PERTH, AUSTRALIA...BEAUTY IN THE BUSH BY JOEL CANO

94TH PERSUASIVE APPEAL_21NOV16_TO THE SCP JUSTICES :THE 9 SUPREME COURT JUSTICES SURE WILL STRIKE AGAIN THROUGH PET

PREDICTED DECISION  COME TRUE 78TH PERSUASIVE APPEALS_28OCT16_TO THE SCP JUSTICES : TRICK OR TREAT ON NOVEMBER 8 COMEDY SKIT

LIVE NOW: Marcos buried at Libingan ng mga Bayani

Started streaming 2 hours ago Late strongman Ferdinand Marcos has been buried at the Libingan ng mga Bayani November 18, 2016. Watch ANC coverage

93RD PERSUASIVE APPEAL_18NOV16_TO THE SCP JUSTICES : HONOR GIVEN TO MARCOS IS HONOR STOLEN FROM MILLIONS

Published on Nov 17, 2016 "HONOR GIVEN TO MARCOS BY THE SUPREME COURT  IS DISRESPECT TO THE MILLIONS OF PEOPLE WHO  SACRIFICED TO RESTORE OUR DEMOCRACY BACK." FROM THE JUDICIAL BAR COUNCIL INTERVIEW FOR ASSOCIATE JUSTICE POSITION

BLACK FRIDAY PROTESTS ON SUPREME COURT APPROVAL OF MARCOS BURIAL IN THE HEROES' GROUND

Anti-Marcos groups to hold 'Black Friday' protest against SC ruling

Anti-Marcos forces are staging a protest Friday to denounce the recent high court ruling allowing the burial of the late dictator Ferdinand Marcos at the Libingan ng mga Bayani. – ANC, The World Tonight, November 17, 2016

FVR to Marcos family: Apologize, return ill-gotten wealth

FVR to Marcos family: Apologize, return ill-gotten wealth Former President Fidel V. Ramos said it is high time for the family of the late dictator Ferdinand Marcos Sr. to apologize for the atrocities committed during Martial Law and to return to the government the remaining ill-gotten wealth that are still in their possession. In an interview with GMA reporter Sandra Aguinaldo, Ramos said a public apology from the Marcos family is necessary to lessen the pain and anger of the human rights violation victims, in light of the recent Supreme Court ruling allowing the late strongman’s burial at the Libingan ng mga Bayani (LNMB). ““[Apology] addressed to all the descendants of the victims, whether or not because there is investigation but to show sincere desire to discard, reject and eliminate already all of the dictatorial tendencies and happenings during that [Martial Law] period,” Ramos said. Ramos said Marcos’ kin must also voluntarily return the wealth that their family illegally amassed during their patriarch’s dictatorship, instead of just awaiting the resolution of pending civil cases aimed to recover the same. “Pero baka may iba pa na kontrolado ng pamilya, e di yun ang maging subject ng panggagalingan ng philanthropic or humanitarian support. Pero dapat kusang loob na donation or compassionate contribution,” Ramos said. Ramos, was the chief of the Philippine Constabulary (now Philippine National Police) before he withdrew his support to Marcos and became a key figure in the EDSA People Power revolution that ended the dictatorial rule. Based on the estimate of the Presidential Commission on Good Government (PCGG), the Marcos family allegedly amassed a total of around $5 billion to $10 billion worth of wealth during Martial Law. In its report in February of this year, the PCGG said that from 1986 to 2015, it has already recovered around P170 billion or $3.6 billion of the Marcos wealth. shared from

JBC Public Interview for the position of Associate Justice Day 2 - AM

Streamed live 21 hours ago The Judicial and Bar Council (JBC) interview for the position of Supreme Court Associate Justice (vice Justice Arturo D. Brion, who will compulsorily retire on 29 December 2016). November 16, 2016 at 9:00AM.

