Claim Number 55-06c6-44x SHOW ACTIONS TO PROVE YOU ARE NOT PARTY TO THE CRIMES COMMITTED BY JOHN TITOUAH dated 6aug20

AUGUST 6,  2020 GORDON LIU CLAIM SPECIALIST STATE FARM HOME INSURANCE RE: Claim Number 55-06c6-44x        Policy Number 77-C3-B499-7 DATE OF LOSS: April 26, 2020 SHOW ACTIONS TO PROVE YOU ARE NOT PARTY  TO THE CRIMES COMMITTED BY JOHN TITOUAH Dear Mr. Liu: While waiting for your response on the  THIRTY-FOUR (34) COUNTS OF BAD FAITH EVIDENCES dated July 31, 2020,  PLEASE SEE, PAR. 4 July 31, 2020 DENIAL LETTER You wrote, "Your email contains allegations of misconduct by me and State Farm. All such contentions are denied.  We handle each claim on its own merits. State Farm and I have complied with the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing in the investigation and handling of your claim." You wrote, " Your email contains allegations of misconduct by me and State Farm. All such contentions are denied." COMMENTS : Mere words of denials to the allegations of misconduct by State Farm and you are worthless without showing actions proving that State Farm and you are not party to his crime. TO WIT, AMONG OTHERS: STATE FARM AND YOU ARE MOST PROBABLY PARTY TO HIS CRIMES OF PRODUCING AND DISTRIBUTING A RIGGED FRAUDULENT VIDEO AND BY WAY OF VANDALISM, DIGGING A HUGE EXCESS EXCAVATION MORE THAN WHAT IS REQUIRED TO ACCESS PIPE WITHIN THE SLAB AND REPAIR PIPE, being you as: 1. THE MAIN BENEFICIARY OF THE RIGGED FRAUDULENT VIDEO PRESENTATION AND STATEMENTS  AS YOU USED AND RELIED ON THEM TO DENY OUR CLAIM. 2. DESPITE THE FACT THAT I HAVE REPORTED HIS CRIME TO CONCERNED POLICE AGENCIES AND THIS FACT HAVING BEEN PRESENTED TO YOU, I AM PERPLEXED WHY YOU HAVE  NOT SHOWN OR WRITTEN CONCRETE ACTIONS TO INVESTIGATE OR AT LEAST VERIFY FACTS RELEVANT TO THE ALLEGATIONS OF FRAUD BY TITOUAH OR WRITE ACTIONS TAKEN TO SEEK HELP FROM THE POLICE IN INVESTIGATING TITOUAH. 3. HAVING BEEN VISITED THE SITE OF HIS CRIME AND INVITED PURPOSELY TO TAKE MEASUREMENTS OF THE EXCAVATION, BUT YOU DID NOT TAKE MEASUREMENTS OR EVEN AT LEAST BRING WITH YOU A MEASURING TOOL AND WORSE, YOU STILL MAINTAIN YOUR POSITION OF 10, 8 TO 9 AND 8 INCHES DEPTH OF THE EXCAVATION IN YOUR DENIAL LETTERS, WHICH ARE FAR FROM THE ACTUAL DEPTH MEASUREMENT OF 4 TO 6 INCHES. 4. HAVING YOU STATED  THAT " It does not matter which plumber is called, who they worked for, and what they charge, the only way to confirm the Predominant cause of water losses is to contact and discuss the facts of the discharge directly with the plumber who discovered, located, and repaired the leak.",  You wrote, "what they charge, " MEANS THAT YOU IMPLICITLY ADMITTED THAT THE PLUMBER TITOUAH CHARGES FEES AND YOU PAID HIM FOR THE SERVICES HE HAD RENDERED FOR YOUR BENEFIT. IN OTHER WORDS, YOU HAVE  CREATED A BUSINESS PARTNERSHIP WITH TITOUAH WHERE YOU ARE HIS CLIENT FOR THE RIGGED VIDEO PRESENTATION HE PRODUCED.  DOUBTLESS, THAT TITOUAH AND YOU ARE PARTNERS IN THIS ENDEAVOR . AND, THEREFORE,  YOU CAN NOT DENY THAT STATE FARM AND YOU ARE PARTY TO THE CRIMES COMMITTED BY TITOUAH. 5.  HAVING YOU STATED  THAT " It does not matter which plumber is called, who they worked for, and what they charge, the only way to confirm the Predominant cause of water losses is to contact and discuss the facts of the discharge directly with the plumber who discovered, located, and repaired the leak." MEANS THAT ACCORDING TO WHAT YOU HAVE WRITTEN, " the only way to confirm the Predominant cause of water losses is to contact and discuss the facts of the discharge directly with the plumber who discovered, located, and repaired the leak." THEN IT FOLLOWS YOU NEED TO CONTACT A PLUMBER  WHO DISCOVERED, LOCATED  AND REPAIRED THE LEAK. BUT YOUR PROBLEM IS, THERE IS NO PLUMBER WHO DISCOVERED NOR LOCATED THE LEAK, BUT THE FACT IS IT IS US WHO DISCOVERED THE LEAK  NOT JOHN TITOUAH AND NEITHER HE REPAIRED THE LEAK. THEREFOR, THE RIGHT PERSON TO TALK TO IS NOT JOHN TITOUAH BUT US.  WHY NOT TALK TO US AND IGNORE TITOUAH?  IF NOT BOTH OF YOU ARE PARTNERS TO HIS CRIMES, HOW COME UP TO THIS TIME BOTH OF YOU ARE ONE TOGETHER IN HIS LIES?  SOURCE FOR NO. 4 and 5 ON PAR.4 June 12, 2020 denial letter You wrote,  "As far as State Farm's relationship with All Express Plumbing and John Titouah, all insurance carriers after a water loss has been immediately contacts and discusses causation and location of pipe breaks. It does not matter which plumber is called, who they worked for, and what they charge, the only way to confirm the Predominant cause of water losses is to contact and discuss the facts of the discharge directly with the plumber who discovered, located, and repaired the leak. In regards to the costs of a re-route, that would be up to the discretion of the Insured. 1. You wrote, "what they charge " meaning, in other words, plumber John charges fees and you paid him in return for his rigged live video presentation and fraudulent statements. How much did he charge you and the amount you paid him? 2. You wrote, "to contact and discuss the facts of the discharge directly with the plumber who discovered, located, and repaired the leak. " Why talk to John Titouah extensively and rely heavily on his statements? John Titouah, Yes he is a plumber. But he is not the one who discovered the leak. It is us. He is not the one who located the leak, It is us; and he is not the one who repaired the leak. Hence, John Titouah is not the right person to talk to but us. So talk to us not John.  AGAIN, JOHN DID NOT DISCOVER, LOCATE AND REPAIR the leak. Therefore,  he can not be called to testify on matters he did not witness or see. Please acknowledge receipt of this e-mail and kindly inform me when  I expect a reply to this email. Yours faithfully, Antonio L. Buensuceso

