B.
COMPLAINT AFFIDAVIT vs. JOHN TITOUAH
AN ANTE MORTEM COMPLAINT AFFIDAVIT DATE EXECUTED 17JUNE20
C.
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY SAN DIEGO : should we file a fraud case against JOHN, THE PLUMBER. 24MAY20
D.
E.
COMPLAINT TO THE SAN DIEGO FBI
F.
DESCRIPTION OF THE COMPLAINT TO THE SAN DIEGO FBI
G.
EMAILS FROM AUGUST AND SEPTEMBER 2020
HENCE , CRIMES BY TITOUAH ARE CRIMES BY STATE FARM, GUENIOT AND LIU.
H.
NOTE: (For the criminal attorney)
I.
STATE FARM AND US RECORD OF NEGOTIATIONS
note: serial numbers in red is a communication from STATE FARM
001 STATE FARM HOME INSURANCE FIRST DENIAL LETTER DATED MAY 6, 2020
Instant letter of denial a day after the fraudulent video presentation and statements by plumber John Titouah on May 5, 2020, sent by State Farm claims specialist Gordon Liu attached to an email.002 LETTER E-MAIL TO STATE FARM INSURANCE ADJUSTER GORDON LIU DATED MAY 29, 2020
In a sort of a motion for reconsideration, we informed Gordon Liu that:1. State Farm have denied the claim on account of the video presentation and statements by plumber John Titouah to the effect that there is no leak in the slab but a suspected leak under the foundation. That is false and absolutely fraudulent. Then we showed supporting facts of Titouah's fraudulent acts.
2. I have reported this to the Mira Mesa Neighborhood Watch officer Christina Santos and to the local San Diego FBI in charge of internet fraud and white collar crimes.
001 GORDON LIU : REQUEST FOR AN UPDATE JUNE 15, 2020
Sent an email requesting for an update or comments to the email letter dated May 29, 2020, aimed to know whether Gordon Liu would reverse the denial decision on our claim.002 STATE FARM RESPONSE DATED JUNE 15, 2020
Gordon Liu said he had sent me a letter of denial the second time around dated June 12, 2020 and sent through postal mail.
003 STATE FARM SECOND DENIAL LETTER DATED JUNE 12, 2020
This is a two-page letter of denial and was written on June 12, 2020, postmarked June 16, 2020 and received by us on June 20, 2020. That is 8 long agonizing days.
004 STATE FARM GORDON LIU CONTINUING APPEAL FOR RECONSIDERATION JUNE 20, 2020
Here I pleaded for a letter be attached to an email so that I can read it immediately after he has written the letter and second I sent him an invitation to come to the site where the event actually happened and see our side of the story.
005 Claim Number 55-06C6-44X STATE FARM MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION FOLLOW UP JUNE 23, 2020 2:20PM EMAIL M. R.
Email depicting bad faith manifestation on part of Gordon Liu/State Farm
NOTE: 1. element for Bad Faith Manifestation by Gordon Liu/State Farm.
006 Claim Number 55-06C6-44X EMAIL LETTER OF INVITATION TO TAKE MEASUREMENTS DATED JUNE 25, 2020 Sent on Jun 24, 2020, 11:01 PM
Email inviting Gordon Liu/State Farm to take actual measurements of the excavation vandalized by John Titouah, includes PICTURE A, 1A, B and F1.
Email in screenshot response by Gordon Liu/State Farm showing the subject he is responding to, "INVITATION TO TAKE MEASUREMENTS".
NOTE: 2. element for Bad Faith Manifestation by Gordon Liu/State Farm.
NOTE: 2. element for Bad Faith Manifestation by Gordon Liu/State Farm.
Email saying thanks to Gordon Liu/State Farm and offered that the visit would be regarded as confidential.
Email response from Gordon Liu/State Farm that the visit be non-confidential.
010 Claim Number 55-06C6-44X EMAIL LETTER CONFIRMATION FOR COMING FOR NON CONFIDENTIAL OFFICIAL BUSINESS VISIT DATED 25 JUNE 2020 9:34pm
Email follow up as we confirmed Gordon Liu will be coming in a non- confidential status.
001 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x FIRST SITE VISIT AFTER A COUPLE OF MONTHS AFTER REPORTING OF LOSS FOLLOW UP DATED JULY 2, 2020
NOTE: 3. element for Bad Faith Manifestation by Gordon Liu/State Farm.
002 STATE FARM RESPONSE DATED JULY 2, 2020
NOTE: 4. element for Bad Faith Manifestation by Gordon Liu/State Farm.
NOTE: 5. element for Bad Faith Manifestation by Gordon Liu/State Farm.
004 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x REQUEST FOR ASSISTANCE TO KNOW PERSPECTIVE ON YOUR SIDE OF VIEW JULY 4, 2020 8:57AM
005 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x REQUEST FOR ASSISTANCE TO KNOW THE PERSPECTIVE ON YOUR SIDE OF VIEW_resend with correction on item written report. JULY 4, 2020 8:27PM
006 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x REQUEST FOR ASSISTANCE TO KNOW PERSPECTIVE ON YOUR SIDE OF VIEW_THIRD TIME TO MANIFEST URGENCY Jul 8, 2020, 7:58 AM
007 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x REQUEST FOR ASSISTANCE TO KNOW PERSPECTIVE ON YOUR SIDE OF VIEW_resend FOURTH TIME TO MANIFEST URGENCY Jul 10, 2020, 2:43 AM
008 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x QUICK DRY NEEDS THAT THESE SERVICES BE PAID DATED JUL 10, 2020 Jul 10, 2020, 2:25 PM
009 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x REQUEST FOR ASSISTANCE TO KNOW PERSPECTIVE ON YOUR SIDE OF VIEW_resend FIFTH TIME TO MANIFEST URGENCY Jul 13, 2020, 10:54 AM
010 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x QUICK DRY NEEDS THAT THESE SERVICES BE PAID DATED JULY 10, 2020_RESEND TO MANIFEST URGENCY July 13, 2020, 11:11 AM
011 STATE FARM RESPONSE 13JULY20 SHOWING THIRD DENIAL LETTER WITH SAME DATE
012 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x REQUEST THAT THE THIRD DENIAL LETTER BE REWRITTEN FOR CLEAR UNDERSTANDING DATED 14 JULY 2020
013 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF EMAIL RECEIPT WITH CORRESPONDING MESSAGE WHEN TO EXPECT A REPLY TO IT. dated 29 July 2020
014 STATE FARM RESPONSE DATED JULY 29, 2020 WITH ATTACHED AFFIRMED THIRD DENIAL LETTER DATED JULY 17, 2020
015 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF EMAIL RECEIPT WITH CORRESPONDING MESSAGE WHEN TO EXPECT A REPLY TO IT- DISCUSSION IN RELATION TO BAD FAITH dated 30July2020
017 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x THIRTY-FOUR (34) COUNTS OF AGGRAVATING BAD FAITH EVIDENCES AGAINST STATE FARM/GORDON LIU 31July20 11:24pm
001 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x EXPLANATION FOR CONFLICTING CONTRARY INFORMATION dated 4August20
002 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x VERBAL STATEMENTS USELESS WITHOUT WITNESSES TO TESTIFY ITS VERACITY dated 5aug20 2:28pm
003 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x LYING BY LIU ON PHOTO MEDIA SHEET ATTACHMENT dated 5aug20 2:32pm
004 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x WHY EXCLUDE JUNE 12, 2020 AMONG THE COMPILATION OF DENIAL LETTERS dated 5aug20 2:36pm
005 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x SHOW ACTIONS TO PROVE YOU ARE NOT PARTY TO THE CRIMES COMMITTED BY JOHN TITOUAH dated 6aug20 10:26pm
006 55-06C6-44X STATE FARM RESPONSE DATED AUGUST 14, 2020 AND DENIAL LETTER DATED AUGUST 14, 2020 AND PHOTO MEDIA SHEET ATTACHED
008 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x SHOW ME MY EMAIL TO YOU DATED AUGUST 3, 2020 (aug 15, 2020 11:01pm) lying allegation committed by Liu
009 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x WANTED AN EXPLANATION CONFLICTING CONTRARY INFORMATION AUG 16, 2020 08:17am
010 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x WANTED VALID EXPLANATION WHY YOU DISAGREE aug 16, 2020 12:37pm
011 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x LYING CONFIRMED ON PHOTO MEDIA SHEET ATTACHMENT BY GORDON LIU DATED 17AUG20 6:36am
012 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x IDENTIFY ALLEGATIONS OF MISCONDUCT BY STATE FARM AND YOU IN MY EMAILS dated 17aug20 9:49am
013 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x 34 COUNTS BAD FAITH NIXES CLAIMS OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE IMPLIED COVENANT OF GOOD FAITH AND FAIR DEALING dated 17aug20 10:46am
014 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x EMAILS WITH ALLEGATIONS OF MISCONDUCT BY TITOUAH BE IDENTIFIED AND CLASSIFIED AS EMAILS GORDON LIU WILL NOT RESPOND TO dated 17aug20 1:06pm
015 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x FIVE (5) UNDISPUTED FACTS PROVING STATE FARM AND LIU ARE PARTIES TO TITOUAH'S CRIMES dated 17aug20 4:47pm
016 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x CITE ISSUES AND REASONS WHY YOU AFFIRMED DENIAL OF CLAIM dated 17aug20 9:43pm
017 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x POSITIONS UNCHANGED BUT LIU CHANGED THEM HIMSELF dated 17aug20 9:53pm
018 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x WHILE WE ARE NEGOTIATING CLAIM FILE SHOULD BE OPEN dated 17aug20 11:20pm
019 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x STATEMENTS MEANT TO CONFUSE dated 17aug20 11:46pm
020 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x STUDY THIS CLAIM THOROUGHLY AND DEFINE YOUR POLICY DEFENSES NOW NOT LATER dated 18aug20 6:46am
021 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x STATEMENT OF A SERVICE OFFER WHICH THE OFFEROR HAD NO INTENTION TO FULFILL dated 18aug20 9:44pm
022 STATE FARM RESPONSE WITH DENIAL LETTER BOTH DATED 21 AUGUST 2020
023 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x EFFORT TO SOW CONFUSION BLOCKED DATED AUGUST 21, 2020 6:56AM (note: date should read as August 22, 2020)
024 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x EFFORT TO SOW CONFUSION BLOCKED DATED AUGUST 22, 2020 1:18PM (note: resent with corrected date 22aug20)
025 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x CONTINUING INQUIRY WANTED A VALID EXPLANATION FOR CONFLICTING CONTRARY INFORMATION dated 22aug20 9:12pm
026 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x CONTINUING INQUIRY-WANTED VALID EXPLANATION WHY YOU DISAGREE DATED AUGUST 23, 2020 1:03am
027 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x CONTINUING INQUIRY-IDENTIFY ALLEGATIONS OF MISCONDUCT BY STATE FARM AND YOU IN MY EMAILS dated 23aug20 1:21am
028 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x CONSTANT ASSERTION OF FACTS AND 34 COUNTS OF BAD FAITH DATED AUGUST 23, 2020 11:17am
029 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x CONTINUING INQUIRY-EMAILS WITH ALLEGATIONS OF MISCONDUCT BY TITOUAH dated 23aug20 2:34pm
030 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x STATE FARM AND LIU ARE PARTIES TO TITOUAH'S CRIMES DATED AUGUST 23, 2020 9:31pm
031 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x CONTINUING INQUIRY-CITE ISSUES AND REASONS DATED AUGUST 23, 2020 9:51pm
032 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x CONTINUING POSITION - WHILE WE ARE NEGOTIATING CLAIM FILE SHOULD BE OPEN DATED AUGUST 24, 2020 6:48am
033 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x STATEMENTS MEANT TO CONFUSE DATED AUGUST 24, 2020 9:45am
034 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x INDOLENCE MUST BE DESPISED.DEFINE YOUR POLICY DEFENSES NOW DATED AUGUST 24, 2020 11:05am
035 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x PUNITIVE ACTION SOUGHT- OFFER OFFEROR HAD NO INTENTION TO FULFILL dated 24aug20 3:59pm
039 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x PATTERN of SOWING CONFUSION ON EMAIL RESPONSES DATED AUGUST 26, 2020 5:13am
041 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x STATEMENT OF A SERVICE OFFER WHICH THE OFFEROR HAD NO INTENTION TO FULFILL DATED AUGUST 26, 2020 5:57am
043 STATE FARM RESPONSE DEFINE YOU POLICY DEFENSES NOW AUGUST 26, 2020 7:54AM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 2
045 STATE FARM RESPONSE PROVIDE LIST OF INFORMATION AUGUST 26, 2020 8:03AM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 4
049 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x GUENIOT INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 4 AUGUST 27, 2020 12:33am
050 STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 5 DATED AUGUST 27, 2020 8:12am
053 STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 8 DATED AUGUST 27, 2020 8:13 am
054 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 5 DATED AUGUST 28, 2020 12:20am
058 STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSES 9, 10, 11, 12, DATED AUGUST 28, 2020 7:38AM 7:39AM 7:40AM 7:41AM
059 STATE FARM RESPONSE TO INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSES 9,10,11,12 DATED AUGUST 28, 2020 2:40PM
061 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x CRIMINAL COMPLAINT INVESTIGATION AGAINST TITOUAH QUESTION 1 29aug20 11:29pm
What is expected on you to do when insurance fraud is brought to your attention?
062 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JOHN TITOUAH QUESTION 2 DATED 31AUG20 7:01pm
Would you still hide the live video footages?
003 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JOHN TITOUH QUESTION 3 dated September 1, 2020 4:25pm
How much did you pay Titouah for his services?
004 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JOHN TITOUAH QUESTION 4 DATED 1SEPT20 5:16pm
How would you able to investigate Titouah where you might be the mastermind of his crime?
005 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JOHN TITOUAH QUESTION 5 DATED 1SEPT20 5:34pm
In all instances STATE FARM might be buying false statements and information..?
006 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JOHN TITOUAH QUESTION 6 DATED 1SEPT20 9:58pm
Are you aware Mr. Gueniot seems placing your neck alone in the chopping block?
007 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JOHN TITOUAH QUESTION 7 DATED 2SEPT20 4:53am
Simple question about the verbal conversation in getting information from Titouah, is it through the telephone or by personal interview?
008 STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 15 DATED 2SEPT20 8:37AM
009 STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 16 DATED 2SEPT2012:22PM
Simpler question answerable by either yes or no. Do STATE FARM TOP MANAGEMENT KNOW WHAT MR. GUENIOT IS DOING?
