Short list of praiseworthy senior Royal Dutch Shell executives

Jan 18th, 2013 

by John Donovan.

Now we have his equally scandal tainted successor, Peter Voser, Chairman of the UBS Audit Committee at the time when UBS was engaged in all kinds of criminal activity.

Posting on Shell Blog by LondonLad on Jan 17th, 2013 at 19:56

In all honesty can the Donovan's kindly list some of the past and present senior executives of Royal Dutch Shell that they would support for their good work, honesty, ability to abide by country HSE requirements, etc. etc. More and more it seems that if you work for RDS at a (very) senior level they'll get shafted via real AND tabloid reporting on this website, Greenpeace (dick-heads), and other tree hugging websites. We (the countries around the world) need to advance, risks need to be taken as a result….

JOHN DONOVAN REPLY TO LONDONLAD:

Supply a list of past and present praiseworthy senior Shell executives? That is an ask too far.

Sir John Jennings

I can think of one example. Sir John Jennings. We had dealings with him on a face-to-face basis when he was Chairman of Shell Transport & Trading and a Group Managing Director of Royal Dutch Shell Group. He demonstrated his integrity and his support for Shell's Statement of General Business Principles in an unprecedented way. If he had not retired, this website would almost certainly not be in existence.

Moody-Stuart took over and hid behind Shell's army of lawyers, supporting a thoroughly dishonest Shell executive who, in addition to repeatedly stealing intellectual property, not only from us, rigged a contract tender in a conspiracy involving a number of high level people at Shell, one of whom at least, Tim Hannigan, is still a Shell executive. 

Next came Sir Philip Watts who inherited the hydrocarbon value creation teams set up under Moody-Stuart and fraudulently conjured up some much needed proven reserves.

After he was forced to resign, Jeroen van der Veer was given the top job and was soon engulfed in the TOUCH FUCK ALL scandal and cover-up, and then the Sakhalin 2 debacle when he surrendered Shell's majority stake to Putin in the most humiliating circumstances.

Now we have his equally scandal tainted successor, Peter Voser, Chairman of the UBS Audit Committee at the time when UBS was engaged in all kinds of criminal activity.

As for taking risks, we may have already caused irreversible calamitous damage to the environment and the future of humanity by flouting the dire warnings about climate change.

It would help if we could at least have confidence in the integrity and competence of senior management of multinational giants such as Shell who want to run risks for commercial gain. Unfortunately we know that the overriding driving motivation behind most fat cat business moguls appears to be pure personal greed. And they end up with millions even when the risk-taking ends in disaster. Sir Philip Watts walked off with a reported severance/pension package worth $18.5 million after defrauding Shell shareholders and bringing to an end the 100 year old partnership between Royal Dutch Petroleum and Shell Transport & Trading. 

Posted in: Business Principles, Corporate Governance, GoogleNews, Jeroen van der Veer, John Donovan, Oil, Peter Voser, Royal Dutch Shell Plc, Russia, Sakhalin II, Shell Oil Reserves Scandal, Shell Project Delays, Shell Project Overruns, Sir Philip Watts,TOUCH F*** ALL.
Tagged: Jeroen van der Veer · John Donovan · Oil · Royal Dutch Shell Plc · Sir Mark Moody-Stuart · Sir Philip Watts

← As Shell's Arctic Drilling Hopes Hit Snags, Its Rivals Watch

Shell, Ukraine Sign Shale Gas Production Sharing Act →

Shell, Coast Guard figure out next step for Kulluk rig

Jan 15th, 2013 

by John Donovan.

Posted on January 14, 2013 at 10:57 am by Jennifer A. Dlouhy

In the week that  Shell's Kullukdrilling rig has been anchored in Alaska's sheltered Kiliuda Bay, workers have scrutinized its exterior and studied conditions inside the 266-foot vessel.

Remote-operated vehicles and divers have been evaluating the hull of the conical drilling unit, which beached Dec. 31 on an uninhabited Alaskan island 30 miles away. That underwater assessment finished late Saturday, and workers are now analyzing data from the examination to determine what will happen next with the rig.

Officials with the unified command — comprising  Shell, the Coast Guard and others — said they will provide  more information when an assessment report is complete.

