LOUIS E. GUENIOT TEAM MANAGER CLAIM SPECIALIST
STATE FARM HOME INSURANCE
RE: Claim Number 55-06c6-44x
Policy Number 77-C3-B499-7
DATE OF LOSS: April 26, 2020
STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 47 15OCT20 7:47AM
INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 47
REPEATED MISCONDUCTS
FROM
INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSES
MULTIPLE MISCONDUCTS
1 TO 8 AND 9/10/11/12/13 AND 14
AND 15/16/17/18/19/20/21/22/23/24/25/26/27/28/29/30/31/32/33/34/35/36
AND 37/38/39/40/41/42/43/44/45/46
BEING NOT DISPUTED, OBJECTED AND HABITUALLY REPEATED WITH IMPUNITY. HENCE, PROVEN TO BE INTENTIONAL, DELIBERATE, MALICIOUS, WILLFUL, WANTON, OPPRESSIVE AND OUTRAGEOUS
AND BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT
Dear Messrs Gueniot and Liu:
PLEASE SEE,
As Mr. Gueniot responded to email as shown next:
Claim Number 55-06c6-44x CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JOHN TITOUAH QUERY 9 DATED 15OCT20 12:29AM
THIS SHOWS: EVIDENCE OF 47TH RECORDED MISCONDUCT, PROOF BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT OF, REPEATED HABITUALLY, INTENTIONALLY, DELIBERATELY. MISCONDUCT RESPONDING TO EMAILS SUBJECT OUTSIDE OF THE SUBJECT UNDER DISCUSSION AND/OR RESPONDING TO EMAILS NOT ADDRESSED TO HIM TO RESPOND AND/OR RESPONDING TO SEVERAL EMAILS ONCE LEAVING OTHER EMAILS NOT RESPONDED.
HE HAD SHOWN A TOTAL OF FORTY-SEVEN (47) RECORDED INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSES AND/OR MISCONDUCTS TO SOW CONFUSION AND INTENTIONALLY AND DELIBERATELY DERAIL AND DELAY THE PROCEEDINGS. HOWEVER, AGAIN, HIS INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 46TH IS WORTHLESS SIMPLY BECAUSE THE CONTENTS ARE NOT RELATED TO THE QUESTION POSTED FOR HIM TO ADDRESS AND/OR OUTSIDE OF THE SUBJECT MATTER OF THE DISCUSSION AND/OR PROFESSIONALLY DISRESPECTFUL RESPONSE. YOUR ACTIONS, MR. GUENIOT TEND TO SHOW THAT YOU MIGHT BE THE REAL MASTERMIND OF TITOUAH'S CRIMES.
|
Tuesday, October 15, 2019
Claim Number 55-06c6-44x INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 47 DATED 15OCT20 10:07AM
STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 47 15OCT20 7:47AM
INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 47 RESPONSE TO EMAIL:DENIALS AND ASSERTIONS NEEDED TO BE SUBSTANTIATED, OTHERWISE, CRIMINALS MERE SAYING EMPTY WORDS OF DENIAL AND STATEMENTS WOULD NEVER BE CONVICTED.
NOTE : INAPPROPRIATE RE, MR. GUENIOT AS USUAL, A LAZY RESPONSE RESPONDING ONCE TO MULTIPLE EMAILS WITH DIFFERENT SUBJECT MATTERS AND DISCUSSING ISSUES OUT OF THE SUBJECT BEING RESPONDED TO, A DELIBERATE AND WILLFUL VIOLATION OF SECTION 2695.5(b). Section 2695.5. Duties upon Receipt of Communications(b) Upon receiving any communication from a claimant, regarding a claim, that reasonably suggests that a response is expected, every licensee shall immediately, but in no event more than fifteen (15) calendar days after receipt of that communication, furnish the claimant with a complete response based on the facts as then known by the licensee. This subsection shall not apply to require communication with a claimant subsequent to receipt by the licensee of a notice of legal action by that claimant.
CLEARER READING BELOW OF THE EMAIL SCREENSHOT ABOVE:
Dear Mr. Buensuceso,
I’m writing to acknowledge receipt of the email below along with other emails from you since my last response to you on October 13, 2020.
Please refer to our previous correspondence and email communications. This claim file remains closed. All conditions previously quoted still apply.