020 STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 24 DATED 4SEP20 11:05AM
019 STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 23 DATED 4SEP20 11:02AM
020 STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 24 DATED 4SEP20 11:05AM
021 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSES 23/24 DATED 4SEP20 2:23pm
Would you be willing to write a report?
023 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JOHN TITOUAH QUESTION 10 DATED 5SEP20 12:50am
Do you think STATE FARM will be with till then?
Would you act now before STATE FARM acted on you?
Would you let me know who is the person-in-charge over both of you?
026 STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 25 DATED 9SEP20 7:17am
035 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JOHN TITOUAH QUESTION 13 DATED 10SEP20 4:48am
044 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JOHN TITOUAH QUESTION 14 DATED 11SEP20 1:14am
047 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JOHN TITOUAH QUESTION 15 DATED 11SEP20 9:20AM
060 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JOHN TITOUAH QUESTION 16 DATED 14SEP20 8:13PM
061 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JOHN TITOUAH QUESTION 17 DATED 15SEP20 9:54pm
062 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JOHN TITOUAH QUESTION 18 DATED 16SEP20 2:24pm
063 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JOHN TITOUAH QUESTION 19 DATED 16SEP20 2:33pm
064 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JOHN TITOUAH QUESTION 20 DATED 16SEP20 2:48pm
065 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JOHN TITOUAH QUESTION 21 DATED 16SEP20 3:14pm
066 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JOHN TITOUAH QUESTION 22 DATED 16SEP20 3:47pm
067 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JOHN TITOUAH QUESTION 23 DATED 16SEP20 9:35pm
068 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JOHN TITOUAH QUESTION 24 DATED 16SEP20 11:38pm
069 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JOHN TITOUAH QUESTION 25 DATED 17SEP20 8:55am
070 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JOHN TITOUAH QUESTION 26 DATED 17SEP20 11:11am
071 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JOHN TITOUAH QUESTION 27 DATED 17SEP20 1:24pm
072 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JOHN TITOUAH QUESTION 28 DATED 17SEP20 11:21pm
075 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JOHN TITOUAH QUESTION 30 DATED 21SEP20 5:30pm
076 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JOHN TITOUAH QUESTION 31 DATED 21SEP20 5:44 pm
077 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JOHN TITOUAH QUESTION 32 DATED 21SEP20 7:27pm
078 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JOHN TITOUAH QUESTION 33 DATED 21SEP20 9:31pm
079 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JOHN TITOUAH QUESTION 34 DATED 21SEP20 9:47pm
080 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JOHN TITOUAH QUESTION 35 DATED 21SEP20 10:54pm
081 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JOHN TITOUAH QUESTION 36 DATED 22SEP20 8:44 AM
Jennifer Chase I'll never get caught
082 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JOHN TITOUAH QUESTION 37 DATED 22SEP20 9:01AM
Jennifer Chase Remorse and Empathy
083 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JOHN TITOUAH QUESTION 38 DATED 22SEP20 9:32am
Jennifer Chase Impulsion
084 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JOHN TITOUAH QUESTION 39 DATED 22SEP20 2:10pm
Jennifer Chase Cognitive Laziness
085 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JOHN TITOUAH QUESTION 40 DATED 22SEP20 2:46pm
Jennifer Chase Entitlement Career criminals thought they can do whatever they want.
086 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JOHN TITOUAH QUESTION 41 DATED 23SEP20 9:08am
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AFFIDAVIT AGAINST TITOUAH.
087 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JOHN TITOUAH QUESTION 42 DATED 23SEP20 9:23am
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT IN THE SAN DIEGO FBI IN CHARGE OF WHITE COLLAR CRIMES AND INTERNET FRAUD AGAINST TITOUAH.
088 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JOHN TITOUAH QUESTION 43 DATED 23SEP20 9:57am
PLUMBER CITIZEN COMPLAINT IN THE CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE AFFIRMATIVE CIVIL ENFORCEMENT UNIT.
089 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x SUMMARY OF INVESTIGATIVE QUESTIONS FOR MR. LIU ENDED UP TO GRAVE, SERIOUS AND REPREHENSIBLE MANIFESTATIONS OF BAD FAITH dated 24SEP20 10:19PM
097 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JOHN TITOUAH QUERY 5 DATED 29SEP20 10:14am
FAIR CLAIMS SETTLEMENT PRACTICES REGULATION
005 STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 46 DATED 13OCT20 6:29AM
NOTE : INAPPROPRIATE RE, MR. GUENIOT AS USUAL, A LAZY RESPONSE RESPONDING ONCE TO MULTIPLE EMAILS WITH DIFFERENT SUBJECT MATTERS AND DISCUSSING ISSUES OUT OF THE SUBJECT BEING RESPONDED TO; AN INTENTIONAL AND DELIBERATE AND WILLFUL VIOLATION OF SECTION 2695.5(b). THOUGH HE HIMSELF PROVIDED ME A COPY OF THIS REGULATION ON 13 OCTOBER 2020. HE IS CONSTANTLY VIOLATING THIS REGULATION FEARLESSLY WITH IMPUNITY.
Section 2695.5. Duties upon Receipt of Communications
(b) Upon receiving any communication from a claimant, regarding a claim, that reasonably suggests that a response is expected, every licensee shall immediately, but in no event more than fifteen (15) calendar days after receipt of that communication, furnish the claimant with a complete response based on the facts as then known by the licensee. This subsection shall not apply to require communication with a claimant subsequent to receipt by the licensee of a notice of legal action by that claimant.
WOULD YOU LIKE, though SIX (6) MONTHS LATE, TO FOLLOW THE MANDATE OF § 2695.5. Duties upon Receipt of Communications Section 2695.5 (e) (2) ?
AS COROLLARY TO QUERY 10, THOUGH SIX (6) MONTHS LATE, WOULD YOU PLEASE PROVIDE ME NECESSARY FORMS, INSTRUCTIONS AND REASONABLE ASSISTANCE AND SPECIFY THE INFORMATION I SHOULD PROVIDE FOR PROOF OF CLAIM?
AS COROLLARY TO QUERY 11, WOULD YOU ADMIT THAT YOU SHOULD HAVE COMPLIED FIRST WITH Section 2695.5. (e) (2) BEFORE WRITING YOUR DENIAL LETTER?
014 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JOHN TITOUAH QUERY 13 DATED 18OCT20 (SENT 17OCT20 2:27AM)
THOUGH SIX (6) MONTHS LATE WOULD YOU PLEASE SPECIFY THE INFORMATION YOU NEED ME TO PROVIDE FOR PROOF OF CLAIM OR OFFER NOW A COMPROMISE SETTLEMENT AS YOUR LIABILITY IS ABSOLUTELY
CONVINCINGLY APPARENT?
015 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JOHN TITOUAH QUERY 14 DATED 19OCT20 3:23AM
WOULD YOU STILL FORCE US TO ELEVATE THESE ISSUES TO THE DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE AND/OR SEEK LEGAL HELP TO DEFEND OUR RIGHT TO OUR LEGITIMATE INSURANCE CLAIM COVERAGE?
016 STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 48 DATED 23OCT20 7:43AM
SECOND TIME, WOULD YOU STILL FORCE US TO ELEVATE THESE ISSUES TO THE DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE AND/OR SEEK LEGAL HELP TO DEFEND OUR RIGHT TO OUR LEGITIMATE INSURANCE CLAIM COVERAGE? YES OR NO?
019 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JOHN TITOUAH QUERY 16 DATED 26OCT20 5:44AM
THIRD TIME, WOULD YOU STILL FORCE US TO ELEVATE THESE ISSUES TO THE DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE AND/OR SEEK LEGAL HELP TO DEFEND OUR RIGHT TO OUR LEGITIMATE INSURANCE CLAIM COVERAGE? YES OR NO?
020 STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 49 26OCT20 8:00AM
021 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 49 DATED 26OCT20 9:21AM
FOURTH TIME, WOULD YOU STILL FORCE US TO ELEVATE THESE ISSUES TO THE DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE AND/OR SEEK LEGAL HELP TO DEFEND OUR RIGHT TO OUR LEGITIMATE INSURANCE CLAIM COVERAGE? YES OR NO?
FIFTH TIME, WOULD YOU STILL FORCE US TO ELEVATE THESE ISSUES TO THE DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE AND/OR SEEK LEGAL HELP TO DEFEND OUR RIGHT TO OUR LEGITIMATE INSURANCE CLAIM COVERAGE? YES OR NO?
024 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JOHN TITOUAH QUERY 19 DATED 29OCT20 12:09AM
SIXTH TIME, WOULD YOU STILL FORCE US TO ELEVATE THESE ISSUES TO THE DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE AND/OR SEEK LEGAL HELP TO DEFEND OUR RIGHT TO OUR LEGITIMATE INSURANCE CLAIM COVERAGE? YES OR NO?
SEVENTH TIME, WOULD YOU STILL FORCE US TO ELEVATE THESE ISSUES TO THE DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE AND/OR SEEK LEGAL HELP TO DEFEND OUR RIGHT TO OUR LEGITIMATE INSURANCE CLAIM COVERAGE? YES OR NO?
026 STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 50 DATED 30OCT20 8:49AM
EIGHTH TIME, WOULD YOU STILL FORCE US TO ELEVATE THESE ISSUES TO THE DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE AND/OR SEEK LEGAL HELP TO DEFEND OUR RIGHT TO OUR LEGITIMATE INSURANCE CLAIM COVERAGE? PLEASE BE CLEAR. YES OR NO?
001 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JOHN TITOUAH QUERY 22 1NOV20 1:59am
NINTH TIME, WOULD YOU STILL FORCE US TO ELEVATE THESE ISSUES TO THE DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE AND/OR SEEK LEGAL HELP TO DEFEND OUR RIGHT TO OUR LEGITIMATE INSURANCE CLAIM COVERAGE? PLEASE BE CLEAR. YES OR NO?
Please acknowledge receipt of this e-mail and kindly inform me when I should expect a reply to this email AND kindly put back the following reminders to your response which had been missing for quite some time.
1.
The one year “Suit Against Us” time period referred to in the May 6, 2020 letter includes the time period from the date of loss (April 26, 2020) to the date the claim was reported to State Farm (April 29, 2020). The one year time period was tolled during our investigation of this claim (April 29, 2020) to the date the claim was initially denied (May 6, 2020). The one year time period was tolled upon receipt of Antonio Buensuceso Jr.’s email dated May 29, 2020 for additional investigation until the date the denial of the claim was confirm in our June 12, 2020 letter. That one year time period continues to run as of the date of our June 12, 2020 letter.
2.
"We are required by California Insurance Regulations, Section 2695.7(b)(3), to advise you that if you believe this claim, or any part of this claim, has been wrongfully denied or rejected, you may have the matter reviewed by the California Department of Insurance, Claim Service Bureau, 300 South Spring Street, Los Angeles, California 90013, telephone 800 927 4357."
002 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JOHN TITOUAH QUERY 23 DATED 2NOV20 5:05AM
TENTH TIME, WOULD YOU STILL FORCE US TO ELEVATE THESE ISSUES TO THE DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE AND/OR SEEK LEGAL HELP TO DEFEND OUR RIGHT TO OUR LEGITIMATE INSURANCE CLAIM COVERAGE? PLEASE BE CLEAR. YES OR NO?
Please acknowledge receipt of this e-mail and kindly inform me when I should expect a reply to this email AND kindly put back the following reminders to your response which had been missing for quite some time.
1.
The one year “Suit Against Us” time period referred to in the May 6, 2020 letter includes the time period from the date of loss (April 26, 2020) to the date the claim was reported to State Farm (April 29, 2020). The one year time period was tolled during our investigation of this claim (April 29, 2020) to the date the claim was initially denied (May 6, 2020). The one year time period was tolled upon receipt of Antonio Buensuceso Jr.’s email dated May 29, 2020 for additional investigation until the date the denial of the claim was confirm in our June 12, 2020 letter. That one year time period continues to run as of the date of our June 12, 2020 letter.
2.
"We are required by California Insurance Regulations, Section 2695.7(b)(3), to advise you that if you believe this claim, or any part of this claim, has been wrongfully denied or rejected, you may have the matter reviewed by the California Department of Insurance, Claim Service Bureau, 300 South Spring Street, Los Angeles, California 90013, telephone 800 927 4357."
003 STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 51 DATED 2NOV20 8:12AM
SUIT AGAINST US STILL NOT MENTIONED.
The one year “Suit Against Us” time period referred to in the May 6, 2020 letter includes the time period from the date of loss (April 26, 2020) to the date the claim was reported to State Farm (April 29, 2020). The one year time period was tolled during our investigation of this claim (April 29, 2020) to the date the claim was initially denied (May 6, 2020). The one year time period was tolled upon receipt of Antonio Buensuceso Jr.’s email dated May 29, 2020 for additional investigation until the date the denial of the claim was confirm in our June 12, 2020 letter. That one year time period continues to run as of the date of our June 12, 2020 letter.
004 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 51 DATED 2NOV20 9:20am
WILL YOU PLEASE KINDLY PROVIDE ME WITH AN
EMAIL ADDRESS OF MS TIFFANI WYATT?
006 STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 52 DATED 3NOV20 6:42AM
SUIT AGAINST US STILL NOT MENTIONED.
The one year “Suit Against Us” time period referred to in the May 6, 2020 letter includes the time period from the date of loss (April 26, 2020) to the date the claim was reported to State Farm (April 29, 2020). The one year time period was tolled during our investigation of this claim (April 29, 2020) to the date the claim was initially denied (May 6, 2020). The one year time period was tolled upon receipt of Antonio Buensuceso Jr.’s email dated May 29, 2020 for additional investigation until the date the denial of the claim was confirm in our June 12, 2020 letter. That one year time period continues to run as of the date of our June 12, 2020 letter.
007 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 52 DATED 3NOV20 11:44AM
FOLLOW UP REQUEST FOR INSURANCE POLICY BOOKLET
WOULD YOU PLEASE CLARIFY YOUR POSITION ABOUT THIS REMINDER WITH REFERENCE TO THE EMAIL FROM MR. EDDIE ATCHLEY.
"The one year “Suit Against Us” time period referred to in the May 6, 2020 letter includes the time period from the date of loss (April 26, 2020) to the date the claim was reported to State Farm (April 29, 2020). The one year time period was tolled during our investigation of this claim (April 29, 2020) to the date the claim was initially denied (May 6, 2020). The one year time period was tolled upon receipt of Antonio Buensuceso Jr.’s email dated May 29, 2020 for additional investigation until the date the denial of the claim was confirm in our June 12, 2020 letter. That one year time period continues to run as of the date of our June 12, 2020 letter."
