Claim Number 55-06c6-44x CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JOHN TITOUAH QUESTION 35 DATED 21SEP20 10:54pm

SEPTEMBER 21,  2020 LOUIS E. GUENIOT TEAM MANAGER GORDON LIU CLAIM SPECIALIST STATE FARM HOME INSURANCE RE: Claim Number 55-06c6-44x        Policy Number 77-C3-B499-7 DATE OF LOSS: April 26, 2020 CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JOHN TITOUAH QUESTION 35  DID YOU INFORM MR. GUENIOT THAT THE CRIMES OF FRAUD AND VANDALISM YOUR BUSINESS PARTNER WITNESS TITOUAH COMMITTED ARE ALSO YOUR OWN CRIME OF FRAUD AND VANDALISM? Dear Mr. Liu: PLEASE INCLUDE THIS INFORMATION, "THAT THE CRIMES OF FRAUD AND VANDALISM YOUR BUSINESS PARTNER WITNESS TITOUAH COMMITTED ARE ALSO YOUR OWN CRIMES OF FRAUD AND VANDALISM.", ONE INFORMATION AMONG THE SEVERAL MORE THAN 10 VIDEOS SHOWN TO YOU ON Monday 29 June 2020 11AM.  STATE FARM/LIU-TITOUAH RELATIONSHIP The principal-agent relationship The principal-agent relationship is a relationship that arises from situations in which one entity (STATE FARM AND LIU as the principal) has power over another (the TITOUAH, the agent). TITOUAH  is acting in STATE FARM AND LIU'S place . In doing so, TITOUAH is expected to carry out STATE FARM AND LIU'S DIRECTIVES. STATE FARM AND LIU ARE the party who authorizes TITOUAH  to act in STATE FARM AND LIU'S place, and TITOUAH is the person who has the authority to act on behalf of  STATE FARM AND LIU. CONSEQUENTLY, THE ACTS BY TITOUAH ARE ACTS OF STATE FARM AND LIU. THEREFORE, THE FRAUD AND VANDALISM DONE BY TITOUAH ARE OBVIOUSLY, FRAUD AND VANDALISM DONE BY STATE FARM AND LIU. QUESTION 34  DID YOU INFORM MR. GUENIOT THAT THE CRIMES OF FRAUD AND VANDALISM YOUR BUSINESS PARTNER WITNESS TITOUAH COMMITTED ARE ALSO YOUR OWN CRIME OF FRAUD AND VANDALISM? Please acknowledge receipt of this e-mail and kindly inform me when I should expect a reply to this email. PLEASE RESTRICT ISSUES AND ANSWERS WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF THE SUBJECT MATTER TO AVOID INAPPROPRIATENESS. Please be reminded that your DENIAL LETTER DATED MAY 6, 2020 was prepared, relayed to us, sent and read by us in just a few minutes. Thank you very much. Yours faithfully, Antonio L. Buensuceso

Claim Number 55-06c6-44x CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JOHN TITOUAH QUESTION 34 DATED 21SEP20 9:47pm

