Claim Number 55-06c6-44x LYING BY LIU ON PHOTO MEDIA SHEET ATTACHMENT dated 5aug20

AUGUST 5,  2020 GORDON LIU CLAIM SPECIALIST STATE FARM HOME INSURANCE RE: Claim Number 55-06c6-44x        Policy Number 77-C3-B499-7 DATE OF LOSS: April 26, 2020 LYING BY LIU ON PHOTO MEDIA SHEET ATTACHMENT Dear Mr. Liu: While waiting for your response on the  THIRTY-FOUR (34) COUNTS OF BAD FAITH EVIDENCES dated July 31, 2020,  PLEASE SEE,  PAR. 3 July 31, 2020 DENIAL LETTER You wrote, "Attached is a copy of the photo media sheet with the photographs obtained during our virtual Claims Xperience inspection which took place on May 5, 2020. The information provided by John Titouah was provided verbally and not in a written form. The information contained in our claim file notes are not considered claim-related documents, as defined by Insurance Code Section 10082.3 and will not be provided." COMMENTS: You wrote, " Attached is a copy of the photo media sheet with the photographs obtained during our virtual Claims Xperience inspection which took place on May 5, 2020.  " Meaning, The copy of the photo media sheet with photographs obtained during your virtual claims Xperience which took place on May 5, 2020 is attached to your DENIAL LETTER dated July 31, 2020. However, efforts to locate any attachment proves nothing to be found and you are most probably lying about it to impress upon us that you have, AT LEAST,  a record of complying partly to my request for copies of the video presentation, photographs and written report by Titouah to you on May 5, 2020 by sending me just the photographs discounting the video presentation and written report but actually you have not granted me anything. THIS ABSOLUTELY CHEATING AND/OR MISREPRESENTATION THROUGH WRITING A FALSE STATEMENT OF AN UNDERTAKING IN CONTRAVENTION TO THE IMPLIED COVENANT OF GOOD FAITH AND FAIR DEALING BETWEEN US. Please acknowledge receipt of this e-mail and kindly inform me when do I expect a reply to this email. Yours faithfully, Antonio L. Buensuceso

Claim Number 55-06c6-44x WHY EXCLUDE JUNE 12, 2020 AMONG THE COMPILATION OF DENIAL LETTERS dated 5aug20

AUGUST 5,  2020 GORDON LIU CLAIM SPECIALIST STATE FARM HOME INSURANCE RE: Claim Number 55-06c6-44x        Policy Number 77-C3-B499-7 DATE OF LOSS: April 26, 2020 REQUEST FOR AN EXPLANATION WHY EXCLUDE JUNE 12, 2020 DENIAL LETTER IN THE RECORD OF CORRESPONDENCES Dear Mr. Liu: While waiting for your response on the  THIRTY-FOUR (34) COUNTS OF BAD FAITH EVIDENCES dated July 31, 2020,  PLEASE SEE, PAR. 2 DENIAL LETTER dated July 31, 2020   State Farm has considered all the information presented by you in relation to claim number 55-06C6-44X. Our position as communicated in our previous correspondences dated May 6, 2020, July 13, 2020, and July 17, 2020 remain unchanged. This file remains closed. All policy conditions previously quoted still apply. DO YOU REALLY INTEND TO EXCLUDE JUNE 12, 2020 DENIAL CORRESPONDENCE? WHY? PAR. 2 AFFIRMED THIRD DENIAL LETTER dated July 17, 2020 "As discussed, State Farm has considered all of the facts related to your claim as presented and no new information has been received in relation to your claim. Therefore, our position regarding the coverage of the claim as communicated in our original corresondence of May 6, 2020 and July 13, 2020 remain unchanged." DO YOU REALLY INTEND TO EXCLUDE JUNE 12, 2020 DENIAL CORRESPONDENCE? WHY? Please acknowledge receipt of this e-mail and kindly inform me when do I expect a reply to this email. Yours faithfully, Antonio L. Buensuceso

Claim Number 55-06c6-44x VERBAL STATEMENTS USELESS WITHOUT WITNESSES TO TESTIFY ITS VERACITY dated 5aug20

AUGUST 5,  2020 GORDON LIU CLAIM SPECIALIST STATE FARM HOME INSURANCE RE: Claim Number 55-06c6-44x        Policy Number 77-C3-B499-7 DATE OF LOSS: April 26, 2020 VERBAL STATEMENTS USELESS WITHOUT WITNESSES TO TESTIFY ON ITS VERACITY Dear Mr. Liu: While waiting for your response on the  THIRTY-FOUR (34) COUNTS OF BAD FAITH EVIDENCES dated July 31, 2020,  PLEASE SEE, PAR. 3 DENIAL LETTER dated July 31, 2020  You wrote, "Attached is a copy of the photo media sheet with the photographs obtained during our virtual Claims Xperience inspection which took place on May 5, 2020. The information provided by John Titouah was provided verbally and not in a written form. The information contained in our claim file notes are not considered claim-related documents, as defined by Insurance Code Section 10082.3 and will not be provided." You wrote,  "  The information provided by John Titouah was provided verbally and not in a written form. " COMMENTS : This means that the information provided by John Titouah to you are in uttered words and sentences or through verbal communications. How would you prove that what you are writing to me about matters on the May 5, 2020 incident which led you to determine denial of our claim is exactly what he said, no more, no less. You may need to present a third party, credible non interested person who is present in the conversation to attest to the veracity  and correctness of those information and swear that those are based exactly and actually on what the informant said. Failure on your part to present such a third party credible witness to attest to the veracity of your statements,  whether it precisely conform to what Totouah exactly and actually said, and this failure would definitely turn all your denial letters from May 6, 2020 to July 31, 2020 to shambles, naught and worthless. Consequently, this becomes a manifestation that you have not written any denial letter at all from May 6, 2020 to July 31, 2020 and therefore lead to the conclusion that you did not diligently act on our claim in due time and be considered as another violation of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing between us. Please acknowledge receipt of this e-mail and kindly inform me when do I expect a reply to this email. Yours faithfully, Antonio L. Buensuceso