009 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JOHN TITOUAH QUERY 25 DATED 4NOV20 5:35AM
ARE YOU AFRAID STATE FARM TOP MANAGEMENT DISCOVER THE ALLEGED CRIME INVOLVING THE BUSINESS PARTNERSHIP BETWEEN TITOUAH LIU AND YOU THROUGH MS TIFFANI WYATT?
NOTE 1 :
Section 2695.5. Duties upon Receipt of Communications
(e) (2)
(e) Upon receiving notice of claim, every insurer shall immediately, but in no event more than fifteen (15) calendar days later, do the following unless the notice of claim received is a notice of legal action:
(2) provide to the claimant necessary forms, instructions, and reasonable assistance, including but not limited to, specifying the information the claimant must provide for proof of claim;
NOTE 2 : ARBITRARY COMMENTS MEANT TO DERAIL THE NEGOTIATION PROCESS
BUT WE ARE NOT STOPPING GOOD FAITH NEGOTIATIONS DESPITE MR. GUENIOT'S DISPLAY OF CONTINUING BAD FAITH MANIFESTATIONS.
"We will not provide you with any other State Farm personnel’s email address. All communication related to this claim will be directed to my attention for review. "
WOULD YOU LIKE ME TO SEEK THE HELP MR. EDDIE ATCHLEY?
013 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x MISREPRESENTATION AND BAD FAITH RE:ONE YEAR SUIT AGAINST US DATED 6NOV20 5:45AM
ONE YEAR SUIT AGAINST US STATEMENT BY TANDEM GUENIOT AND LIU IS A CONTINUING DELIBERATE AND INTENTIONAL BAD FAITH AND MISREPRESENTATION TO MISLEAD US.
014 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x CLAIM FOR DAMAGES CAUSED BY VANDALISM DATED 7NOV20 10:23AM
ASSISTANCE REQUEST FOR FILING CLAIM FOR DAMAGES CAUSED BY VANDALISM COMMITTED BY TITOUAH
WATER DAMAGES BASIS OF DENIAL. PLEASE EXPLAIN IN PLAIN STATEMENTS THAT WE COULD UNDERSTAND THE BASIS OF THE WATER DAMAGES DENIAL AND SHOW WHERE IN PAGES 1 TO 45 OF THE POLICY BOOKLET IT IS WRITTEN.
016 STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 53 DATED 13NOV20 7:42AM
016A STATE FARM RESPONSE ON WATER DAMAGES (VANDALISM) DATED 13NOV20 7:42AM (TAKEN FROM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 53.
EXCAVATING A PORTION OF THE CONCRETE TO SEARCH FOR THE LEAK IN A SUPPLY LINE TO "FIX IT" IS NOT AN ACCIDENT.........
017 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 53 DATED 13NOV20 3:43PM
IT IS TWO YEARS, MR. GUENIOT, NOT ONE YEAR.
DESPITE HAVING BEEN DISCOVERED AND INFORMED YOU, YOU
KEPT ON CONTINUING YOUR ACTS OF MISREPRESENTATION.
THIS IS DELIBERATE, INTENTIONAL, BLAMEWORTHY, SHAMEFUL ACT OF MISREPRESENTATION, A GRAVE DISPLAY OF BAD FAITH.
MR. GUENIOT, YOU MIGHT HAVE FALLEN TO A TRAP.
YOU DO NOT KEEP SILENT IF YOU HAVE A VALID ARGUMENT. AND CONVERSELY, YOU KEEP SILENT WHEN YOU DO NOT HAVE ANY.
019 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x VANDALISM BY TITOUAH DATED 14NOV20 12:27PM
PLEASE EXPLAIN
"John Titouah excavating a portion of the concrete to search for the leak in a supply line to "fix it" is not an accident, and is not vandalism to personal property.....",
I DISCUSS RE: GUENIOT UNABLED TO EXPLAIN
"John Titouah excavating a portion of the concrete to search for the leak in a supply line to "fix it" is not an accident, and is not vandalism to personal property.....",
MR. GUENIOT IF EVER HE WOULD LIKE TO DENY MY CLAIM OF VANDALISM AGAINST TITOUAH HE SHOULD HAVE WRITTEN A CLEAR SUBSTANTIVE DENIAL DOCUMENT CORRESPONDING TO IT IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 2695.5.
021 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 54 DATED 17NOV20 12:12pm
MR. GUENIOT IF EVER HE WOULD LIKE TO DENY MY CLAIM OF VANDALISM AGAINST TITOUAH HE SHOULD HAVE WRITTEN A CLEAR SUBSTANTIVE DENIAL DOCUMENT CORRESPONDING TO IT IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 2695.5.
022 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x COMPLETE COPIES OF ALL DENIAL LETTERS DATED 23NOV20 6:57am
MAY I MOST HUMBLY AND RESPECTFULLY REQUEST FROM YOU FOR COMPLETE COPIES OF ALL MY INSURANCE CLAIMS COVERING WATER SECONDARY DAMAGES FILED ON JUNE 2020 AND VANDALISM WHICH COVERAGE I DISCOVERED JUST THIS MONTH OF NOVEMBER FROM THE POLICY BOOKLET YOU PROVIDED ME ON NOVEMBER 4, 2020.
023 STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 55 DATED 30NOV20 7:21 TO 7:30AM
NOTE : MR. GUENIOT, THE ASSISTANCE SOUGHT IS, PLEASE PROVIDE SUBSTANTIVE DENIAL LETTERS NOT RELATED CLAIM FILE DOCUMENTS,
TO WIT:
1. DENIAL LETTERS PERTAINING TO SECONDARY DAMAGES CLAIM DUE TO LEAKING HOT WATER PIPE ENCASED IN THE CONCRETE SLAB.
2. DENIAL LETTER FOR DAMAGES CLAIM ON VANDALISM COMMITTED BY TITOUAH.
FAILURE TO PROVIDE WRITTEN A CLEAR SUBSTANTIVE DENIAL DOCUMENTS CORRESPONDING TO THEM ARE CLEAR VIOLATIONS OF SECTION 2695.5.
001 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 55 DATED 1DEC20 9:02PM
MAY I MOST HUMBLY AND RESPECTFULLY REQUEST FROM YOU FOR A CONCISE DENIAL LETTER OF MY INSURANCE CLAIMS COVERING WATER SECONDARY DAMAGES FILED ON JUNE 2020 AND VANDALISM WHICH COVERAGE I DISCOVERED JUST THIS MONTH OF NOVEMBER FROM THE POLICY BOOKLET YOU PROVIDED ME ON NOVEMBER 4, 2020.
003 STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 56 DATED 14DEC20 10:00AM
NOTES ON IMPROPRIETY :
NUMBER 1.
MR. GUENIOT, THE ASSISTANCE SOUGHT IS, PLEASE PROVIDE A CONCISE SUBSTANTIVE DENIAL LETTER ON MY CLAIMS FOR SECONDARY DAMAGES FILED IN JUNE 2020 AND VANDALISM WHICH COVERAGE I DISCOVERED JUST IN NOVEMBER 4, 2020 WHEN YOU BELATEDLY FURNISHED ME WITH THE COPY OF THE POLICY BEYOND ON WHAT IS REQUIRED BY THE REGULATION.
TO WIT:
FAILURE TO PROVIDE WRITTEN A CLEAR SUBSTANTIVE DENIAL DOCUMENTS CORRESPONDING TO THEM ARE CLEAR VIOLATIONS OF SECTION 2695.5.
NUMBER 2.
DELIBERATE INTENTION TO SOW CONFUSION.
IT IS AN IMPROPER RESPONSE FOR RESPONDING TO EMAILS WITH DIFFERENT SUBJECTS WHICH TEND TO CREATE MORE CONFUSIONS.
NOTES ON IMPROPRIETY :
NUMBER 1.
MR. GUENIOT, THE ASSISTANCE SOUGHT IS, PLEASE PROVIDE A CONCISE SUBSTANTIVE DENIAL LETTER ON MY CLAIMS FOR SECONDARY DAMAGES FILED IN JUNE 2020 AND VANDALISM WHICH COVERAGE I DISCOVERED JUST IN NOVEMBER 4, 2020 WHEN YOU BELATEDLY FURNISHED ME WITH THE COPY OF THE POLICY BEYOND ON WHAT IS REQUIRED BY THE REGULATION.
TO WIT:
FAILURE TO PROVIDE WRITTEN A CLEAR SUBSTANTIVE DENIAL DOCUMENTS CORRESPONDING TO THEM ARE CLEAR VIOLATIONS OF SECTION 2695.5.
NUMBER 2.
DELIBERATE INTENTION TO SOW CONFUSION.
IT IS AN IMPROPER RESPONSE FOR RESPONDING TO EMAILS WITH DIFFERENT SUBJECTS WHICH TEND TO CREATE MORE CONFUSIONS.
004 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 56 DATED 14DEC20 11:38AM
PLEASE SEE NOTES ON IMPROPRIETY IN 003 ABOVE.
PLEASE SEE NOTES ON IMPROPRIETY IN 003 ABOVE.
005 STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 57 DATED 14DEC20 12:00PM
NOTES ON IMPROPRIETY : PERTAINING TO INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 57.
NUMBER 1.
MR. GUENIOT, THE ASSISTANCE SOUGHT IS, PLEASE PROVIDE A CONCISE SUBSTANTIVE DENIAL LETTER ON MY CLAIMS FOR SECONDARY DAMAGES FILED IN JUNE 2020 AND VANDALISM WHICH COVERAGE I DISCOVERED JUST IN NOVEMBER 4, 2020 WHEN YOU BELATEDLY FURNISHED ME WITH THE COPY OF THE POLICY BEYOND ON WHAT IS REQUIRED BY THE REGULATION.
TO WIT:
FAILURE TO PROVIDE WRITTEN A CLEAR SUBSTANTIVE DENIAL DOCUMENTS CORRESPONDING TO THEM ARE CLEAR VIOLATIONS OF SECTION 2695.5.
NUMBER 2.
DELIBERATE INTENTION TO SOW CONFUSION.
IT IS AN IMPROPER RESPONSE FOR RESPONDING TO AN EMAIL ASKING FOR A CLEAR AND CONCISE DENIAL LETTER LIKE "As I previously communicated to you on November 13, 2020, we have done our best to answer your questions and provide a reasonable explanation for the basis of the denial of the claim based on the policy language. " WHERE IN YOUR EMAIL IN NOVEMBER 13, 2020 YOU MENTIONED OF MY DAMAGES CLAIM FROM VANDALISM COMMITTED BY YOUR INFORMANT PLUMBER TITOUAH?
NUMBER 3.
YOU ARE SAYING "we have done our best" WHAT EFFORTS HAVE YOU MADE TO EXPLAIN YOUR POSITION? WHAT YOU HAVE WRITTEN ME ARE JUST A TEMPLATE OF EMPTY AND UNSUBSTANTIATED FIVE (5) FEEBLE MINDED OR FEW INSANE SENTENCES, REPEATEDLY ALL OVER AGAIN? WHAT YOU HAVE DONE BEST IS TO SOW MORE AND MORE CONFUSIONS TO DETER ME CONTINUING NEGOTIATIONS WITH YOU. BUT I ASSURE YOU, I WILL CONTINUE GOOD FAITH NEGOTIATIONS WITH YOU THOUGH YOU CONTINUALLY DISPLAY OBVIOUS AND REPREHENSIBLE MANIFESTATIONS OF BAD FAITH.
NOTES ON IMPROPRIETY : PERTAINING TO INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 57.
NUMBER 1.
MR. GUENIOT, THE ASSISTANCE SOUGHT IS, PLEASE PROVIDE A CONCISE SUBSTANTIVE DENIAL LETTER ON MY CLAIMS FOR SECONDARY DAMAGES FILED IN JUNE 2020 AND VANDALISM WHICH COVERAGE I DISCOVERED JUST IN NOVEMBER 4, 2020 WHEN YOU BELATEDLY FURNISHED ME WITH THE COPY OF THE POLICY BEYOND ON WHAT IS REQUIRED BY THE REGULATION.
TO WIT:
FAILURE TO PROVIDE WRITTEN A CLEAR SUBSTANTIVE DENIAL DOCUMENTS CORRESPONDING TO THEM ARE CLEAR VIOLATIONS OF SECTION 2695.5.
NUMBER 2.
DELIBERATE INTENTION TO SOW CONFUSION.
IT IS AN IMPROPER RESPONSE FOR RESPONDING TO AN EMAIL ASKING FOR A CLEAR AND CONCISE DENIAL LETTER LIKE "As I previously communicated to you on November 13, 2020, we have done our best to answer your questions and provide a reasonable explanation for the basis of the denial of the claim based on the policy language. " WHERE IN YOUR EMAIL IN NOVEMBER 13, 2020 YOU MENTIONED OF MY DAMAGES CLAIM FROM VANDALISM COMMITTED BY YOUR INFORMANT PLUMBER TITOUAH?
NUMBER 3.
YOU ARE SAYING "we have done our best" WHAT EFFORTS HAVE YOU MADE TO EXPLAIN YOUR POSITION? WHAT YOU HAVE WRITTEN ME ARE JUST A TEMPLATE OF EMPTY AND UNSUBSTANTIATED FIVE (5) FEEBLE MINDED OR FEW INSANE SENTENCES, REPEATEDLY ALL OVER AGAIN? WHAT YOU HAVE DONE BEST IS TO SOW MORE AND MORE CONFUSIONS TO DETER ME CONTINUING NEGOTIATIONS WITH YOU. BUT I ASSURE YOU, I WILL CONTINUE GOOD FAITH NEGOTIATIONS WITH YOU THOUGH YOU CONTINUALLY DISPLAY OBVIOUS AND REPREHENSIBLE MANIFESTATIONS OF BAD FAITH.
006 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 57 DATED 14DEC20 2:37PM
PLEASE SEE NOTES ON IMPROPRIETY IN 005 ABOVE.
PLEASE SEE NOTES ON IMPROPRIETY IN 005 ABOVE.
007 STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 58 DATED 28DEC20 7:18AM
NOTES ON IMPROPRIETY : PERTAINING TO INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 58.
NUMBER 1.
MR. GUENIOT, THE ASSISTANCE SOUGHT IS, PLEASE PROVIDE A CONCISE SUBSTANTIVE DENIAL LETTER ON MY CLAIMS FOR SECONDARY DAMAGES FILED IN JUNE 2020 AND VANDALISM WHICH COVERAGE I DISCOVERED JUST IN NOVEMBER 4, 2020 WHEN YOU BELATEDLY FURNISHED ME WITH THE COPY OF THE POLICY BEYOND ON WHAT IS REQUIRED BY THE REGULATION.
