REPUBLIC ACT 7641 CIRCUMVENTED BY SHELL, PROMOTER GUARDIANS OF LAW SHOULD BE DISCIPLINED

from:		antonio jr. Buensuceso <antoniobuensuceso@gmail.com>
to:		pio@sc.judiciary.gov.ph, pio_personnel@sc.judiciary.gov.ph
cc:		Antonio Buensuceso
date:		Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 6:05 PM
subject:		REPUBLIC ACT 7641 CIRCUMVENTED BY SHELL, PROMOTER GUARDIANS OF LAW SHOULD BE DISCIPLINED
mailed-by:		gmail.com

FIRST SENDING_MARCH 24, 2015

NOTE NO RESPONSE

from:		antonio jr. Buensuceso <antoniobuensuceso@gmail.com>
to:		pio@sc.judiciary.gov.ph, pio_personnel@sc.judiciary.gov.ph, Antonio Buensuceso
date:		Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 1:31 AM
subject:		REPUBLIC ACT 7641 CIRCUMVENTED BY SHELL , PROMOTER GUARDIANS OF LAW SHOULD BE DISCIPLINED
mailed-by:		gmail.com

SECOND SENDING_APRIL 6, 2015
NOTE NO RESPONSE

from:		antonio jr. Buensuceso <antoniobuensuceso@gmail.com>
to:		pio@sc.judiciary.gov.ph, pio_personnel@sc.judiciary.gov.ph
cc:		Antonio Buensuceso
date:		Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 12:25 PM
subject:		REPUBLIC ACT 7641 CIRCUMVENTED BY SHELL, PROMOTER GUARDIANS OF LAW SHOULD BE DISCIPLINED
mailed-by:		gmail.com

THIRD SENDING
APRIL 13, 2015
NO RESPONSE

from:		antonio jr. Buensuceso <antoniobuensuceso@gmail.com>
to:		pio@sc.judiciary.gov.ph, pio_personnel@sc.judiciary.gov.ph
cc:		Antonio Buensuceso
date:		Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 2:06 AM
subject:		REPUBLIC ACT 7641 CIRCUMVENTED BY SHELL, PROMOTER GUARDIANS OF LAW SHOULD BE DISCIPLINED
mailed-by:		gmail.com

FOURTH SENDING
APRIL 20, 2015

REPUBLIC ACT 7641 CIRCUMVENTED BY SHELL, PROMOTER GUARDIANS OF LAW

SHOULD BE DISCIPLINED

March 21, 2015


Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno

Supreme Court of the Philippines 

Padre Faura, Manila

Republic of the Philippines

HILING SA KUSANG PAGKILOS NG KORTE SUPREMA NG PILIPINAS

ad perpetuam rei memoriam
In perpetual memory

Mahal na Chief Justice Ma. Lourdes Sereno,

Magandang araw po sa inyo.

PASIMUNONG PANGUNGUSAP :



ALAMIN NG LAHAT, 


na kung sa daan ay napansin 

ang mga tinik sa tatapakan 

at ang ginawa mo ay umiwas lang

aba eh  wag  magmaktol o maghimutok kung

ikaw o isa sa angkan mo  ay matusok

nito ngayon  o sa  kinabukasan.

BASEHAN NG USAPIN

===========================================================

===========================================================

ANNEX 5

THIS IS DOCUMENT TITLED "ANNEX 5" PRESENTED BY SHELL AND PROMOTED BY ATTY. QUIROZ TO SUPPORT PAYMENT OF SEPARATION PAY WHERE IN FACT THE INFORMATION CONTAINED ON IT SHOWED MY RETIREMENT PAY ACCOUNTS,  HENCE,  MY RETIREMENT PAY HAD BEEN MISAPPROPRIATED, AND RA 7641 CIRCUMVENTED,  THEREFORE UNLAWFUL.

