RA 7641 CIRCUMVENTION RECIPIENT RECORD HISTORY

RA 7641 CIRCUMVENTION 

RECIPIENT RECORD HISTORY

5TH SENDING

APRIL 27, 2015

from:		antonio jr. Buensuceso <antoniobuensuceso@gmail.com>
to:		pio@sc.judiciary.gov.ph, pio_personnel@sc.judiciary.gov.ph
cc:		John Donovan , davan.majaraj@latimes.com, paul.pringle@latimes.com, dick_and_sharon@laprogressive.com, feedback@inquirer.com.ph, bulletin@mb.com.ph, feedback@philstar.net.ph, nfo@manilastandardtoday.com, mst.daydesk@gmail.com, editorial@malaya.com.ph, editorial@bworld.com.ph, news@businessmirror.com.ph, newsdesk@manilatimes.net, opinion@manilatimes.net, newsboy@tribune.net.ph, siongpo@gmail.com, abante@abante-tonite.com, tonite@abante-tonite.com, editorial@mb.com.ph, newscolumn@bandera.ph, bosesngmasa@bulgar.com.ph, peoplesbalita@yahoo.com, peoples@journal.com.ph, nt@journal.com.ph, psngayon@philstar.net.ph, policefiles_tonite@yahoo.com, remate.tonight@gmail.com, feedback@gmanews.tv, postmaster@igma.tv, feedback@abs-cbn.com, rusty_1530kHz@yahoo.com, email_us@dzme1530.com, interact@mbcradio.net, pmbuen@edsamail.com.ph, an_laroza@yahoo.com, 702dzas@febc.org.ph, serdibaja@yahoo.com, honey_mei02@yahoo.com, eduardo_caones@yahoo.com, alanallanigue@yahoo.com, edgarallan_40@yahoo.com, santybautista@yahoo.com, newsfeedback@abs-cbn.com, studio23@pinoycentral.com, abcnews_phil@yahoo.com, emile-i@mailcity.com, ancphil@abs-cbn.com, nfo@untvweb.com, ca_manila@yahoo.com, ca_cebu@yahoo.com, ca_cagayandeoro@yahoo.com, op@president.gov.ph, vp@ovp.gov.ph, sen.escudero@gmail.com, Chiz Escudero , sjvanzi@newsflash.org, accra@accralaw.com, accralawcebu@accralaw.com, accradavao@accralaw.com
date:		Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 12:52 AM
subject:		5TH SENDING APRIL 27, 2015 REPUBLIC ACT 7641 CIRCUMVENTED BY SHELL, PROMOTER GUARDIANS OF LAW SHOULD BE DISCIPLINED
mailed-by:		gmail.com

FOURTH SENDING 

APRIL 20, 2015

NO RESPONSE

from:		antonio jr. Buensuceso <antoniobuensuceso@gmail.com>
to:		pio@sc.judiciary.gov.ph, pio_personnel@sc.judiciary.gov.ph
cc:		Antonio Buensuceso
date:		Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 2:06 AM
subject:		REPUBLIC ACT 7641 CIRCUMVENTED BY SHELL, PROMOTER GUARDIANS OF LAW SHOULD BE DISCIPLINED
mailed-by:		gmail.com

THIRD SENDING

APRIL 13, 2015

NO RESPONSE

from:		antonio jr. Buensuceso <antoniobuensuceso@gmail.com>
to:		pio@sc.judiciary.gov.ph, pio_personnel@sc.judiciary.gov.ph
cc:		Antonio Buensuceso
date:		Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 12:25 PM
subject:		REPUBLIC ACT 7641 CIRCUMVENTED BY SHELL, PROMOTER GUARDIANS OF LAW SHOULD BE DISCIPLINED
mailed-by:		gmail.com

SECOND SENDING_APRIL 6, 2015

NOTE NO RESPONSE

from:		antonio jr. Buensuceso <antoniobuensuceso@gmail.com>
to:		pio@sc.judiciary.gov.ph, pio_personnel@sc.judiciary.gov.ph, Antonio Buensuceso
date:		Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 1:31 AM
subject:		REPUBLIC ACT 7641 CIRCUMVENTED BY SHELL , PROMOTER GUARDIANS OF LAW SHOULD BE DISCIPLINED
mailed-by:		gmail.com

FIRST SENDING_MARCH 24, 2015

NOTE NO RESPONSE

from:		antonio jr. Buensuceso <antoniobuensuceso@gmail.com>
to:		pio@sc.judiciary.gov.ph, pio_personnel@sc.judiciary.gov.ph
cc:		Antonio Buensuceso
date:		Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 6:05 PM
subject:		REPUBLIC ACT 7641 CIRCUMVENTED BY SHELL, PROMOTER GUARDIANS OF LAW SHOULD BE DISCIPLINED
mailed-by:		gmail.com

The TRUTH will set you FREE.

