What the BP Oil Disaster Tells Us About Arctic Drilling: Keep Out!

What the BP Oil Disaster Tells Us About Arctic Drilling: Keep Out!

Apr 20th, 2015 

by John Donovan. 

No comments yet

BY CAROL BROWNER AND MICHAEL CONATHAN 4/20/15

Five years ago today, an explosion on board the oil rig Deepwater Horizon killed 11 men and unleashed one of the largest and costliest offshore oil disaster this nation has ever experienced. By the end of 2014, BP, the company primarily responsible for the disaster, estimated the overall economic losses from the spill at over $43 billion.

The disaster that began five years ago today must serve as a reminder that offshore oil and gas exploration and development never comes without risk. In the Arctic Ocean, where Royal Dutch Shell is preparing to return to drill sites it last explored in 2012, that risk is unacceptably high. Simply put, the United States should not permit oil drilling in the Arctic Ocean.

read more

Share this:

• Facebook
• Twitter
• Email
• Print

Like this:

Loading...

Posted in: Alaska, Arctic, BP, Chukchi Sea, Environment, Exxon Mobil, Greenpeace, Gulf of Mexico, Litigation, Oil, Oil Spill, Pollution, Royal Dutch Shell Plc, Shell, United States.
Tagged: Alaska · Arctic Ocean · Chukchi Sea · Deepwater Horizon · ExxonMobil · Gulf of Mexico · Rex Tillerson · Royal Dutch Shell Plc · Shell

The TRUTH will set you FREE.

HOWARD_20APR15_6th TIME_EDUCATIONAL CREDENTIALS AS EVALUATED BY ERES WITHHELD BY COOPEr

The TRUTH will set you FREE.

HOWARD_20APRIL15_8TH TIME_USURPATION OF AUTHORITY COMMITTED BY ANDREW COOPER

The TRUTH will set you FREE.

REPUBLIC ACT 7641 CIRCUMVENTED BY SHELL, PROMOTER GUARDIANS OF LAW SHOULD BE DISCIPLINED

from:		antonio jr. Buensuceso <antoniobuensuceso@gmail.com>
to:		pio@sc.judiciary.gov.ph, pio_personnel@sc.judiciary.gov.ph
cc:		Antonio Buensuceso
date:		Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 6:05 PM
subject:		REPUBLIC ACT 7641 CIRCUMVENTED BY SHELL, PROMOTER GUARDIANS OF LAW SHOULD BE DISCIPLINED
mailed-by:		gmail.com

FIRST SENDING_MARCH 24, 2015

NOTE NO RESPONSE

from:		antonio jr. Buensuceso <antoniobuensuceso@gmail.com>
to:		pio@sc.judiciary.gov.ph, pio_personnel@sc.judiciary.gov.ph, Antonio Buensuceso
date:		Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 1:31 AM
subject:		REPUBLIC ACT 7641 CIRCUMVENTED BY SHELL , PROMOTER GUARDIANS OF LAW SHOULD BE DISCIPLINED
mailed-by:		gmail.com

SECOND SENDING_APRIL 6, 2015
NOTE NO RESPONSE

from:		antonio jr. Buensuceso <antoniobuensuceso@gmail.com>
to:		pio@sc.judiciary.gov.ph, pio_personnel@sc.judiciary.gov.ph
cc:		Antonio Buensuceso
date:		Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 12:25 PM
subject:		REPUBLIC ACT 7641 CIRCUMVENTED BY SHELL, PROMOTER GUARDIANS OF LAW SHOULD BE DISCIPLINED
mailed-by:		gmail.com

THIRD SENDING
APRIL 13, 2015
NO RESPONSE

from:		antonio jr. Buensuceso <antoniobuensuceso@gmail.com>
to:		pio@sc.judiciary.gov.ph, pio_personnel@sc.judiciary.gov.ph
cc:		Antonio Buensuceso
date:		Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 2:06 AM
subject:		REPUBLIC ACT 7641 CIRCUMVENTED BY SHELL, PROMOTER GUARDIANS OF LAW SHOULD BE DISCIPLINED
mailed-by:		gmail.com

FOURTH SENDING
APRIL 20, 2015

REPUBLIC ACT 7641 CIRCUMVENTED BY SHELL, PROMOTER GUARDIANS OF LAW

SHOULD BE DISCIPLINED

March 21, 2015


Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno

Supreme Court of the Philippines 

Padre Faura, Manila

Republic of the Philippines

HILING SA KUSANG PAGKILOS NG KORTE SUPREMA NG PILIPINAS

ad perpetuam rei memoriam
In perpetual memory

Mahal na Chief Justice Ma. Lourdes Sereno,

Magandang araw po sa inyo.

PASIMUNONG PANGUNGUSAP :



ALAMIN NG LAHAT, 


na kung sa daan ay napansin 

ang mga tinik sa tatapakan 

at ang ginawa mo ay umiwas lang

aba eh  wag  magmaktol o maghimutok kung

ikaw o isa sa angkan mo  ay matusok

nito ngayon  o sa  kinabukasan.

BASEHAN NG USAPIN

===========================================================

===========================================================

ANNEX 5

THIS IS DOCUMENT TITLED "ANNEX 5" PRESENTED BY SHELL AND PROMOTED BY ATTY. QUIROZ TO SUPPORT PAYMENT OF SEPARATION PAY WHERE IN FACT THE INFORMATION CONTAINED ON IT SHOWED MY RETIREMENT PAY ACCOUNTS,  HENCE,  MY RETIREMENT PAY HAD BEEN MISAPPROPRIATED, AND RA 7641 CIRCUMVENTED,  THEREFORE UNLAWFUL.