SEPTEMBER 21,  2020 LOUIS E. GUENIOT TEAM MANAGER GORDON LIU CLAIM SPECIALIST STATE FARM HOME INSURANCE RE: Claim Number 55-06c6-44x        Policy Number 77-C3-B499-7 DATE OF LOSS: April 26, 2020 CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JOHN TITOUAH QUESTION 34  DID YOU INFORM MR. GUENIOT THAT YOUR BUSINESS PARTNER WITNESS TITOUAH AFTER SEEING SOMETHING THAT BOTHERED HIM SO MUCH IN EXCAVATION SECTION 1 THEN MOVED TOWARD FARTHER AWAY FROM IT DID AN EXCAVATION VIA VANDALISM EXCESSIVELY MORE THAN WHAT IS REQUIRED? Dear Mr. Liu: PLEASE INCLUDE THIS INFORMATION, "THAT YOUR BUSINESS PARTNER WITNESS TITOUAH AFTER SEEING SOMETHING THAT BOTHERED HIM SO MUCH IN EXCAVATION SECTION 1 WHICH WILL SPOIL STATE FARM AND YOUR PLAN TO SHOW A LEAK FREE EXCAVATION TO PROVE THAT THE LEAK IS WAY BELOW THE FOUNDATION, A LEGAL ALIBI TO DENY OUR CLAIM,  THEN THIS TIME TITOUAH MOVED TOWARD FARTHER AWAY FROM IT.", ONE INFORMATION AMONG THE SEVERAL MORE THAN 10 VIDEOS SHOWN TO YOU ON Monday 29 June 2020 11AM.  VANDALISM : EXCAVATION IN EXCESS OF WHAT IS REQUIRED DURING THE HOT WATER LINE LEAK PROBING, YOUR BUSINESS PARTNER WITNESS TITOUAH AFTER SEEING SOMETHING THAT BOTHERED HIM SO MUCH IN EXCAVATION SECTION 1 THEN MOVED TOWARD FARTHER AWAY FROM IT". IT IS AT THIS POINT TITOUAH COMMITTED THE CRIME OF VANDALISM EXCAVATING THE CONCRETE SLAB IN EXCESS OF WHAT IS REQUIRED TO FIX THE LEAKING PIPE ENCASED IN THE SLAB. FOOTAGES SHOWING DELIBERATE AND INTENTIONAL HIDING THE LEAK FROM US BY STOPPING EXCAVATION SECTION 1 AND PROCEEDED TO EXCAVATE FARTHER AWAY FROM IT, AND PURPOSELY TO SHOW AN EXCAVATION VIA VANDALISM WITH NO TRACES OF WATER LEAK TO SATISFY STATE FARM AND YOUR NEED FOR AN ALIBI TO DENY OUR CLAIM". QUESTION 34  DID YOU INFORM MR. GUENIOT THAT YOUR BUSINESS PARTNER WITNESS TITOUAH AFTER SEEING SOMETHING THAT BOTHERED HIM SO MUCH IN EXCAVATION SECTION 1 THEN MOVED TOWARD FARTHER AWAY FROM IT DID AN EXCAVATION VIA VANDALISM EXCESSIVELY MORE THAN WHAT IS REQUIRED? EXCAVATION VIA VANDALISM California Code, Penal Code - PEN § 594 (a) Every person who maliciously commits any of the following acts with respect to any real or personal property not his or her own, in cases other than those specified by state law, is guilty of vandalism: (1) Defaces with graffiti or other inscribed material. (2) Damages. (3) Destroys. Whenever a person violates this subdivision with respect to real property, vehicles, signs, fixtures, furnishings, or property belonging to any public entity, as defined by Section 811.2 of the Government Code , or the federal government, it shall be a permissive inference that the person neither owned the property nor had the permission of the owner to deface, damage, or destroy the property. (b)(1) If the amount of defacement, damage, or destruction is four hundred dollars ($400) or more, vandalism is punishable by imprisonment pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 1170 or in a county jail not exceeding one year, or by a fine of not more than ten thousand dollars ($10,000), or if the amount of defacement, damage, or destruction is ten thousand dollars ($10,000) or more, by a fine of not more than fifty thousand dollars ($50,000), or by both that fine and imprisonment. (2)(A) If the amount of defacement, damage, or destruction is less than four hundred dollars ($400), vandalism is punishable by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding one year, or by a fine of not more than one thousand dollars ($1,000), or by both that fine and imprisonment. (B) If the amount of defacement, damage, or destruction is less than four hundred dollars ($400), and the defendant has been previously convicted of vandalism or affixing graffiti or other inscribed material under Section 594 , 594.3 , 594.4 , 640.5 , 640.6 , or 640.7 , vandalism is punishable by imprisonment in a county jail for not more than one year, or by a fine of not more than five thousand dollars ($5,000), or by both that fine and imprisonment. Please acknowledge receipt of this e-mail and kindly inform me when I should expect a reply to this email. PLEASE RESTRICT ISSUES AND ANSWERS WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF THE SUBJECT MATTER TO AVOID INAPPROPRIATENESS. Please be reminded that your DENIAL LETTER DATED MAY 6, 2020 was prepared, relayed to us, sent and read by us in just a few minutes. Thank you very much. Yours faithfully, Antonio L. Buensuceso

