ANDY WILLIAMS 1928-2012 exodus song

The TRUTH will set you FREE.

ANDY WILLIAMS 1928-2012 love story

The TRUTH will set you FREE.

ANDY WILLIAMS 1928-2012 love story (live)

The TRUTH will set you FREE.

REPLY TO CERTAIN CHRISTINE GORDON

antonio jr. Buensuceso  September 25, 2012	9/25/12
to Christine.Gord., Wes.Wilkinson, Debbie.Zuccala, Doug.Wilson

  

Dear   Christine,

With your express and written admission that you are the manager of

Ms. Debbie Zuccala, it follows that Ms. Zuccala is acting under your 

full supervision and control. It follows further that based on the principle 

of command responsibility, the willful neglect of duty to reply to my 

e-mails as Ms. Debbie Zuccala has demonstrated is an act done with 

your  advise,  decision, consent and approval. With your act of replying 

to my letter supposedly addressed to her, you are obviously showing 

discourtesy and   protecting her from culpability. Unfortunately, with your

actions you even have proven  her incompetence and inefficiency. She 

could not even write a simple e-mail response and could not at least 

showed she could explain herself. If really she is not capable of writing 

e-mail response, she had at least informed me promptly, for 

courtesy sake, that she did not know the answers and  formally 

endorsed  somebody to write in her behalf and not left me waiting for 

a long time.   Ms Debbie Zuccala had never endorsed a person to act 

on her behalf. Though you are her  manager, courtesy dictates that 

you need to be  introduced  to me by Ms. Debbie Zuccala  so that the 

same issues and questions which I posted for Ms. Debbie  Zuccala 

could be continually addressed  without any alibi that you or the 

person writing on her behalf  are not aware of it.

You know, Christine,  I believe  you should not  just interfere as it 

seemed you did not know the facts yet. If you do at least some 

reading you should have known that I do not have a phone to discuss 

this issue with you. It is clearly written on my application form that 

I wrote  NONE for phone and equally clearly stated in my e-mail 

communications that I do not have phone, why keep on asking me for

a phone when you can discuss all these issues  with me through e-mail. 

Your excuse that you have exerted much effort to contact me by 

asking for my phone number or giving your phone number since

the start of this controversy is a lame alibi  ab initio. For the record,

 I would like to reiterate that in the application form that I have 

submitted to your office, it showed clearly that I have no phone for you 

to contact me with. This act  of asking for a phone to contact me with 

when you know that I have none resolutely exemplifies your collective 

incompetence,  inefficiency and willful neglect of duty causing

much disappointment, discomfort and frustration on my part.

Now, again, may I request that please allow or advise or instruct  

Ms Debbie Zuccala to respond promptly and responsibly and give 

her a chance to prove herself worthy of the trust and confidence

of the people she is duty bound to serve. Otherwise, 

with all due respect,  in my opinion she should not be there.

Sincerely,

Antonio L. Buensuceso Jr.

Dear  Christine,

I have  the  pleasure to show my e-mail complaint   letter  

below levied against Ms. Debbie Zuccala.

September 6, 2012

Ms. Debbie Zuccala

State Water Resources Control Board

Office of Operator Certification

Division of Financial Assistance

 RE :         IGNORED  E-MAIL  COMMUNICATIONS 

                 DEMONSTRATING    INCOMPETENCE    

                 INEFFICIENCY  AND  INEXCUSABLE  

                 NEGLECT     OF  DUTY

          

Dear  Ms.  Zuccala,

              

I received a letter from you dated August 2, 2012 , informing 

me among others that, " If  you (me)  have any question, 

please contact  (you) Debbie Zuccala at (916) 341-5639  or 

dzuccala@waterboards.ca.gov."             

You gave me two options on how to communicate with you, 

first by phone and the second via e-mail. I chose the second 

option, through e-mail.

So, on August 8, 2012, the day I received your dated 

August 2, 2012 letter, I sent you an e-mail telling you some 

clarifications and asking some questions. 

But you did not give me a reply.

So, on  August 14, 2012. I sent you again the same e-mail. 

