Marso 22, 2013
Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno
Supreme Court of the Philippines
Padre Faura, Manila
Republic of the Philippines
USAPIN : Disbarment of
Atty. RAUL QUIROZ
ad perpetuam rei memoriam
Mahal na Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno,
Magandang araw po sa inyo.
PASIMUNONG PANGUNGUSAP :
ALAMIN NG LAHAT,
na kung sa daan ay napansin ang mga tinik sa
tatapakan at ang ginawa mo ay umiwas lang,
tatapakan at ang ginawa mo ay umiwas lang,
aba eh wag magmaktol o maghimutok kung
ikaw o isa sa angkan mo ay matusok
ikaw o isa sa angkan mo ay matusok
nito ngayon o sa kinabukasan.
1.0 PAGPAPAKILALA
1.1 Ako po si G. Antonio L. Buensuceso,
58 taong gulang, Pilipino, sa Pilipinas
58 taong gulang, Pilipino, sa Pilipinas
po ay naninirahan sa 103 K. Ponso St.,
Bauan, Batangas at dine naman po sa
Bauan, Batangas at dine naman po sa
Estados Unidos, ay nanatiling may
hawak ng pasaporte ng Pilipinas
hawak ng pasaporte ng Pilipinas
at may postal address na:
12901 Francine Terrace
Poway, CA 92064
USA
1.2 Ako po ang complainant sa kaso na
may bilang GR-183273 na may
may bilang GR-183273 na may
pamagat na :
Antonio L. Buensuceso vs.
Pilipinas Shell Petroleum
Corporation/Rico Bersamin
Corporation/Rico Bersamin
2.0 LAYUNIN SA PAGLIHAM
2.1 Your Honor, upang ipaabot sa inyong
kaalaman na ako po ay naghahain ng
kaso na disbarment laban kay
kaso na disbarment laban kay
Atty. Raul Quiroz, Abogado
ng SHELL, may tanggapan
po sa
po sa
12th Floor Shell House,
156 Valero St.,
156 Valero St.,
Salcedo Village, Makati City,
PTR No. 7058056:16/01/04; Makati City;
IBP No.607694, 16/01/04,
Cagayan de Oro Chapter, Roll No. 38465;
p.13, Atty. Raul Quiroz
professional circumstances shown
2.2 at para po sa inyong kaalaman, na ako po
ay humingi ng tulong sa Kagalanggalang na
Ombudsman Conchita Carpio Morales, na
masampahan ng kaso at tiyaking mapanagot
si Kgg. Labor ArbIter, MICHAELA LONTOC,
Kgg.NLRC Commissioners, TITO F. GENILO,
GREGORIO O. BILOG III, LOURDES C. JAVIER,
Kgg. Associate Justices JOSEFINA GUEVARA
SALONGA, MAGDANGAL M. DE LEON,
NORMANDY B. PIZARRO at
Kgg. SC First Division Clerk of Court
ENRIQUETA ESGUERRA VIDAL at ang sulat
(ORDER) mula sa Tanggapan ng OMBUDSMAN
at ang akin pong tugon sa naturang ORDER
kaugnay ng usaping laban sa mga "public officers "
na naturan sa kanilang paglabag sa
R.A. 3019 BATAS LABAN SA KURAKUTAN AT
KATIWALIAN ay inilakip ko sa liham kong ito sa
inyo, bilang katibayan o ebidensya ng paghahabol
ko sa kanila at gayon din, nais ko po ring
ipabatid sa inyo, Your Honor, ang aking
pagbibigay pahintulot sa kanino mang tao o
samahan ng mga tao na may kaso laban sa
lahat o sa kanino man sa mga "public officers"
o sa abogado ng SHELL na ipinakilala ko,
at maging sa SHELL , kay G. Rico Bersamin at
na gamitin o magamit ang mga ebidensya ,
mga pangyayari, mga pahayag na aking isinawalat
sa usaping ito, upang maisakatuparan ang mithiin
nila at ng ating pamahalaan at lalong higit,
ng ating HUKUMAN, para sa isang matapat at
malinis at marangal na paglilingkod bayan,
na wala ng kahit anong dungis ng
KABUKTUTAN, KURAKUTAN AT KATIWALIAN ;
LABEL 2.2.2 TUGON KO PO SA ORDER
ng OMBUDSMAN
FIRST page SECOND page
THIRD page FOURTH page
FIFTH page SIXTH page
LAST page
FIRST page SECOND page
THIRD page FOURTH page
FIFTH page SIXTH page
LAST page
2.3 na kung sakaling abutin ako ng pangyayaring hindi