SHELL SHOULD NOT BE ABOVE THE LAW IN THE PHILIPPINES

5TH SENDING
APRIL 27, 2015
E-MAIL RECEIPT HISTORY
LIST OF RECIPIENTS

REPUBLIC ACT 7641 CIRCUMVENTED BY SHELL, PROMOTER GUARDIANS OF LAW

SHOULD BE DISCIPLINED

March 21, 2015


Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno

Supreme Court of the Philippines 

Padre Faura, Manila

Republic of the Philippines

HILING SA KUSANG PAGKILOS 

NG KORTE 

SUPREMA NG PILIPINAS

ad perpetuam rei memoriam
In perpetual memory

Mahal na Chief Justice Ma. Lourdes Sereno,

Magandang araw po sa inyo.

PASIMUNONG PANGUNGUSAP :



ALAMIN NG LAHAT, 


na kung sa daan ay napansin 

ang mga tinik sa tatapakan 

at ang ginawa mo ay umiwas lang

aba eh  wag  magmaktol o 

maghimutok kung

ikaw o isa sa angkan mo  ay matusok

nito ngayon  o sa  kinabukasan.

BASEHAN NG USAPIN

===========================================================

===========================================================

ANNEX 5

THIS IS DOCUMENT TITLED "ANNEX 5" PRESENTED BY SHELL AND PROMOTED BY ATTY. QUIROZ TO SUPPORT PAYMENT OF SEPARATION PAY WHERE IN FACT THE INFORMATION CONTAINED ON IT SHOWED MY RETIREMENT PAY ACCOUNTS,  HENCE,  MY RETIREMENT PAY HAD BEEN MISAPPROPRIATED, AND RA 7641 CIRCUMVENTED,  THEREFORE UNLAWFUL AND SUBJECT TO THE PENAL PROVISIONS UNDER ARTICLE 288  OF THE LABOR CODE OF THE PHILIPPINES.

SHELL CIRCUMVENTED THE LAW.  

SHELL MISAPPROPRIATED THIS

RETIREMENT PAY TO REPLACE 

HER OBLIGATION FOR THE  

PAYMENT OF  SEPARATION 

PAY.  THIS IS UNLAWFUL  AND

SUBJECT TO PENAL PROVISIONS

PROVIDED FOR IN

RA NO. 7641

=============================================================

==============================================================

COMPLAINT ON DECEITFUL SEPARATION PAY BEEN

PRESENTED ON THE REJOINDER BY THE COMPLAINANT

AS SHOWN BELOW:

PAGE 6 PAR26 REJOINDER_DECEITFUL SEPARATION PAY

TAKEN FROM PAGE 7 PAR27,28 REJOINDER_DECEITFUL SEPARATION PAY ===============================================================================

========================================

LABOR ARBITER LONTOC  KNEW,  PROMOTED AND CONFORMED TO UNLAWFUL ACT BY SHELL AND PROMOTED BY ATTY. QUIROZ  TO MISAPPROPRIATE  MY RETIREMENT PAY AS PAYMENT FOR SEPARATION PAY, SO THEREFORE, AS MEMBER OF THE BAR CONFORMING TO AN UNLAWFUL ACT,  SHE SHOULD BE DISCIPLINED.