TO WIT:
FAILURE TO PROVIDE WRITTEN A CLEAR SUBSTANTIVE DENIAL DOCUMENTS CORRESPONDING TO THEM ARE CLEAR VIOLATIONS OF SECTION 2695.5.
NOTES ON IMPROPRIETY : PERTAINING TO INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 58.
NUMBER 1.
MR. GUENIOT, THE ASSISTANCE SOUGHT IS, PLEASE PROVIDE A CONCISE SUBSTANTIVE DENIAL LETTER ON MY CLAIMS FOR SECONDARY DAMAGES FILED IN JUNE 2020 AND VANDALISM WHICH COVERAGE I DISCOVERED JUST IN NOVEMBER 4, 2020 WHEN YOU BELATEDLY FURNISHED ME WITH THE COPY OF THE POLICY BEYOND ON WHAT IS REQUIRED BY THE REGULATION.
TO WIT:
FAILURE TO PROVIDE WRITTEN A CLEAR SUBSTANTIVE DENIAL DOCUMENTS CORRESPONDING TO THEM ARE CLEAR VIOLATIONS OF SECTION 2695.5.
Section 2695.5. Duties upon Receipt of Communications
(b) Upon receiving any communication from a claimant, regarding a claim, that reasonably suggests that a response is expected, every licensee shall immediately, but in no event more than fifteen (15) calendar days after receipt of that communication, furnish the claimant with a complete response based on the facts as then known by the licensee. This subsection shall not apply to require communication with a claimant subsequent to receipt by the licensee of a notice of legal action by that claimant.
NUMBER 2.
DELIBERATE INTENTION TO SOW CONFUSION.
IT IS AN IMPROPER RESPONSE FOR RESPONDING TO AN EMAIL ASKING FOR A CLEAR AND CONCISE DENIAL LETTER LIKE "As I previously communicated to you on November 13, 2020, we have done our best to answer your questions and provide a reasonable explanation for the basis of the denial of the claim based on the policy language. " WHERE IN YOUR EMAIL IN NOVEMBER 13, 2020 YOU MENTION THIS? YOU DID NOT EVEN MENTION OF MY DAMAGES CLAIM FROM VANDALISM COMMITTED BY YOUR INFORMANT PLUMBER TITOUAH?
NUMBER 3.
YOU ARE SAYING "we have done our best" WHAT EFFORTS HAVE YOU MADE TO EXPLAIN YOUR POSITION? WHAT YOU HAVE WRITTEN ME ARE JUST A TEMPLATE OF EMPTY AND UNSUBSTANTIATED THREE (3) FEEBLE MINDED OR FEW INSANE SENTENCES, REPEATEDLY ALL OVER AGAIN. WHAT YOU HAVE DONE BEST IS TO SOW MORE AND MORE CONFUSIONS TO DETER ME CONTINUING NEGOTIATIONS WITH YOU. BUT I ASSURE YOU, I WILL CONTINUE GOOD FAITH NEGOTIATIONS WITH YOU THOUGH YOU CONTINUALLY DISPLAY OBVIOUS AND REPREHENSIBLE MANIFESTATIONS OF BAD FAITH.
(b) Upon receiving any communication from a claimant, regarding a claim, that reasonably suggests that a response is expected, every licensee shall immediately, but in no event more than fifteen (15) calendar days after receipt of that communication, furnish the claimant with a complete response based on the facts as then known by the licensee. This subsection shall not apply to require communication with a claimant subsequent to receipt by the licensee of a notice of legal action by that claimant.
NUMBER 2.
DELIBERATE INTENTION TO SOW CONFUSION.
IT IS AN IMPROPER RESPONSE FOR RESPONDING TO AN EMAIL ASKING FOR A CLEAR AND CONCISE DENIAL LETTER LIKE "As I previously communicated to you on November 13, 2020, we have done our best to answer your questions and provide a reasonable explanation for the basis of the denial of the claim based on the policy language. " WHERE IN YOUR EMAIL IN NOVEMBER 13, 2020 YOU MENTION THIS? YOU DID NOT EVEN MENTION OF MY DAMAGES CLAIM FROM VANDALISM COMMITTED BY YOUR INFORMANT PLUMBER TITOUAH?
NUMBER 3.
YOU ARE SAYING "we have done our best" WHAT EFFORTS HAVE YOU MADE TO EXPLAIN YOUR POSITION? WHAT YOU HAVE WRITTEN ME ARE JUST A TEMPLATE OF EMPTY AND UNSUBSTANTIATED THREE (3) FEEBLE MINDED OR FEW INSANE SENTENCES, REPEATEDLY ALL OVER AGAIN. WHAT YOU HAVE DONE BEST IS TO SOW MORE AND MORE CONFUSIONS TO DETER ME CONTINUING NEGOTIATIONS WITH YOU. BUT I ASSURE YOU, I WILL CONTINUE GOOD FAITH NEGOTIATIONS WITH YOU THOUGH YOU CONTINUALLY DISPLAY OBVIOUS AND REPREHENSIBLE MANIFESTATIONS OF BAD FAITH.
008 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 58 DATED 28DEC20 12:13PM
SEE NOTES ON IMPROPRIETY : PERTAINING TO INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 58.
SEE NOTES ON IMPROPRIETY : PERTAINING TO INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 58.
009 STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 59 DATED 28DEC20 2:16PM
SAME NOTES ON IMPROPRIETY ABOVE.
SAME NOTES ON IMPROPRIETY ABOVE.
010 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 59 28DEC20 5:07PM
SAME NOTES ON IMPROPRIETY ABOVE.
011 STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 60 DATED 29DEC20 9:02AM
SAME NOTES ON IMPROPRIETY ABOVE.
012 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 60 DATED 29DEC20 11:09AM
SAME NOTES ON IMPROPRIETY ABOVE.
013 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x REQUEST FOR ASSISTANCE STATE FARM INSURANCE AGENT DATED 29DEC20 2:37PM
014 STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 61DATED 29DEC20 2:57PM
SAME NOTES ON IMPROPRIETY ABOVE.
015 STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 62 DATED 29DEC20 2:57PM
SAME NOTES ON IMPROPRIETY ABOVE WHERE NUMBER 4 IS ADDED.NUMBER 4MR. GUENIOT, PLEASE DO NOT DERAIL EFFORTS TO RESOLVE THIS CONFLICT TOWARD A HOLISTIC RESOLUTION. THIS EMAIL WHICH YOU ARE RESPONDING TO IS INTENDED FOR MR. EDDIE ATCHLEY AND NOT FOR YOU TO ANSWER. I FURNISHED YOU A COPY OF IT FOR THE SAKE OF COURTESY JUST TO LET YOU KNOW THAT I AM PRUDENTLY EXPLORING OPTIONS TO NEGOTIATE THESE INSURANCE CLAIMS BETWEEN RESPECTABLE AND HONORABLE MEN. STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANY DESERVES MEN OF HIGH HONOR AND INTEGRITY IN THE EXACT OPPOSITE OF WHAT YOU ARE SHOWING. PLEASE LET MR. EDDIE ATCHLEY DO WHATEVER HE COULD TO HELP US OUT OF THIS PREDICAMENT.
SAME NOTES ON IMPROPRIETY ABOVE WHERE NUMBER 4 IS ADDED.
NUMBER 4
MR. GUENIOT, PLEASE DO NOT DERAIL EFFORTS TO RESOLVE THIS CONFLICT TOWARD A HOLISTIC RESOLUTION. THIS EMAIL WHICH YOU ARE RESPONDING TO IS INTENDED FOR MR. EDDIE ATCHLEY AND NOT FOR YOU TO ANSWER. I FURNISHED YOU A COPY OF IT FOR THE SAKE OF COURTESY JUST TO LET YOU KNOW THAT I AM PRUDENTLY EXPLORING OPTIONS TO NEGOTIATE THESE INSURANCE CLAIMS BETWEEN RESPECTABLE AND HONORABLE MEN. STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANY DESERVES MEN OF HIGH HONOR AND INTEGRITY IN THE EXACT OPPOSITE OF WHAT YOU ARE SHOWING. PLEASE LET MR. EDDIE ATCHLEY DO WHATEVER HE COULD TO HELP US OUT OF THIS PREDICAMENT.
016 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 61 DATED 29DEC20 6:11PM
017 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 62 DATED 29DEC20 8:50PM
018 STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSES 63/64 DATED 30DEC20 8:28AM 8:29AM
019 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSES 63/64 DATED 30DEC20 4:00PM
001 STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 65 DATED 13JAN21 10:33AM
002 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 65 DATED 13JAN21 9:55PM
003 STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 66 27JAN21 08:06AM
004 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 66 DATED 27JAN21 9:08 PM
INTRODUCTION OF THE CONTINUING VIOLATION DOCTRINE
002 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 67 DATED FEBRUARY 11, 2021 11:38PM
003 STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 68 DATED 25FEB21 12:19PM
001 STATE FARM INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 69 DATED 11MAR21 11:42AM
002 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x INAPPROPRIATE 69 DATED 11MAR21 11:14PM
003 VIRTUAL CONFERENCE DATED 12MAR21 6:19AM
requested from Eddie Atchley
004 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x WANTED RIGHT PERSON TO NEGOTIATE DATED 12MAR21 1:49PM
005 MOMENTS FOR RETROSPECTION 1 DATED 13MAR21 8:41AM
007 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE 70 DATED 15MAR21 11:51 PM
001 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x MOMENTS FOR RETROSPECTION 8 DATED 9APR21 4:22AM cc POLICE OFFICER CSANTOS AND COMPANION BEGAN
002 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x RETROSPECTION 9 DATED 10APR21 SENT 12APR21 12:50AM
HOUSE DAMAGED BY A PIPE BREAK STATE FARM BRING HOME RELATIONS TO A BREAK
003 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x INQUIRY 1 DATED 13APR21 5:09PM
INQUIRY 1 : DO YOU HAVE ANY SUGGESTION?
004 Claim Number 55-06C6-44X INQUIRY 2 DATED 14APR21 5:24AM
INQUIRY 2 : DO YOU HAVE A FILE COPY OF YOUR DENIAL LETTER DATED MAY 6, 2020? Last cc POLICE OFFICER CSANTOS intended for her and 2 other companions.
005 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x INQUIRY 3 DATED 20APRIL21 12:35AM
INQUIRY 3 : HAVE YOU READ AND UNDERSTOOD AND INCLUDED IN YOUR CLAIM FILE RETROSPECTION 9?
006 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x INQUIRY 4 DATED 21APR21 12:35AM
DO YOU KNOW YOUR INFORMANT PLUMBER TITOUAH HAD ANOTHER VICTIM SOME 4 MONTHS AGO SIMILAR TO WHAT HE DID TO US ON MAY 5, 2020?
007 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x INQUIRY 5 DATED22APR21 3:17AM
INQUIRY 5: DO YOU KNOW THE SCAM YOU DID ON GREG IS SIMILAR IN PATTERN OF EXECUTION AS YOU DID ON US?
008 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x INQUIRY 6 DATED 23APR21 3:50AM
INQUIRY 6: ARE YOU, MR. LIU THE SAME CLAIMS ADJUSTER WHOM GREG DEALT WITH FROM STATE FARM?
INQUIRY 7: ARE YOU AWARE, MR. LIU THE CONSEQUENCES IF YOU DO NOT ADMIT YOU ARE THE SAME CLAIMS ADJUSTER WHOM GREG DEALT WITH FROM STATE FARM?
INQUIRY 8 : IN RELATION TO WHAT TITOUAH DID ON GREG, HAD YOU COMMUNICATED WITH TITOUAH DAYS BEFORE MAY 5. 2020?
INQUIRY 9 : IN RELATION TO WHAT TITOUAH DID ON GREG, WOULD YOU ADMIT TITOUAH AND YOU ARE ALREADY FAMILIAR WITH EACH OTHER DAYS BEFORE MAY 5. 2020?
INQUIRY 10 : IN RELATION TO WHAT FIRST AMERICAN AND STATE FARM DID ON GREG, DO YOU KNOW SY-JOSE MEDINA CLAIMS ADJUSTER FROM FIRST AMERICAN?
INQUIRY 11 : IN RELATION TO WHAT FIRST AMERICAN AND STATE FARM DID ON GREG, DID YOU ADVISE SY-JOSE MEDINA CLAIMS ADJUSTER FROM FIRST AMERICAN WHAT ALIBI TO SAY WITH REGARD TO RE ASSIGNMENT OF PLUMBING JOB TO YOUR BUSINESS PARTNER TITOUAH?
INQUIRY 12 : IN RELATION TO WHAT FIRST AMERICAN AND STATE FARM DID ON GREG, DID YOU KNOW HOW SY-JOSE MEDINA CLAIMS ADJUSTER FROM FIRST AMERICAN SIGNIFIES HIS INTENTION TO JOIN THE CONSPIRACY WITH GUENIOT AND YOU OF STATE FARM AND TITOUAH?
INQUIRY 13 : DID YOU KNOW SY-JOSE MEDINA CLAIMS ADJUSTER FROM FIRST AMERICAN REFUSED TO INVESTIGATE TITOUAH ON ALLEGATIONS OF FRAUD AND VANDALISM SIMILAR TO WHAT GUENIOT AND YOU DID ON ME, LIKE WHAT FIRST AMERICAN AND STATE FARM DID ON GREG?
INQUIRY 14 : DO YOU KNOW WHY THE FBI WOULD CONFIRM THAT STATE FARM, GUENIOT AND YOU MASTERMINDED THE CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY TOGETHER WITH FIRST AMERICAN, SY-JOSE MEDINA AND TITOUAH LIKE WHAT STATE FARM DID TOGETHER WITH FIRST AMERICAN ON GREG?
INQUIRY 15 : DO YOU KNOW WHY NOW THE FBI HAVE REASONS TO BELIEVE THAT YOUR TRIUMVIRATE IS IN CONSTANT COMMUNICATION WITH EACH OTHER AS SHOWN IN THE EVENTS ON GREG AND ON OUR CASE IN A MANNER TO PROTECT TITOUAH AGAINST ANY INVESTIGATION OF HIS CRIME OF FRAUD AND/OR DISHONESTY AND VANDALISM TO PERPETUATE YOUR LEAST DETECTABLE, PRODUCTIVE ILLICIT COVERT BUSINESS PARTNERSHIP?
005 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x INQUIRY 16 DATED 9MAY21 4:30AM
INQUIRY 16 : DO YOU KNOW WHY THE FBI WOULD HAVE REASONS TO BELIEVE FIRST AMERICAN WOULD WANT TO REFUSE ME ACCESS TO COMMUNICATION RECORD THROUGH THE MESSAGE CENTER I HAVE WITH THEM?
