LAPITAN_9DEC15_4th FOLLOW UP OBJECTION ON THE MATTER OF SENDING NOTICE BY THE THIRD DIVISION OF THE SUPREME COURT

from:		antonio buensuceso <antoniobuensucesoshell@gmail.com>
to:		pio_questions@sc.judiciary.gov.ph, pio@sc.judiciary.gov.ph, pio_feedback@sc.judiciary.gov.ph, pio_invitations@sc.judiciary.gov.ph, pio_personnel@sc.judiciary.gov.ph
cc:		John Donovan , rosebuens@gmail.com, Mosses Buensuceso , mimikyut , Aaron Buensuceso , veronica buensuceso , Mia Buensuceso , Eduard.Geus@shell.com, ecmanibogjr@accralaw.com, jcleong@accralaw.com, accra@accralaw.com
date:		Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 12:13 AM
subject:		LAPITAN_9DEC15_4th FOLLOW UP OBJECTION ON THE MATTER OF SENDING NOTICE BY THE THIRD DIVISION OF THE SUPREME COURT
mailed-by:		gmail.com

ATTY. WILFREDO V. LAPITAN

THIRD DIVISION DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT

EXHIBIT A 

NOTICE  DATED APRIL 7, 2014

SENT TO MY ADDRESS IN THE PHILIPPINES WITH BAD INTENT  

THAT I MAY NOT BE ABLE TO READ THIS AND FAIL TO MAKE 

AN APPEAL ON TIME.  

AN OBVIOUS CHICANERY,  THE CULPRIT MUST BE ADMONISHED.

EXHIBIT  1

   RED RIBBON AUTHENTICATION

ANTONIO L. BUENSUCESO JR.

LAST KNOWN ADDRESS

THIS DOCUMENT SHOWS  THAT

BUENSUCESO IS IN THE U.S.A.

AND NOT IN THE PHILIPPINES

HENCE COMMUNICATIONS DOCUMENTS

SHOULD BE SENT TO MY REGISTERED ADDRESS

HERE IN THE U.S.A.

 EXHIBIT 2

LAST KNOWN ADDRESS

 FROM PAGE 32 DISBARMENT COMPLAINT

12901 Francine Terrace

Poway, CA 92064

EXHIBIT 3

LAST KNOWN ADDRESS

FROM  FROM Atty. Oliveros  dated  13 June 2013

my address here in the U.S.

COPY RECIPIENTS

Copies  for Atty. Raul Quiroz and his counsels  was sent through his counsels'  

Atty.Emiterio C. Manibog Jr.

 and

Atty. Joy Anne C. Leong-Pambid  and

ACCRA LAW Head Office

 e-mail addresses and copies

  for PILIPINAS SHELL PETROLEUM CORPORATION, STOCKHOLDERS, DIRECTORS, OFFICERS and Mr. Eduard Geus was sent  through    

Mr. Eduard  Geus e-mail 

 for the Third Division Deputy Clerk of Court, Wilfredo V. Lapitan  

AND

for Honorable Chief Justice 

Ma. Lourdes Sereno

is coursed through 

Atty. Theodore Te, PIO Chief, Supreme Court of the Philippines

on

December 3, 2015

The TRUTH will set you FREE.

GEUS_9DEC15_3rd FOLLOW UP REITERATION OF DEMAND PAYMENT OF RETIREMENT PAY

to:		Eduard.Geus@shell.com, accra@accralaw.com, ecmanibogjr@accralaw.com, jcleong@accralaw.com, pio@sc.judiciary.gov.ph, pio_feedback@sc.judiciary.gov.ph, pio_invitations@sc.judiciary.gov.ph, pio_personnel@sc.judiciary.gov.ph, pio_questions@sc.judiciary.gov.ph
cc:		John Donovan , rosebuens@gmail.com, Mosses Buensuceso , mimikyut , Aaron Buensuceso , veronica buensuceso , Mia Buensuceso
date:		Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 12:09 AM
subject:		GEUS_9DEC15_3rd FOLLOW UP REITERATION OF DEMAND PAYMENT OF RETIREMENT PAY
mailed-by:		gmail.com

EXHIBIT  1

EXHIBIT 2

EXHIBIT 3

EXHIBIT 4

EXCERPTED FROM 

ATTY. RAUL QUIROZ DEFENSE PLEADINGS

NUMBERS 21,  22,  23,  24,  25,  26

EXHIBIT 5

EXHIBIT 6

photos of the defense lawyers and particulars

COPY RECIPIENTS

Copies  for Atty. Raul Quiroz and his counsels  was sent through his counsels'  

Atty.Emiterio C. Manibog Jr.

 and

Atty. Joy Anne C. Leong-Pambid  and

ACCRA LAW Head Office
 e-mail addresses and copies

  for PILIPINAS SHELL PETROLEUM CORPORATION, STOCKHOLDERS, DIRECTORS, OFFICERS and Mr. Eduard Geus was sent  through    

Mr. Eduard  Geus e-mail 

 for the Third Division Deputy Clerk of Court, Wilfredo V. Lapitan  

AND

for Honorable Chief Justice 
Ma. Lourdes Sereno

is coursed through 

Atty. Theodore Te, PIO Chief, Supreme Court of the Philippines

on

December 4, 2015

The TRUTH will set you FREE.

The Sanders Polling Anomaly

New polling shows that Sanders presents Democratic voters with the existential choice of attempting to at least start digging out of the corrupt plutocracy, or instead burrowing in even deeper with another Clinton.

Published: December 8, 2015 | Authors: Rob Hager | NationofChange | Op-Ed

shared from

Last week the highly trusted Quinnipiac University National Poll (“Q-Poll”) delivered good news and bad news for Bernie Sanders.