We previously communicated to you that State Farm will no longer respond to your emails which do not provide any new information for us to evaluate on this claim. You should not interpret our silence as any agreement with you, or any waiver of our rights under the policy or law.
We have provided a reasonable explanation for the basis of the denial of the claim based on the policy language. This claim has been denied as explained in our letters and responsive emails and the file remains closed.
As we have previously communicated to you, we are required by California Insurance Regulations, Section 2695.7(b)(3), to advise you that if you believe this claim, or any part of this claim, has been wrongfully denied or rejected, you may have the matter reviewed by the California Department of Insurance, Claim Service Bureau, 300 South Spring Street, Los Angeles, California 90013, telephone 800 927 4357.
Your emails contain allegations of misconduct. All such contentions are denied. You should not interpret our silence as any agreement with you, or any waiver of our rights under the policy or law. We reserve all rights under the policy and the law.
Sincerely,
Louis
Louis E Gueniot III Claim Team Manager |
Claim Number 55-06c6-44x CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JOHN TITOUAH QUERY 9 DATED 15OCT20 12:29AM
OCTOBER 15, 2020
LOUIS E. GUENIOT TEAM MANAGER CLAIM SPECIALIST
STATE FARM HOME INSURANCE
RE: Claim Number 55-06c6-44x
Policy Number 77-C3-B499-7
DATE OF LOSS: April 26, 2020
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JOHN TITOUAH
QUERY 9 WOULD YOU LIKE TO COUNT YOUR VIOLATION OF 10 CCR § 2695.5 AND ADD SOME MORE?
Dear Mr. GUENIOT:
MAY I MOST RESPECTFULLY REFER YOU TO THE REGULATIONS
10 CA ADC § 2695.5 BARCLAYS OFFICIAL CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS Barclays Official California Code of Regulations Title 10. Investment Chapter 5. Insurance Commissioner Subchapter 7.5. Unfair or Deceptive Acts or Practices in the Business of Insurance Article 1. Fair Claims Settlement Practices Regulations 10 CCR § 2695.5 § 2695.5. Duties upon Receipt of Communications. (b) Upon receiving any communication from a claimant, regarding a claim, that reasonably suggests that a response is expected, every licensee shall immediately, but in no event more than fifteen (15) calendar days after receipt of that communication, furnish the claimant with a complete response based on the facts as then known by the licensee. This subsection shall not apply to require communication with a claimant subsequent to receipt by the licensee of a notice of legal action by that claimant. § 2695.5. MANDATES THAT, MR. GUENIOT, UPON RECEIVING ANY COMMUNICATION FROM ME THAT REASONABLY SUGGESTS THAT A RESPONSE IS EXPECTED, EVERY LICENSEE, MEANING YOU, MR. GUENIOT SHALL IMMEDIATELY, BUT IN NO EVENT MORE THAN FIFTEEN (15) CALENDAR DAYS AFTER RECEIPT OF THAT COMMUNICATION, FURNISH THE CLAIMANT, ME, WITH A COMPLETE RESPONSE BASED ON THE FACTS AS THEN KNOWN BY THE LICENSEE, YOU MR. GUENIOT. AGAIN, YOU, MR. GUENIOT SHALL FURNISH ME WITH COMPLETE RESPONSE, MEANING NOT INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE NOR MERELY ACKNOWLEDGING IT. MOREOVER, AS MY EMAIL COMMUNICATIONS SUGGEST THAT RESPONSES ARE EXPECTED. HENCE, FOR EVERY EMAIL FROM ME DESERVES ONE COMPLETE EMAIL RESPONSE FROM YOU. LAST SEPTEMBER 2020 ALONE WE HAVE NINETY-SEVEN (97) EMAIL COMMUNICATIONS WHERE I GOT NO COMPLETE EMAIL RESPONSE FROM YOU BUT ONLY THIRTY-THREE (33) INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSES.
QUERY 9 WOULD YOU LIKE TO COUNT YOUR VIOLATION OF 10 CCR § 2695.5 AND ADD SOME MORE?
Please acknowledge receipt of this e-mail and kindly inform me when I should expect a reply to this email.