SHELL CIRCUMVENTED THE LAW.  SHELL MISAPPROPRIATED THIS
RETIREMENT PAY TO REPLACE HER OBLIGATION FOR THE  PAYMENT
OF SEPARATION PAY. THIS IS UNLAWFUL AND
SUBJECT TO PENAL PROVISIONS
PROVIDED FOR IN
RA NO. 7641

=============================================================

==============================================================

COMPLAINT ON DECEITFUL SEPARATION PAY BEEN

PRESENTED ON THE REJOINDER BY THE COMPLAINANT

AS SHOWN BELOW:

PAGE 6 PAR26 REJOINDER_DECEITFUL SEPARATION PAY

TAKEN FROM PAGE 7 PAR27,28 REJOINDER_DECEITFUL SEPARATION PAY ===============================================================================

========================================
LABOR ARBITER LONTOC  KNEW,  PROMOTED AND CONFORMED TO UNLAWFUL ACT BY SHELL AND PROMOTED BY ATTY. QUIROZ  TO MISAPPROPRIATE  MY RETIREMENT PAY AS PAYMENT FOR SEPARATION PAY, SO THEREFORE, AS MEMBER OF THE BAR CONFORMING TO AN UNLAWFUL ACT,  SHE SHOULD BE DISCIPLINED.

Labor Arbiter Michaela Lontoc knew and wrote that  Shell had misappropriated my retirement pay as payment for separation pay as shown in her decision shown below, yet she conformed with it:

TAKEN FROM PAGE 6 PAR2 NLRC DECISION28 DECEMBER2006 BY LABOR ARBITER MICHAELA LONTOC

=========================================================

======================================= COMMISSIONERS JAVIER, BILOG III, AND GENILO  KNEW AND CONFORMED TO UNLAWFUL ACT BY SHELL TO MISAPPROPRIATE MY RETIREMENT PAY AS PAYMENT FOR SEPARATION PAY, SO THEREFORE, AS MEMBERS OF THE BAR CONFORMING TO AN UNLAWFUL ACT, THEY SHOULD BE DISCIPLINED. COMMISSIONERS JAVIER, BILOG III, AND GENILO knew and wrote that Shell had misappropriated my retirement pay as found by the labor arbiter as payment for separation pay as shown in their decision shown below, yet they conformed with it:

TAKEN FROM PAGE 6 PAR3_NLRC RESOLUTION_29JUNE2007 BY JAVIER,  BILOGIII, GENILO =================================================================

=================================================================

JUSTICES GUEVARA-SALONGA, DE LEON AND PIZARRO

KNEW AND CONFORMED TO UNLAWFUL ACT BY SHELL TO MISAPPROPRIATE MY RETIREMENT PAY AS PAYMENT FOR SEPARATION PAY,  SO,  THEREFORE,  AS MEMBERS OF THE BAR CONFORMING TO AN 

UNLAWFUL ACT, THEY SHOULD BE DISCIPLINED.

JUSTICES GUEVARA-SALONGA, DE LEON AND PIZARRO  knew and wrote that Shell had misappropriated my retirement pay as payment for separation pay as shown in their decision shown below,  yet they conformed with it:

TAKEN FROM PAGE 3 PAR 1 COURT OF APPEALS DECISION_6JUNE2007 BY GUEVARA-SALONGA, DELEON, PIZARRO

==================================================================


==================================================================

HONORABLE VIDAL, SC CLERK OF COURT THE SUPREME JUDGE HONORABLE VIDAL CONFORMED AND CONCURRED WITH CA JUSTICES GUEVARA-SALONGA, DE LEON AND PIZARRO, ALSO WITH COMMISSIONERS JAVIER,    BILOG III, AND GENILO,  AND LIKEWISE WITH THE LABOR ARBITER LONTOC TO THE UNLAWFUL ACT BY SHELL TO MISAPPROPRIATE MY RETIREMENT PAY AS PAYMENT FOR SEPARATION PAY,  SO,  THEREFORE,  AS MEMBER OF THE BAR CONFORMING TO AN UNLAWFUL ACT, SHE SHOULD BE DISCIPLINED.

