REPUBLIC ACT 7641 CIRCUMVENTED BY SHELL , PROMOTER GUARDIANS OF LAW SHOULD BE DISCIPLINED

RELATED FILES

UNANG PANDARAYA

PANGALAWANG PANDARAYA 

PANGATLONG PANDARAYA 

PANGAPAT NA PANDARAYA 

PANGLIMANG PANDARAYA

PANG ANIM NA PANDARAYA 

PAMPITONG PANDARAYA 

PANG WALONG PANDARAYA 

PANG SIYAM NA PANDARAYA 

PANG SAMPUNG PANDARAYA 

PANG LABING-ISANG PANDARAYA 

PANG LABINDALAWANG PANDARAYA

HULING BAHAGI (13TH PART) 

RAUL QUIROZ  DEFENSE  PLEADINGS

RA  7641 CIRCUMVENTED BY SHELL,   

GUARDIANS OF LAW SHOULD BE DISCIPLINED

from:		antonio jr. Buensuceso <antoniobuensuceso@gmail.com>
to:		pio@sc.judiciary.gov.ph, pio_personnel@sc.judiciary.gov.ph
cc:		Antonio Buensuceso
date:		Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 6:05 PM
subject:		REPUBLIC ACT 7641 CIRCUMVENTED BY SHELL, PROMOTER GUARDIANS OF LAW SHOULD BE DISCIPLINED
mailed-by:		gmail.com

REPUBLIC ACT 7641 CIRCUMVENTED BY SHELL, PROMOTER GUARDIANS OF LAW

SHOULD BE DISCIPLINED

March 21, 2015


Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno

Supreme Court of the Philippines 

Padre Faura, Manila

Republic of the Philippines

HILING SA KUSANG PAGKILOS NG KORTE SUPREMA NG PILIPINAS

ad perpetuam rei memoriam
In perpetual memory

Mahal na Chief Justice Ma. Lourdes Sereno,

Magandang araw po sa inyo.

PASIMUNONG PANGUNGUSAP :

ALAMIN NG LAHAT, 


na kung sa daan ay napansin 
ang mga tinik sa tatapakan 

at ang ginawa mo ay umiwas lang
aba eh  wag  magmaktol o maghimutok kung
ikaw o isa sa angkan mo  ay matusok
nito ngayon  o sa  kinabukasan.

BASEHAN NG USAPIN

===========================================================

===========================================================

ANNEX 5

THIS IS DOCUMENT TITLED "ANNEX 5" PRESENTED BY SHELL AND PROMOTED BY ATTY. QUIROZ TO SUPPORT PAYMENT OF SEPARATION PAY WHERE IN FACT THE INFORMATION CONTAINED ON IT SHOWED MY RETIREMENT PAY ACCOUNTS,  HENCE,  MY RETIREMENT PAY HAD BEEN MISAPPROPRIATED, AND RA 7641 CIRCUMVENTED,  THEREFORE UNLAWFUL.

SHELL CIRCUMVENTED THE LAW.  SHELL MISAPPROPRIATED THIS
RETIREMENT PAY TO REPLACE HER OBLIGATION FOR THE  PAYMENT
OF SEPARATION PAY. THIS IS UNLAWFUL AND
SUBJECT TO PENAL PROVISIONS
PROVIDED FOR IN
RA NO. 7641

=============================================================

==============================================================

COMPLAINT ON DECEITFUL SEPARATION PAY BEEN

PRESENTED ON THE REJOINDER BY THE COMPLAINANT

AS SHOWN BELOW:

PAGE 6 PAR26 REJOINDER_DECEITFUL SEPARATION PAY

TAKEN FROM PAGE 7 PAR27,28 REJOINDER_DECEITFUL SEPARATION PAY ===============================================================================

========================================
LABOR ARBITER LONTOC  KNEW,  PROMOTED AND CONFORMED TO UNLAWFUL ACT BY SHELL AND PROMOTED BY ATTY. QUIROZ  TO MISAPPROPRIATE  MY RETIREMENT PAY AS PAYMENT FOR SEPARATION PAY, SO THEREFORE, AS MEMBER OF THE BAR CONFORMING TO AN UNLAWFUL ACT,  SHE SHOULD BE DISCIPLINED.