Claim Number 55-06c6-44x CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JOHN TITOUAH QUESTION 33 DATED 21SEP20 9:31pm

SEPTEMBER 21,  2020 LOUIS E. GUENIOT TEAM MANAGER GORDON LIU CLAIM SPECIALIST STATE FARM HOME INSURANCE RE: Claim Number 55-06c6-44x        Policy Number 77-C3-B499-7 DATE OF LOSS: April 26, 2020 CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JOHN TITOUAH QUESTION 33  DID YOU INFORM MR. GUENIOT THAT YOUR BUSINESS PARTNER WITNESS TITOUAH IS A REAL LIFE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR WHEN HE HAD FOUND THE LEAK BUT WHEN ASKED ABOUT IT, HE REPLIED A RESOUNDING, "NO, NOT YET"? Dear Mr. Liu: PLEASE INCLUDE THIS INFORMATION, "THAT YOUR BUSINESS PARTNER WITNESS TITOUAH IS A REAL LIFE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR WHEN HE HAD FOUND THE LEAK BUT WHEN ASKED ABOUT IT, HE REPLIED A RESOUNDING, "NO, NO YET", ONE INFORMATION AMONG THE SEVERAL MORE THAN 10 VIDEOS SHOWN TO YOU ON Monday 29 June 2020 11AM.  DURING THE HOT WATER LINE LEAK PROBING, YOUR BUSINESS PARTNER WITNESS TITOUAH IS A REAL LIFE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR PURPOSELY TO REALIZE STATE FARM AND YOUR OBJECTIVE THAT THOUGH HE HAD FOUND THE LEAK BUT WHEN ASKED ABOUT IT, HE REPLIED A RESOUNDING, "NO, NO YET". FOOTAGES SHOWING DELIBERATE AND INTENTIONAL HIDING THE LEAK FROM US THROUGH ORAL DENIAL OF THE EXISTENCE OF LEAK IN THE LINE . HE WAS ASKED WHETHER HE DID FIND THE LEAK ALREADY BY MY DAUGHTER WHILE I AM TAKING THE FOOTAGES AND JOHN REPLIED A RESOUNDING "NO, NOT YET." QUESTION 33  DID YOU INFORM MR. GUENIOT THAT YOUR BUSINESS PARTNER WITNESS TITOUAH IS A REAL LIFE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR WHEN HE HAD FOUND THE LEAK BUT WHEN ASKED ABOUT IT, HE REPLIED A RESOUNDING, "NO, NO YET"? Please acknowledge receipt of this e-mail and kindly inform me when I should expect a reply to this email. PLEASE RESTRICT ISSUES AND ANSWERS WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF THE SUBJECT MATTER TO AVOID INAPPROPRIATENESS. Please be reminded that your DENIAL LETTER DATED MAY 6, 2020 was prepared, relayed to us, sent and read by us in just a few minutes. Thank you very much. Yours faithfully, Antonio L. Buensuceso

Claim Number 55-06c6-44x CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JOHN TITOUAH QUESTION 32 DATED 21SEP20 7:27pm

