October 30, 2013 E-mail to Mr. James Maughan

October 30, 2013

Mr. James Maughan

Assistant Deputy Director

Division of Financial Assistance

Phone: 916-341-5694

Email: jmaughan@waterboards.ca.gov

Mail address:  1001 I Street, 16th Floor

Sacramento, CA 95814

 SUBJECT :  Continuing demand for the return of  the original educational credentials                       as evaluated by ERES and comments why  a circle mark was wrap around                       the word  "PHILIPPINES" as shown in the returned exact copy  (photocopy)                     of my original educational credentials.

Copy of the credential with circular mark around the word "PHILIPPINES".

Dear Mr. James Maughan,

Good morning.

My application for operator certification was received by Ms Debbie Zuccala which she outrightly denied

Thirty days had lapsed after I sent you my e-mail dated September 30, 2013 with the same SUBJECT : Continuing demand for the return of the original  educational credentials as evaluated by ERES and comments why a circle mark was wrap around the word "PHILIPPINES" as shown in the returned exact copy (photocopy) of my original educational credentials, but   you opted to hide and ignored to reply or to send  me back the original educational credentials with your signature and the signatures of Mr. Wes Wilkinson and Ms. Anna Hernandez to show proof that the three of you had conscientiously and prudently examined my educational credentials and determined that it could not merit a minimum six(6) educational point requirement for Grade 1  operator certification examination. 

Hernandez denial letter page 1

Please take a closer look at the images on the left. This is the letter of denial written by Ms Anna Hernandez saying that I do not meet the minimum educational requirement for the operator examination and gave me a "zero" educational point. Mr. Wes Wilkinson examined it and conformed  with      Ms Anna Hernandez findings, and  so with you.

Since September 6, 2012  I have asked that those original educational credentials be sent back to me with signatures of Ms Anna Hernandez and      Mr Wes Wilkinson to show proof that they have prudently and conscientiously examined those documents and determined that those educational credentials did not meet the minimum 6 educational points for Grade 1 operator certification examination. Since you belatedly upheld  their findings, hence, you, being in conformity with them should sign those documents, then send them back to me,  so that I may have the chance to show those educational credentials to a neutral third party to seek for their valued opinion and advise. 

Hernandez denial letter page 2

Please do not hide your professional responsibility and accountability behind the stamp of the Office of Operator Certification,  and by concocting deceits and gullible alibis. If you believe that I do not meet the minimum 6 educational requirement for the Grade 1 operator certification examination then, please have the original educational credentials covering the Bachelor of Science in Management Engineering as evaluated by ERES signed by the three of you and send them back to me.

Thank you very much.

Yours faithfully,

Antonio L. Buensuceso Jr.

The TRUTH will set you FREE.

PORK BARREL SA PINAS

                                                                                                         

                                                                                                                                               

The TRUTH will set you FREE.

AI ONLINE ASSIGNMENT3

                    buensuceso_ai3_online

                       History of Typeface

The TRUTH will set you FREE.

KENTUCKY BOY

The TRUTH will set you FREE.

MY LOGO

AI Logo  Statement of Purpose                                                                                                                                                                                                                              

In the video shown a  logo is compared to the tip of an iceberg and being the tip, it represents the huge mass of ice beneath the surface. This logo is a symbol which represent the whole and complex business enterprise which the logo signifies. A logo therefore, lead one as to what to expect on what the enterprise is all about.

This time the requirement is to create a personal or business logo in black and white and I prefer  making one on the personal level. A logo which I would be designing need to be a representation of who I am and think I am . It would not matter to me how others may be looking or making comments about it, as the video for this exercise had shown or advised.  I would not care how stupid or learned I am to their eyes. What matter most to me is I devoted effort and passion into it and whatever is created, for me is a masterpiece in my own niche accomplished in most splendid way.

Sample of logos were shown in class and their application are mostly for the promotion of the business by which those logos tried to represent. They are really professional and impressive ones. Likewise, contract negotiations for logo design projects are discussed where expectations, design and budget are critical in evaluation of the project  worth. Too high or unrealistic expectation from client as the video imparted should be countered with persuasive explanation of how the project is to be accomplished in real design environment as clients are not actual designers after all.