760TH PERSUASIVE APPEAL_6AUG19_TO THE SCP JUSTICIDES

1 CERTIFICATE OF SEPARATION FROM LAST EMPLOYER COMPLAINT 2.  MY QUEST FOR SWINDLED  RETIREMENT PAY BY SHELL SWINDLING ITO, SYNDICATED ESTAFA HOT PURSUIT DUTY OF LAW ENFORCEMENT ENTITIES 905counts SEE BELOW FOR THE 905TH    TIME THE REITERATION OF DEMAND PAYMENT OF RETIREMENT PAY WHICH SHELL REFUSED TO HONOR IN THE PRESENCE AND DEEMED APPROVAL OF THE HONORABLE MAGISTRATES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE PHILIPPINES GEUS_15MAR16_66th FOLLOW UP_REITERATION OF DEMAND  PAYMENT OF RETIREMENT PAY Dishonest scales are an abomination to the Lord, but a just weight is His delight... Proverbs Chapter 11  v. 1 Retirement Pay Law circumvented by Shell subject to penal provision provided for by Article 288 of the Labor Code of the Philippines.

Claim Number 55-06c6-44x LYING BY LIU ON PHOTO MEDIA SHEET ATTACHMENT dated 5aug20

AUGUST 5,  2020 GORDON LIU CLAIM SPECIALIST STATE FARM HOME INSURANCE RE: Claim Number 55-06c6-44x        Policy Number 77-C3-B499-7 DATE OF LOSS: April 26, 2020 LYING BY LIU ON PHOTO MEDIA SHEET ATTACHMENT Dear Mr. Liu: While waiting for your response on the  THIRTY-FOUR (34) COUNTS OF BAD FAITH EVIDENCES dated July 31, 2020,  PLEASE SEE,  PAR. 3 July 31, 2020 DENIAL LETTER You wrote, "Attached is a copy of the photo media sheet with the photographs obtained during our virtual Claims Xperience inspection which took place on May 5, 2020. The information provided by John Titouah was provided verbally and not in a written form. The information contained in our claim file notes are not considered claim-related documents, as defined by Insurance Code Section 10082.3 and will not be provided." COMMENTS: You wrote, " Attached is a copy of the photo media sheet with the photographs obtained during our virtual Claims Xperience inspection which took place on May 5, 2020.  " Meaning, The copy of the photo media sheet with photographs obtained during your virtual claims Xperience which took place on May 5, 2020 is attached to your DENIAL LETTER dated July 31, 2020. However, efforts to locate any attachment proves nothing to be found and you are most probably lying about it to impress upon us that you have, AT LEAST,  a record of complying partly to my request for copies of the video presentation, photographs and written report by Titouah to you on May 5, 2020 by sending me just the photographs discounting the video presentation and written report but actually you have not granted me anything. THIS ABSOLUTELY CHEATING AND/OR MISREPRESENTATION THROUGH WRITING A FALSE STATEMENT OF AN UNDERTAKING IN CONTRAVENTION TO THE IMPLIED COVENANT OF GOOD FAITH AND FAIR DEALING BETWEEN US. Please acknowledge receipt of this e-mail and kindly inform me when do I expect a reply to this email. Yours faithfully, Antonio L. Buensuceso

