LYING ASSERTIONS BY THE SCP JUSTICES
EVIDENCE OF THE JUSTICES' LYING ASSERTIONS IN THE PIZARRO DECISION
COMPLAINT AGAINST PIZARRO ET AL PENDING IN THE SUPREME COURT SINCE MARCH 24, 2015 attested by my direct personal knowledge.
JUSTICES GUEVARA-SALONGA, DE LEON AND PIZARRO
KNEW AND CONFORMED TO UNLAWFUL ACT BY SHELL TO MISAPPROPRIATE MY RETIREMENT PAY AS PAYMENT FOR SEPARATION PAY, SO, THEREFORE, AS MEMBERS OF THE BAR CONFORMING TO AN UNLAWFUL ACT, THEY SHOULD BE DISCIPLINED. JUSTICES GUEVARA-SALONGA, DE LEON AND PIZARRO knew and wrote that Shell had misappropriated my retirement pay as payment for separation pay as shown in their decision shown below, yet they conformed with it:
|
TAKEN FROM PAGE 3 PAR 1 COURT OF APPEALS DECISION_6JUNE2007 BY GUEVARA-SALONGA, DELEON, PIZARRO
|
COMPLAINT FILED MARCH 24, 2015
REPUBLIC ACT 7641 CIRCUMVENTED BY SHELL, PROMOTER GUARDIANS OF LAW SHOULD BE DISCIPLINED
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION
SHELL MISAPPROPRIATED MY RETIREMENT PAY AS PAYMENT FOR SEPARATION PAY. SHELL CIRCUMVENTED THE LAW.
THIS IS UNLAWFUL AND SUBJECT TO PENAL PROVISIONS PROVIDED FOR IN RA NO. 7641
SEPARATION PAY DOCUMENT WHERE MY RETIREMENT PAY ACCOUNTS DISBURSEMENT SHOWN NEXT. DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE OF RETIREMENT PAY MISAPPROPRIATION AS PAYMENT FOR SEPARATION PAY
SHELL POSITION PAPER ANNEX 5
COMPLAINT ON DECEITFUL SEPARATION PAY BEEN PRESENTED ON THE REJOINDER BY THE COMPLAINANT AS SHOWN BELOW
FROM PAGE 6 PAR26 REJOINDER DECEITFUL SEPARATION PAY
FROM P7 PAR27/28 REJOINDER DECEITFUL SEPARATION PAY
LABOR ARBITER MICHAELA LONTOC KNEW, PROMOTED AND CONFORMED TO THE UNLAWFUL ACT BY SHELL AS PROMOTED BY ATTY. QUIROZ TO MISAPPROPRIATE MY RETIREMENT PAY AS PAYMENT FOR SEPARATION, UNLAWFUL; SO THEREFORE, AS MEMBER OF THE BAR CONFORMING TO AN UNLAWFUL ACT, SHE SHOULD BE DISCIPLINED.
LABOR ARBITER MICHAELA LONTOC KNEW AND WROTE THAT SHELL HAD MISAPPROPRIATED MY RETIREMENT PAY AS PAYMENT FOR SEPARATION PAY AS SHOWN IN HER DECISION SHOWN BELOW, YET SHE CONFORMED WITH IT, THOUGH UNLAWFUL. SHE SHOULD BE DISCIPLINED.
FROM PAGE6 PAR2 NLRC DECISION 28DECEMBER2006 BY LABOR ARBITER MICHAELA LONTOC
COMMISSIONERS JAVIER, BILOG III AND GENILO KNEW AND CONFORMED TO THE UNLAWFUL ACT BY SHELL AS PROMOTED BY ATTY. RAUL QUIROZ TO MISAPPROPRIATE MY RETIREMENT PAY AS PAYMENT FOR SEPARATION PAY; UNLAWFUL. SO THEREFORE AS MEMBERS OF THE BAR CONFORMING TO AN UNLAWFUL ACT, THEY SHOULD BE DISCIPLINED.
COMMISSIONERS JAVIER BILOG III AND GENILO KNEW AND WROTE THAT SHELL HAD MISAPPROPRIATED MY RETIREMENT PAY AS PAYMENT FOR MY SEPARATION PAY AS FOUND BY THE LABOR ARBITER AND TO WHICH THEY CONCUR AND CONFORMED WITH IT; UNLAWFUL :
FROM PAGE6 PAR3 NLRC RESOLUTION 29JUNE2007 BY JAVIER, BILOG III AND GENILO
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS JUSTICES GUEVARRA-SALONGA, DE LEON AND PIZARRO KNEW AND CONFORMED TO THE UNLAWFUL ACT BY SHELL AS PROMOTED BY ATTY. RAUL QUIROZ MISAPPROPRIATING MY RETIREMENT PAY AS PAYMENT FOR SEPARATION PAY, SO THEREFORE, AS MEMBERS OF THE BAR CONFORMING TO AN UNLAWFUL ACT, THEY SHOULD BE DISCIPLINED.