Labor Arbiter Michaela Lontoc knew and wrote that  Shell had misappropriated my retirement pay as payment for separation pay as shown in her decision shown below, yet she conformed with it:

TAKEN FROM PAGE 6 PAR2 NLRC DECISION28 DECEMBER2006 BY LABOR ARBITER MICHAELA LONTOC

=========================================================

======================================= COMMISSIONERS JAVIER, BILOG III, AND GENILO  KNEW AND CONFORMED TO UNLAWFUL ACT BY SHELL TO MISAPPROPRIATE MY RETIREMENT PAY AS PAYMENT FOR SEPARATION PAY, SO THEREFORE, AS MEMBERS OF THE BAR CONFORMING TO AN UNLAWFUL ACT, THEY SHOULD BE DISCIPLINED. COMMISSIONERS JAVIER, BILOG III, AND GENILO knew and wrote that Shell had misappropriated my retirement pay as found by the labor arbiter as payment for separation pay as shown in their decision shown below, yet they conformed with it:

TAKEN FROM PAGE 6 PAR3_NLRC RESOLUTION_29JUNE2007 BY JAVIER,  BILOGIII, GENILO =================================================================

=================================================================

JUSTICES GUEVARA-SALONGA, DE LEON AND PIZARRO

KNEW AND CONFORMED TO UNLAWFUL ACT BY SHELL TO MISAPPROPRIATE MY RETIREMENT PAY AS PAYMENT FOR SEPARATION PAY,  SO,  THEREFORE,  AS MEMBERS OF THE BAR CONFORMING TO AN 
UNLAWFUL ACT, THEY SHOULD BE DISCIPLINED.

JUSTICES GUEVARA-SALONGA, DE LEON AND PIZARRO  knew and wrote that Shell had misappropriated my retirement pay as payment for separation pay as shown in their decision shown below,  yet they conformed with it:

TAKEN FROM PAGE 3 PAR 1 COURT OF APPEALS DECISION_6JUNE2007 BY GUEVARA-SALONGA, DELEON, PIZARRO

==================================================================


==================================================================

HONORABLE VIDAL, SC CLERK OF COURT THE SUPREME JUDGE HONORABLE VIDAL CONFORMED AND CONCURRED WITH CA JUSTICES GUEVARA-SALONGA, DE LEON AND PIZARRO, ALSO WITH COMMISSIONERS JAVIER,    BILOG III, AND GENILO,  AND LIKEWISE WITH THE LABOR ARBITER LONTOC TO THE UNLAWFUL ACT BY SHELL TO MISAPPROPRIATE MY RETIREMENT PAY AS PAYMENT FOR SEPARATION PAY,  SO,  THEREFORE,  AS MEMBER OF THE BAR CONFORMING TO AN UNLAWFUL ACT, SHE SHOULD BE DISCIPLINED.

                        please click on the image to enlarge

JUDGE, THE CLERK OF COURT DECISION dated 30 July 2008

SHELL CIRCUMVENTED THIS LAW

RA NO.7641

SOURCE FROM

CHAN ROBLES PUBLISHING COMPANY

RELATED 

UNANG PANDARAYA NI ATTY. RAUL QUIROZ 

FIRST ARTICLE OF THE DISBARMENT COMPLAINT
against Atty. Raul Quiroz

PAGGAMIT NG RETIREMENT BILANG PAMBAYAD SA SEPARATION PAY

ATTY. RAUL QUIROZ DISBARMENT COMPLAINT
FIRST PART

MGA PANDARAYA NI ATTY. RAUL QUIROZ

UNANG PANDARAYA

PANGALAWANG PANDARAYA 

PANGATLONG PANDARAYA 

PANGAPAT NA PANDARAYA 

PANGLIMANG PANDARAYA

PANG ANIM NA PANDARAYA 

PAMPITONG PANDARAYA 

PANG WALONG PANDARAYA 

PANG SIYAM NA PANDARAYA 

PANG SAMPUNG PANDARAYA 

PANG LABING-ISANG PANDARAYA 

PANG LABINDALAWANG PANDARAYA

HULING BAHAGI (13TH PART) 

THIS MAIL WAS SENT ELECTRONICALLY TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE PHILIPPINES ON MARCH 24, 2015  THROUGH THE FOLLOWING E-MAIL ADDRESSES:

pio@sc.judiciary.gov.ph

pio_personnel@sc.judiciary.gov.ph

The TRUTH will set you free.

UK Government must defend against big oil and mining dirty tricks

UK Government must defend against big oil and mining dirty tricks

Mar 24th, 2015 

by John Donovan. 

No comments yet

UK Government must defend against big oil and mining dirty tricks

Oil and mining bodies together with companies such as BP and Royal Dutch Shell have drafted industry compliance guidelines that weaken the impact of new UK anti-corruption laws.