INQUIRY 17 : THIS TIME WOULD YOU LIKE TO IMPRESS THE FBI AND COME TOGETHER WITH GUENIOT AND SY-JOSE MEDINA AND SEE THE DAMAGE CAUSED BY VANDALISM COMMITTED BY YOUR PARTNER TITOUAH?
REMINDER 1 OF INQUIRY 17 DATED MAY 12, 2021 PUBLICLY SHARED EMAIL COMMUNICATION NEGOTIATION TO RAISE AWARENESS TO THE PUBLIC OF A MOSTLY PROBABLE EXISTENCE OF AN UNHOLY ALLIANCE BETWEEN A HOME WARRANTY AND HOME INSURANCE CARRIER AND SERVICE CONTRACTOR TO DEFRAUD HOMEOWNERS OF SAN DIEGO OF COVERAGE OF THEIR LEGITIMATE INSURANCE CLAIM BENEFITS.
REMINDER 2 OF INQUIRY 17 DATED MAY 13, 2021 PUBLICLY SHARED EMAIL COMMUNICATION NEGOTIATION TO RAISE AWARENESS TO THE PUBLIC OF A MOSTLY PROBABLE EXISTENCE OF AN UNHOLY ALLIANCE BETWEEN A HOME WARRANTY AND HOME INSURANCE CARRIER AND SERVICE CONTRACTOR TO DEFRAUD HOMEOWNERS OF SAN DIEGO OF COVERAGE OF THEIR LEGITIMATE INSURANCE CLAIM BENEFITS.
REMINDER 3 OF INQUIRY 17 DATED MAY 14, 2021 PUBLICLY SHARED EMAIL COMMUNICATION NEGOTIATION TO RAISE AWARENESS TO THE PUBLIC OF A MOSTLY PROBABLE EXISTENCE OF AN UNHOLY ALLIANCE BETWEEN A HOME WARRANTY AND HOME INSURANCE CARRIER AND SERVICE CONTRACTOR TO DEFRAUD HOMEOWNERS OF SAN DIEGO OF COVERAGE OF THEIR LEGITIMATE INSURANCE CLAIM BENEFITS.
EMAIL COMMUNICATION WITH STATE FARM HOME INSURANCE AGENCY MANAGER MR. EDDIE ATCHLEY INFORMING HIM ABOUT OWNER INN WRONGFUL RESPONSE TO MY COMMENTS IN GOOGLE MAPS TO CONVINCE THE OWNER TO EDIT HIS RESPONSE THERETO.
REMINDER 4 OF INQUIRY 17 DATED MAY 15, 2021 PUBLICLY SHARED EMAIL COMMUNICATION NEGOTIATION TO RAISE AWARENESS TO THE PUBLIC OF A MOSTLY PROBABLE EXISTENCE OF AN UNHOLY ALLIANCE BETWEEN A HOME WARRANTY AND HOME INSURANCE CARRIER AND SERVICE CONTRACTOR TO DEFRAUD HOMEOWNERS OF SAN DIEGO OF COVERAGE OF THEIR LEGITIMATE INSURANCE CLAIM BENEFITS.
012 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x REMINDER 5 OF INQUIRY 17 DATED 18MAY21 DATED 18MAY21 12:23AM
REMINDER 5 OF INQUIRY 17 DATED MAY 18, 2021 PUBLICLY SHARED EMAIL COMMUNICATION NEGOTIATION TO RAISE AWARENESS TO THE PUBLIC OF A MOSTLY PROBABLE EXISTENCE OF AN UNHOLY ALLIANCE BETWEEN A HOME WARRANTY AND HOME INSURANCE CARRIER AND SERVICE CONTRACTOR TO DEFRAUD HOMEOWNERS OF SAN DIEGO OF COVERAGE OF THEIR LEGITIMATE INSURANCE CLAIM BENEFITS.
FOLLOW UP AFTER 3 DAYS FOR EMAIL COMMUNICATION WITH STATE FARM HOME INSURANCE AGENCY MANAGER MR. EDDIE ATCHLEY INFORMING HIM ABOUT OWNER INN WRONGFUL RESPONSE TO MY COMMENTS IN GOOGLE MAPS TO CONVINCE THE OWNER TO EDIT HIS RESPONSE THERETO.
014 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x REMINDER 6 OF INQUIRY 17 DATED 19MAY21 6:28AM
REMINDER 6 OF INQUIRY 17 DATED MAY 19, 2021 PUBLICLY SHARED EMAIL COMMUNICATION NEGOTIATION TO RAISE AWARENESS TO THE PUBLIC OF A MOSTLY PROBABLE EXISTENCE OF AN UNHOLY ALLIANCE BETWEEN A HOME WARRANTY AND HOME INSURANCE CARRIER AND SERVICE CONTRACTOR TO DEFRAUD HOMEOWNERS OF SAN DIEGO OF COVERAGE OF THEIR LEGITIMATE INSURANCE CLAIM BENEFITS.
015 RESPONSE TO MY GOOGLE MAPS COMMENTS REMAINS NOT CORRECTED DATED 19MAY21 11:23PM SECOND FOLLOW UP.
REMINDER 7 OF INQUIRY 17 DATED MAY 20, 2021 PUBLICLY SHARED EMAIL COMMUNICATION NEGOTIATION TO RAISE AWARENESS TO THE PUBLIC OF A MOSTLY PROBABLE EXISTENCE OF AN UNHOLY ALLIANCE BETWEEN A HOME WARRANTY AND HOME INSURANCE CARRIER AND SERVICE CONTRACTOR TO DEFRAUD HOMEOWNERS OF SAN DIEGO OF COVERAGE OF THEIR LEGITIMATE INSURANCE CLAIM BENEFITS.
AGENCY OWNER INTENDED HIS RESPONSE TO REMAIN THAT WAY.
REMINDER 8 OF INQUIRY 17 DATED MAY 21, 2021 PUBLICLY SHARED EMAIL COMMUNICATION NEGOTIATION TO RAISE AWARENESS TO THE PUBLIC OF A MOSTLY PROBABLE EXISTENCE OF AN UNHOLY ALLIANCE BETWEEN A HOME WARRANTY AND HOME INSURANCE CARRIER AND SERVICE CONTRACTOR TO DEFRAUD HOMEOWNERS OF SAN DIEGO OF COVERAGE OF THEIR LEGITIMATE INSURANCE CLAIM BENEFITS.
REMINDER 9 OF INQUIRY 17 DATED MAY 24, 2021 PUBLICLY SHARED EMAIL COMMUNICATION NEGOTIATION TO RAISE AWARENESS TO THE PUBLIC OF A MOSTLY PROBABLE EXISTENCE OF AN UNHOLY ALLIANCE BETWEEN A HOME WARRANTY AND HOME INSURANCE CARRIER AND SERVICE CONTRACTOR TO DEFRAUD HOMEOWNERS OF SAN DIEGO OF COVERAGE OF THEIR LEGITIMATE INSURANCE CLAIM BENEFITS.
AND 20MAY21 REVELATION BY MR. DERICK INN DATED 24MAY21.
REMINDER 10 OF INQUIRY 17 DATED MAY 25, 2021 PUBLICLY SHARED EMAIL COMMUNICATION NEGOTIATION TO RAISE AWARENESS TO THE PUBLIC OF A MOSTLY PROBABLE EXISTENCE OF AN UNHOLY ALLIANCE BETWEEN A HOME WARRANTY AND HOME INSURANCE CARRIER AND SERVICE CONTRACTOR TO DEFRAUD HOMEOWNERS OF SAN DIEGO OF COVERAGE OF THEIR LEGITIMATE INSURANCE CLAIM BENEFITS.
AND 20MAY21 REVELATION BY MR. DERICK INN DATED 25MAY21.
REMINDER 11 OF INQUIRY 17 DATED MAY 26, 2021 PUBLICLY SHARED EMAIL COMMUNICATION NEGOTIATION TO RAISE AWARENESS TO THE PUBLIC OF A MOSTLY PROBABLE EXISTENCE OF AN UNHOLY ALLIANCE BETWEEN A HOME WARRANTY AND HOME INSURANCE CARRIER AND SERVICE CONTRACTOR TO DEFRAUD HOMEOWNERS OF SAN DIEGO OF COVERAGE OF THEIR LEGITIMATE INSURANCE CLAIM BENEFITS.
AND 20MAY21 REVELATION BY MR. DERICK INN DATED 26MAY21.
AFTER REMINDER 15 OF INQUIRY 17 WE SHALL PROCEED WITH INQUIRY 18 WHERE MR. DERYK INN SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE UNHOLY ALLIANCE.
REMINDER 12 OF INQUIRY 17 DATED MAY 27, 2021 PUBLICLY SHARED EMAIL COMMUNICATION NEGOTIATION TO RAISE AWARENESS TO THE PUBLIC OF A MOSTLY PROBABLE EXISTENCE OF AN UNHOLY ALLIANCE BETWEEN A HOME WARRANTY AND HOME INSURANCE CARRIER AND SERVICE CONTRACTOR TO DEFRAUD HOMEOWNERS OF SAN DIEGO OF COVERAGE OF THEIR LEGITIMATE INSURANCE CLAIM BENEFITS. AND 20MAY21 REVELATION BY MR. DERICK INN DATED 26MAY21. AFTER REMINDER 15 OF INQUIRY 17 WE SHALL PROCEED WITH INQUIRY 18 WHERE MR. DERYK INN SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE UNHOLY ALLIANCE AND THE DECLARATION OF SETTLEMENT AMOUNTS.
024 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x REMINDER 13 OF INQUIRY 17 AND DERYK INN 20MAY21 REVELATION DATED 28MAY21
REMINDER 13 OF INQUIRY 17 DATED MAY 28, 2021 PUBLICLY SHARED EMAIL COMMUNICATION NEGOTIATION TO RAISE AWARENESS TO THE PUBLIC OF A MOSTLY PROBABLE EXISTENCE OF AN UNHOLY ALLIANCE BETWEEN A HOME WARRANTY AND HOME INSURANCE CARRIER AND SERVICE CONTRACTOR TO DEFRAUD HOMEOWNERS OF SAN DIEGO OF COVERAGE OF THEIR LEGITIMATE INSURANCE CLAIM BENEFITS. AND 20MAY21 REVELATION BY MR. DERICK INN DATED 28MAY21. AFTER REMINDER 15 OF INQUIRY 17 WE SHALL PROCEED WITH INQUIRY 18 WHERE MR. DERYK INN SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE UNHOLY ALLIANCE AND THE DECLARATION OF SETTLEMENT AMOUNTS.
REMINDER 14 OF INQUIRY 17 DATED MAY 27, 2021 PUBLICLY SHARED EMAIL COMMUNICATION NEGOTIATION TO RAISE AWARENESS TO THE PUBLIC OF A MOSTLY PROBABLE EXISTENCE OF AN UNHOLY ALLIANCE BETWEEN A HOME WARRANTY AND HOME INSURANCE CARRIER AND SERVICE CONTRACTOR TO DEFRAUD HOMEOWNERS OF SAN DIEGO OF COVERAGE OF THEIR LEGITIMATE INSURANCE CLAIM BENEFITS. AND 20MAY21 REVELATION BY MR. DERICK INN DATED 1JUNE21. AFTER REMINDER 15 OF INQUIRY 17 WE SHALL PROCEED WITH INQUIRY 18 WHERE MR. DERYK INN SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE UNHOLY ALLIANCE AND THE DECLARATION OF SETTLEMENT AMOUNTS.
REMINDER 15 OF INQUIRY 17 DATED MAY 27, 2021 PUBLICLY SHARED EMAIL COMMUNICATION NEGOTIATION TO RAISE AWARENESS TO THE PUBLIC OF A MOSTLY PROBABLE EXISTENCE OF AN UNHOLY ALLIANCE BETWEEN A HOME WARRANTY AND HOME INSURANCE CARRIER AND SERVICE CONTRACTOR TO DEFRAUD HOMEOWNERS OF SAN DIEGO OF COVERAGE OF THEIR LEGITIMATE INSURANCE CLAIM BENEFITS. AND 20MAY21 REVELATION BY MR. DERICK INN DATED 1JUNE21. AFTER REMINDER 15 OF INQUIRY 17 WE SHALL PROCEED WITH INQUIRY 18 WHERE MR. DERYK INN SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE UNHOLY ALLIANCE AND THE DECLARATION OF SETTLEMENT AMOUNTS.
INQUIRY 18 : DID YOU KNOW YOUR AGENT MR. DERYK INN WHILE ABIDING BY YOUR INSTRUCTIONS NOT TO PROVIDE NAMES OF MANAGERS OVER GUENIOT AND YOU, UNWITTINGLY REVEALED THAT IT IS A CORPORATE DECISION BY STATE FARM HOME INSURANCE?
INQUIRY 19 : WOULD YOU LIKE TO OBJECT TO MR. DERYK INN AS HE WROTE TO ME THAT THE WAY YOU ARE DEALING WITH US IS A MATTER OF A CORPORATE STATE FARM DECISION?
REITERATION 1 OF INQUIRY 19 DATED JUNE 9, 2021 PUBLICLY SHARED EMAIL COMMUNICATION NEGOTIATION TO RAISE AWARENESS TO THE PUBLIC OF A MOSTLY PROBABLE EXISTENCE OF AN UNHOLY ALLIANCE BETWEEN A HOME WARRANTY AND HOME INSURANCE CARRIER AND ITS AGENCY AND SERVICE CONTRACTOR TO DEFRAUD HOMEOWNERS OF SAN DIEGO OF COVERAGE OF THEIR LEGITIMATE INSURANCE CLAIM BENEFITS.
REITERATION 2 OF INQUIRY 19 DATED JUNE 10, 2021 PUBLICLY SHARED EMAIL COMMUNICATION NEGOTIATION TO RAISE AWARENESS TO THE PUBLIC OF A MOSTLY PROBABLE EXISTENCE OF AN UNHOLY ALLIANCE BETWEEN A HOME WARRANTY AND HOME INSURANCE CARRIER AND ITS AGENCY AND SERVICE CONTRACTOR TO DEFRAUD HOMEOWNERS OF SAN DIEGO OF COVERAGE OF THEIR LEGITIMATE INSURANCE CLAIM BENEFITS.
REITERATION 3 OF INQUIRY 19 DATED JUNE 11, 2021 PUBLICLY SHARED EMAIL COMMUNICATION NEGOTIATION TO RAISE AWARENESS TO THE PUBLIC OF A MOSTLY PROBABLE EXISTENCE OF AN UNHOLY ALLIANCE BETWEEN A HOME WARRANTY AND HOME INSURANCE CARRIER AND ITS AGENCY AND SERVICE CONTRACTOR TO DEFRAUD HOMEOWNERS OF SAN DIEGO OF COVERAGE OF THEIR LEGITIMATE INSURANCE CLAIM BENEFITS.