SEPTEMBER 21,  2020 LOUIS E. GUENIOT TEAM MANAGER GORDON LIU CLAIM SPECIALIST STATE FARM HOME INSURANCE RE: Claim Number 55-06c6-44x        Policy Number 77-C3-B499-7 DATE OF LOSS: April 26, 2020 CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JOHN TITOUAH QUESTION 32  DID YOU INFORM MR. GUENIOT THAT YOUR BUSINESS PARTNER WITNESS TITOUAH INSTRUCTED HIS HELPER TO OPEN THE KITCHEN SINK FAUCET TO RELIEVE HOT WATER LINE OF PRESSURE? Dear Mr. Liu: PLEASE INCLUDE THIS INFORMATION, "THAT YOUR BUSINESS PARTNER WITNESS TITOUAH INSTRUCTED HIS HELPER TO OPEN UP THE KITCHEN SINK FAUCET TO RELIEVE THE HOT WATERLINE OF PRESSURE", ONE INFORMATION AMONG THE SEVERAL MORE THAN 10 VIDEOS SHOWN TO YOU ON Monday 29 June 2020 11AM.  DURING THE HOT WATER LINE LEAK PROBING, YOUR BUSINESS PARTNER WITNESS TITOUAH INSTRUCTED HIS HELPER TO OPEN UP THE HOT SIDE OF THE KITCHEN SINK FAUCET TO RELIEVE PRESSURE ON THE HOT WATER LINE. THE HELPER WENT TO THE KITCHEN HOT WATER FAUCET. MY DAUGHTER ASKED HIM WHAT WAS HE DOING. HE ANSWERED,       "HE TOLD ME TO OPEN THE FAUCET". QUESTION 32  DID YOU INFORM MR. GUENIOT THAT YOUR BUSINESS PARTNER WITNESS TITOUAH INSTRUCTED HIS HELPER TO OPEN THE KITCHEN SINK FAUCET TO RELIEVE HOT WATER LINE OF PRESSURE? Please acknowledge receipt of this e-mail and kindly inform me when I should expect a reply to this email. PLEASE RESTRICT ISSUES AND ANSWERS WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF THE SUBJECT MATTER TO AVOID INAPPROPRIATENESS. Please be reminded that your DENIAL LETTER DATED MAY 6, 2020 was prepared, relayed to us, sent and read by us in just a few minutes. Thank you very much. Yours faithfully, Antonio L. Buensuceso

Claim Number 55-06c6-44x CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JOHN TITOUAH QUESTION 31 DATED 21SEP20 5:44 pm

SEPTEMBER 21,  2020 LOUIS E. GUENIOT TEAM MANAGER GORDON LIU CLAIM SPECIALIST STATE FARM HOME INSURANCE RE: Claim Number 55-06c6-44x        Policy Number 77-C3-B499-7 DATE OF LOSS: April 26, 2020 CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JOHN TITOUAH QUESTION 31  DID YOU INFORM MR. GUENIOT THAT YOUR BUSINESS PARTNER WITNESS TITOUAH LOOKED RATTLED WHEN HE SAW SOMETHING UNPLEASANT WHILE DOING HIS EXCAVATION? Dear Mr. Liu: PLEASE INCLUDE THIS INFORMATION, "THAT YOUR BUSINESS PARTNER WITNESS TITOUAH WAS RATTLED ON SOMETHING UNPLEASANT WHILE DOING HIS EXCAVATION", ONE INFORMATION AMONG THE SEVERAL MORE THAN 10 VIDEOS SHOWN TO YOU ON Monday 29 June 2020 11AM.  DURING THE HOT WATER LINE LEAK PROBING, YOUR BUSINESS PARTNER WITNESS TITOUAH WAS RATTLED WHEN HE SAW SOMETHING UNPLEASANT WHILE DOING HIS EXCAVATION. THAT "SOMETHING" BOTHERED HIM SO MUCH. HE STOPPED DIGGING. HE FIXED "SOMETHING" IN THE HOTSIDE OF THE LINE AS HE INSTRUCTED HIS HELPER TO OPEN THE HOT SIDE KITCHEN SINK FAUCET, TO DEVOID THE HOT WATER LINE PRESSURE THEREBY HIDING THE LEAK TO US. QUESTION 31  DID YOU INFORM MR. GUENIOT THAT YOUR BUSINESS PARTNER WITNESS TITOUAH LOOKED RATTLED WHEN HE SAW SOMETHING UNPLEASANT WHILE DOING HIS EXCAVATION? Please acknowledge receipt of this e-mail and kindly inform me when I should expect a reply to this email. PLEASE RESTRICT ISSUES AND ANSWERS WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF THE SUBJECT MATTER TO AVOID INAPPROPRIATENESS. Please be reminded that your DENIAL LETTER DATED MAY 6, 2020 was prepared, relayed to us, sent and read by us in just a few minutes. Thank you very much. Yours faithfully, Antonio L. Buensuceso