21st March 2015

Anti-corruption campaigners urge the UK Government to divorce itself from industry guidelines that would create transparency black-holes

Oil and mining bodies together with companies such as BP and Royal Dutch Shell have drafted industry compliance guidelines that weaken the impact of new UK anti-corruption laws. (1) A coalition of over 800 organisations including Global Witness, CAFOD, Oxfam, Christian Aid and ONE are urging the Government to reject industry’s proposed guidelines which suggest that the law allows companies to keep certain payments secret. (2)

The UK transparency law aims to cut corruption by forcing UK-based extractive companies to publish highly detailed reports of their payments to governments – such as taxes, royalties and licence fees – broken down by each of their projects worldwide; these payments are worth billions of pounds each year. Disclosure provides citizens in resource-rich but impoverished countries with the means to “follow the money” and hold governments and companies to account.

However, the draft industry guidelines suggest that companies can lump projects together when they report, and withhold from public view certain crucial payments they make as part of joint ventures. The result is that billions of pounds worth of payments will remain hidden from view and vulnerable to corruption.

Industry claims that their guidance is a reasonable interpretation of regulations; however, Global Witness believes that the draft industry guidelines go against the letter and intent of the law (3). EU legal expert Paul Lasok QC, Head of Monckton Chambers agrees, calling the guidelines “highly unsatisfactory … to the extent of being positively misleading” and states that they guide companies to report in a manner that could be “in breach of the regulations”. (4)

In addition, this week’s disclosures by Norwegian oil major Statoil under a similar law show that the UK industry guidelines are not fit for purpose. “Statoil’s highly detailed report puts the UK industry’s approach to shame,” said Dominic Eagleton, Senior Campaigner at Global Witness. (5)

Global Witness applauds the UK Government’s record for leading on extractives transparency up to this point. Lib-Dem Business Minister Jo Swinson and Department for Business officials championed the law, and the Prime Minister made the issue a top priority during his G8 Presidency in 2013. (6) “The UK has established a strong transparency law. The Government must stand firm against big business and divorce itself from industry guidelines that would allow companies to continue making payments in secret” says Eagleton.

Ends

Contact: Dominic Eagleton – +44 7738 713 016 /deagleton@globalwitness.org

FULL ARTICLE WITH NOTES

RELATED

Statoil’s historic disclosures blow holes in Exxon and Shell’s campaign for secrecy

Share this:

• Facebook
• Twitter
• Email
• Print

Like this:

Loading...

Posted in: BP, Bribery, Business Principles, Corruption, Oil, Royal Dutch Shell Plc, Shell,Statoil.
Tagged: BP · Corruption · Oil · Royal Dutch Shell Plc

The TRUTH will set you FREE.

Global warming is now slowing down the circulation of the oceans — with potentially dire consequences

Global warming is now slowing down the circulation of the oceans — with potentially dire consequences

Mar 24th, 2015 

by John Donovan. 

No comments yet

FROM AN ARTICLE BY CHRIS MOONEY PUBLISHED BY THE WASHINGTON POST ON 23 MARCH 2015

Global warming is now slowing down the circulation of the oceans — with potentially dire consequences

According to a new study just out in Nature Climate Change by Stefan Rahmstorf of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research and a group of co-authors, we’re now seeing a slowdown of the great ocean circulation that, among other planetary roles, helps to partly drive the Gulf Stream off the U.S. east coast. The consequences could be dire – including significant extra sea level rise for coastal cities like New York and Boston.

FULL ARTICLE

Share this:

• Facebook
• Twitter
• Email
• Print

Like this:

Loading...

Posted in: Climate Change.
Tagged: Global Warming

The TRUTH will set you FREE.

Here’s Why Shell Drilling Proposition In Arctic Is Facing Opposition

Here’s Why Shell Drilling Proposition In Arctic Is Facing Opposition

Mar 24th, 2015

by John Donovan. 

No comments yet

By: MICHEAL KAUFMAN
Published: Mar 23, 2015 at 10:54 am EST

According to the Guardian, Royal Dutch Shell plc (ADR) (NYSE:RDS.A) will most probably get an approval by the US government to drill in the Arctic. An approval last month was given by the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BEOM).

A formal statement is expected to come from the US interior Secretary Sally Jewel. The decision might spark opposition from environmentalist groups that are not in favor of Shell operating in the Chukchi and Beaufort seas of Alaska.

Earlier, the US federal court had allowed Shell to operate in Alaska, but the environmentalists believed that drilling in the Arctic would have adverse environmental effects. Hence, after a lot of persistence, the US Interior department was forced to revise its decision-making process, assessing the viability of drilling in the Arctic.