759TH PERSUASIVE APPEAL_5AUG19_TO THE SCP JUSTICIDES

1 CERTIFICATE OF SEPARATION FROM LAST EMPLOYER COMPLAINT 2.  MY QUEST FOR SWINDLED  RETIREMENT PAY BY SHELL SWINDLING ITO, SYNDICATED ESTAFA HOT PURSUIT DUTY OF LAW ENFORCEMENT ENTITIES 904counts SEE BELOW FOR THE 904TH    TIME THE REITERATION OF DEMAND PAYMENT OF RETIREMENT PAY WHICH SHELL REFUSED TO HONOR IN THE PRESENCE AND DEEMED APPROVAL OF THE HONORABLE MAGISTRATES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE PHILIPPINES GEUS_15MAR16_66th FOLLOW UP_REITERATION OF DEMAND  PAYMENT OF RETIREMENT PAY Dishonest scales are an abomination to the Lord, but a just weight is His delight... Proverbs Chapter 11  v. 1 Retirement Pay Law circumvented by Shell subject to penal provision provided for by Article 288 of the Labor Code of the Philippines.

Claim Number 55-06c6-44x EXPLANATION FOR CONFLICTING CONTRARY INFORMATION dated 4August20

AUGUST 4,  2020 GORDON LIU CLAIM SPECIALIST STATE FARM HOME INSURANCE RE: Claim Number 55-06c6-44x        Policy Number 77-C3-B499-7 DATE OF LOSS: April 26, 2020 REQUEST FOR AN EXPLANATION FOR CONFLICTING CONTRARY INFORMATION Dear Mr. Liu: While waiting for your response on the  THIRTY-FOUR (34) COUNTS OF BAD FAITH EVIDENCES dated July 31, 2020,  may I most respectfully avail of this time to ask for an explanation from you about writing the following two (2) confusing contrary conflicting information. TO WIT: ON PAR.2 June 12, 2020 DENIAL LETTER You wrote, "As outlined in our May 6, 2020 declination letter, the predominant cause of the water damages was wear, tear, and deterioration to the forty one year old "hot" side copper water line located under the concrete foundation which resulted in a continuous and repeated seepage of water below the foundation, eventually migrated upwards and manifested itself on the date of the discovery to the interior of the home. My virtual inspection on May 5, 2020, the photographs of the excavating of the pipe, multiple discussions with All Express Plumbing, his written report and a detailed follow up conversation with the plumber, John Titouah on June 5, 2020 confirmed all the original facts of the loss." "his written report  " This means on the denial letter dated June 12, 2020, you impressed upon us a copy of the written report of JOHN TITOUAH. BUT HOW COME YOU ARE DENYING  THE EXISTENCE OF JOHN TITOUAH's REPORT ON PAR.3 JULY 31, 2020 DENIAL LETTER TO THE EFFECT THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED BY JOHN TITOUAH WAS PROVIDED VERBALLY AND NOT IN WRITTEN FORM. PAR. 3 July 31, 2020 DENIAL LETTER You wrote, "Attached is a copy of the photo media sheet with the photographs obtained during our virtual Claims Xperience inspection which took place on May 5, 2020. The information provided by John Titouah was provided verbally and not in a written form. The information contained in our claim file notes are not considered claim-related documents, as defined by Insurance Code Section 10082.3 and will not be provided." PLEASE ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF THIS EMAIL AND INFORM ME WHEN TO EXPECT A REPLY TO IT. AND, KINDLY DO ACKNOWLEDGE, RECEIPT AND WHEN TO EXPECT A  REPLY TO  34 COUNTS OF BAD FAITH EVIDENCES. Yours faithfully, Antonio L. Buensuceso

758TH PERSUASIVE APPEAL_2AUG19_TO THE SCP JUSTICIDES

1 CERTIFICATE OF SEPARATION FROM LAST EMPLOYER COMPLAINT 2.  MY QUEST FOR SWINDLED  RETIREMENT PAY BY SHELL SWINDLING ITO, SYNDICATED ESTAFA HOT PURSUIT DUTY OF LAW ENFORCEMENT ENTITIES 903counts SEE BELOW FOR THE 903RD    TIME THE REITERATION OF DEMAND PAYMENT OF RETIREMENT PAY WHICH SHELL REFUSED TO HONOR IN THE PRESENCE AND DEEMED APPROVAL OF THE HONORABLE MAGISTRATES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE PHILIPPINES GEUS_15MAR16_66th FOLLOW UP_REITERATION OF DEMAND  PAYMENT OF RETIREMENT PAY Dishonest scales are an abomination to the Lord, but a just weight is His delight... Proverbs Chapter 11  v. 1 Retirement Pay Law circumvented by Shell subject to penal provision provided for by Article 288 of the Labor Code of the Philippines.