JUSTICES GUEVARRA-SALONGA, DE LEON AND PIZARRO KNEW AND WROTE THAT SHELL HAD MISAPPROPRIATED MY RETIREMENT PAY AS PAYMENT FOR SEPARATION PAY AS PROMOTED BY ATTY. RAUL QUIROZ AS WRITTEN IN THEIR DECISION SHOWN BELOW; THIS ACT IS UNLAWFUL YET THEY CONFORMED WITH IT:
FROM PAGE3 PAR1 COURT OF APPEALS DECISION 28MAY2008
SUPREME COURT OF THE PHILIPPINES
HONORABLE VIDAL, SC CLERK OF COURT ACTING JUSTICE, ONLY IN THE PHILIPPINES
DUE TO GROSS INEXCUSABLE NEGLIGENCE HONORABLE VIDAL HAD DEEMED CONFORMED AND CONCURRED WITH CA JUSTICES GUEVARRA-SALONGA, DE LEON AND PIZARRO, ALSO WITH COMMISSIONERS JAVIER, BILOG III AND GENILO, AND LIKEWISE WITH WITH LABOR ARBITER LONTOC TO THE UNLAWFUL ACT BY SHELL MISAPPROPRIATING MY RETIREMENT PAY AS PAYMENT FOR MY SEPARATION PAY AS PROMOTED BY ATTY. RAUL QUIROZ. SO THEREFORE AS MEMBER OF THE BAR CONFORMING TO AN UNLAWFUL ACT, SHE SHOULD BE DISCIPLINED.
JUSTICE VIDAL, THE CLERK OF COURT DECISION DATED 30JULY2008
REPUBLIC ACT NO. 7641
IMAGES FROM CHANROBLES PUBLISHING COMPANY
RA 7641 CIRCUMVENTION RECIPIENT RECORD HISTORY
RA 7641 CIRCUMVENTION
RECIPIENT RECORD HISTORY
5TH SENDING
APRIL 27, 2015
from: | antonio jr. Buensuceso <antoniobuensuceso@gmail.com> |
to: | pio@sc.judiciary.gov.ph, pio_personnel@sc.judiciary.gov.ph |
cc: | John Donovan , davan.majaraj@latimes.com, paul.pringle@latimes.com, dick_and_sharon@laprogressive.com, feedback@inquirer.com.ph, bulletin@mb.com.ph, feedback@philstar.net.ph, nfo@manilastandardtoday.com, mst.daydesk@gmail.com, editorial@malaya.com.ph, editorial@bworld.com.ph, news@businessmirror.com.ph, newsdesk@manilatimes.net, opinion@manilatimes.net, newsboy@tribune.net.ph, siongpo@gmail.com, abante@abante-tonite.com, tonite@abante-tonite.com, editorial@mb.com.ph, newscolumn@bandera.ph, bosesngmasa@bulgar.com.ph, peoplesbalita@yahoo.com, peoples@journal.com.ph, nt@journal.com.ph, psngayon@philstar.net.ph, policefiles_tonite@yahoo.com, remate.tonight@gmail.com, feedback@gmanews.tv, postmaster@igma.tv, feedback@abs-cbn.com, rusty_1530kHz@yahoo.com, email_us@dzme1530.com, interact@mbcradio.net, pmbuen@edsamail.com.ph, an_laroza@yahoo.com, 702dzas@febc.org.ph, serdibaja@yahoo.com, honey_mei02@yahoo.com, eduardo_caones@yahoo.com, alanallanigue@yahoo.com, edgarallan_40@yahoo.com, santybautista@yahoo.com, newsfeedback@abs-cbn.com, studio23@pinoycentral.com, abcnews_phil@yahoo.com, emile-i@mailcity.com, ancphil@abs-cbn.com, nfo@untvweb.com, ca_manila@yahoo.com, ca_cebu@yahoo.com, ca_cagayandeoro@yahoo.com, op@president.gov.ph, vp@ovp.gov.ph, sen.escudero@gmail.com, Chiz Escudero , sjvanzi@newsflash.org, accra@accralaw.com, accralawcebu@accralaw.com, accradavao@accralaw.com |
date: | Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 12:52 AM |
subject: | 5TH SENDING APRIL 27, 2015 REPUBLIC ACT 7641 CIRCUMVENTED BY SHELL, PROMOTER GUARDIANS OF LAW SHOULD BE DISCIPLINED |
mailed-by: | gmail.com
|
FOURTH SENDING
APRIL 20, 2015
NO RESPONSE
from:
| antonio jr. Buensuceso <antoniobuensuceso@gmail.com> |
to:
| pio@sc.judiciary.gov.ph, pio_personnel@sc.judiciary.gov.ph |
cc:
| Antonio Buensuceso |
date:
| Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 2:06 AM |
subject:
| REPUBLIC ACT 7641 CIRCUMVENTED BY SHELL, PROMOTER GUARDIANS OF LAW SHOULD BE DISCIPLINED |
mailed-by:
| gmail.com |