Again, you did not give me a reply.

So, on  August  15 ,2012, I sent you again the same e-mail 

for the third time. Again, you did not give me a reply.

So, on August  16, 2012, I sent  you again the same e-mail 

through registered mail and as per confirmation records on 

the Linda Vista Post Office showed the same was received 

by your office on August 20,2012. But as of today I have not 

received any response from you affirmative or otherwise.

Had you responded promptly, you could have asked  and I 

could have  explained to you why I was misled into  filling up

 the " APPLICATION FOR WASTE WATER TREATMENT  

PLANT OPERATOR CERTIFICATION"  form and  not the 

"EXAMINATION  APPLICATION FOR WASTE WATER 

TREATMENT PLANT OPERATOR"  and  eventually, 

probably, be granted a  reconsideration upon appreciation 

of the merits   I  might have presented in due time.

I was separated from my work, bio-diesel  plant operator, 

at New Leaf Biofuel last July 24, 2012 and I devotedly 

searched for another source of livelihood, another job or 

career. Waste water treatment plant operations is one 

field I thought interesting, challenging and rewarding. I surfed 

the web and  looked for waste water treatment plant operator 

jobs and I noticed that all job openings in that field called  

for a need to be certified before I could be considered for

 the position. This led me to your site and browsed therein for 

some information. After a few minutes of reading,  I decided 

that I should  take the examination, having thoughts in my 

mind that upon passing the examination,  eventual certification 

would be the consequence thereof .Being unaware of the 

existence of a form  specially intended for examination, 

after  clicking web pages  I came across a form titled 

"APPLICATION FOR WASTE WATER TREATMENT 

PLANT OPERATOR CERTIFICATION". I filled it out, and  

again, honestly I am not aware of the existence of another 

form intended for examination. Actually, I thought that the  

examination was an implied component of the certification 

application. This belief is bolstered by  the existence of the 

form titled " WASTE WATER TREATMENT PLANT  

OPERATOR  CERTIFICATION EXAMINATION SCHEDULE 

AND INFORMATION"  which shows undoubtedly that  

certification and examination are combined together as one 

unit or entity. In the same manner,  may I invite your attention

 to the last page of the form titled " APPLICATION FOR 

WASTE WATER TREATMENT  PLANT OPERATOR 

CERTIFICATION"  sub titled "PRIVACY ACT DISCLOSURE",  

to wit:

xxxxx

PRIVACY ACT DISCLOSURE 

This information is requested by the STATE WATER 

RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD, OFFICE OF 

OPERATOR CERTIFICATION.  The authority for maintaining 

the requested information is the California Code of Regulations, 

Division 4, Chapter 14.  All information requested on the 

application form must be provided by the applicant for 

examination.  Failure to complete any portion of this form 

may result in delay or denial of eligibility for examination.  

The information provided is used to evaluate the applicant’s 

eligibility for examination for Wastewater Treatment Plant 

Operators.  No transfers of this information are anticipated.  

For more information, or access to your records, contact the 

Office of Operator Certification, PO Box 944212, 

Sacramento, CA  94244-2120, Phone (916) 341-5819.   

xxxxxx

May I cite the following sentences taken therein : 

xxxx" All information requested on the application form must 

be provided by the applicant for examination. Failure to 

complete any portion of this form may result in delay or 

denial of eligibility for examination.  The 

information provided is used to evaluate the applicant’s 

eligibility for examination for 

Wastewater Treatment Plant Operators." xxxx

The first sentence requires that all information be provided

 by the applicant on the form for examination. This sentence 

clearly suggests that this form must be filled up for the purpose 

of examination. This implicitly manifests that this form for 

certification is one and the same form for examination. This 

gives credence that this form for certification is the same 

form for examination. By this form I would take the 

examination and consequential certification upon

passing the examination.

The second sentence warns that failure to complete any 

portion of this form   may result in delay or denial of eligibility

for examination. This sentence obviously establishes the 

inseparability  between the completeness of   information 

in this form  and the delay or denial of eligibility to take the 

examination. This instance conclusively conforms to my belief 

the the examination and certification forms are one in  the 

operator certification form.