I made the logo first with color combinations with a little gradient effect on it, out images of rounded cornered rectangle with star emblem. Then, I transform it to simple black and white color combination. I wrote BUENSUCESO PRODUCTIONS in it signifying that all my media productions endeavor would later be seen by the world with this accompanying tip of the iceberg, a logo, representing the enormous mass of ice beneath the surface, the mass of ice the ill fated Titanic unknowingly  refused to acknowledge, which I am pleased and proud to present to you today, with a subtle message of a couple of choices, do acknowledge or sink.

The TRUTH will set you FREE.

THREE IN ITALY

The TRUTH will set you FREE.

Email to Supt Murphy regarding Shell Police Corruption allegations

Oct 4th, 2013

by John Donovan. 

No comments yet

…a complete file of the Shell internal investigation is held by Shell E&P Ireland and thus subject to Irish jurisdiction. Under the circumstances your investigation will not be perceived as thorough and complete unless this entire highly relevant evidence, vital to your inquiries, is seen and taken into account by you.

From: John Donovan
Subject: OSSL ALLEGATIONS
Date: 4 October 2013 10:35:10 GMT+01:00
To: Thomas Murphy
Cc: THE OSSL COMPANY , michiel.brandjes@shell.com, m.crothers@shell.com

Dear Supt Murphy

Assuming your investigation is still in progress, I have a suggestion to make.

Shell has frequently referred to an internal investigation by Shell that found no evidence to support the allegations made by OSSL.

For some reason, despite all requests made by the news media, including Ed Vulliamy of The Observer/Guardian Group, Shell has declined to let anyone outside Shell view the information gathered together for their internal investigation.

Since you are a senior police officer investigating the same potentially criminal matters, I hope you will insist, if you have not already done so, in having unrestricted access to ALL such information/evidence.

I have reason to believe that it will provide evidence that Shell has been engaged in a cover-up of the truth about this very serious matter.

SOME OF THE ALLEGATIONS

OSSL, a local contractor on the Shell Corrib Gas project claims that it supplied gifts and/or free services (sweeteners/bribes) to third parties on Shell’s instruction to smooth the path of the controversial project. OSSL says purchase receipts were destroyed by Shell and invoices falsified on Shell’s instructions to hide what was going on. OSSL alleges that alcohol worth tens of thousands of Euros was delivered to Garda stations by OSSL for distribution to police officers as festive gifts, including Garda policing protests against the project. OSSL claims Shell still owes OSSL money for the gifts, including Garda alcohol.

Under the circumstances your investigation will not be perceived as thorough and complete unless this entire highly relevant evidence, vital to your inquiries, is seen and taken into account by you.

If Shell refuses your request, that response would speak volumes.

Commonsense suggests that a complete file of the Shell internal investigation is held by Shell E&P Ireland and thus subject to Irish jurisdiction.

I hope you will act immediately on this important line of investigation if you have not already done so.

Kind regards
John

Share this:

• Facebook
• Twitter
• Email
• Print

Like this:

Posted in: Bribery, Business Principles, Corrib Gas Project, Corruption, Garda, Gas,GoogleNews, Ireland, John Donovan, OSSL, Royal Dutch Shell Plc.
Tagged: Corrib Gas Project · Corruption · Gas · Ireland · John Donovan · Royal Dutch Shell Plc

The TRUTH will set you FREE.

September 30, 2013 E-mail to Mr. James Maughan

September 30, 2013

Mr. James Maughan

Assistant Deputy Direct

Division of Financial Assistance

Phone: 916-341-5694

Email: jmaughan@waterboards.ca.gov

Mail address:  1001 I Street, 16th Floor

Sacramento, CA 95814

SUBJECT :  Continuing demand for the return of the original educational

                credentials as evaluated by ERES and comments why  a circle

                mark was wrap around  the word  "PHILIPPINES" as shown in

                the returned exact copy (photocopy) of my original educational

                credentials.

Dear Mr. James Maughan,

Now, after  I,  having exposed your machinations to avoid the return of my
 "original" educational credentials with your signature and signatures of
Ms. Anna Hernandez and Mr. Wes Wilkinson,  you, with all due respect,
had resorted to manipulate incredible alibis. Instead, of sending back to me
the "original" copy of my educational credentials, you send me photo copy of
the "original" and called  "exact" copy of what I have sent to your office. Then,
as a proof that you and Mr. Wes Wilkinson together with Ms. Anna Hernandez
had conscientiously evaluated that "original" educational credentials, hence,
I have demanded that  the three of you signed it, as the three of you had
determined that it could not merit the minimum 6 educational point requirement
for  operator certification examination, but to avoid personal accountability,
you just place the stamp of the Office of Operator Certification. In addition,
instead of placing your signatures on that "original" educational credentials
as a matter of appropriate annotation, you have made a discriminatory circular
mark wrap around the word "PHILIPPINES". Wrapping the word "PHILIPPINES"
with a circle as a reason for annotation is untenable in the light of my painful
experience dealing with your office and employees.