THIRD SENDING
APRIL 13, 2015
NO RESPONSE
from:
| antonio jr. Buensuceso <antoniobuensuceso@gmail.com> |
to:
| pio@sc.judiciary.gov.ph, pio_personnel@sc.judiciary.gov.ph |
cc:
| Antonio Buensuceso |
date:
| Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 12:25 PM |
subject:
| REPUBLIC ACT 7641 CIRCUMVENTED BY SHELL, PROMOTER GUARDIANS OF LAW SHOULD BE DISCIPLINED |
mailed-by:
| gmail.com |
SECOND SENDING_APRIL 6, 2015
NOTE NO RESPONSE
from:
| antonio jr. Buensuceso <antoniobuensuceso@gmail.com> |
to:
| pio@sc.judiciary.gov.ph, pio_personnel@sc.judiciary.gov.ph, Antonio Buensuceso |
date:
| Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 1:31 AM |
subject:
| REPUBLIC ACT 7641 CIRCUMVENTED BY SHELL , PROMOTER GUARDIANS OF LAW SHOULD BE DISCIPLINED |
mailed-by:
| gmail.com |
FIRST SENDING_MARCH 24, 2015
NOTE NO RESPONSE
from: | antonio jr. Buensuceso <antoniobuensuceso@gmail.com> |
to: | pio@sc.judiciary.gov.ph, pio_personnel@sc.judiciary.gov.ph |
cc: | Antonio Buensuceso |
date: | Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 6:05 PM |
subject: | REPUBLIC ACT 7641 CIRCUMVENTED BY SHELL, PROMOTER GUARDIANS OF LAW SHOULD BE DISCIPLINED |
mailed-by: | gmail.com |
The following Justices of
the Supreme Court of the
Philippines are DEEMED
provided with copy of
this "REPUBLIC ACT 7641 CIRCUMVENTED
BY SHELL, PROMOTER GUARDIANS OF LAW
SHOULD BE DISCIPLINED"
through Atty. Theodore
Te's PIO e-mail
address on March 24, 2015
to the present and prayers
for corrective and/or
and/or investigative
and/or administrative
and/or judicial and/or
disciplinary actions
be instituted in due time.
IMAGE CREDIT:http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/
MAGE CREDIT:http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/
MAGE CREDIT:http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/
MAGE CREDIT:http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/
MAGE CREDIT:http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/
MAGE CREDIT:http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/
MAGE CREDIT:http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/
IMAGE CREDIT:http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/
MAGE CREDIT:http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/
MAGE CREDIT:http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/
MAGE CREDIT:http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/
IMAGE CREDIT:http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/
MAGE CREDIT:http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/
MAGE CREDIT:http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/
MAGE CREDIT:http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/
CERTIFICATE OF SEPARATION FROM LAST EMPLOYER COMPLAINT
1
2.
MY QUEST FOR SWINDLED
RETIREMENT PAY BY SHELL
596counts
SEE BELOW FOR THE 596TH TIME THE REITERATION OF DEMAND PAYMENT OF RETIREMENT PAY WHICH SHELL REFUSED TO HONOR IN THE PRESENCE AND DEEMED APPROVAL OF THE HONORABLE MAGISTRATES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE PHILIPPINES
Dishonest scales are an abomination to the Lord, but a just weight is His delight... Proverbs Chapter 11 v. 1
Retirement Pay Law circumvented by Shell subject to penal provision provided for by Article 288 of the Labor Code of the Philippines.
|
|
|