                        please click on the image to enlarge

JUDGE, THE CLERK OF COURT DECISION dated 30 July 2008

SHELL CIRCUMVENTED THIS LAW

RA NO.7641

SOURCE FROM

CHAN ROBLES PUBLISHING COMPANY

RELATED 

UNANG PANDARAYA NI ATTY. RAUL QUIROZ 

FIRST ARTICLE OF THE DISBARMENT COMPLAINT
against Atty. Raul Quiroz

PAGGAMIT NG RETIREMENT BILANG PAMBAYAD SA SEPARATION PAY

ATTY. RAUL QUIROZ DISBARMENT COMPLAINT
FIRST PART

MGA PANDARAYA NI ATTY. RAUL QUIROZ

UNANG PANDARAYA

PANGALAWANG PANDARAYA 

PANGATLONG PANDARAYA 

PANGAPAT NA PANDARAYA 

PANGLIMANG PANDARAYA

PANG ANIM NA PANDARAYA 

PAMPITONG PANDARAYA 

PANG WALONG PANDARAYA 

PANG SIYAM NA PANDARAYA 

PANG SAMPUNG PANDARAYA 

PANG LABING-ISANG PANDARAYA 

PANG LABINDALAWANG PANDARAYA

HULING BAHAGI (13TH PART) 

THIS MAIL WAS SENT ELECTRONICALLY TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE PHILIPPINES ON    MARCH 24, 2015, April 6, 2015 , April 13, 2015  and April 20, 2015 as shown in the start of the article   THROUGH 

THE FOLLOWING E-MAIL ADDRESSES:

pio@sc.judiciary.gov.ph

pio_personnel@sc.judiciary.gov.ph

The TRUTH will set you FREE.

How to Make an Earthquake

Weather Underground

The arrival of man-made earthquakes.

BY RIVKA GALCHEN

In the fall of 2011, students in Katie Keranen’s seismology course at the University of Oklahoma buried portable seismograph stations around the campus, in anticipation of a football game between the Sooners and the Texas A. & M. Aggies. The plan was to see if the students could, by reading the instruments, detect the rumble of eighty-two thousand fans cheering for a touchdown. “To see if they can figure out if a signal is a passing train or a cheering crowd—that’s much more interesting for them than discussing data in theory,” Keranen, an assistant professor of geophysics, told me.

But at 2:12 A.M. on November 5th, the day of the game, people in seventeen states felt an earthquake of 4.8 magnitude, centered near Prague, Oklahoma, a town of roughly twenty-five hundred, which is about an hour’s drive from Norman, where O.U. is situated. The students quickly packed up the seismographs and headed to Prague, hoping to measure the aftershocks. “Obviously, this was more worthwhile than a game,” Keranen said.

read more

shared from

Rivka Galchen is the author of the short-story collection 

“American Innovations” and the book-length essay 

“Little Labors,” which is due out later this year.

The TRUTH will set you FREE.

Huntington Hospital’s Dirty and Expensive Union-Busting Pays Off

BY PETER DREIER

Over the past several months, Huntington Memorial Hospital in Pasadena, California, waged a vicious, expensive, and ugly union-busting campaign to undermine its nurses’ efforts to win a voice at work. The hospital hired high-priced consultants and lawyers, experienced in union-busting, to intimidate and harass its own employees, including using outrageous (and possibly illegal) efforts to disenfranchise nurses from exercising their right to vote. Hospital CEO Steve Ralph and board chair James Rothenberg should be ashamed of themselves for denying the nurses their right to a fair election free of coercion and intimidation.

The nurses’ campaign, waged with the help of the California Nurses Association, gained incredible support from community leaders, clergy from many faiths and congregations, and elected officials.

After two days of voting, the temporary results are in and the hospital prevailed — hardly a surprise in light of the one-sided playing field that the nurses had to play on. Here’s the California Nurses Association’s statement about the election:

Federal government officials Thursday night counted votes cast by registered nurses in an election to determine whether they would join the nation’s largest RN union, the California Nurses Association/National Nurses United.

Results of the vote remain inconclusive as a result of 175 yet to be determined disputed ballots. Among those that were counted, the hospital administration led 539 to 445.