Black Friday rally to dramatize opposition to FM burial By Mayen Jaymalin (The Philippine Star) | Updated November 18, 2016 - 12:00am MANILA, Philippines - Anti-Marcos protesters will hold a Black Friday rally today to dramatize their opposition to the planned burial of former president Ferdinand Marcos at the Libingan ng mga Bayani in Taguig City. A noise barrage is set at 12 noon at various sites in Quezon City, Manila, Marikina, Caloocan City and Parañaque, according to Christian Yamzon, Bayan media officer. “At the different protest centers, protesters will burn images of Marcos,” he said. “They will also announce future plans for their campaign against the Marcos burial.” A bigger protest action will be mounted during the actual burial of Marcos, Yamzon said. Meanwhile, most candidates for the posts to be vacated by retiring Associate Justices Arturo Brion and Jose Perez, who went through the two-day public interviews that ended yesterday, agreed with the SC decision allowing the Libingan burial of Marcos. The Judicial and Bar Council asked them if they agreed with the SC ruling. Headlines ( Article MRec ), pagematch: 1, sectionmatch: 1 Chief Public Attorney Persida Rueda-Acosta, Centro Escolar University Law School vice dean Rita Linda Ventura-Jimeno and Sandiganbayan Associate Justice Samuel Martires agreed with the majority decision that the Marcos burial is a political question resolved by presidential prerogative under the Constitution. Acosta said the burial of Marcos has basis in law, citing Republic Act 289 (National Pantheon law). “I will concur (with the SC ruling), the law is very clear. It’s time for the nation to be healed,” she said when asked how she would have voted in the case if she were already a member of the SC. Jimeno agreed with the SC upholding the eligibility of Marcos for burial at the Libingan as a former president, soldier and Medal of Valor recipient. “It is my respect for the rule of law which tells me the Supreme Court’s decision should be respected, and I do respect it,” she said. Martires said he does not believe that Marcos was dishonorably discharged by the Filipino people. “It’s always been my belief that Marcos wasn’t ousted, but he opted to leave to prevent bloodshed,” he said. In the continuation of the public interviews yesterday, aspirants Court of Appeals Associate Justice Amy Lazaro-Javier and law professor Joseph San Pedro disagreed with the SC ruling and supported the dissenting opinions. Javier believes in the dissenting opinion that Marcos was dishonorably discharged during the EDSA people power revolution in 1986 and therefore disqualified for a hero’s burial. “The highest form of conviction is people power… I think the conviction made by the people themselves is the highest court,” she said. “Any other inferior court, even the SC, can’t trivialize that decision (of the people).” San Pedro agreed with this opinion. “I think the primary issue there is the historical underpinning of our 1987 Constitution,” he said. “We came from an ouster of a dictator and to allow the dictator is a dishonor to the people who sacrificed to have our democracy right now.” Other nominees who faced the JBC are CA Associate Justices Japar Dimaampao and Noel Tijam; Department of Justice chief state counsel Ricardo Paras III; Davao Regional Trial Court Judge Rowena Apao-Adlawan, and CA Mindanao Executive Justice Romulo Borja. Seven other candidates for the vacancies were no longer interviewed because of their previous interviews over the past year. They are CA Presiding Justice Andres Reyes Jr. and CA Justices Apolinario Bruselas Jr., Rosmari Carandang, Stephen Cruz and Jose Reyes Jr., Quezon City Judge Reynaldo Daway and Sandiganbayan Justice Alex Quiroz. Close A ‘People must decide’ Sanlakas secretary general Aaron Pedrosa said the decision on whether to bury Marcos at the Libingan must be left to the Filipino people, who were also the game changer in Edsa 1. “President Duterte cannot simply reduce the issue to a clash of political clans, especially if he is aware of the injustices and crimes committed by the Marcos dictatorship,” he said. Pedrosa said the Aquinos were not the only victims of martial law nor are they the ones leading the condemnation of a hero’s burial for Marcos. “Under Marcos’s rule, 3,240 were killed, more than 70,000 were imprisoned, 34,000 people were tortured and 254 people were victimized by enforced disappearances,” he said. Pedrosa said the “last word” on the issue could now rest in the hands of the Filipino people, who have every right to resist any attempt to deodorize the atrocities committed by Marcos. “We demonstrated this when we ousted the dictatorship in 1986,” he said “A hero’s burial for Marcos will not give closure to the families and the memory of those who were denied dignity and rights under his tyranny. Nor will it absolve the present and future generations of the 26.7 billion-dollar debt we will be paying as late as 2025, almost forty years after Marcos’s regime ended.” Pedrosa said since the SC ruled that the matter was a political question, Duterte has the power to cancel or retract his order allowing the burial of Marcos. “It is enough for the President to look at the backlash caused by his order to see that the Marcos burial will not bring closure and healing to the Philippines,” he said. – With Edu Punay, Ding Cervantes shared from