ako magkaroon ng pagkakataong maisakatuparan
ang pangangailangang legal na panunumpa sa
katotohanan ng mga kadahilanan na nagbunsod ng
mga usaping ito sa harap ng isang notario publiko,
sa dahilang pong kasalatan sa pananalapi, o dili
kaya po ay pagkakasakit o paglabo hanggang
paglaho ng paningin o pagmaliw ng diwa at ala-ala,
o mawala ako na parang bula o lalong higit ay
mangyaring mauna ang aking kamatayan bago ako
makapanumpa ay ipinababatid ko sa inyo at sa lahat,
Your Honor, ang aking nag-aalab na mithiin na
maituloy ang usaping ito,
ad perpetuam rei memoriam,
PARA PO SA KAPAKANAN NG
ATING INANG BAYAN at LALONG
HIGIT PO PARA SA KADAKILAAN
AT KAPURIHAN NG DIYOS .
3.0 Mga basehan ng kasong disbarment
laban kay Atty. Raul Quiroz
3.1 Attorneys and Admission to Bar,
Rule 138-Rules of Court, Sec. 27
Attorneys and Admission to Bar
Sec. 27. Attorneys removed or suspended by
Supreme Court on what grounds. -
A member of the bar may be removed
or suspended from his office as attorney
or suspended from his office as attorney
by the Supreme Court for any deceit,
malpractice, or other gross misconduct
in such office, grossly immoral conduct,
or by reason of his conviction of a
crime involving moral turpitude, or for
any violation of the oath which he is
required to take before admission
to practice, or for a wilfull disobedience
of any lawful order of a superior court,
or for corruptly or wilfully appearing as
an attorney for a party to a case without
authority so to do. The practice of
soliciting cases at law fo the purpose
of gain, either personally or through
paid agents or brokers, constitutes
malpractice.
Specifically,
3.1.1 XXX .... A member of the bar
maybe removed or suspended
from his office as attorney by
the Supreme Court for
any deceit, xxx.
3.1.2 XXX... or for any violation of
the oath, (Lawyer's Oath shown
below, mine) which he is required
to take before admission to
practice, or...xxx
Lawyers oath
Form 28 of the Judicial Standard Forms
prescribes the following oath to be taken
by the applicant:
I, ______________________ of
___________, do solemnly swear that I
will maintain allegiance to the Republic of
the Philippines; I will support its Constitution
and obey the laws as well as the legal orders
of the duly constituted authorities therein;
I will do no falsehood, nor consent to the doing
of any in court; I will not wittingly or willingly
promote or sue any groundless, false or
unlawful suit, nor give aid nor consent to the
same; I will delay no man for money or malice,
and will conduct myself as a lawyer according
to the best of my knowledge and discretion with
all good fidelity as well to the courts as to my
clients; and I impose upon myself this voluntary
obligation without any mental reservation or
purpose of evasion. So help me God.
Specifically,
3.1.2.1 FIRST COUNT, VIOLATION OF
THE LAWYERS OATH
XXX .... I will do no falsehood,
nor consent to the doing of any
in court, xxx
3.1.2.2 SECOND COUNT VIOLATION OF
THE LAWYER'S OATH
XXX......I will not wittingly or
willingly promote or sue any
groundless, false or unlawful
suit nor give aid nor consent
to the same;....xxx
DINE PO ANG SUNOD (second part) NA BAHAGI...
DISBARMENT COMPLAINT AGAINST
ATTY. RAUL QUIROZ FILED DOCUMENT HERE
DISBARMENT COMPLAINT AGAINST
ATTY. RAUL QUIROZ FILED DOCUMENT HERE
Letter to Hon. CJ Sereno postage receipt
No comments:
Post a Comment