“CNA salutes the courageous Huntington Memorial RNs who withstood an unconscionable, immoral and illegal campaign of harassment, coercion and intimidation to vote in large numbers for a collective voice for their colleagues and their patients,” said CNA Co-President Zenei Cortez, RN.

“While the outcome remains to be determined, what is clear is that the top administration of Huntington conducted a disgraceful campaign against their frontline caregivers,” Cortez said.

The National Labor Relations Board has already issued one formal complaint against the hospital citing seven instances of unlawful conduct, including unlawful interrogation of RNs by supervisors, and surveillance and interference with RNs who supported the union. Many other charges are pending before the board.

Huntington officials recently told nurses that they would be going over budget this year by $6 million. We believe much of that – money diverted from patient care delivery – is attributable to the massive, illegal anti-union campaign that included the hiring of at least four separate anti-union law firms and consultants, including two of the most notorious, and expensive, in the nation, the Littler Mendelsohn law firm and IRI Consultants.

The litany of repressive tactics by Huntington, in flagrant violation of federal law, as well as the RNs rights include:

• Harassment of pro-union nurses, including surveillance and intimidation with the threat of discipline for those who supported the union.
• Bribes, in the form of illegal promises of pay increases if nurses voted “no”.
• Pulling RNs away from the bedside to attend mandatory anti-union “classes”
• Discrimination and retaliation against pro-union nurses
• Using beefed up security to create a climate of fear

“Overall, the pattern of hospital behavior has cast an irreparable cloud over the entire election,” Cortez said. “The American public and the residents of Pasadena would be horrified if they witnessed the gauntlet of bullying and persecution of RNs by Huntington’s administration that made a mockery of the concept of a free and fair election.”

A campaign of harassment was even carried out by leading hospital officials and consultants against community supporters of the RNs’ right to organize a union, including local elected officials, community and civic leaders and clergy from several faiths.

“These reprehensible and illegal actions are a testimony to the broken state of federal labor law protections for workers seeking collective representation, and the ideal of a free and fair union election,” Cortez noted

The parties have a week to file objections to the election with the federal government.

“CNA is committed to defending the RNs’ rights to organize a union, and we will continue to advocate for their rights, their voice to advocate for their patients, and their respect as RNs. We are confident that when the wishes of Huntington Memorial RNs are finally determined in a free and fair election, they will have won the union representation that they so deserve,” Cortez said.

“We are so proud of our colleagues for standing up for our rights, despite the outrageous and bullying behavior of our hospital administrators,” said Huntington RN Jackie Hauffen. “We know in our hearts that we will prevail, and RNs will enjoy CNA representation. When we do, we will have a better hospital, with better care for our patients, our community, and the skilled and caring RNs of Huntington.”

Peter Dreier

About Peter Dreier

Peter Dreier teaches Politics and chairs the Urban & Environmental Policy Department at Occidental College. His most recent book is The 100 Greatest Americans of the 20th Century: A Social Justice Hall of Fame (Nation Books, 2012) 

shared from

SATURDAY, 19 APRIL 2015 Why Is the Religious Right Is Sooooo Damn Wrong? Hasira Ashemu: Come with us O' brothers and sisters as we embark upon this journey of America's religious righteousness, let us in unison and with open hearts and minds explore the world of westernized religion and some of its accompanying foibles. READ MORE Huntington Hospital's Union-Busting Pays Off Peter Dreier: After two days of voting, the temporary results are in and the hospital prevailed -- hardly a surprise in light of the one-sided playing field that the nurses had to play on.   READ HERE Hillary Lifts Populist Spirits Brent Budowsky:Clinton is making political reform one of the cornerstone issues in her campaign for the White House. She has begun a frontal assault against the widely unpopular Supreme Court decision in the Citizens United case.   READ MORE Native Plants Save Money Mary Beth Fielder:Replacing your lawn with natives is a win-win-win-win. Restore the eco-system and bring back the native birds, bees and insects, save water, save money and create something beautiful in the process. READ MORE Bad Cops: The Gift That Keeps on Giving Cheryl Dorsey: Why would a police department knowingly hire a police officer who has demonstrated a proclivity toward aggressive behavior, potential emotional instability, and a wanton disregard for adhering to organizational policy? READ MORE

The TRUTH will set you FREE.

