INCOHERENT ARGUMENTS AS IN REQUESTING FOR UPLOAD OF VIDEO FILES IN MY POSSESSION  BUT THEN WRITING "THE FILES ARE CLOSED" WHAT THEN IS THE USE OF THOSE VIDEO FILES IF THE FILES ARE CLOSED AND MOST RIDICULOUSLY UNPROFESSIONAL AND INAPPROPRIATE MANNER OF DISCUSSING TOPIC OUTSIDE OF THE SUBJECT MATTER. A WORTHLESS AND SILLY RESPONSE INDEED, I AM SORRY,  I BEG PARDON FROM MR. GUENIOT,  HE HAVE MISERABLY LOST HIS PATIENCE AND ZEAL OF SPORTSMANSHIP SHAMELESSLY IN FRONT OF HIS MEN AND PEERS AND TO ALL WHO HAPPENED TO READ THE COMMUNICATION RECORD BETWEEN US. MR. GUENIOT JUST KEPT ON MALICIOUSLY BUTTING IN. HOWEVER, THE INVESTIGATIVE QUESTIONS MOVE ON. CLEARER READING BELOW OF THE EMAIL SCREENSHOT ABOVE: Dear Mr. Buensuceso, I’m writing to acknowledge receipt of your email below as you requested, as well as, the additional thirteen emails received from you since my last response to you on Monday, September 14, 2020.  Two emails were received on Monday, September 14, 2020, one email on Tuesday, September 15, 2020, seven emails received on Wednesday, September 16, 2020 and four emails received on Thursday, September 17, 2020. Please refer to our previous correspondence and email communications.  This claim file remains closed.  All conditions previously quoted still apply. Your emails contain allegations of misconduct. All such contentions are denied. You should not interpret our silence as any agreement with you, or any waiver of our rights under the policy or law.  We reserve all such rights in the past, present, and future.  Sincerely, Louis Louis E Gueniot III Claim Team Manager State Farm General Insurance Company