PLEASE RESTRICT ISSUES AND ANSWERS WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF THE SUBJECT MATTER TO AVOID INAPPROPRIATENESS. Please be reminded that your DENIAL LETTER DATED MAY 6, 2020 was prepared, relayed to us, sent and read by us in just a few minutes.
Thank you very much. Yours faithfully, Antonio L. Buensuceso |
808TH PERSUASIVE APPEAL_15 OCT19_TO THE SCP JUSTICIDES_ WELL SECURED RETIREMENT HOME FOR ALBAYALDE?
|
953counts
SEE BELOW FOR THE 953RD TIME THE REITERATION OF DEMAND PAYMENT OF RETIREMENT PAY WHICH SHELL REFUSED TO HONOR IN THE PRESENCE AND DEEMED APPROVAL OF THE HONORABLE MAGISTRATES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE PHILIPPINES
Dishonest scales are an abomination to the Lord, but a just weight is His delight... Proverbs Chapter 11 v. 1
Retirement Pay Law circumvented by Shell subject to penal provision provided for by Article 288 of the Labor Code of the Philippines.
|
Monday, October 14, 2019
Claim Number 55-06c6-44x INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 46 DATED 14OCT20 12:17AM
OCTOBER 14, 2020
LOUIS E. GUENIOT TEAM MANAGER CLAIM SPECIALIST
STATE FARM HOME INSURANCE
RE: Claim Number 55-06c6-44x
Policy Number 77-C3-B499-7
DATE OF LOSS: April 26, 2020
STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 46 DATED 13OCT20 6:29AM
INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 46
REPEATED MISCONDUCTS
FROM
INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSES
MULTIPLE MISCONDUCTS
1 TO 8 AND 9/10/11/12/13 AND 14
AND 15/16/17/18/19/20/21/22/23/24/25/26/27/28/29/30/31/32/33/34/35/36
AND 37/38/39/40/41/42/43/44/45
BEING NOT DISPUTED, OBJECTED AND HABITUALLY REPEATED WITH IMPUNITY. HENCE, PROVEN TO BE INTENTIONAL, DELIBERATE, MALICIOUS, WILLFUL, WANTON, OPPRESSIVE AND OUTRAGEOUS
AND BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT
Dear Messrs Gueniot and Liu:
PLEASE SEE,
As Mr. Gueniot responded to emails as shown next:
Claim Number 55-06c6-44x INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 45 DATED 12OCT20 4:39PMClaim Number 55-06c6-44x CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JOHN TITOUAH QUERY 7 DATED 12OCT20 5:11PMFAIR CLAIMS SETTLEMENT PRACTICES REGULATION
THIS SHOWS: EVIDENCE OF 46TH RECORDED MISCONDUCT, PROOF BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT OF, REPEATED HABITUALLY, INTENTIONALLY, DELIBERATELY. MISCONDUCT RESPONDING TO EMAILS SUBJECT OUTSIDE OF THE SUBJECT UNDER DISCUSSION AND/OR RESPONDING TO EMAILS NOT ADDRESSED TO HIM TO RESPOND AND/OR RESPONDING TO SEVERAL EMAILS ONCE LEAVING OTHER EMAILS NOT RESPONDED.
HE HAD SHOWN A TOTAL OF FORTY-SIX (46) RECORDED INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSES AND/OR MISCONDUCTS TO SOW CONFUSION AND INTENTIONALLY AND DELIBERATELY DERAIL AND DELAY THE PROCEEDINGS. HOWEVER, AGAIN, HIS INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 46TH IS WORTHLESS SIMPLY BECAUSE THE CONTENTS ARE NOT RELATED TO THE QUESTION POSTED FOR HIM TO ADDRESS AND/OR OUTSIDE OF THE SUBJECT MATTER OF THE DISCUSSION AND/OR PROFESSIONALLY DISRESPECTFUL RESPONSE. YOUR ACTIONS, MR. GUENIOT TEND TO SHOW THAT YOU MIGHT BE THE REAL MASTERMIND OF TITOUAH'S CRIMES.
|
SHELL CIRCUMVENTED RA 7641
SYNDICATED ESTAFA
HOT PURSUIT
DUTY OF LAW ENFORCEMENT ENTITIES
SHELL SWINDLING OF RETIREMENT PAY 5TH YEAR
|