Depending on the documented damage, the Kulluk could undergo some repairs in its current location in Kiliuda Bay. For now, Shell is under orders to keep the unpropelled rig  in the Kodiak Island bay until the Coast Guard signs off on further towing.

Shell had been using its purpose-built anchor handler Aiviq to tow the Kulluk across the frequently stormy Gulf of Alaska in late December when the vessels ran into problems. Amid high winds and waves, the Aiviq lost its tow line to the Kulluk and then its four engines failed. The Coast Guard and Shell sent more boats to help, but after four failed attempts to tow the Kulluk to safe harbor, first responders cut the rig loose and it grounded on Sitkalidak Island.

Salvage teams were able to pull the rig free  Jan. 7,  taking advantage of high tides and applying steadily increasing pressure to a tow line.

Questions have arisen about the reliability of the weather forecastthat Shell used to predict what it called a "favorable" two-week window on Dec. 21, when the Kulluk set out on its two-week trek across the Gulf of Alaska. The National Weather Service uses forecasts that extend just a few days out, and its meteorologists say anything over 60 hours is unreliable.

The Kulluk itself is designed to thwart floating ice; its conical, upside-down-umbrella shape allows its hull to be lifted up by ice and then crash down on it, breaking and pushing it away. But that same configuration may make it ill-suited for journeys across stormy seas.

In an Anchorage Daily News article, Lisa Demer notes that even the high-powered Crowley Marine Services tugboat Alert used with tankers in Prince William Sound had trouble pulling the Kulluk during the tow emergency. Demer writes:

Towing the round Kulluk is nothing like towing a big oil tanker, which the Alert, as a Prince William Sound tanker escort vessel, is designed to do, said Charlie Nalen, Crowley Marine Services vice president of operations for Valdez. "This big saucer is turning. It's an ungainly structure," Nalen said. In contrast, a tanker will follow along behind a tug.

SOURCE ARTICLE

Posted in: Alaska, Arctic, Oil, Royal Dutch Shell Plc, United States.
Tagged: Alaska · Arctic Ocean · Beaufort Sea · Chukchi Sea · Fuel Fix

← U.K. Government Rejects Lawmakers' Calls to Halt Arctic Oil Drilling

US scuppers Shell’s hopes of drilling Alaskan Arctic (and others)

US scuppers Shell's hopes of drilling Alaskan Arctic

Jan 10th, 2013

by John Donovan. 

No comments yet

By Rob Davies; PUBLISHED: 09:03, 10 January 2013

Shell's dream of drilling for oil in the Alaskan Arctic has suffered another blow, after US authorities announced a 'high-level' review likely to delay its plans still further.

US Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar said his department would launch a 60-day probe 'to review practices and identify challenges as well as lessons learned'.

It follows a series of accidents and setbacks that have hit Shell's Alaskan programme, the latest of which saw its drilling rig, the Kulluk, rescued after running aground on New Year's Eve.

Salazar said the probe had been 'expedited', suggesting the Kulluk incident has sharpened his department's focus on Shell's Arctic activities.

The US Coastguard launched a parallel probe into how the Kulluk ran aground.

The development will raise fears that Shell's plans, which have cost it £3billion so far, will be hampered by a government still cool on British oil firms after BP's spill at its Macondo well.

Salazar was instrumental in holding BP's feet to the fire after the catastrophe, saying he lacked confidence in the company, which had left him 'angry' and 'frustrated'.

'In the context of Macondo, no-one in government is going to err on the side of giving oil companies a break,' said Stuart Joyner, oil analyst with City firm Investec.

He said Shell (up 9p to 2141p) was likely to suffer delays to its Arctic plans as a result of its problems in Alaska and would have to address the setbacks at its fourth-quarter results this month.

He said investors hoping for Arctic operations to move more quickly could become 'tetchy', amid fears that Britain's two oil giants are losing their touch.

But he added the firm was unlikely to be fazed by delays to a project that is already expected to take between five and ten years to come to fruition.

Shell would also welcome stiff regulation if it meant avoiding a major disaster like BP's oil spill, he added.

The Anglo-Dutch firm welcomed the review, saying that it would 'help strengthen our Alaska exploration programme going forward'. But Shell acknowledged that it had 'experienced challenges' with its venture.

It suffered delays in securing approval to use a spill-response barge, the Arctic Challenger, that would collect oil in the event of an accident.