Labor Arbiter Michaela Lontoc knew and wrote that  Shell had misappropriated my retirement pay as payment for separation pay as shown in her decision shown below, yet she conformed with it:

TAKEN FROM PAGE 6 PAR2 NLRC DECISION28 DECEMBER2006 BY LABOR ARBITER MICHAELA LONTOC

=========================================================

======================================= COMMISSIONERS JAVIER, BILOG III, AND GENILO  KNEW AND CONFORMED TO UNLAWFUL ACT BY SHELL TO MISAPPROPRIATE MY RETIREMENT PAY AS PAYMENT FOR SEPARATION PAY, SO THEREFORE, AS MEMBERS OF THE BAR CONFORMING TO AN UNLAWFUL ACT, THEY SHOULD BE DISCIPLINED. COMMISSIONERS JAVIER, BILOG III, AND GENILO knew and wrote that Shell had misappropriated my retirement pay as found by the labor arbiter as payment for separation pay as shown in their decision shown below, yet they conformed with it:

TAKEN FROM PAGE 6 PAR3_NLRC RESOLUTION_29JUNE2007 BY JAVIER,  BILOGIII, GENILO =================================================================

=================================================================

JUSTICES GUEVARA-SALONGA, DE LEON 

AND PIZARRO

KNEW AND CONFORMED TO UNLAWFUL ACT BY 

SHELL TO MISAPPROPRIATE MY RETIREMENT PAY 

AS PAYMENT FOR SEPARATION PAY, 

 SO,  THEREFORE,  AS MEMBERS OF THE BAR 

CONFORMING TO AN 

UNLAWFUL ACT, THEY SHOULD BE DISCIPLINED.

JUSTICES GUEVARA-SALONGA, DE LEON AND PIZARRO  knew and wrote that Shell had misappropriated my retirement pay as payment for separation pay as shown in their decision shown below,  yet they conformed with it:

TAKEN FROM PAGE 3 PAR 1 COURT OF APPEALS DECISION_6JUNE2007 BY GUEVARA-SALONGA, DELEON, PIZARRO

==================================================================


==================================================================

HONORABLE VIDAL, SC CLERK OF COURT THE SUPREME JUDGE HONORABLE VIDAL CONFORMED AND CONCURRED WITH CA JUSTICES GUEVARA-SALONGA, DE LEON AND PIZARRO, ALSO WITH COMMISSIONERS JAVIER,    BILOG III, AND GENILO,  AND LIKEWISE WITH THE LABOR ARBITER LONTOC TO THE UNLAWFUL ACT BY SHELL TO MISAPPROPRIATE MY RETIREMENT PAY AS PAYMENT FOR SEPARATION PAY,  SO,  THEREFORE,  AS MEMBER OF THE BAR CONFORMING TO AN UNLAWFUL ACT, SHE SHOULD BE DISCIPLINED.

                        please click on the image to enlarge

JUDGE, THE CLERK OF COURT DECISION dated 30 July 2008

SHELL CIRCUMVENTED THIS LAW

RA NO.7641

SOURCE FROM

CHAN ROBLES PUBLISHING COMPANY

RELATED 

UNANG PANDARAYA NI ATTY. RAUL QUIROZ 

FIRST ARTICLE OF THE DISBARMENT COMPLAINT
against Atty. Raul Quiroz

PAGGAMIT NG RETIREMENT BILANG PAMBAYAD 

SA 

SEPARATION PAY

ATTY. RAUL QUIROZ DISBARMENT COMPLAINT

FIRST PART

MGA PANDARAYA NI ATTY. RAUL QUIROZ

UNANG PANDARAYA

PANGALAWANG PANDARAYA 

PANGATLONG PANDARAYA 

PANGAPAT NA PANDARAYA 

PANGLIMANG PANDARAYA

PANG ANIM NA PANDARAYA 

PAMPITONG PANDARAYA 

PANG WALONG PANDARAYA 

PANG SIYAM NA PANDARAYA 

PANG SAMPUNG PANDARAYA 

PANG LABING-ISANG PANDARAYA 

PANG LABINDALAWANG PANDARAYA

HULING BAHAGI (13TH PART) 

VERIFIED DISBARMENT COMPLAINT AGAINST 

ATTY. RAUL QUIROZ 

THIS MAIL WAS SENT ELECTRONICALLY TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE PHILIPPINES ON    MARCH 24, 2015, April 6, 2015 , April 13, 2015 , April 20, 2015 and April 27, 2015 as shown in the start of the article   THROUGH THE FOLLOWING E-MAIL ADDRESSES:

pio@sc.judiciary.gov.ph

pio_personnel@sc.judiciary.gov.ph

The TRUTH will set you FREE.