The third consistently proves complete connection between 

the information contained in this form called certification  

and applicants' eligibility for examination for Waste Water 

Treatment Plant Operators.  Again, examination and 

certification are taken together in a  single  contextual form. 

Hence, I was misled, then consequently erred in filling up the 

form for WWTP Operator Certification.

Secondly, had you responded to my e-mail timely I could 

have asked  you and you  could have explained why and 

how you erroneously considered a form specifically titled 

 "APPLICATION  FOR WASTE WATER TREATMENT 

PLANT OPERATOR CERTIFICATION"  which I have filed, 

be ridiculously taken as an application for 

"WASTE WATER TREATMENT PLANT 

OPERATOR-IN-TRAINING  CERTIFICATION. These are 

two titles of forms which are distinctly different from each 

other. As you can see "PLANT OPERATOR CERTIFICATION" 

is obviously far from "PLANT OPERATOR-IN-TRAINING 

CERTIFICATION. If you were efficient and competent enough 

you should have sent me an e-mail reply and guided me  to 

correct deficiencies which you think I need to resolve so that 

I might be able to take the October 6, 2012  

GRADE 1  WWTP OPERATOR EXAMINATION than just 

left me hanging in vain.  Have you not committed a willful 

neglect of duty, as demonstrated in this case, I should have 

made remedial actions to avoid loss of time, money and 

opportunity. By your negligence, I am required to pay 

another application fee and  wait for another examination 

schedule and suffered prolonged  agony,  

distress and frustration.

Thirdly, had you been  punctual to respond to  my e-mail

 I could have asked and  you could have explained to me  

why a five-year  Bachelor of Science in 

 Management Engineering course would    not merit 

a  6 - educational point requirement

for GRADE 1  WWTP OPERATOR  EXAMINATION. 

As you could see from the educational records, I have  

studied subjects dealing with engineering mathematics, 

physics and chemistry.The course  have subject  studies 

on civil, mechanical ,electrical  and chemical engineering 

reinforced with a great deal of business management 

subjects. Anyway,  just in case, the 5-year BACHELOR OF 

SCIENCE IN MANAGEMENT ENGINEERING course

credentials or records that I have sent to you together with 

my application did not merit a 6- point educational point, 

then, may I request that the same be returned to me with 

comments and annotations so that I may have a chance 

to seek a professional  third   party opinion about the matter.

I will appreciate your kind and prompt response.

Sincerely,

Antonio L. Buensuceso Jr. 

Jecjec's First Birthday....0318

Please see September 18,19,20,21,22,23,24 for more of Jecjec's....



The TRUTH will set you FREE.

Jecjec's first Birthday...0319

Please see September 18,19,20,21,22,23,24 for more of Jecjec's...
The TRUTH will set you FREE.

Jecjec's First Birthday...0320

Please see September 18,19,20,21,22,23,24 for more of Jecjec's....
The TRUTH will set you FREE.

REPLY TO certain WES WILKINSON

antonio jr. Buensuceso  September 25, 2012	9/25/12
to Wes.Wilkinson, Christine.Gord., Debbie.Zuccala

Dear Mr. Wilkinson,

Now,  another person is claiming manager for Ms. Debbie Zuccala.

A person in the name of Christine Gordon  had already claimed she 

was Debbie Zuccala's  manager.

Who else tomorrow and the day after tomorrow?

This shows you are making a fool of  my person.  This is not tolerable.

I felt really upset. I felt insulted and maligned.  Please be reminded 

that I am already much aggrieved. This is too much pain to bear.

Now,  I will be forced  to seek legal remedy about this matter.

FYI

Antonio L. Buensuceso Jr.

The TRUTH will set you FREE.

Jecjec's First Birthday....0321

Please see September 18,19,20,21,22,23 for more of Jecjec's....
The TRUTH will set you FREE.

Jecjec's First Birthday...0322

Please see September 18,19,20,21,22,23 for more of Jecjec's....
The TRUTH will set you FREE.