SHELL CIRCUMVENTED THE LAW.  SHELL MISAPPROPRIATED THIS
RETIREMENT PAY TO REPLACE HER OBLIGATION FOR THE  PAYMENT
OF SEPARATION PAY. THIS IS UNLAWFUL AND
SUBJECT TO PENAL PROVISIONS
PROVIDED FOR IN
RA NO. 7641

=============================================================

==============================================================

COMPLAINT ON DECEITFUL SEPARATION PAY BEEN

PRESENTED ON THE REJOINDER BY THE COMPLAINANT

AS SHOWN BELOW:

PAGE 6 PAR26 REJOINDER_DECEITFUL SEPARATION PAY

TAKEN FROM PAGE 7 PAR27,28 REJOINDER_DECEITFUL SEPARATION PAY ===============================================================================

========================================
LABOR ARBITER LONTOC  KNEW,  PROMOTED AND CONFORMED TO UNLAWFUL ACT BY SHELL AND PROMOTED BY ATTY. QUIROZ  TO MISAPPROPRIATE  MY RETIREMENT PAY AS PAYMENT FOR SEPARATION PAY, SO THEREFORE, AS MEMBER OF THE BAR CONFORMING TO AN UNLAWFUL ACT,  SHE SHOULD BE DISCIPLINED.

Labor Arbiter Michaela Lontoc knew and wrote that  Shell had misappropriated my retirement pay as payment for separation pay as shown in her decision shown below, yet she conformed with it:

TAKEN FROM PAGE 6 PAR2 NLRC DECISION28 DECEMBER2006 BY LABOR ARBITER MICHAELA LONTOC

=========================================================

======================================= COMMISSIONERS JAVIER, BILOG III, AND GENILO  KNEW AND CONFORMED TO UNLAWFUL ACT BY SHELL TO MISAPPROPRIATE MY RETIREMENT PAY AS PAYMENT FOR SEPARATION PAY, SO THEREFORE, AS MEMBERS OF THE BAR CONFORMING TO AN UNLAWFUL ACT, THEY SHOULD BE DISCIPLINED. COMMISSIONERS JAVIER, BILOG III, AND GENILO knew and wrote that Shell had misappropriated my retirement pay as found by the labor arbiter as payment for separation pay as shown in their decision shown below, yet they conformed with it:

TAKEN FROM PAGE 6 PAR3_NLRC RESOLUTION_29JUNE2007 BY JAVIER,  BILOGIII, GENILO =================================================================

=================================================================

JUSTICES GUEVARA-SALONGA, DE LEON AND PIZARRO

KNEW AND CONFORMED TO UNLAWFUL ACT BY SHELL TO MISAPPROPRIATE MY RETIREMENT PAY AS PAYMENT FOR SEPARATION PAY,  SO,  THEREFORE,  AS MEMBERS OF THE BAR CONFORMING TO AN 

UNLAWFUL ACT, THEY SHOULD BE DISCIPLINED.

JUSTICES GUEVARA-SALONGA, DE LEON AND PIZARRO  knew and wrote that Shell had misappropriated my retirement pay as payment for separation pay as shown in their decision shown below,  yet they conformed with it:

TAKEN FROM PAGE 3 PAR 1 COURT OF APPEALS DECISION_6JUNE2007 BY GUEVARA-SALONGA, DELEON, PIZARRO

==================================================================


==================================================================

HONORABLE VIDAL, SC CLERK OF COURT THE SUPREME JUDGE HONORABLE VIDAL CONFORMED AND CONCURRED WITH CA JUSTICES GUEVARA-SALONGA, DE LEON AND PIZARRO, ALSO WITH COMMISSIONERS JAVIER,    BILOG III, AND GENILO,  AND LIKEWISE WITH THE LABOR ARBITER LONTOC TO THE UNLAWFUL ACT BY SHELL TO MISAPPROPRIATE MY RETIREMENT PAY AS PAYMENT FOR SEPARATION PAY,  SO,  THEREFORE,  AS MEMBER OF THE BAR CONFORMING TO AN UNLAWFUL ACT, SHE SHOULD BE DISCIPLINED.

                        please click on the image to enlarge

JUDGE, THE CLERK OF COURT DECISION dated 30 July 2008

SHELL CIRCUMVENTED THIS LAW

RA NO.7641

SOURCE FROM

CHAN ROBLES PUBLISHING COMPANY

RELATED 

UNANG PANDARAYA NI ATTY. RAUL QUIROZ 

FIRST ARTICLE OF THE DISBARMENT COMPLAINT
against Atty. Raul Quiroz

PAGGAMIT NG RETIREMENT BILANG PAMBAYAD SA SEPARATION PAY

ATTY. RAUL QUIROZ DISBARMENT COMPLAINT
FIRST PART

MGA PANDARAYA NI ATTY. RAUL QUIROZ

UNANG PANDARAYA

PANGALAWANG PANDARAYA 

PANGATLONG PANDARAYA 

PANGAPAT NA PANDARAYA 

PANGLIMANG PANDARAYA

PANG ANIM NA PANDARAYA 

PAMPITONG PANDARAYA 

PANG WALONG PANDARAYA 

PANG SIYAM NA PANDARAYA 

PANG SAMPUNG PANDARAYA 

PANG LABING-ISANG PANDARAYA 

PANG LABINDALAWANG PANDARAYA

HULING BAHAGI (13TH PART) 

THIS MAIL WAS SENT ELECTRONICALLY TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE PHILIPPINES ON    MARCH 24, 2015, April 6, 2015 , April 13, 2015  and April 20, 2015 as shown in the start of the article   THROUGH 

THE FOLLOWING E-MAIL ADDRESSES:

pio@sc.judiciary.gov.ph

pio_personnel@sc.judiciary.gov.ph

The TRUTH will set you FREE.