And a containment dome that would also be used in responding to a spill was 'crushed like a beer can' during testing.

More…

• Incident at Royal Dutch Shell Arctic rig sparks drill fears
• ALEX BRUMMER: Alarm sounds for Arctic oil after Kulluk incident
• SHELL SHARES: Check the latest price here

Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

SOURCE

Posted in: Alaska, Arctic, Corporate Governance, Daily Mail, Environment, Oil,Pollution, Royal Dutch Shell Plc, Shell Project Delays, United States.
Tagged: Alaska · Arctic Ocean · Beaufort Sea · Chukchi Sea · Oil · Royal Dutch Shell Plc

Tom Botts

Jan 9th, 2013

by John Donovan. 

No comments yet

Botts was in charge of Southern as GasDirector UEG with his buddy Finlayson as Oil Director UED. It's interesting the connection with Wood Group as one of the guys killed by the combined neglect of Birnie, Bayliss, Berget, Finlayson, Botts, Hill and their mentor TFA Brinded was a Wood Group employee, who of course was blamed for contributing to his own demise…

John,

Thought you may like this press release in todays Scotsman and also Aberdeen Press and Journal.

Botts was in Aberdeen following Finlayson so he continued the TFA policy during his tenure. Shortly after his departure the Brent B fatalities took place sliding the blame on his successor!  

Botts implemented Brindeds ruthless staff reductions and dilution of retained skill levels resulting in todays Management profiles of the inability to do anything.

Botts finished up in Houston overseeing the Motiva refinery expansion resulting in a massive cock up on start up costing many millions and months of delayed start up

More Shell dross being recycled that's for sure,  stand by your beds in Wood Group, Botts will be behind the massive job losses which will be in the pipeline very soon.

John Wood Group PLC announces the following board appointment.

Thomas M. Botts joins Wood Group as a non-executive director on 8 January 2013 and will also join the Board's Nomination Committee.

Tom worked for Shell for 35 years, starting as a production engineer, later as Treasurer of Shell's US activities and then in senior roles in London, Aberdeen and The Hague where he led Shell's European Exploration and Production business from 2003. In 2009 Tom was appointed as Global head of Shell's manufacturing business (including Shell's worldwide refineries and chemical complexes). Tom retired from Shell in October 2012. He is a non-executive director of EnPro Industries, Inc., is a member of Council at the Jones Graduate School of Business at Rice University, is on the Governor's Task Force at the University of Wyoming, and is a longstanding member of the Society of Petroleum Engineers.

Allister Langlands, Chairman, said "We are delighted to welcome Tom to the Board. His in-depth experience of the international oil & gas industry, both in upstream and in petrochemicals and refineries, will be of great value to the Group".

There are no other details which require to be disclosed under the Listing Rules LR 9.6.13. and Mr Botts does not have any interest in the shares of Wood Group.

COMMENT BY RETIRED SHELL HSE GROUP AUDITOR, BILL CAMPBELL

Botts was in charge of Southern as GasDirector UEG with his buddy Finlayson as Oil Director UED. It's interesting the connection with Wood Group as one of the guys killed by the combined neglect of Birnie, Bayliss, Berget, Finlayson, Botts, Hill and their mentor TFA Brinded was a Wood Group employee, who of course was blamed for contributing to his own demise to hide from public scrutiny the failures of the HSE and the Scottish CPS.

Posted in: Bill Campbell, Malcolm Brinded, Oil, Royal Dutch Shell Plc, TOUCH F*** ALL.
Tagged: Chris Finlayson · Malcolm Brinded · Royal Dutch Shell Plc · Shell Brent Bravo Scandal · Tom Botts · Wood Group

SHELL'S ALASKAN FOLLY

Jan 9th, 2013

by John Donovan. 

No comments yet

Do we really need to have another disaster on the scale of Piper Alpha or Alexander Kielland before Shell starts to apply the same standards to their Alaskan operations as are applied to their international operations? Has anyone ever heard of a 47 year old drilling vessel being used in the Arctic in Norway, or even a 30 year old drilling vessel? Or helicopters without de-icing equipment? Shell has lost control of both of their vessels in Alaska, leading to well publicised groundings. Why do we never hear of loss of control incidents and vessels running aground in the Norwegian Arctic?