Claim Number 55-06c6-44x CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JOHN TITOUAH QUESTION 30 DATED 21SEP20 5:30pm

SEPTEMBER 21,  2020   LOUIS E. GUENIOT TEAM MANAGER GORDON LIU CLAIM SPECIALIST STATE FARM HOME INSURANCE RE: Claim Number 55-06c6-44x        Policy Number 77-C3-B499-7 DATE OF LOSS: April 26, 2020 CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JOHN TITOUAH QUESTION 30  DID YOU INFORM MR. GUENIOT THAT YOUR BUSINESS PARTNER WITNESS TITOUAH CHEATED BY SHOWING THE VALVE TO THE HOT WATER LINE WAS FULLY OPEN THOUGH IT WAS NOT? Dear Mr. Liu: PLEASE INCLUDE THIS INFORMATION, "THAT YOUR BUSINESS PARTNER WITNESS TITOUAH CHEATED BY SHOWING THE VALVE TO THE HOT WATER LINE WAS FULLY OPEN THOUGH IT WAS NOT", ONE INFORMATION AMONG THE SEVERAL MORE THAN 10 VIDEOS SHOWN TO YOU ON Monday 29 June 2020 11AM.  DURING THE HOT WATER LINE LEAK PROBING, YOUR BUSINESS PARTNER WITNESS TITOUAH CHEATED BY SHOWING THE VALVE TO THE HOT WATER LINE WAS FULLY OPEN THOUGH IT WAS NOT WHEN THEY ARE LOOKING FOR WATER LEAK ON THE HOT WATER LINES. THE VALVE TO THE WATER HEATER OR HOT WATER LINE WAS JUST SLIGHTLY OPENED WHEN I CHECKED ON IT NEXT TO TITOUAH. QUESTION 30  DID YOU INFORM MR. GUENIOT THAT YOUR BUSINESS PARTNER WITNESS TITOUAH CHEATED BY SHOWING THE VALVE TO THE HOT WATER LINE WAS FULLY OPEN THOUGH IT WAS NOT? Please acknowledge receipt of this e-mail and kindly inform me when I should expect a reply to this email. PLEASE RESTRICT ISSUES AND ANSWERS WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF THE SUBJECT MATTER TO AVOID INAPPROPRIATENESS. Please be reminded that your DENIAL LETTER DATED MAY 6, 2020 was prepared, relayed to us, sent and read by us in just a few minutes. Thank you very much. Yours faithfully, Antonio L. Buensuceso

791ST PERSUASIVE APPEAL_20SEP19_TO THE SCP JUSTICIDES_ISKO MORENO SEES STUMBLING BLOCKS AS LADDERS TO CLIMB ON

1 CERTIFICATE OF SEPARATION FROM LAST EMPLOYER COMPLAINT 2.  MY QUEST FOR SWINDLED  RETIREMENT PAY BY SHELL SWINDLING ITO, SYNDICATED ESTAFA HOT PURSUIT DUTY OF LAW ENFORCEMENT ENTITIES 936counts SEE BELOW FOR THE 936TH   TIME THE REITERATION OF DEMAND PAYMENT OF RETIREMENT PAY WHICH SHELL REFUSED TO HONOR IN THE PRESENCE AND DEEMED APPROVAL OF THE HONORABLE MAGISTRATES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE PHILIPPINES GEUS_15MAR16_66th FOLLOW UP_REITERATION OF DEMAND  PAYMENT OF RETIREMENT PAY Dishonest scales are an abomination to the Lord, but a just weight is His delight... Proverbs Chapter 11  v. 1 Retirement Pay Law circumvented by Shell subject to penal provision provided for by Article 288 of the Labor Code of the Philippines.