The BOEM after reconsidering the process approved Shell’s drilling plan in the Arctic. What was the most surprising was that the decision came ahead despite the BOEM disclosing that a chance for one or larger oil spills to occur would be 75%. This was revealed by the BOEM in its Environmental Impact Statement.

As reported by the Guardian, Professor Robert Bea, one of the faculty members at the University of California, has expressed his concerns over the approval by BOEM for Shell to operate in the Arctic. Crude oil price since the last six months has fallen over 50%. Hence, energy companies are exploring different ways to save on costs and maintain liquidity.

Mr. Bea believes that these cost cutting strategies could make it difficult for energy companies to comply with safety standards and could increase the probability of a spill occurring.

In a statement reported by Guardians, Mr. Bea said: “We should all be concerned about tradeoffs between production and protection…With the significant reduction in the price for oil; there are equally significant pressures to reduce costs so that acceptable profitability can be maintained.”

Mr. Bea has worked as a consultant for BP and Shell. He initially was brought in by Shell in 2004 to review the risks that came up with drilling in the Arctic. The conclusion drawn by Mr. Bea was operating in the Gulf had many risks involved and disapproved Shell’s plans to drill in the region.

An environmental group Greenpeace has expressed similar concerns as Mr. Bea. One of the campaigners of Greenpeace claimed that the contractors of these energy firms do not have good track records, and with crude oil price around $50 per barrel and high emphasis on cutting costs, the risk seems to be very high.

He further claimed that the move goes against the need to curb global warming. Regarding the issue as reported by the Guardian, he said: “if we want to avoid catastrophic climate change we can’t even burn all the fossil fuels we already have; we definitely don’t need to trash what’s left of the melting Arctic looking for more.”

He asked the Obama administration to show some responsibility by not allowing the energy companies to operate in the Gulf. He exclaimed that if President Obama agreed to this, it would seriously undermine the credibility of his leadership.

CEO Ben van Beurden according to the Guardian in a financial results conference indicated that the company is more than ready to go ahead with the Arctic project drilling this year. Shell spokesman indicated that the company has set high standards when it comes to maintaining adequate safety.

Shell since a very long time has been working on the Arctic project, but has seen many obstacles in terms of legal challenges. Though the company remains optimistic on its drilling proposition, it is likely to face a lot of opposition from the major environmentalist groups. Shell would have to take the risks head on, and would have to adopt a business model that complies with safety standards.

SOURCE

Share this:

• Facebook
• Twitter
• Email
• Print

Like this:

Loading...

Posted in: Alaska, Arctic, Beaufort Sea, Bidness Etc, Chukchi Sea, Environment,Greenpeace, Litigation, Oil, Oil Spill, Pollution, Royal Dutch Shell Plc, United States.
Tagged: Alaska · Arctic Ocean · Beaufort Sea · Chukchi Sea · Oil · Royal Dutch Shell Plc

The TRUTH will set you FREE.

Why The Oil Price Could Fall Even Further

Why The Oil Price Could Fall Even Further

Mar 24th, 2015 

by John Donovan. 

No comments yet

From an article by Prabhat Sakya published 24 March 2015 by The Motley Fool under the headline:

BP plc And Royal Dutch Shell plc: Why The Oil Price Could Fall Even Further

The oil price has fallen dramatically since last summer. This has meant difficult times for the oil producers, including companies such as BP and Royal Dutch Shell.

…people have been buying more fuel-efficient cars, and there has been huge investment in technologies such as hybrid, electric and fuel cell vehicles.

So supply has been steadily increasing, and demand has been falling, and the world now has too much oil. Oil prices have begun a downtrend; and I don’t think that this fall will just last a few months, before bouncing back.

You see, commodity markets are not just about supply and demand. They are about momentum. That’s why I think this new era of low oil prices could last another decade. All those wells that have been drilled won’t suddenly run dry, and production won’t suddenly end.

This is the oil industry’s ‘new normal’

This is why I think that the oil price could fall even further over the next few years. And I think companies like BP and Shell realise this.

They are now adjusting to the new reality of low commodity prices.

FULL ARTICLE

Share this:

• Facebook
• Twitter
• Email
• Print

Like this:

Loading...

Posted in: Alternative Energy, Alternative Fuels, BP, Oil Company Profits, Oil Prices,Royal Dutch Shell Plc.
Tagged: BP · Oil Prices · Royal Dutch Shell Plc · The Motley Fool

The TRUTH will set you FREE.