REITERATION 4 OF INQUIRY 19 DATED JUNE 14, 2021 PUBLICLY SHARED EMAIL COMMUNICATION NEGOTIATION TO RAISE AWARENESS TO THE PUBLIC OF A MOSTLY PROBABLE EXISTENCE OF AN UNHOLY ALLIANCE BETWEEN A HOME WARRANTY AND HOME INSURANCE CARRIER AND ITS AGENCY AND SERVICE CONTRACTOR TO DEFRAUD HOMEOWNERS OF SAN DIEGO OF COVERAGE OF THEIR LEGITIMATE INSURANCE CLAIM BENEFITS.
REITERATION 5 OF INQUIRY 19 DATED JUNE 16, 2021 PUBLICLY SHARED EMAIL COMMUNICATION NEGOTIATION TO RAISE AWARENESS TO THE PUBLIC OF A MOSTLY PROBABLE EXISTENCE OF AN UNHOLY ALLIANCE BETWEEN A HOME WARRANTY AND HOME INSURANCE CARRIER AND ITS AGENCY AND SERVICE CONTRACTOR TO DEFRAUD HOMEOWNERS OF SAN DIEGO OF COVERAGE OF THEIR LEGITIMATE INSURANCE CLAIM BENEFITS.
REITERATION 6 OF INQUIRY 19 DATED JUNE 17, 2021 PUBLICLY SHARED EMAIL COMMUNICATION NEGOTIATION TO RAISE AWARENESS TO THE PUBLIC OF A MOSTLY PROBABLE EXISTENCE OF AN UNHOLY ALLIANCE BETWEEN A HOME WARRANTY AND HOME INSURANCE CARRIER AND ITS AGENCY AND SERVICE CONTRACTOR TO DEFRAUD HOMEOWNERS OF SAN DIEGO OF COVERAGE OF THEIR LEGITIMATE INSURANCE CLAIM BENEFITS.
REITERATION 7 OF INQUIRY 19 DATED JUNE 18, 2021 PUBLICLY SHARED EMAIL COMMUNICATION NEGOTIATION TO RAISE AWARENESS TO THE PUBLIC OF A MOSTLY PROBABLE EXISTENCE OF AN UNHOLY ALLIANCE BETWEEN A HOME WARRANTY AND HOME INSURANCE CARRIER AND ITS AGENCY AND SERVICE CONTRACTOR TO DEFRAUD HOMEOWNERS OF SAN DIEGO OF COVERAGE OF THEIR LEGITIMATE INSURANCE CLAIM BENEFITS.
012 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x REITERATION 8 DATED 21JUNE21 9:38PM
REITERATION 8 OF INQUIRY 19 DATED JUNE 21 , 2021 PUBLICLY SHARED EMAIL COMMUNICATION NEGOTIATION TO RAISE AWARENESS TO THE PUBLIC OF A MOSTLY PROBABLE EXISTENCE OF AN UNHOLY ALLIANCE BETWEEN A HOME WARRANTY AND HOME INSURANCE CARRIER AND ITS AGENCY AND SERVICE CONTRACTOR TO DEFRAUD HOMEOWNERS OF SAN DIEGO OF COVERAGE OF THEIR LEGITIMATE INSURANCE CLAIM BENEFITS.
REITERATION 9 OF INQUIRY 19 DATED JUNE 22 , 2021 PUBLICLY SHARED EMAIL COMMUNICATION NEGOTIATION TO RAISE AWARENESS TO THE PUBLIC OF A MOSTLY PROBABLE EXISTENCE OF AN UNHOLY ALLIANCE BETWEEN A HOME WARRANTY AND HOME INSURANCE CARRIER AND ITS AGENCY AND SERVICE CONTRACTOR TO DEFRAUD HOMEOWNERS OF SAN DIEGO OF COVERAGE OF THEIR LEGITIMATE INSURANCE CLAIM BENEFITS.
REITERATION 10 OF INQUIRY 19 DATED JUNE 23, 2021 PUBLICLY SHARED EMAIL COMMUNICATION NEGOTIATION TO RAISE AWARENESS TO THE PUBLIC OF A MOSTLY PROBABLE EXISTENCE OF AN UNHOLY ALLIANCE BETWEEN A HOME WARRANTY AND HOME INSURANCE CARRIER AND ITS AGENCY AND SERVICE CONTRACTOR TO DEFRAUD HOMEOWNERS OF SAN DIEGO OF COVERAGE OF THEIR LEGITIMATE INSURANCE CLAIM BENEFITS.
REITERATION 11 OF INQUIRY 19 DATED JUNE 24, 2021 PUBLICLY SHARED EMAIL COMMUNICATION NEGOTIATION TO RAISE AWARENESS TO THE PUBLIC OF A MOSTLY PROBABLE EXISTENCE OF AN UNHOLY ALLIANCE BETWEEN A HOME WARRANTY AND HOME INSURANCE CARRIER AND ITS AGENCY AND SERVICE CONTRACTOR TO DEFRAUD HOMEOWNERS OF SAN DIEGO OF COVERAGE OF THEIR LEGITIMATE INSURANCE CLAIM BENEFITS.
016 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x REITERATION 12 DATED 25JUNE21 10:37PM
REITERATION 12 OF INQUIRY 19 DATED JUNE 25, 2021 PUBLICLY SHARED EMAIL COMMUNICATION NEGOTIATION TO RAISE AWARENESS TO THE PUBLIC OF A MOSTLY PROBABLE EXISTENCE OF AN UNHOLY ALLIANCE BETWEEN A HOME WARRANTY AND HOME INSURANCE CARRIER AND ITS AGENCY AND SERVICE CONTRACTOR TO DEFRAUD HOMEOWNERS OF SAN DIEGO OF COVERAGE OF THEIR LEGITIMATE INSURANCE CLAIM BENEFITS.
REITERATION 13 OF INQUIRY 19 DATED JUNE 28, 2021 PUBLICLY SHARED EMAIL COMMUNICATION NEGOTIATION TO RAISE AWARENESS TO THE PUBLIC OF A MOSTLY PROBABLE EXISTENCE OF AN UNHOLY ALLIANCE BETWEEN A HOME WARRANTY AND HOME INSURANCE CARRIER AND ITS AGENCY AND SERVICE CONTRACTOR TO DEFRAUD HOMEOWNERS OF SAN DIEGO OF COVERAGE OF THEIR LEGITIMATE INSURANCE CLAIM BENEFITS.
REITERATION 14 OF INQUIRY 19 DATED JUNE 29, 2021 PUBLICLY SHARED EMAIL COMMUNICATION NEGOTIATION TO RAISE AWARENESS TO THE PUBLIC OF A MOSTLY PROBABLE EXISTENCE OF AN UNHOLY ALLIANCE BETWEEN A HOME WARRANTY AND HOME INSURANCE CARRIER AND ITS AGENCY AND SERVICE CONTRACTOR TO DEFRAUD HOMEOWNERS OF SAN DIEGO OF COVERAGE OF THEIR LEGITIMATE INSURANCE CLAIM BENEFITS.
REITERATION 15 OF INQUIRY 19 DATED JUNE 30, 2021 PUBLICLY SHARED EMAIL COMMUNICATION NEGOTIATION TO RAISE AWARENESS TO THE PUBLIC OF A MOSTLY PROBABLE EXISTENCE OF AN UNHOLY ALLIANCE BETWEEN A HOME WARRANTY AND HOME INSURANCE CARRIER AND ITS AGENCY AND SERVICE CONTRACTOR TO DEFRAUD HOMEOWNERS OF SAN DIEGO OF COVERAGE OF THEIR LEGITIMATE INSURANCE CLAIM BENEFITS.
INQUIRY 20 : HAVE YOU AGREED WITH FIRST AMERICAN HOME WARRANTY TO SHOULDER $5,130.31 ON YOUR COLLECTIVE CIVIL LIABILITY OF $1,000,000 I AM DEMANDING FROM BOTH OF YOU?
INQUIRY 21 : WOULD YOU WANT FIRST AMERICAN HOME WARRANTY TO SHOULDER MORE THAN THE $5,130 SHARE ON YOUR COLLECTIVE CIVIL LIABILITY OF $1,000,000 I AM DEMANDING FROM BOTH OF YOU ? RE : CHEATING 1.
INQUIRY 22 : WOULD YOU WANT FIRST AMERICAN HOME WARRANTY TO SHOULDER MORE THAN THE $5,130 SHARE ON YOUR COLLECTIVE CIVIL LIABILITY OF $1,000,000 I AM DEMANDING FROM BOTH OF YOU ? RE : CHEATING 2.
HABITUAL, OUTRAGEOUS, DELIBERATE AND INTENTIONAL DISTORTION OF MATERIAL FACT
INQUIRY 23 : WOULD YOU WANT FIRST AMERICAN HOME WARRANTY TO SHOULDER MORE THAN THE $5,130 SHARE ON YOUR COLLECTIVE CIVIL LIABILITY OF $1,000,000 I AM DEMANDING FROM BOTH OF YOU ? RE : CHEATING 3.
CHEATING 3 . MEDINA REFUSED TO SEND REQUESTED UPDATE
Sy-Jose Medina from June 20 to July 4, 2020, despite first 8 persistent requests written to the First American Message Center, refused to send requested updates to my email address where after request for it in the 8th time, the Message Center wrote, specifically: "Any email that have occurred between you and Mr. Medina should be in your own email box." The First American Message Center through this sentence made it appear that as if Sy-Jose Medina are sending me updates to my email address but actually he was not. There is not even one email of any email subjects Medina ever sent to my email address. This message from The First American Message Center had with it the intention to cheat in making it appear that Medina was sending updates to my email address though actually he was not.
INQUIRY 24. WOULD YOU WANT FIRST AMERICAN HOME WARRANTY TO SHOULDER MORE THAN THE $5,130 SHARE ON YOUR COLLECTIVE CIVIL LIABILITY OF $1,000,000 I AM DEMANDING FROM BOTH OF YOU ? RE : CHEATING 4.
CHEATING 4. MISREPRESENTATION ON ADJUSTERS HANDLING OUR CLAIM
SY-JOSE MEDINA OR JOSE MEDINA AND JOSE M. ARE ARE ONE AND THE SAME PERSON. THE FACT THAT FIRST AMERICAN MADE IT APPEAR THAT A NEW CLAIM SPECIALIST WAS ASSIGNED TO OUR CLAIM TO AVOID ANSWERING THE QUESTION, " PLEASE ANSWER YES OR NO, HAVE YOU ADVISED SY-JOSE MEDINA TO SEND ME UPDATES FROM APRIL 28, 2020 UP TO THE PRESENT VIA MY EMAIL ADDRESS: antoniobuensuceso@gmail.com?". THIS QUESTION REMAINED NOT ANSWERED WHICH MEANS HE HAD NO PROOF THAT HE ADVISED SY-JOSE MEDINA TO SEND ME UPDATES VIA MY EMAIL ADDRESS MAKING THEIR ACTS TO CHEAT COLLECTIVELY BE DELIBERATE, WILLFUL, INTENTIONAL AND OUTRAGEOUS.
SY-JOSE MEDINA OR JOSE MEDINA AND JOSE M. ARE ARE ONE AND THE SAME PERSON. THE FACT THAT FIRST AMERICAN MADE IT APPEAR THAT A NEW CLAIM SPECIALIST WAS ASSIGNED TO OUR CLAIM TO AVOID ANSWERING THE QUESTION, " PLEASE ANSWER YES OR NO, HAVE YOU ADVISED SY-JOSE MEDINA TO SEND ME UPDATES FROM APRIL 28, 2020 UP TO THE PRESENT VIA MY EMAIL ADDRESS: antoniobuensuceso@gmail.com?". THIS QUESTION REMAINED NOT ANSWERED WHICH MEANS HE HAD NO PROOF THAT HE ADVISED SY-JOSE MEDINA TO SEND ME UPDATES VIA MY EMAIL ADDRESS MAKING THEIR ACTS TO CHEAT COLLECTIVELY BE DELIBERATE, WILLFUL, INTENTIONAL AND OUTRAGEOUS. |
INQUIRY 25. WOULD YOU WANT FIRST AMERICAN HOME WARRANTY TO SHOULDER MORE THAN THE $5,130 SHARE ON YOUR COLLECTIVE CIVIL LIABILITY OF $1,000,000 I AM DEMANDING FROM BOTH OF YOU ? RE : CHEATING 5.
CHEATING 5. LEAK DETECTION REPORT
We requested from the message center for a copy of the leak detection report submitted to them by the contractor plumber Titouah. The message center and/or Sy-Jose Medina denied our request and wrote to ask for that report from Titouah. However, Titouah likewise refused to give us copy of the leak detection report though actually we are his customer.
Meanwhile, the State Farm Home Insurance got hold of the leak detection report both Sy-Jose Medina and or Titouah refused to show us. Whoever between Titouah and Sy-Jose Medina, it is done with implicit approval of First American while denying us, who actually are Titouah's clients who needed that vital information, the chance to examine it. This is CHEATING 5.
We requested from the message center for a copy of the leak detection report submitted to them by the contractor plumber Titouah. The message center and/or Sy-Jose Medina denied our request and wrote to ask for that report from Titouah. However, Titouah likewise refused to give us copy of the leak detection report though actually we are his customer. Meanwhile, the State Farm Home Insurance got hold of the leak detection report both Sy-Jose Medina and or Titouah refused to show us. Whoever between Titouah and Sy-Jose Medina, it is done with implicit approval of First American while denying us, who actually are Titouah's clients who needed that vital information, the chance to examine it. This is CHEATING 5. |
INQUIRY 26. WOULD YOU WANT FIRST AMERICAN HOME WARRANTY TO SHOULDER MORE THAN THE $5,130 SHARE ON YOUR COLLECTIVE CIVIL LIABILITY OF $1,000,000 I AM DEMANDING FROM BOTH OF YOU ? RE : CHEATING 6.
CHEATING 6. AIDING TITOUAH TO EXECUTE HIS CRIME
Sy-Jose Medina/ First American/ Message Center intentionally did not inform us early about the repair that they had authorized Titouah to perform, purposely to allow Titouah to execute the plan without any questioning from us to make a huge excavation that would make it appear that he had excavated enough but did find any leak and able to conclude in a statement that the leak is under the foundation favorable to Sy-Jose Medina's partner Liu/Gueniot of State Farm Home Insurance. This is CHEATING 6.