Claim Number 55-06c6-44x WHY EXCLUDE JUNE 12, 2020 AMONG THE COMPILATION OF DENIAL LETTERS dated 5aug20

AUGUST 5,  2020 GORDON LIU CLAIM SPECIALIST STATE FARM HOME INSURANCE RE: Claim Number 55-06c6-44x        Policy Number 77-C3-B499-7 DATE OF LOSS: April 26, 2020 REQUEST FOR AN EXPLANATION WHY EXCLUDE JUNE 12, 2020 DENIAL LETTER IN THE RECORD OF CORRESPONDENCES Dear Mr. Liu: While waiting for your response on the  THIRTY-FOUR (34) COUNTS OF BAD FAITH EVIDENCES dated July 31, 2020,  PLEASE SEE, PAR. 2 DENIAL LETTER dated July 31, 2020   State Farm has considered all the information presented by you in relation to claim number 55-06C6-44X. Our position as communicated in our previous correspondences dated May 6, 2020, July 13, 2020, and July 17, 2020 remain unchanged. This file remains closed. All policy conditions previously quoted still apply. DO YOU REALLY INTEND TO EXCLUDE JUNE 12, 2020 DENIAL CORRESPONDENCE? WHY? PAR. 2 AFFIRMED THIRD DENIAL LETTER dated July 17, 2020 "As discussed, State Farm has considered all of the facts related to your claim as presented and no new information has been received in relation to your claim. Therefore, our position regarding the coverage of the claim as communicated in our original corresondence of May 6, 2020 and July 13, 2020 remain unchanged." DO YOU REALLY INTEND TO EXCLUDE JUNE 12, 2020 DENIAL CORRESPONDENCE? WHY? Please acknowledge receipt of this e-mail and kindly inform me when do I expect a reply to this email. Yours faithfully, Antonio L. Buensuceso

Claim Number 55-06c6-44x VERBAL STATEMENTS USELESS WITHOUT WITNESSES TO TESTIFY ITS VERACITY dated 5aug20

AUGUST 5,  2020 GORDON LIU CLAIM SPECIALIST STATE FARM HOME INSURANCE RE: Claim Number 55-06c6-44x        Policy Number 77-C3-B499-7 DATE OF LOSS: April 26, 2020 VERBAL STATEMENTS USELESS WITHOUT WITNESSES TO TESTIFY ON ITS VERACITY Dear Mr. Liu: While waiting for your response on the  THIRTY-FOUR (34) COUNTS OF BAD FAITH EVIDENCES dated July 31, 2020,  PLEASE SEE, PAR. 3 DENIAL LETTER dated July 31, 2020  You wrote, "Attached is a copy of the photo media sheet with the photographs obtained during our virtual Claims Xperience inspection which took place on May 5, 2020. The information provided by John Titouah was provided verbally and not in a written form. The information contained in our claim file notes are not considered claim-related documents, as defined by Insurance Code Section 10082.3 and will not be provided." You wrote,  "  The information provided by John Titouah was provided verbally and not in a written form. " COMMENTS : This means that the information provided by John Titouah to you are in uttered words and sentences or through verbal communications. How would you prove that what you are writing to me about matters on the May 5, 2020 incident which led you to determine denial of our claim is exactly what he said, no more, no less. You may need to present a third party, credible non interested person who is present in the conversation to attest to the veracity  and correctness of those information and swear that those are based exactly and actually on what the informant said. Failure on your part to present such a third party credible witness to attest to the veracity of your statements,  whether it precisely conform to what Totouah exactly and actually said, and this failure would definitely turn all your denial letters from May 6, 2020 to July 31, 2020 to shambles, naught and worthless. Consequently, this becomes a manifestation that you have not written any denial letter at all from May 6, 2020 to July 31, 2020 and therefore lead to the conclusion that you did not diligently act on our claim in due time and be considered as another violation of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing between us. Please acknowledge receipt of this e-mail and kindly inform me when do I expect a reply to this email. Yours faithfully, Antonio L. Buensuceso

759TH PERSUASIVE APPEAL_5AUG19_TO THE SCP JUSTICIDES

1 CERTIFICATE OF SEPARATION FROM LAST EMPLOYER COMPLAINT 2.  MY QUEST FOR SWINDLED  RETIREMENT PAY BY SHELL SWINDLING ITO, SYNDICATED ESTAFA HOT PURSUIT DUTY OF LAW ENFORCEMENT ENTITIES 904counts SEE BELOW FOR THE 904TH    TIME THE REITERATION OF DEMAND PAYMENT OF RETIREMENT PAY WHICH SHELL REFUSED TO HONOR IN THE PRESENCE AND DEEMED APPROVAL OF THE HONORABLE MAGISTRATES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE PHILIPPINES GEUS_15MAR16_66th FOLLOW UP_REITERATION OF DEMAND  PAYMENT OF RETIREMENT PAY Dishonest scales are an abomination to the Lord, but a just weight is His delight... Proverbs Chapter 11  v. 1 Retirement Pay Law circumvented by Shell subject to penal provision provided for by Article 288 of the Labor Code of the Philippines.