COMMENT ON SHELL'S ALASKAN FOLLY BY AN EXPERT

Many of your readers will be familiar with the two major North Sea disasters (Piper Alpha and Alexander Kielland) which together resulted in 290 deaths in the 1980s. Those with longer memories will remember the Sea Gem which was lost (with 13 lives) while being moved in December 1965.
 
These vessels were all constructed in accordance with the standards in force at the time. The standards simply could not have anticipated the ferocity of the conditions under which the vessels would be used, or the specifics of the export system to which the Piper Alpha platform was attached.
 
As suggested by Tennille Tracy's article, standards are created to address the circumstances of accidents/incidents that have already happened. They cannot anticipate new circumstances and are usually the result of compromises which try to balance the economic costs of applying new standards with the perceived benefits. The Cullen Report into the Piper Alpha disaster proposed the use of Safety Cases which would review both operating practices and equipment standards for specific anticipated circumstances. The Safety Case approach has been adopted globally (outside the US) and has undoubtedly contributed to the fall in the number of accidents/incidents in the offshore oil and gas industry.
 
The US should have learned a lesson from BP's Macondo disaster, but continues to rely on standards which were written long before deep water or arctic drilling was even considered: fortunately most international operators have their own internal standards (which are required to support their Safety Cases) which far exceed the minima of the applicable statutory requirements, if indeed such statutory requirements exist. However, when no internal operator standard is available and costs can be reduced by applying legal minima, the application of standards written for a different world may result in a disaster. Most US standards are based on operations in the Gulf of Mexico or on land, so it is hardly surprising that they are inadequate for the Arctic.
 
Do we really need to have another disaster on the scale of Piper Alpha or Alexander Kielland before Shell starts to apply the same standards to their Alaskan operations as are applied to their international operations? Has anyone ever heard of a 47 year old drilling vessel being used in the Arctic in Norway, or even a 30 year old drilling vessel? Or helicopters without de-icing equipment? Shell has lost control of both of their vessels in Alaska, leading to well publicised groundings. Why do we never hear of loss of control incidents and vessels running aground in the Norwegian Arctic?
 
The Noble Discoverer was designed long before the Sea Gem accident, and the Kulluk long before Piper Alpha: the creation of new standards will not fix the shortcomings inherent in their designs. 

RELATED

http://www.hse.gov.uk/offshore/safetycases.htm

The day the sea caught fire: 20 years after the Piper Alphaexplosion .

Sea Gem oil rig collapses

Posted in: Alaska, Arctic, BP, Corporate Governance, Environment, GoogleNews, Gulf of Mexico, Oil, Pollution, Royal Dutch Shell Plc, Shell Employee Safety, United States.
Tagged: Alaska · Arctic Ocean · Beaufort Sea · BP · Chukchi Sea · Kulluk · Noble Discoverer · Oil · Royal Dutch Shell Plc

Royal Dutch Shell tax dodging key factor in Kulluk debacle

Jan 9th, 2013

by John Donovan. 

No comments yet

By John Donovan

Royal Dutch Shell has a history of tax avoidancestretching back many decades. A Shell spokesmanhas confirmed that the Kulluk was being towed from Alaskan waters for tax reasons. The timing was designed to take advantage of a tax loophole, which allowed the oil giant to avoid $6 million in Alaska state taxes. Should be no surprise since the company is infamous for putting profit before offshore safety. And the company is now run by a pair of ruthless bean counter fat cats, Voser and Henry.

COMMENT BY "OUTSIDER"

From the information on this site, the need for a "Safety Case" approach for Shell's Alaskan operations seems to be overwhelming. Helicopters that couldn't fly in ice and fog, two vessels aground, and the failure of the containment dome are all examples of how the prescriptive approach used in the US does not work when circumstances change. Shell has experience of operations all over the world, but apparently applied only their knowledge of operations in the Gulf of Mexico to their Alaskan fiasco.

Posted in: Alaska, Arctic, Business Principles, Corporate Governance, GoogleNews,John Donovan, Oil, Peter Voser, Royal Dutch Shell Plc, Simon Henry, United States.
Tagged: Alaska · Arctic Ocean · Beaufort Sea · Chukchi Sea · John Donovan · Peter Voser · Royal Dutch Shell Plc