Sy-Jose Medina/ First American/ Message Center intentionally did not inform us early about the repair that they had authorized Titouah to perform, purposely to allow Titouah to execute the plan without any questioning from us to make a huge excavation that would make it appear that he had excavated enough but did find any leak and able to conclude in a statement that the leak is under the foundation favorable to Sy-Jose Medina's partner Liu/Gueniot of State Farm Home Insurance. This is CHEATING 6. |
008 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x INQUIRY 27 DATED 22JULY21 6:23AM
INQUIRY 27. WOULD YOU WANT FIRST AMERICAN HOME WARRANTY TO SHOULDER MORE THAN THE $5,130 SHARE ON YOUR COLLECTIVE CIVIL LIABILITY OF $1,000,000 I AM DEMANDING FROM BOTH OF YOU ? RE : CHEATING 7.
CHEATING 7. LYING ON CASH OFFER ACCEPTANCE ON JUNE 3, 2020.
THOUGH HAVING BEEN INFORMED ABOUT THE CASH OFFER BEING DENIED ON MAY 20, 2020.(see below) THE MESSAGE CENTER/SY-JOSE MEDINA/FIRST AMERICAN KEPT ON LYING ON THEIR WRITTEN STATEMENTS ON VITAL INFORMATION ABOUT THIS ISSUE, SPECIFICALLY, THE FACT THAT WE ACCEPTED THE CASH OFFER ON 6/3, WRITTEN 3 TIMES RESPECTIVELY ON JUNE 29, 2020, JULY 6, 2020 AND JULY 8, 2020. THIS EVENT DID NOT HAPPEN. THIS FACT AMONG OTHERS, SHOWED IMPRESSIVELY CONSTANT HABITUAL CHEATING AND LYING BY SY-JOSE MEDINA/THE MESSAGE CENTER/FIRST AMERICAN. THIS IS CHEATING 7.
THOUGH HAVING BEEN INFORMED ABOUT THE CASH OFFER BEING DENIED ON MAY 20, 2020.(see below) THE MESSAGE CENTER/SY-JOSE MEDINA/FIRST AMERICAN KEPT ON LYING ON THEIR WRITTEN STATEMENTS ON VITAL INFORMATION ABOUT THIS ISSUE, SPECIFICALLY, THE FACT THAT WE ACCEPTED THE CASH OFFER ON 6/3, WRITTEN 3 TIMES RESPECTIVELY ON JUNE 29, 2020, JULY 6, 2020 AND JULY 8, 2020. THIS EVENT DID NOT HAPPEN. THIS FACT AMONG OTHERS, SHOWED IMPRESSIVELY CONSTANT HABITUAL CHEATING AND LYING BY SY-JOSE MEDINA/THE MESSAGE CENTER/FIRST AMERICAN. THIS IS CHEATING 7. |
009 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x INQUIRY 28 DATED 25JULY21 10:40PM
INQUIRY 28 : WOULD YOU WANT FIRST AMERICAN HOME WARRANTY TO SHOULDER MORE THAN $5,130 SHARE ON YOUR COLLECTIVE CIVIL LIABILITY OF $1,000,000 I AM DEMANDING FROM BOTH OF YOU? RE : CHEATING 8.
CHEATING 8. LYING ON THE CASH OFFER HAVING BEEN SENT TO US
THOUGH HAVING BEEN INFORMED ABOUT THE CASH OFFER BEING DENIED ON MAY 20, 2020.(see below) THE MESSAGE CENTER/SY-JOSE MEDINA/FIRST AMERICAN KEPT ON LYING ON THEIR WRITTEN STATEMENTS ON VITAL INFORMATION ABOUT THIS ISSUE, SPECIFICALLY, THE FACT THAT THEY SENT THE CHECK FOR $482.50 TO US, WRITTEN 9 COUNTS RESPECTIVELY ON JUNE 8, 2020, JULY 6, 2020, JULY 8, 2020, JULY 29, 2020, SEPTEMBER 25, 2020 12:53PM AND 3:04PM, SEPTEMBER 30, 2020 12:39PM AND 2:53PM AND OCTOBER 6, 2020. THESE EVENTS MENTIONED DID NOT HAPPEN AS WE DID NOT EVEN SEE ANY TRACE OF THAT CHECK. THESE FACTS AMONG OTHERS, SHOWED IMPRESSIVELY CONSTANT FEARLESS, SHAMELESS, OUTRAGEOUS, WILLFUL, DELIBERATE, INTENTIONAL, REPREHENSIBLE HABITUAL CHEATING AND LYING BY SY-JOSE MEDINA/THE MESSAGE CENTER/FIRST AMERICAN. THIS IS CHEATING 8.
THOUGH HAVING BEEN INFORMED ABOUT THE CASH OFFER BEING DENIED ON MAY 20, 2020.(see below) THE MESSAGE CENTER/SY-JOSE MEDINA/FIRST AMERICAN KEPT ON LYING ON THEIR WRITTEN STATEMENTS ON VITAL INFORMATION ABOUT THIS ISSUE, SPECIFICALLY, THE FACT THAT THEY SENT THE CHECK FOR $482.50 TO US, WRITTEN 9 COUNTS RESPECTIVELY ON JUNE 8, 2020, JULY 6, 2020, JULY 8, 2020, JULY 29, 2020, SEPTEMBER 25, 2020 12:53PM AND 3:04PM, SEPTEMBER 30, 2020 12:39PM AND 2:53PM AND OCTOBER 6, 2020. THESE EVENTS MENTIONED DID NOT HAPPEN AS WE DID NOT EVEN SEE ANY TRACE OF THAT CHECK. THESE FACTS AMONG OTHERS, SHOWED IMPRESSIVELY CONSTANT FEARLESS, SHAMELESS, OUTRAGEOUS, WILLFUL, DELIBERATE, INTENTIONAL, REPREHENSIBLE HABITUAL CHEATING AND LYING BY SY-JOSE MEDINA/THE MESSAGE CENTER/FIRST AMERICAN. THIS IS CHEATING 8. |
010 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x INQUIRY 29 DATED 27JULY21 12:52AM
INQUIRY 29. WOULD YOU WANT FIRST AMERICAN HOME WARRANTY TO SHOULDER MORE THAN THE $5,130 SHARE ON YOUR COLLECTIVE CIVIL LIABILITY OF $1,000,000 I AM DEMANDING FROM BOTH OF YOU ? RE : CHEATING 9.
CHEATING 9. MEDINA ET AL PASSES ON TO OUR SHOULDERS A LIABILITY WHICH SHOULD BE BORNE BY THEM
MEANING : SY-JOSE MEDINA/THE MESSAGE CENTER/ FIRST AMERICAN WANTED US TO FILE DAMAGES AGAINST THE CONTRACTOR WHO IS WORKING UNDER GUENIOT/LIU/MEDINA'S CONTROL AND SUPERVISION. TITOUAH SUBMITTED HIS LEAK REPORT TO BOTH GUENIOT AND LIU AND MEDINA AND NOT TO US. THEREFORE, TITOUAH IS THEIR CONTRACTOR AND NOT OURS. SY-JOSE MEDINA/FIRST AMERICAN UNDER OUR CONTRACT HAD THE OBLIGATION TO FIX OUR PLUMBING CONCERNS REPORTED TO MEDINA. IN ORDER TO FIX IT, MEDINA/FIRST AMERICAN HIRED ML PLUMBING THEN REPLACED IT ALL EXPRESS PLUMBING. BOTH NOT OUR OWN CHOICE AND ACTION BUT MEDINA'S. IF THE CONTRACTOR IS UNABLE TO PERFORM THE JOB MEDINA WANTED HIM TO FIX FOR US AND WORSE, VANDALIZED OUR PROPERTY AND WORST, DEFRAUDED US, OUR PART IS TO REPORT THE MISCONDUCTS TO MEDINA AND CLAIM FOR DAMAGES DONE BY THE CONTRACTOR ON MEDINA/FIRST AMERICAN, SINCE TITOUAH IS UNDER CONTRACT WITH THEM AND NOT WITH US. MEDINA MUST UNDERSTAND THAT TITOUAH IS UNDER CONTRACTUAL ARRANGEMENTS WITH FIRST AMERICAN AND NOT WITH US. TITOUAH SUBMITTED HIS LIABILITY INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS TO FIRST AMERICAN NOT TO US. TITOUAH GOT INSTRUCTIONS FROM MEDINA TO ACCESS THE LEAKING HOT WATER PIPE ENCASED IN THE SLAB AND REPAIR PIPE BUT TITOUAH DID NOT FOLLOW THE INSTRUCTIONS AND WORSE, VANDALIZED OUR PROPERTY, AND WORST DEFRAUDED US, IT IS MEDINA /FIRST AMERICAN DUTY, NOT OURS, TO FILE FOR CLAIMS ON DAMAGES DONE ON TITOUAH FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT, WITH THAT HAVING BEEN SAID, THE POSITION BY MEDINA/THE MESSAGE CENTER/FIRST AMERICAN WRITTEN FIRST ON JUNE 8, 2020 "If you feel there was damages caused by the contractor, you will need to place a damages claim with them directly." WRITTEN SECOND TIME ON JULY 29, 2020, "If you feel there were damages caused by the contractor you will need to file a damages claim with the contractors liability insurance. First American will not be involved in this process." IS DELIBERATE HABITUAL CHEATING. MEDINA ET AL WANTED TO CHEAT. MEDINA ET AL PASSES ON TO OUR SHOULDERS A LIABILITY WHICH SHOULD BE BORNE BY THEM. THIS IS CHEATING 9. |
INQUIRY 30. WOULD YOU WANT FIRST AMERICAN HOME WARRANTY TO SHOULDER MORE THAN THE $5,130 SHARE ON YOUR COLLECTIVE CIVIL LIABILITY OF $1,000,000 I AM DEMANDING FROM BOTH OF YOU ? RE : CHEATING 10.
CHEATING 10. PROMISE OF CLAIMS UPDATE WITH NO INTENTION TO FULFILL
MEDINA/THE MESSAGE CENTER/FIRST AMERICAN PROMISED OF DOING A COURSE OF ACTION AS A STEP TO SOLUTIONS TO THE PROBLEM AS IN PROMISING OF PROVIDING UPDATES FROM THE CLAIMS SPECIALIST ASSIGNED TO THE CASE. BUT MEDINA/THE MESSAGE CENTER/FIRST AMERICAN PROVEN HAD NO INTENTION TO FULFILL. THE FOLLOWING ARE 20 PICTURES OF EVIDENCES OF THE COMMUNICATION RECORD PROVING OF THE PROMISE OF PROVIDING CLAIMS UPDATES FROM THE CLAIM SPECIALIST MEDINA WHICH MEDINA NEVER FULFILL DESPITE OF TWENTY-EIGHT (28) PERSISTENT NOTICES FOR HIM TO COMPLY WITH THIS PROMISE. THIS IS CHEATING 10.
MEDINA/THE MESSAGE CENTER/FIRST AMERICAN PROMISED OF DOING A COURSE OF ACTION AS A STEP TO SOLUTIONS TO THE PROBLEM AS IN PROMISING OF PROVIDING UPDATES FROM THE CLAIMS SPECIALIST ASSIGNED TO THE CASE. BUT MEDINA/THE MESSAGE CENTER/FIRST AMERICAN PROVEN HAD NO INTENTION TO FULFILL. THE FOLLOWING ARE 20 PICTURES OF EVIDENCES OF THE COMMUNICATION RECORD PROVING OF THE PROMISE OF PROVIDING CLAIMS UPDATES FROM THE CLAIM SPECIALIST MEDINA WHICH MEDINA NEVER FULFILL DESPITE OF TWENTY-EIGHT (28) PERSISTENT NOTICES FOR HIM TO COMPLY WITH THIS PROMISE. THIS IS CHEATING 10. |
INQUIRY 31 : WOULD YOU WANT FIRST AMERICAN HOME WARRANTY TO SHOULDER MORE THAN $5,130 SHARE ON YOUR COLLECTIVE CIVIL LIABILITY OF $1,000,000 I AM DEMANDING FROM BOTH OF YOU? RE : CHEATING 11.
CHEATING 11. PROMISE FOR A FIRST AMERICAN AGENT TO WORK WITH US TO GET A RESOLUTION NEVER DONE
MEDINA/THE MESSAGE CENTER/FIRST AMERICAN PROMISED OF DOING A COURSE OF ACTION AS A STEP TO SOLUTIONS TO THE PROBLEMS ENCOUNTERED IN THE CLAIM PROCESS NEXT TO ADVISING US THAT SY-JOSE MEDINA IS NO LONGER ASSOCIATED WITH THIS CLAIM . AS IN, THIS TIME A PROMISE FOR A FIRST AMERICAN AGENT NEXT TO MEDINA TO WORK WITH US TO GET A RESOLUTION. BUT MEDINA/THE MESSAGE CENTER/FIRST AMERICAN PROVEN HAD NO INTENTION TO FULFILL. THEY HAD FROM JULY 29, 2020 TO SEPTEMBER 30 WINDOW TO FULFILL THAT PROMISE BUT NEVER DID ANOTHER FIRST AMERICAN AGENT WORK WITH US TO GET A RESOLUTION OR EVEN UNTIL OUR CONTRACT WITH FIRST AMERICAN ENDS. THIS IS CHEATING 11.
MEDINA/THE MESSAGE CENTER/FIRST AMERICAN PROMISED OF DOING A COURSE OF ACTION AS A STEP TO SOLUTIONS TO THE PROBLEMS ENCOUNTERED IN THE CLAIM PROCESS NEXT TO ADVISING US THAT SY-JOSE MEDINA IS NO LONGER ASSOCIATED WITH THIS CLAIM . AS IN, THIS TIME A PROMISE FOR A FIRST AMERICAN AGENT NEXT TO MEDINA TO WORK WITH US TO GET A RESOLUTION. BUT MEDINA/THE MESSAGE CENTER/FIRST AMERICAN PROVEN HAD NO INTENTION TO FULFILL. THEY HAD FROM JULY 29, 2020 TO SEPTEMBER 30 WINDOW TO FULFILL THAT PROMISE BUT NEVER DID ANOTHER FIRST AMERICAN AGENT WORK WITH US TO GET A RESOLUTION OR EVEN UNTIL OUR CONTRACT WITH FIRST AMERICAN ENDS. THIS IS CHEATING 11. |
INQUIRY 32 : WOULD YOU WANT FIRST AMERICAN HOME WARRANTY TO SHOULDER MORE THAN $5,130 SHARE ON YOUR COLLECTIVE CIVIL LIABILITY OF $1,000,000 I AM DEMANDING FROM BOTH OF YOU? RE : CHEATING 12.
