Claim Number 55-06c6-44x INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 50 DATED 30OCT20 10:17AM

OCTOBER 30,  2020 LOUIS E. GUENIOT TEAM MANAGER GORDON LIU CLAIM SPECIALIST STATE FARM HOME INSURANCE RE: Claim Number 55-06c6-44x        Policy Number 77-C3-B499-7 DATE OF LOSS: April 26, 2020 STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 50 DATED 30OCT20 8:49AM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 50 REPEATED MISCONDUCTS FROM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSES MULTIPLE MISCONDUCTS  1 TO 8 AND 9/10/11/12/13 AND 14 AND 15/16/17/18/19/20/21/22/23/24/25/26/27/28/29/30/31/32/33/34/35/36 AND 37/38/39/40/41/42/43/44/45/46/47/48/49 BEING NOT DISPUTED, OBJECTED AND HABITUALLY REPEATED WITH IMPUNITY.  HENCE, PROVEN TO BE INTENTIONAL, DELIBERATE, MALICIOUS, WILLFUL, WANTON, OPPRESSIVE AND OUTRAGEOUS AND BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT Dear Messrs Gueniot and Liu: PLEASE SEE, As Mr. Gueniot responded to email as shown next: Claim Number 55-06c6-44x CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JOHN TITOUAH QUERY 20 DATED 30OCT20 8:13am SEVENTH TIME, WOULD YOU STILL FORCE US TO ELEVATE THESE ISSUES TO THE DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE AND/OR SEEK LEGAL HELP TO DEFEND OUR RIGHT TO OUR LEGITIMATE INSURANCE CLAIM COVERAGE?  PLEASE BE CLEAR . YES OR NO.    THIS SHOWS: EVIDENCE OF 50TH RECORDED MISCONDUCT, PROOF BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT OF, REPEATED HABITUALLY, INTENTIONALLY,  DELIBERATELY OF MISCONDUCTS RESPONDING TO EMAILS SUBJECT OUTSIDE OF THE SUBJECT UNDER DISCUSSION AND/OR RESPONDING TO EMAILS NOT ADDRESSED TO HIM TO RESPOND AND/OR RESPONDING TO SEVERAL EMAILS ONCE LEAVING OTHER EMAILS NOT RESPONDED. HE HAD SHOWN A TOTAL OF FIFTY (50) RECORDED INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSES AND/OR MISCONDUCTS TO SOW CONFUSION AND INTENTIONALLY AND DELIBERATELY DERAIL AND DELAY THE PROCEEDINGS. HOWEVER, AGAIN, HIS  INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 50TH IS WORTHLESS  SIMPLY BECAUSE THE CONTENTS ARE NOT RELATED TO THE QUESTION POSTED FOR HIM TO ADDRESS AND/OR OUTSIDE OF THE SUBJECT MATTER OF THE DISCUSSION AND/OR PROFESSIONALLY DISRESPECTFUL RESPONSE. YOUR ACTIONS, MR. GUENIOT TEND TO SHOW  THAT YOU MIGHT BE THE REAL MASTERMIND OF  TITOUAH'S CRIMES. SO, MR. GUENIOT, AGAIN, MAY I REQUEST FOR YOUR KIND UNDERSTANDING. WE NEED TO HAVE OUR NEGOTIATION ORGANIZED AND RECORDS CLEAR,  SO THAT WE MAY AVOID CONFUSION. OBVIOUSLY, IT APPEARS THAT YOU WANTED MUCH EAGERLY TO CLOSE THE NEGOTIATION AND THE INVESTIGATION PROCESS. HOWEVER, YOUR EFFORTS ARE IN VAIN AS I SEE YOUR INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSES NOW ARE WANING TO ONLY FEW OR THREE (3) WEAK,  SENILE AND FEEBLE PARAGRAPHS  AND THUS, SIMPLY THIS FACT LEAD ME TO THINK YOU REALLY JUST WANTED TO AVOID QUESTIONS, WHICH ANSWERS OR NO ANSWER FROM YOU TEND TO SPILL THE BEANS OF MOST PROBABLY TITOUAH AND YOUR CRIMES IN PARTNERSHIP WITH HIM SIMPLY BY READING THE QUERIES SPECIALLY CRAFTED FOR YOU, WITH OR WITHOUT YOUR ANSWERS. SO PLEASE MR. GUENIOT, KINDLY READ VERY CONSCIENTIOUSLY. DO NOT WORRY, I HAVE PREPARED SOME 100 EASY QUESTIONS ESPECIALLY CRAFTED FOR YOU, I PROMISE, I WILL GIVE YOU THE HONORS TO INTELLIGENTLY AND HONESTLY ANSWER THOSE QUESTIONS OR IF YOU WISHED TO BE SILENT, I RESPECT YOUR CHOICE, IT IS YOUR RIGHT. HOWEVER, CRIMINALS NO MATTER HOW THEY TRIED TO KEEP SILENT ARE CONVICTED THROUGH THEIR ACTS AND OMISSIONS AND CONVINCING FACTUAL AND CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCES. Please acknowledge receipt of this e-mail. THIS EMAIL RESPONSE IS INTENDED FOR YOUR  COLLECTION OF NEW INFORMATION ON INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSES WHICH TO MY TALLY RIGHT NOW ROSE TO 50.  IN OTHER WORDS,  FIFTY (50) COUNTS OF STATE FARM RECORDED MISCONDUCTS. THOSE UNRECORDED MISCONDUCTS, I AM STILL COLLECTING THEM AND I PROMISE I WILL ADD THEM TO THE LIST WHICH INFORMATION YOU MAY STILL WANTED TO KNOW. PLEASE RESTRICT ISSUES WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF THE SUBJECT MATTER TO AVOID INAPPROPRIATENESS AND CONFUSION. Please be reminded that your DENIAL LETTER DATED MAY 6, 2020 was prepared, relayed to us, sent and read by us in just a few minutes. Thank you very much. Yours faithfully, Antonio L. Buensuceso

STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 50 DATED 30OCT20 8:49AM

INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 50 RESPONSE TO EMAIL: Claim Number 55-06c6-44x CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JOHN TITOUAH QUERY 20 DATED 30OCT20 8:13am SEVENTH TIME, WOULD YOU STILL FORCE US TO ELEVATE THESE ISSUES TO THE DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE AND/OR SEEK LEGAL HELP TO DEFEND OUR RIGHT TO OUR LEGITIMATE INSURANCE CLAIM COVERAGE? YES OR NO? DENIALS AND ASSERTIONS NEEDED TO BE  SUBSTANTIATED, OTHERWISE, CRIMINALS MERE  SAYING EMPTY WORDS OF DENIAL AND STATEMENTS  WOULD NEVER BE CONVICTED. NOTE : INAPPROPRIATE RE, MR. GUENIOT  AS USUAL, A LAZY RESPONSE RESPONDING ONCE TO MULTIPLE EMAILS WITH DIFFERENT SUBJECT MATTERS AND DISCUSSING ISSUES OUT OF THE SUBJECT BEING RESPONDED TO, A DELIBERATE AND WILLFUL AND WANTON AND INTENTIONAL VIOLATION OF SECTION 2695.5(b). Section 2695.5. Duties upon Receipt of Communications (b) Upon receiving any communication from a claimant, regarding a claim, that reasonably suggests that a response is expected, every licensee shall immediately, but in no event more than fifteen (15) calendar days after receipt of that communication, furnish the claimant with a complete response based on the facts as then known by the licensee. This subsection shall not apply to require communication with a claimant subsequent to receipt by the licensee of a notice of legal action by that claimant. CLEARER READING BELOW OF THE EMAIL SCREENSHOT ABOVE: Dear Mr. Buensuceso,   I’m writing to acknowledge receipt of the email below along with other emails from you since my last response to you on October 26, 2020.   Please refer to our previous correspondence and email communications.  This claim file remains closed.  All conditions previously quoted still apply.   Your emails contain allegations of misconduct. All such contentions are denied. You should not interpret our silence as any agreement with you, or any waiver of our rights under the policy or law.  We reserve all rights under the policy and the law.    Sincerely,   Louis     Louis E Gueniot III Claim Team Manager State Farm General Insurance Company

Claim Number 55-06c6-44x CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JOHN TITOUAH QUERY 20 DATED 30OCT20 8:13am