May I reiterate in unequivocal terms that I  have sent the "original" copy of my
educational credentials covering the Bachelor of Science in Management
Engineering as evaluated by ERES. Sacramento, CA, together with my
application for operator certification and the check payment of $95. This set
of application documents was received by Ms. Debbie Zuccala. Hence, may
I most respectfully remind you that your statement on your e-mail below, to wit:

" If this document was not the "original" then the only thing I can conclude is
 that you never  sent the "original" to us but a copy." ,  is outrageous, baseless 
and irresponsible. As a matter of fact, Ms Debbie Zuccala had not denied the 
existence of the "original" ERES  educational credentials since 
September 6, 2012 up to the present times .Ms Christine Gordon,  
Mr. Wes Wilkinson and Ms Anna Hernandez, all did not deny the existence 
of  the "original" copy of my educational credentials as evaluated by ERES. 
Therefore, you can not belatedly claim otherwise,  during these times, after you
been caught  cheating and lying about it.

My prayers remain, please send me back the " original" copy of my 
educational credentials covering the Bachelor of Science in Management
Engineering as  evaluated by ERES, Sacramento, Ca with signatures of  
Ms  Anna Hernandez, Mr. Wes Wilkinson and yours as a proof that the three 
of you have conscientiously  and prudently determined that it could not meet
the minimum 6 educational points requirement for Grade 1 operator 
certification examination.

Thank you very much.

Cordially,

Antonio L. Buensuceso Jr.

REFERENCE E-MAIL

Maughan, James@Waterboards                                                     Sep 23 (7 days ago)
to me, shellresearchw.

Mr. Buensuceso,

I do recognize and acknowledge that you have made the same request several times. This request concerns us returning to you the original copy of your educational credentials.  We did return exactly what you sent us, and would point out that the document we sent you back has our original date and time stamp.  We place a date stamp on original documents that we receive in our office. 

If this document was not the "original" then the only thing I can conclude is that you never sent the "original" to us but a copy.

Concerning the word "PHILIPPINES" being circled on the document we sent back to you, this is done routinely to annotate pertinent information on documents that we review. We gladly accept education credits from many countries including the Philippines.  

Again to state we accepted the document in full faith but needed further clarifying information about specific classes taken in the course of you attaining your degree, so that we could give you the proper credit to take the exam. 

Again I am sorry if this is not clear but I have stated this information several times.

James Maughan

The TRUTH will set you FREE.

The risk of sharing your ideas with Shell

Sep 26th, 2013

by John Donovan. 

No comments yet

By John Donovan

Royal Dutch Shell is once again inviting people to share their ideas with the oil giant. (see article below)

I caution anyone contemplating doing so to be on their guard.

In my experience Shell has no respect for confidentiality or intellectual property rights.

I have successfully sued Shell many times for breach of confidence and breach of contract in respect of ideas I disclosed to the company in strictest confidence and Shell then used without giving me any credit or payment.

I know many other people who have had the same problems in having their ideas ripped off by Shell.

Hence the warning.

The TRUTH will set you FREE.

Shell Oil’s Arctic drilling operations in limbo

Sep 26th, 2013

by John Donovan.

Shell Oil has not disclosed new safety measures since a critical federal report in March, and it has not applied to drill in the Arctic in 2014.

By Maria L. La Ganga: Sept 25, 2013

SEATTLE — Six months after federal officials chastised Shell Oil for its faulty offshore drilling operations in the Arctic, the company has yet to explain what safeguards it has put in place or when it plans to resume exploring for oil in the vulnerable region.

Shell’s 2012 return to offshore Arctic exploration after a generation away was marred by high-profile problems, including hefty fines for polluting the air and a drilling rig that ran aground. The company canceled its 2013 drilling season, and its 2014 operations are in question.

The Interior Department is scheduled to unveil a set of tightened safeguards for offshore Arctic drilling before the end of the year, regulations whose need is underscored by Shell’s difficulties.

FULL ARTICLE

The TRUTH will set you FREE.