The unpromising lead is: Sanders polls 30% behind Clinton.

This bad news might be best explained by the Democrats’ even more lopsided answer to the big “electability” question. Unfortunately for Sanders, 38% more Democrats think Clinton “would have a good chance of defeating the Republican nominee” than would Sanders (87% to 49%).

Whose Electability?

The good news for Sanders is what the pollsters actually demonstrate to be true about electability by direct match-ups of the two Democrats against the four Republican contenders who have more than single digit support.  Their findings: “Sanders does just as well [as Clinton against Rubio], or even better, against [the other] top Republicans [Trump, Carson,and Cruz].” Against each of the latter three, Sanders’ winning margin exceeds Clinton’s by 2%, 3% and 5% respectively.

It appears that democratic voters are not just misinformed, but grossly misinformed, about whether Clinton or Sanders would do better against Republicans. Comparing the margin of support among Democrats for Clinton over Sanders (30%) with the even larger 38% margin of polled Democrats who erroneously rank Clinton as a more electable candidate than Sanders suggests the possibility that their grossly erroneous belief may well account for much of their expressed preference for Clinton.

Even if not all Clinton supporters are using electability as their main criterion for preferring her in opinion polls, it would be useful for these grossly misled Democrats when casting their primary vote over the next several months to consider the reason why Sanders’ outperforms Clinton against Republicans. They should remember that it is independent voters, not party loyalists, who generally determine the outcome of typically close general elections. If Democrats really want to lose the 2016 election to a Republican they should by all means choose a candidate that Independents reject. Clinton is just the candidate for that job.

READ MORE

*A previous version of this article was published by Counterpunch

The Sleaze, Guilt and Punishment of Don Blankenship

Bernie Sanders Wins Time Readers’ Poll for Person of the Year then Gets Snubbed from the Shortlist

The Truth will set you free.

RECORD OF MR. TOM HOWARD'S MANAGERIAL IRRESPONSIBILITY AS OF NOVEMBER 30, 2015

The TRUTH will set you FREE.

HOWARD_9DEC15_87th TIME_U.S. EQUIVALENCE BS MANAGEMENT ENGINEERING EDUCATIONAL POINT ASSESSMENT

SUBMITTED CREDENTIALS

(Duplicate copy from my file)

The TRUTH will set you FREE.

Who are these people and why are they buying our democracy?

Robert Reich via MoveOn.org Civic Action

Dear friend,

$176 million.

That's the amount of money 158 families—and the companies they own or control—have already contributed to Republican and Democratic presidential candidates.¹ $176 million—that's half of the total funds contributed thus far in the 2016 presidential race.²

Who are these people and why are they buying our democracy? 

I tackle those big questions and more in three minutes in The Investments of the 158, my latest video with MoveOn. 

Please watch it and share it now.

How much more evidence do we need that our democracy is in crisis?

Please watch and share my latest video, which amounts to a giant wake-up call to reverse Citizens United and get big money out of politics, once and for all.

Thanks for all you do.

--Robert Reich

Sources:

1. "Buying Power," The New York Times, October 10, 2015
http://act.moveon.org/go/76?t=5&akid=160246.19913724.wHJg5F

2. Ibid.

MONDAY, DECEMBER 7, 2015

LOOK WHO’S BUYING AMERICAN DEMOCRACY

According to an investigation by the New York Times, half of all the money contributed so far to Democratic and Republican presidential candidates—$176 million—has come from just 158 families, along with the companies they own or control.

Who are these people?  They’re almost entirely white, rich, older and male—even though America is becoming increasingly black and brown, young, female, and with declining household incomes.

According to the report, most of these big contributors live in exclusive neighborhoods where they have private security guards instead of public police officers, private health facilities rather than public parks and pools.

Most send their kids and grand kids to elite private schools rather than public schools. They fly in private jets and get driven in private limousines rather than rely on public transportation.

They don’t have to worry about whether Social Security or Medicare will be there for them in their retirement because they’ve put away huge fortunes. They don’t have to worry about climate change because they don’t live in flimsy homes that might collapse in a hurricane, or where water is scarce, or food supplies endangered.

It’s doubtful that most of these 158 are contributing to these campaigns out of the goodness of their hearts or a sense of public responsibility. They’re largely making investments, just the way they make other investments.

And the success of these investments depends on whether their candidates get elected, and will lower their taxes even further, expand tax loopholes, shred health and safety and environmental regulations so their companies can make even more money, and cut Social Security and Medicare and programs for the poor—and thereby allow these 158 and others like them to secede even more from the rest of our society.

These people are, after all, are living in their own separate society, and they want to elect people who will represent them, not the rest of us.

How much more evidence do we need that our system is in crisis? How long before we make it work for all of us instead of a handful at the top? We must not let them buy our democracy. We must get big money out of politics. Publicly-finance political campaigns, disclose all sources of campaign funds, and reverse “Citizens United.”

ROBERT B. REICH, Chancellor’s Professor of Public Policy at the University of California at Berkeley and Senior Fellow at the Blum Center for Developing Economies, was Secretary of Labor in the Clinton administration. Time Magazine named him one of the ten most effective cabinet secretaries of the twentieth century. He has written fourteen books, including the best sellers “Aftershock, “The Work of Nations," and"Beyond Outrage." He is also a founding editor of the American Prospect magazine and chairman of Common Cause. His film, INEQUALITY FOR ALL is available on Netflix, iTunes, Amazon. His new book, "SAVING CAPITALISM: For the Many, Not the Few" is out 9/29. 

The TRUTH will set you FREE.