OCTOBER 30,  2020 LOUIS E. GUENIOT TEAM MANAGER GORDON LIU CLAIM SPECIALIST STATE FARM HOME INSURANCE RE: Claim Number 55-06c6-44x        Policy Number 77-C3-B499-7 DATE OF LOSS: April 26, 2020 CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JOHN TITOUAH QUERY 20   SEVENTH TIME, WOULD YOU STILL FORCE US TO ELEVATE THESE ISSUES TO THE DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE AND/OR SEEK LEGAL HELP TO DEFEND OUR RIGHT TO OUR LEGITIMATE INSURANCE CLAIM COVERAGE? YES OR NO?  Dear Mr. GUENIOT: MAY I MOST RESPECTFULLY REFER YOU TO: Section 2695.1 Preamble (a) Section 790.03(h) of the California Insurance Code enumerates sixteen claims settlement practices that, when either knowingly committed on a single occasion, or performed with such frequency as to indicate a general business practice, are considered to be unfair claims settlement practices and are, thus, prohibited by this section of the California Insurance Code. The Insurance Commissioner has promulgated these regulations in order to accomplish the following objectives: (1) To delineate certain minimum standards for the settlement of claims which, when violated knowingly on a single occasion or performed with such frequency as to indicate a general business practice shall constitute an unfair claims settlement practice within the meaning of Insurance Code Section 790.03(h); SECTION 790.03(h) Knowingly committing or performing with such frequency as to indicate a general business practice any of the following unfair claims settlement practices: SPECIFICALLY, (2) (3) (4) (5) (13) (2) Failing to acknowledge and act reasonably promptly upon communications with respect to claims arising under insurance policies. (3) Failing to adopt and implement reasonable standards for the prompt investigation and processing of claims arising under insurance policies. (4) Failing to affirm or deny coverage of claims within a reasonable time after proof of loss requirements have been completed and submitted by the insured. (5) Not attempting in good faith to effectuate prompt, fair, and equitable settlements of claims in which liability has become reasonably clear. (13) Failing to provide promptly a reasonable explanation of the basis relied on in the insurance policy, in relation to the facts or applicable law, for the denial of a claim or for the offer of a compromise settlement. MAY I HUMBLY AND MOST RESPECTFULLY PRESENT TO YOU AGAIN IN MULTIPLE TIMES THE PIPE BREAK WHICH WE DISCOVERED AND DOCUMENTED AS EARLY AS JUNE 2020 AND COLLABORATED TWICE BY FIRST AMERICAN, FIRST ON MAY 6, 2020 AND SECOND SIX DAYS AGO, OCTOBER 24, 2020 IS ON THE PIPE ENCASED IN THE CONCRETE SLAB AND NOT A PIPE BREAK UNDER THE FOUNDATION AND THEREFORE CLEARLY COVERED BY OUR POLICY: CLEARER READING BELOW OF THE SCREENSHOT MESSAGE ABOVE: Saturday, Oct 24, 2020 @ 10:24AM Good Morning, Thank you for reaching out to us in regards to this claim. I apologize for the delay in responding to your message. I have reviewed your claim on your pipe encased in concrete and show that the cash option check was mailed on 6/4/2020 and if the contractor did any damage to your property I would contact them directly to discuss the matter. If you need further assistance, please feel free to reply to this message. Thank you for choosing First American Home Warranty and enjoy the rest of your day. CLEARER READING BELOW OF THE SCREENSHOT MESSAGE ABOVE: Wednesday, May 6, 2020 @ 4:11PM Ms. Brual, All Express Plumbing has been authorized to complete the following repairs. Failure: Leaking water underneath dining room hallway. Correction: Access pipe encased in concrete slab and repair pipe. Have they contacted you to schedule an appointment to complete repairs, or has it already been completed? Please reach out to First American if you need any additional assistance. Thank you. SCREENSHOT FROM VIDEO 2 TAKEN AFTER TITOUAH LEFT SHOWING THE PIPE BREAK WHICH HE CONCEALED FROM US. SCREENSHOT FROM VIDEO 6 TAKEN MAY 20, 2020 THE PIPE BREAK HAD DETERIORATED AFTER TWO WEEKS WHICH TITOUAH CONCEALED FROM US.  QUERY 20   SEVENTH TIME, WOULD YOU STILL FORCE US TO ELEVATE THESE ISSUES TO THE DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE AND/OR SEEK LEGAL HELP TO DEFEND OUR RIGHT TO OUR LEGITIMATE INSURANCE CLAIM COVERAGE? YES OR NO?  Please acknowledge receipt of this e-mail and kindly inform me when I should expect a reply to this email. PLEASE RESTRICT ISSUES AND ANSWERS WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF THE SUBJECT MATTER TO AVOID INAPPROPRIATENESS. Please be reminded that your DENIAL LETTER DATED MAY 6, 2020 was prepared, relayed to us, sent and read by us in just a few minutes. Thank you very much. Yours faithfully, Antonio L. Buensuceso

819TH PERSUASIVE APPEAL_30 OCT19_TO THE SCP JUSTICIDES_ WHY CORDILLERA 'MANSASAKUSA' INAPPLICABLE TO CHIEF JUSTICE BERSAMIN?

1 CERTIFICATE OF SEPARATION FROM LAST EMPLOYER COMPLAINT 2.  MY QUEST FOR SWINDLED  RETIREMENT PAY BY SHELL SWINDLING ITO, SYNDICATED ESTAFA HOT PURSUIT DUTY OF LAW ENFORCEMENT ENTITIES 964counts SEE BELOW FOR THE 964TH   TIME THE REITERATION OF DEMAND PAYMENT OF RETIREMENT PAY WHICH SHELL REFUSED TO HONOR IN THE PRESENCE AND DEEMED APPROVAL OF THE HONORABLE MAGISTRATES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE PHILIPPINES GEUS_15MAR16_66th FOLLOW UP_REITERATION OF DEMAND  PAYMENT OF RETIREMENT PAY Dishonest scales are an abomination to the Lord, but a just weight is His delight... Proverbs Chapter 11  v. 1 Retirement Pay Law circumvented by Shell subject to penal provision provided for by Article 288 of the Labor Code of the Philippines.