CHEATING 12 . LYING ON ATTEMPTING CALLING US MULTIPLE TIMES
MEDINA/THE MESSAGE CENTER/FIRST AMERICAN PROMISED OF DOING A COURSE OF ACTION AS A STEP TO SOLUTIONS TO THE PROBLEMS ENCOUNTERED IN THE CLAIM PROCESS, AS IN WRITING 3 TIMES IN 2 WEEKS STARTING ON SEPTEMBER 3, 2020 TO SEPTEMBER 14, 2020 THAT THEY ATTEMPTED TO CALL US OVER THE PHONE MULTIPLE TIMES FOR WHATEVER MESSAGE OR INTENTION THEY HAVE BUT BUT WE HAVE NOT GOT ANY CALL FROM THEM EVEN UNTIL THE CONTRACT WITH THEM ENDS OTHER THAN THE FIRST FEW DAYS AFTER THE REPORTING OF THE INCIDENT TO THEM WHERE THEY TREATED US LIKE A VOLLEYBALL WHICH THEY JUST TOSSED AROUND AMONG THEMSELVES IN A WAY THAT THEY WILL SETTLE FOR AN AGREEMENT THEN HIDE THEN ANOTHER ADJUSTER WILL TALK AND ASKED AGAIN DETAILS OF THE CLAIM FROM THE BEGINNING AND LATER DENY WHATEVER WE HAVE AGREED UPON ON THE TELEPHONE CONVERSATION. THIS IS HABITUAL, SHAMELESS, OUTRAGEOUS, REPREHENSIBLE, DELIBERATE, WILLFUL, INTENTIONAL LYING. THIS IS CHEATING 12.
MEDINA/THE MESSAGE CENTER/FIRST AMERICAN PROMISED OF DOING A COURSE OF ACTION AS A STEP TO SOLUTIONS TO THE PROBLEMS ENCOUNTERED IN THE CLAIM PROCESS, AS IN WRITING 3 TIMES IN 2 WEEKS STARTING ON SEPTEMBER 3, 2020 TO SEPTEMBER 14, 2020 THAT THEY ATTEMPTED TO CALL US OVER THE PHONE MULTIPLE TIMES FOR WHATEVER MESSAGE OR INTENTION THEY HAVE BUT BUT WE HAVE NOT GOT ANY CALL FROM THEM EVEN UNTIL THE CONTRACT WITH THEM ENDS OTHER THAN THE FIRST FEW DAYS AFTER THE REPORTING OF THE INCIDENT TO THEM WHERE THEY TREATED US LIKE A VOLLEYBALL WHICH THEY JUST TOSSED AROUND AMONG THEMSELVES IN A WAY THAT THEY WILL SETTLE FOR AN AGREEMENT THEN HIDE THEN ANOTHER ADJUSTER WILL TALK AND ASKED AGAIN DETAILS OF THE CLAIM FROM THE BEGINNING AND LATER DENY WHATEVER WE HAVE AGREED UPON ON THE TELEPHONE CONVERSATION. THIS IS HABITUAL, SHAMELESS, OUTRAGEOUS, REPREHENSIBLE, DELIBERATE, WILLFUL, INTENTIONAL LYING. THIS IS CHEATING 12. |
INQUIRY 33 : WOULD YOU WANT FIRST AMERICAN HOME WARRANTY TO SHOULDER MORE THAN $5,130 SHARE ON YOUR COLLECTIVE CIVIL LIABILITY OF $1,000,000 I AM DEMANDING FROM BOTH OF YOU? RE : CHEATING 13.
CHEATING 13. CONFIRMED LYING RE LOUSY ALIBI
MEDINA/THE MESSAGE CENTER/FIRST AMERICAN PROMISED OF DOING A COURSE OF ACTION AS A STEP TO SOLUTIONS TO THE PROBLEMS ENCOUNTERED IN THE CLAIM PROCESS, AS IN WRITING 3 TIMES IN 2 WEEKS STARTING ON SEPTEMBER 3, 2020 TO SEPTEMBER 14, 2020 THAT THEY ATTEMPTED TO CALL US OVER THE PHONE MULTIPLE TIMES FOR WHATEVER MESSAGE OR INTENTION THEY HAVE BUT SY-JOSE MEDINA IS NOT AN IMBECILE PERSON THAT HE MAKE CALLS NOT CONNECTING MULTIPLE TIMES. HE KNOWS THERE ARE POSTAL MAILS AND EMAILS ADDRESSES AVAILABLE FOR HIM TO CONVEY HIS MESSAGE BUT HE DID NOT AND DID NOT UTILIZE THEM MAKING HIS ALIBI LOUSY AND HAS NO LEGS TO STAND ON.THIS IS ONE AMONG SO MANY HABITUAL, SHAMELESS, OUTRAGEOUS, REPREHENSIBLE, DELIBERATE, WILLFUL, INTENTIONAL LYING. THIS IS CHEATING 13.
MEDINA/THE MESSAGE CENTER/FIRST AMERICAN PROMISED OF DOING A COURSE OF ACTION AS A STEP TO SOLUTIONS TO THE PROBLEMS ENCOUNTERED IN THE CLAIM PROCESS, AS IN WRITING 3 TIMES IN 2 WEEKS STARTING ON SEPTEMBER 3, 2020 TO SEPTEMBER 14, 2020 THAT THEY ATTEMPTED TO CALL US OVER THE PHONE MULTIPLE TIMES FOR WHATEVER MESSAGE OR INTENTION THEY HAVE BUT SY-JOSE MEDINA IS NOT AN IMBECILE PERSON THAT HE MAKE CALLS NOT CONNECTING MULTIPLE TIMES. HE KNOWS THERE ARE POSTAL MAILS AND EMAILS ADDRESSES AVAILABLE FOR HIM TO CONVEY HIS MESSAGE BUT HE DID NOT AND DID NOT UTILIZE THEM MAKING HIS ALIBI LOUSY AND HAS NO LEGS TO STAND ON.THIS IS ONE AMONG SO MANY HABITUAL, SHAMELESS, OUTRAGEOUS, REPREHENSIBLE, DELIBERATE, WILLFUL, INTENTIONAL LYING. THIS IS CHEATING 13. |
002 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x INQUIRY 34 DATED 8AUG21 5:35AM
INQUIRY 34 : WOULD YOU WANT FIRST AMERICAN HOME WARRANTY TO SHOULDER MORE THAN $5,130 SHARE ON YOUR COLLECTIVE CIVIL LIABILITY OF $1,000,000 I AM DEMANDING FROM BOTH OF YOU? RE : CHEATING 14.
CHEATING 14. PROMISE FOR A SERVICE APPOINTMENT WITHOUT WILLINGNESS TO FULFILL
MEDINA/THE MESSAGE CENTER/FIRST AMERICAN PROMISED OF DOING A COURSE OF ACTION AS A STEP TO SOLUTIONS TO THE PROBLEMS ENCOUNTERED IN THE CLAIM PROCESS, AS IN WRITING A PROMISE TO US THAT THE COMPANY FIRST AMERICAN WILL BE CALLING US TO SCHEDULE AN APPOINTMENT FOR SERVICE. SY-JOSE MEDINA/ THE MESSAGE CENTER/ FIRST AMERICAN HAD FROM SEPTEMBER 17, 2020 UNTIL THE END OF CONTRACT TO ACCOMPLISH THIS PROMISE BUT THEY NEVER DID. THIS IS ONE AMONG SO MANY HABITUAL, SHAMELESS, OUTRAGEOUS, REPREHENSIBLE, DELIBERATE, WILLFUL, INTENTIONAL LYING AND MISREPRESENTATION. THIS IS CHEATING 14. |
INQUIRY 35 : WOULD YOU WANT FIRST AMERICAN HOME WARRANTY TO SHOULDER MORE THAN $5,130 SHARE ON YOUR COLLECTIVE CIVIL LIABILITY OF $1,000,000 I AM DEMANDING FROM BOTH OF YOU? RE : CHEATING 15.
CHEATING 15. CONSTANT HABITUAL ACTS OF DENIAL THEN APPROVAL THEN DENIAL USING THE SAME WHICH HAD BEEN DEEMED ACCEPTED AS WRONGFUL ARGUMENT
MEDINA/THE MESSAGE CENTER/FIRST AMERICAN PROMISED OF DOING A COURSE OF ACTION AS A STEP TO SOLUTIONS TO THE PROBLEMS ENCOUNTERED IN THE CLAIM PROCESS, AS IN WRITING TWO CONSECUTIVE MESSAGES ON SEPTEMBER 17, 2020 AND SEPTEMBER 19, 2020 TO THE EFFECT THAT THEY ARE APPROVING OUR CLAIM FOR DAMAGES ONLY TO CONTINUE DENYING OUR CLAIM AGAIN STARTING ON SEPTEMBER 25, 2020 USING RECYCLED PROVEN AND DEEMED ACKNOWLEDGED WRONGFUL ACTIONS BEFORE. THIS IS ONE AMONG SO MANY HABITUAL, SHAMELESS, OUTRAGEOUS, REPREHENSIBLE, DELIBERATE, WILLFUL, INTENTIONAL LYING. THIS IS CHEATING 15.
MEDINA/THE MESSAGE CENTER/FIRST AMERICAN PROMISED OF DOING A COURSE OF ACTION AS A STEP TO SOLUTIONS TO THE PROBLEMS ENCOUNTERED IN THE CLAIM PROCESS, AS IN WRITING TWO CONSECUTIVE MESSAGES ON SEPTEMBER 17, 2020 AND SEPTEMBER 19, 2020 TO THE EFFECT THAT THEY ARE APPROVING OUR CLAIM FOR DAMAGES ONLY TO CONTINUE DENYING OUR CLAIM AGAIN STARTING ON SEPTEMBER 25, 2020 USING RECYCLED PROVEN AND DEEMED ACKNOWLEDGED WRONGFUL ACTIONS BEFORE. THIS IS ONE AMONG SO MANY HABITUAL, SHAMELESS, OUTRAGEOUS, REPREHENSIBLE, DELIBERATE, WILLFUL, INTENTIONAL LYING. THIS IS CHEATING 15. |
INQUIRY 36 : WOULD YOU WANT FIRST AMERICAN HOME WARRANTY TO SHOULDER MORE THAN $5,130 SHARE ON YOUR COLLECTIVE CIVIL LIABILITY OF $1,000,000 I AM DEMANDING FROM BOTH OF YOU? RE : CHEATING 16.
CHEATING 16. FORCING US TO DEAL AGAIN WITH THE PLUMBER WHOM WE FIRED FOR HIS FRAUDULENT ACTS
MEDINA/THE MESSAGE CENTER/FIRST AMERICAN PROMISED OF DOING A COURSE OF ACTION AS A STEP TO SOLUTIONS TO THE PROBLEMS ENCOUNTERED IN THE CLAIM PROCESS, AS IN WRITING FOUR (4) CONSECUTIVE MESSAGES OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF THE FACT THAT WE HAD FIRED PLUMBER TITOUAH BUT THEN LATER FORCED US BACK TO DEAL WITH PLUMBER TITOUAH THROUGH TWO (2) CONSECUTIVE MESSAGES THOUGH SY-JOSE MEDINA AND FIRST AMERICAN HAD NOT CONDUCTED ANY INVESTIGATION OF OUR COMPLAINTS OF FRAUD AND MISCONDUCTS DONE BY PLUMBER TITOUAH AGAINST US. THIS IS CHEATING 16.
MEDINA/THE MESSAGE CENTER/FIRST AMERICAN PROMISED OF DOING A COURSE OF ACTION AS A STEP TO SOLUTIONS TO THE PROBLEMS ENCOUNTERED IN THE CLAIM PROCESS, AS IN WRITING FOUR (4) CONSECUTIVE MESSAGES OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF THE FACT THAT WE HAD FIRED PLUMBER TITOUAH BUT THEN LATER FORCED US BACK TO DEAL WITH PLUMBER TITOUAH THROUGH TWO (2) CONSECUTIVE MESSAGES THOUGH SY-JOSE MEDINA AND FIRST AMERICAN HAD NOT CONDUCTED ANY INVESTIGATION OF OUR COMPLAINTS OF FRAUD AND MISCONDUCTS DONE BY PLUMBER TITOUAH AGAINST US. THIS IS CHEATING 16. |
HENCE , CRIMES BY TITOUAH ARE CRIMES BY STATE FARM, GUENIOT AND LIU.
ON AUGUST 2020
005 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x SHOW ACTIONS TO PROVE YOU ARE NOT PARTY TO THE CRIMES COMMITTED BY JOHN TITOUAH dated 6aug20 10:26pm
015 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x FIVE (5) UNDISPUTED FACTS PROVING STATE FARM AND LIU ARE PARTIES TO TITOUAH'S CRIMES dated 17aug20 4:47pm
030 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x STATE FARM AND LIU ARE PARTIES TO TITOUAH'S CRIMES DATED AUGUST 23, 2020 9:31pm
ON SEPTEMBER 2020
003 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JOHN TITOUH QUESTION 3 dated September 1, 2020 4:25pm
How much did you pay Titouah for his services?
004 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JOHN TITOUAH QUESTION 4 DATED 1SEPT20 5:16pm
How would you able to investigate Titouah where you might be the mastermind of his crime?
005 Claim Number 55-06c6-44x CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JOHN TITOUAH QUESTION 5 DATED 1SEPT20 5:34pm
In all instances STATE FARM might be buying false statements and information..?
H.
NOTE: (For the criminal attorney)
I have a criminal complaint against a plumber who made a rigged and fraudulent video message and statements to an insurance adjuster to the effect that though he had excavated much he did not find any leak and he concluded in a statement that the leak is way below the foundation and the insurance adjuster relied on his statement and video presentation to deny our insurance claim. I reported this to the police authorities and to the insurance adjuster. However, the insurance representatives refused to investigate the fraudulent acts by their plumber informant despite my persistent request for them to investigate him for his alleged crimes and/or misconduct. This fact led me to believe that the insurance adjuster and company are most probably parties to the plumber's crime.
We discovered the pipe break after the plumber left, and after he had made the rigged video presentation and statements to the insurance adjuster. I noticed also that the water supply to the hot water pipe which was partly open when he started excavating had been fully closed.
Two weeks after that incident the leak from the pipe becomes more apparent that showed up on the hot water pipe in the slab and could be repaired by just making a small excavation unlike with what the plumber did. I termed the big excavation as an act of vandalism on account that it is an excavation more than what is required purposely to have a convincing presentation of "no leak in the slab but leak under the foundation" scenario.
Until now, the insurance firm through its adjuster and manager remained together with the plumber with their lies. I am thinking that the plumber, the insurance company and its adjuster and manager should be held liable.



;
No comments:
Post a Comment