DISBARMENT COMPLAINT AGAINST
ATTY. RAUL QUIROZ FILED DOCUMENT HERE
RA 7641 CIRCUMVENTED BY SHELL,
GUARDIANS OF LAW SHOULD BE DISCIPLINED
4.1.7 PAMPITONG PANDARAYA:
PAGSISINUNGALING NA PAHAYAG :
FINANCIAL DIFFICULTIES, KAYA
NAGSARA NG PLANTA
p.6 Nos.15,16.17 & 18
Ang DEMOLITION ng LUMANG PLANTA, ang mga
larawan na kuha sa aktibidad na ito, pati na ang
mga dokumento na nagpapakita kung sinong
foreign contractor gumawa nito at ang halagang
ginugol rito ng SHELL para maisakatuparan ang
DEMOLITION ay pawang ipinakita ni
Atty. Raul Quiroz bilang patunay ng pagsasara ng
lumang planta at pagdemolish dito.
Sinabi po niya sa Rejoinder p.7 No. 19 ang ganito :
"19. In fact, as of the date of this Rejoinder, the
Process 2 facilities are not only operational,
but is almost 100% demolished. The demolition
is being undertaken by Euro dismantling Services
Limited under a Service Purchase Order dated
19 June 2003. It is expected that the whole
demolition work, including clean up and
demobilization, will be completed by April 2004.
A photocopy of the Service Purchase Order is
attached as Annex"9" hereof.
Photocopies of the pictures showing the extent
of the demolition are also a ttached as
Annexes "10", "10-A", and "10-B hereof."
PACKET 7 : LABEL 5.7.1 SHELL Rejoinder p.7 No.19
Service Purchase Order
Contractor and Cost of
Annex "10,10A,& 10B"
Demolition pictures
Ngunit sa halip na makatulong ito sa kaso niya,
bagkus higit itong nagdiin sa kaniya para madisbar,
sa dahilang labis pa itong karagdagang patunay ng
pagsisinungaling ni Atty. Raul Quiroz na ang financial
o economic difficulties ang dahilan ng pagsasara ng
lumang planta at pagbabawas ng kawani. Pansinin po
ninyo Your Honor, please, ang halagang ginastos sa
DEMOLITION, Php129,950,000.00. Ganyan po ba ang
paraan ng pag-gastos ng isang kumpanyang may
financial o economic difficulties ang gumastos ng
Php129,950,000.00 para sa isang demolition lang ?
Ang DEMOLIION na hindi naman kailangan noong
panahong iyon. Ang CALTEX po, na halimbawa rin po
ni Atty. Raul Quiroz, na nagsara ng lumang planta,
ngunit ang DEMOLITION ay HINDI nila naging OPTION.
Si Atty. Raul Quiroz ay kitang kita na nagsisinungaling
dapat lamang po siyang madisbar.
(Contrary to 3.1.1 & 3.1.2.2 & 3.1.2.2 )
PANG WALONG PANDARAYA DINE PO
DISBARMENT COMPLAINT AGAINST
ATTY. RAUL QUIROZ FILED DOCUMENT HERE
RA 7641 CIRCUMVENTED BY SHELL,
GUARDIANS OF LAW SHOULD BE DISCIPLINED
PANG WALONG PANDARAYA DINE PO
DISBARMENT COMPLAINT AGAINST
ATTY. RAUL QUIROZ FILED DOCUMENT HERE
RA 7641 CIRCUMVENTED BY SHELL,
GUARDIANS OF LAW SHOULD BE DISCIPLINED
The TRUTH will set you FREE.