Do you have grounds for a lawsuit against Shell? Have you, your firm or family been cheated or injured by Shell?

Apr 16th, 2015

by John Donovan.

If the answer to any of the above questions is yes, then you may find this article by John Donovan to be of interest…

The first difficulty faced by potential litigants considering suing Shell, is finding a law firm with the required resources which does not have a conflict of interest and is willing to confront an opponent quite literally prepared to stop at nothing.

In this connection we may be able to assist by providing introductions at law firms in the UK or Holland with a track record of winning cases against Shell.

The owner of this website has been a participant in countless proceedings with Shell stretching back to 1993. 

Consequently, I know most Shell litigation moves including the use of:

* unscrupulous solicitors
* undercover activity
* witness intimidation
* threats
* jurisdiction ploys
* burying evidence
* tampering with evidence
* holding back discovery documents
* manipulating the news media
* hiding information about the litigation from Shell shareholders
* dragging out litigation to drain the resources of a weaker opponent

Basically nothing is too low for Shell.

Knowing that other parties have had the same problems dealing with Shell can help psychologically and also possibly strengthen a case by providing what is known as “similar fact evidence”. This perhaps explains why one of Shell’s first actions in responding to a case is to ask that the case be sealed, preventing the court documents and documents relating to discovery from reaching the public domain. Even where a case has been sealed, the initial petition is by definition in the public domain, since it was lodged with the court before the case was sealed. Shell does not want news of litigation to circulate in case it reaches the ears of another potential or actual litigant who might be able to supply or benefit from acquiring similar fact evidence.

It has therefore been suggested that we act as a repository of threatened or actual legal proceedings against Shell. This would enable us to compare cases to check for relevance to litigation already in our files and notify relevant parties accordingly, putting them into direct contact if both sides agree. In the event of a pattern of Shell conduct being revealed, perhaps even involving the same Shell individuals, it might enable the cases to proceed more expeditiously and potentially even persuade Shell to settle out of court rather than allowing predatory conduct to be exposed in open court.

Consequently, if you have a legal grievance against Shell you are invited to report it to us. If legal documents are already in the public domain we will, with your permission, publish them. If the information is confidential we will only share it with another party with a similar grievance if you give us clearance to do so.

It can be sent directly to me at: john@shellnews.net

Our own experiences with Shell: At the beginning of our legal battles with Shell we knew nothing about such shady tactics but were well aware of the daunting challenge of taking on a multinational Goliath which has an army of in-house lawyers supported by unlimited financial resources and a ruthless unscrupulous management. We thought we were on our own in having to threaten ligation after a Shell manager stole our intellectual property. Then in a meeting I had with a Shell Chairman, he let it slip that other firms were also threatening to launch legal proceedings on the same basis about the same Shell national manager. In other words, the Shell manager in question had been accused of stealing ideas from other parties who, like us, had disclosed information on a confidential basis believing they could trust Shell. The then Shell Chairman, Dr Chris Fay, claimed that he could not agree to settle our claim because it would set a precedent. This was a major concern in view of the fact that other potential litigants were pressing Shell. Royal Dutch Shell did later did settle for £200,000 (approximately $400,000.)

 RELATED

Corporate espionage: Shell Cloak and Dagger activities

Share this:

• Facebook
• Twitter
• Email
• Print

Like this:

Loading...

Posted in: Business Principles, John Donovan, Litigation, Royal Dutch Shell Plc, Shell.
Tagged: John Donovan · Litigation · Royal Dutch Shell Plc

← Shell/Exxon Induced Earthquakes undermine Dutch Gov Revenues

A Halt to Groningen Production Could Significantly Impact on Shell’s Remaining Reserves →

The TRUTH will set you FREE.

The TRUTH will set you FREE.